Thursday, July 11, 2024

Coronavirus Lockdown: Leaving Metro Manila, Film Festival Returns, and More!

More news about how the COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines is being handled by the public and the government. 

Before the pandemic flights between Cebun and Bantayan Island were privately chartered. The pandemic put a stop to those flights but now they have been revived but this time the flights will be public and regular. 

https://cebudailynews.inquirer.net/582150/regular-flights-to-bantayan-to-launch-this-august

Beginning this August, travelers will finally have the option to fly directly to Bantayan in northern Cebu.

The Cebu Provincial government recently announced that regular flights between the mainland and Bantayan Island via Mactan-Cebu International Airport (MCIA) will resume operations this August 28.

According to the Capitol, the direct flights will be operated by King Aces Travel and Tours Service Inc. (KATTSI), a travel and tours firm.

It can be recalled that before the Covid-19 pandemic, there were direct flights connecting mainland Cebu and Bantayan Island in the north. But these flights were mostly chartered ones.

In turn, the Capitol, Department of Transportation (DOTr), and the Mactan-Cebu International Airport Authority (MCIAA), the state body co-running MCIA, decided to upgrade the airport in Bantayan to accommodate passenger aircrafts like the ATR.

That is another win for the Department of Tourism and their campaign to revive the industry. 

New hotels continue to be built which will drive the post-pandemic tourist boom. 


https://philstar.com/nation/2024/07/08/2368526/new-hotels-boost-philippines-tourism-hoteliers-say

Putting up new hotels will help boost the Philippines’ tourism and hospitality industries, which are “slowly recovering” from the restrictions due to the COVID pandemic, according to Philippine Hotel Owners Association (PHOA) president Arthur Lopez.

The group floated the idea as its goal in organizing the first Philippine Tourism and Hotel Investment Summit held at the New World Makati Hotel last June 21, Lopez said.

The PHOA is composed of 217 hotels across the Philippines.

The group has an inventory of an estimated 40,000 rooms and “continues to expand,” Lopez said, noting that the Philippines should have “80,000 rooms to compete with the regional hotels in Asia.”

He asserted that new hotel investments in the Philippines “will make us more competitive in the region.”

More new hotels would also enable “adjustments to changing preferences of consumers as we see a steady shift towards demand for sustainable tourism, wider use of smart technology and more personalized itineraries,” Lopez said.

New hotel projects would “allow us to offer more eco-friendly products and services that will increase energy savings and support industry-wide sustainable development,” according to Lopez.

PHOA executive director Benito Bengzon Jr. said the group will develop 50 to 55 hotel projects from 2024 to 2028, adding another 15,000 rooms to the inventory.

According to the Philippine Hotel Investment Survey 2024 Report by PHOA and Leechiu Property Consultants, Bohol’s Panglao Island “has garnered significant interest among hotel developers, with 41 percent of respondents exploring hotel development on the island.”

Following Bohol in preferred destinations for hotel investment were Metro Manila, Cebu City, Siargao, El Nido, Mactan in Cebu, Coron, Boracay and Davao, according to the survey.

This seems to be an old story that the news keeps recycling. In fact the building of more hotels was mentioned back in May.

President Marcos has ordered the remains COVID-19 health allowances to be released just in time for the State of the Union Address. 

https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1958166/health-workers-group-questions-timing-of-release-of-covid-19-allowance

MANILA, Philippines “Why is it only now if there was funding available all along?”

The Alliance of Health Workers (AHW) raised this concern on Friday as it questioned the timing of President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr.’s directive to fully release the unpaid COVID-19 Health Emergency Allowance (HEA) for all health workers.

AHW National President Robert Mendoza pointed out that Marcos’ directive’s timing perfectly aligns with the upcoming State of the Nation Address (Sona), where the President will outline his accomplishments.

“The timing of the release of long overdue benefits is very timely to the upcoming Sona by the President. Is it because the administration just wants to showcase his accomplishments rather than addressing the urgent needs of health workers?” Mendoza said in a press statement. 

Despite questioning the timing of Marcos’ directive, Mendoza said he is still hoping that all health workers in private and local government unit hospitals and health facilities will be “paid their much-deserved HEA.”

“[B]ecause during our dialogue with Budget and Management Secretary Pangandaman last April 11, 2024, [the] Department of Health has not yet complied with the final lists and mapping of paid and unpaid health workers of their  Covid-19 allowances,” he said. 

Still, Mendoza believes that releasing the HEA is a “significant victory” for health workers who served the country during the COVID-19 pandemic. 

According to Mendoza, health workers will join the people’s Sona on July 22. 

He said the event will be a platform for them to convey their demands to the Marcos administration.

The answer is because the entire political system is corrupt and politicians and bureaucrats only do things that make them appear to look good. Now Marcos will be able to list the distribution of COVID-19 health allowances as a major accomplishment.

The Manila Film Festival has returned after four years. 

https://news.abs-cbn.com/entertainment/2024/7/8/sinag-maynila-film-festival-returns-for-6th-edition-1253
After a four-year hiatus due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Sinag Maynila Film Festival is set to return this September for its sixth edition.

Founded in 2015, Sinag Maynila is a non-profit film festival born from the vision of Solar Entertainment president and current film festival CEO Wilson Tieng, and Cannes-winning director Brillante Mendoza.

In a statement, Tieng confirmed that Sinag Maynila would return this year in collaboration with Manila City's Department of Tourism, Culture and Arts Office (DTCAM). This year's festival slogan is "Local, International Cinema."

"All those who participated and won are now successful directors in teleserye. They are Zig Dulay, Lawrence Fajardo and Adolf Alix and many others. They have many projects and also big projects on TV and their films are sold abroad in film markets, that's why Sinag Manila is such a big deal," Tieng said.

In an interview, Mendoza said the essence of Sinag Maynila is to give a voice to Filipino filmmakers, establishing their identity at the national and international level.

"It's not a joke to release a movie in theaters, especially if your movies are independent producers and the story is unique," said Mendoza, highlighting the struggles of independent filmmakers.

"We are not alone, we are not here to compete with other film festivals in the Philippines if we don't [want] more venues for young filmmakers to participate in their films," Mendoza said.

The Sinag Manila will also hold a campus tour, a five-day festival proper, and an awards night at the Metropolitan Theater.

Participating full-length and short films, and documentaries in the Sinag Manila Film Festival will be screened in select cinemas from September 4 to 8.

It's another welcome return to normality. 

During the pandemic people left Manila to return to the provinces and elsewhere. The exodus is still happening. 

https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1958948/more-people-are-leaving-metro-manila-heres-why

When COVID-19 landed in the Philippines, nationwide lockdowns prompted many people in the National Capital Region (NCR) to return to their provinces or places of origin outside the capital.

Years into the new normal, even with restrictions lifted, people continued to leave the NCR for other regions.

For decades before the COVID-19 pandemic, Filipinos from impoverished rural regions migrated to densely populated cities, particularly the capital, in search of better-paying jobs and housing for a brighter future.

Results from the 2018 National Migration Survey (2018 NMS)-which was conducted by the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) and the University of the Philippines Population Institute (UPPI)-identified NCR as the top migration destination region.

The survey, which interviewed over 45,000 individual respondents 15 years old and over, found that NCR was also the most popular regional destination for first-time migrants.

In 2020, the government, led by then-President Rodrigo Duterte, launched the “Balik Probinsya, Bagong Pag-asa” program to decongest Metro Manila during the pandemic by encouraging people, including stranded workers, to return to their home provinces.

However, even without the program, many workers affected by the pandemic’s impact on NCR businesses had already moved back to their families outside the capital region.

Years later, new data show a continuous demand for housing in areas outside the NCR, with experts noting that these regions are thriving and keeping the property market active despite a slowdown in the capital.

According to Leechiu Property Consultants, a private real estate brokerage firm, the trend of migration to Calabarzon and other areas outside NCR has likely continued and grown following the pandemic.

“There is a widening gap between the number of loans granted in NCR and in areas outside NCR, which started during the pandemic,” the private realty firm said.

“In 2023, 66 percent of RRELs were granted for new housing units in areas outside NCR, [indicating] that demand is continuing to move outside Metro Manila,” it said.

Leechiu noted that the limited availability and high prices of vacant land in the capital have propelled the rise of infrastructure and residential projects outside of the capital.

Before the pandemic, people from various regions across the country moved to cities in the capital, seeking better job opportunities and higher wages.

What factors are now encouraging those who relocated outside NCR to stay and not return to the capital?

Aboitiz InfraCapital previously observed that a primary reason for Filipinos migrating from NCR to the countryside could be the increase in high-quality job opportunities in those areas.

“Coupled with lower living costs, the ready availability of high-paying jobs outside of Metro Manila and Ceby has already attracted thousands of urban migrants back to their hometowns,” said the infrastructure company.

“The influx of talented working-age individuals, investors, and entrepreneurs to the provinces [have], in turn, spurred local economic activity, further slowing down rural flight and attracting even more urban migrants to return,” it added.

High living costs and better employment opportunities are causing people to flee Manila. Isn't that the story for every big city? 

The House investigation on the utilization of the funds of the Department of Health and the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation during the pandemic continues. Now it has been revealed that COVID-19 test kits were purchased at disparate prices. 

https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1959091/p500-disparity-in-covid-19-test-kits-leads-to-gap-in-bulk-orders-quimbo

A P500 “disparity” in purchasing Covid-19 test kits can lead to a huge gap when the government orders in bulk, Marikina 2nd District Rep. Stella Quimbo said on Monday.

At the hearing of the House of Representatives appropriations panel on the utilization of the funds of the Department of Health (DOH) and the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation, Quimbo said there were instances when test kits of the same brand and the same method were priced at P2,083 and P1,562.

“I observed that there were instances that the testing types were the same, the brand names were the same, but prices were different. And the price difference was as high as about P500. So for example, there was a price difference of P2,083 versus P1,562,” said Quimbo, the senior vice chairperson of the appropriations committee.

“Why did you order in different lots? Why did you not have these ordered at the same time to get favorable prices? Because of that, prices were different.  And there’s a P500 disparity across certain lots and that’s big, especially if you make big orders,” she added.

Health Secretary Teodoro Herbosa explained to Quimbo that the DOH submitted documents requested from them, particularly regarding the P47.6-billion Covid-19 funds transferred by the DOH to the Procurement Service of the Department of Budget and Management (PS-DBM).

Herbosa, who was not yet DOH chief when the pandemic struck in 2020, said he believes the different prices were caused by the items being purchased at different times.

Former Health Secretary Francisco Duque III, the DOH chief during the Covid-19 pandemic who was present at the hearing, agreed with Herbosa.

“However, I can only surmise why the prices were different because I was special advisor of the task force then, and I knew that certain items changed their pricing over the times, so I think we to look at the date that some items are procured because they were changing the cost as the pandemic was ongoing,” Herbosa explained.

“I agree with the statement of Secretary Herbosa; it’s very important to look at the timelines of your Honor,” Duque added.

However, Quimbo pointed out that Duque has been unable to explain the price differences and their relation to the time frame.

You keep repeating Secretary Duque that these were all done in the interest of time; you had to do these all expeditiously, we hastened procurement.  All of a sudden now that we’re asking you to please explain the substantial price difference, you’re now using as a defense the lapse of time. So what is it?  Is it expeditious or lapse of time?” she said.

DOH Secretary Duque says the explanation is the items were purchases at different times and the price changed. Representative Quimbo countered by noting Duque previously said the times were purchased expeditiously which contradicts his explanation that the times were bought at different times. 

Wednesday, July 10, 2024

The God Culture: Mocked By Duterte

While looking over old files I found something I had not yet posted from Timothy Jay Schwab who is The God Culture. Tim says he met Duterte, gave him a copy of The Search for King Solomon's Treasure and then Duterte proceeded to mock him.

Excellent point. We found the President whom we met very hesitant and already ridiculing as he was programmed from the initial discussion admitting he studied to be a Catholic Priest. He was already ridiculing the Bible narrative he doesn't believe even claiming the 440 talents of gold is somehow allegory. Last we checked, when someone tells us they had 15.75 tons of gold, they are recording specifics most certainly that could never be defined as allegory. He, then, wanted to know where the gold was basically ridiculing the narrative as he is unaware of the amount of gold in his own country. We retracted and offered an advanced copy of the book with sourcebook in which he promised to read. He never did.
This is part of a larger conversation which has been deleted by Tim. 


Answers in First Enoch Part 10: Bible History of the Garden of Eden. Affirming Enoch's Geography

Mikee Abe: TGC, this is my suggestion. Please write/inform the PH National Historical Commission about the ancient name of the Philippines.

Present to the said Commission the historical/biblical facts concerning the real name of the Philippines which is OPHIR, and at the same time, the location of the Garden of Eden, which is in Ophir. YAHWEH, OUR GOD, KNOWS ABOUT THIS! GOD BLESS YOU, MEN and WOMEN of TGC!

The God Culture: We have and they refuse to read itThey have no interest in restoring Philippine History. Yah Bless.

Wavemaker: Most probably it is because the info is too shocking for them that it sounds ridiculous. They are uninformed after all. | think the other way around this is to talk to the senator who is in charge of the history or culture. He is influential enough to dictate how the textbooks will be written.

The God Culture: Excellent point. We found the President whom we met very hesitant and already ridiculing as he was programmed from the initial discussion admitting he studied to be a Catholic Priest. He was already ridiculing the Bible narrative he doesn't believe even claiming the 440 talents of gold is somehow allegory. Last we checked, when someone tells us they had 15.75 tons of gold, they are recording specifics most certainly that could never be defined as allegory. He, then, wanted to know where the gold was basically ridiculing the narrative as he is unaware of the amount of gold in his own country. We retracted and offered an advanced copy of the book with sourcebook in which he promised to read. He never did.

This is the problem with academia, the smarter they are, the dumber they become as if any of us thinks we know everything and stop learning, we enter the paradigm of being left behind in knowledge. We see this in the church as well as many grasp onto church doctrine and stop there never testing with what should be our source, The Bible.

Imagine what the Filipino ancestors would have thought of those who become puppets in thinking for the very conquerors that stole, raped, and even killed their children. Yet, these are trying hard to become a part of the Great Society today or in other words the One World Government of Gog of Magog. A perfect example we cover in The Search For King Solomon's Treasure is the Junk ship found off the coast of Zambales dating to the 1400s. The French Marine Archaeologist who was brought in to study and assess the ship determined it was of Philippine design and a Philippine Junk. Then, the National Museum idiot got ahold of these obvious, proven findings wrapped in a bow as one of the greatest finds in Philippine history and published in a science journal that the ship was a Thai ship because he is part of those who think only shame belongs to the Philippines uneducated in the slightest of ancient history as are most. We could all blame him and others at National Museum and National Historical for thinking like fools but the root is the problem. The conquerors control the education system still and must be rooted out. Yah bless.

Not only did Tim gift a copy of his book to Duterte but he also sent a copy to the National Historic Commission of the Philippines. They expressed no interest in his work. Tim says that's because they are not interested in restoring Philippine history. The then goes on to relate the discovery of a Junk ship found off the coast of Zambales. According to Tim:

The French Marine Archaeologist who was brought in to study and assess the ship determined it was of Philippine design and a Philippine Junk. Then, the National Museum idiot got ahold of these obvious, proven findings wrapped in a bow as one of the greatest finds in Philippine history and published in a science journal that the ship was a Thai ship because he is part of those who think only shame belongs to the Philippines uneducated in the slightest of ancient history as are most. 

None of that is true. The French Marine Archaeologist, Franck Goddio, never said the "Junk was of Philippine design and a Philippine Junk." That is pure junk. What he actually said is the Junk is of Chinese design and was likely built by a Chinese community in the Philippines because it was made of wood found in the Philippines and shipbuilding at that time was forbidden by the Ming Dynasty.

Vessel architecture, date and nature of unearthed material as well as shipwreck location (west of the island of Luzon), make it highly to be a “Chinese” wreck – in the broadest sense of the term, namely travelling to or from China. Certainly built outside of China – most likely in the Philippines – it was loaded with an eclectic cargo of goods from all the major production centres of the Celestial Empire, collected in the harbour warehouses of southern China, but also Siam, Vietnam and elsewhere, before travelling to their final markets .The junk was as “Chinese” as the ships in the western Mediterranean from the imperial era were “Roman”.

The junk was also “Chinese” in its construction, with a hull shaped as a piece of split bamboo, transverse bulkheads with a compartmented hold serving as frame, hull planks joined with iron nails but also, following the traditional hybrid Southern China Sea style, with the keel playing an essential structural role, and using timber of tropical origin. All the wood species used in the construction of the Santa Cruz are found in the Philippine archipelago and most of the islands in the South China Sea, but not in China. The merchants who had chartered it therefore could not belong to the provinces of Fujian and Guangdong, sailing on ships built in China. The essentially “Chinese” architecture seems to rule out the possibility that it was chartered by the peoples of South East Asia, very active on the eastern route between Melaka and Manila Bay (Reid, 1996: 34-35), but who sailed on craft built with local traditional techniques (Manguin, 2001).

Ultimately, given the assumed departure port of the ship, wrecked off the coast of Luzon, and the fact that its ceramics all date from a period when the prohibition to build ships and trade abroad was strictly applied by the Mingit is highly unlikely that the ship and its charterers were of continental origin. It is much more likely that they belonged to a Chinese community located in the commercial towns of the archipelago. Certainly made in collaboration with local shipbuilders, the junk benefited from their particular expertise. Its construction is consistent with a “tendency to crossing, identified in shipbuilding technology evolution, with a new type of ship in archaeological sites from between the fourteenth and sixteenth centuries, probably coinciding with the increasing role played by Chinese trade and ‘merchant adventurers’ in Southeast Asia” (Manguin, 2001: 15). 

http://www.themua.org/collections/files/original/d983306f20edca8a8e0889272ba30e0b.pdf

The problem is Tim did not read the whole paper. He stopped at the part he liked and went no further. Tim's citation of Goddio is found on page 134 of his Sourcebook.

Tim appends a rather interesting note to this citation.

NOTE: Archaeologist Goddio above writes that there was "clear evidence that this ship was built in the Philippines." He could be wrong yet he continues to publish this 19 years later on his website indicating he did not see evidence which changed this perhaps. It leads us to question this. Using a bit of logic the conclusion already seems to have no basis. If Thai cargo was found in the lower cargo holds, it means they were the first stop on this very clear extensive International route of the Far East. Trade cargo from the nation of origin would not likely be found on the bottom as they would off-load it at every port from the furtherest point which sounds inefficient to us logically. It makes far more sense we are looking at a fully loaded ship returning to the Philippines in which it likely got caught in a storm and could not make it to shore. It is very odd that all the junks found in the Philippines are dismissed away as belonging to other countries and the Philippine history ignored by their own community of archaeologists it appears. It begs whether they have accurately attributed most of these in fact including the Lena Shoal. WE HAVE NOT EXAMINED THESE BUT THIS IS WORTH FURTHER RESEARCH. This is a discipline which typically sticks in it's paradigm and interprets only based on such paradigm. This is how they lost Ophir and cannot find it nor will they ever until one comes along outside of the box and thinks things through outside of such false paradigms. Good news, that someone is here. 
Tim says outright he has not even fully examined the case of the Santa Cruz or the Lena Shoal Junks. Then, after saying these archaeologists operate within a false paradigm and someone is needed to think outside of the box, with an air of pride he proclaims: 

Good news, that someone is here. 

How ridiculous.

What is needed is not someone who thinks outside the box but someone who can actually take the time to research everything related to his thesis and someone who actually reads through the papers he cites. Tim is not that person. He reads and quotes selectively and does not bother to throughly research anything. We see this time and again which is why I am convinced there is no God Culture team. 

Since Tim does not want to do the research I will give him a hand. The Lena Shoal and Santa Cruz Junks share the same type of construction.

The Lena Shoal and the Santa Cruz were ships that belong to the South China Sea Shipbuilding Tradition. Both exhibit features of the Chinese shipbuilding technique (bulkheads, iron nails) and the Southeast Asian shipbuilding techniques (v-shaped hull, planks edge-joined with wooden dowels).

This is one reason Bobby Orillandea writes the Santa Cruz could be from Thailand. 

From the results of the origin and placement of the cargo, it was suggested that the Santa Cruz could have originated in Thailand, which is further supported by both the shipbuilding construction technique that developed in the area during this period (Flecker 2005), which matches the hull of the Lena Shoal wreck, and presence of Thai stoneware jars in the lower cargo holds.

https://journals.openedition.org/moussons/3529?lang=en

Both paragraphs come from the same paper which Tim cites in his sourcebook. Once again we see he did not read through the whole paper to understand why Orillandea thought the ship could have originated in Thailand. The reasons are the construction of the ship as well as the contents of its cargo. But Tim is focused on the cargo and not the construction of the ship. He has completely missed the point. Instead of trying to understand he defamed Orillandea by calling him an idiot who thinks "only shame belongs to the Philippines uneducated in the slightest of ancient history as are most."

In a paper titled "Shifting patterns of glass bead cargo of 15th – 17th century Philippines shipwrecks" authors Jennifer Craig and Laure Dussubieux combine the statements of Goddio and Orillaneda.

.

In 2003 an excavation off Santa Cruz Island, close to Zambales of Luzon (Orillaneda 2003), was conducted on a shipwreck hull identified as a hybrid South China Sea Shipbuilding Tradition (Goddio et al. 2014:8, 10; Orillaneda 2003; Orillaneda 2012, 2016a, 2016b). The shipbuilding technique is seemingly Chinese but the materials are from the Southeast Asia archipelago (Orillaneda 2016a). Pointedly, scholars surmise the ship was built by Chinese diaspora in the Philippines (Goddio et al. 2014:8, 10; Manguin 2001:15) or Thailand (Flecker 2005; Orillaneda 2016b).

The Elemental Analysis of Glass Beads, pg, 178

See how these two ladies cite several papers to bolster their research? That is the complete opposite of what Tim does. Timothy Jay Schwab who is The God Culture is no researcher. 

Tuesday, July 9, 2024

Insurgency: Basically Neutralized

Armed Forces of the Philippines chief General Romeo Brawner Jr. says the number of guerrilla front have been reduced from 11 to 7.

https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/topstories/nation/911962/brawner-only-7-guerrilla-fronts-remaining/story/

The number of guerrilla fronts in the country has decreased to seven, Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) chief General Romeo Brawner Jr. said on Tuesday.

In an interview on Bagong Pilipinas Ngayon’s pres-SONA special, Brawner said there were 11 guerrilla fronts during the start of the administration of President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. in 2022.

(Out of the 11 guerrilla fronts that we are still confronting since the start of the presidency of President Marcos, now there are only seven left.)

(So, we have dismantled four guerilla fronts and we are still conducting operations continuously.)

Brawner said many “high-value individuals” have been neutralized. Some of the armed rebels were killed in encounters while some have surrendered to authorities.

He said the government is offering a Comprehensive Local Integration Program in which former rebels may receive livelihood programs and other assistance.

President Marcos says the insurgency in Mindanao has been "basically neutralized."

https://mb.com.ph/2024/7/6/marcos-mindanao-insurgents-basically-neutralized

President Marcos has lauded government forces in Mindanao for successfully minimizing the threat posed by the Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG) and other enemies of the state in the province.

Marcos said this during his visit to the headquarters of the 11th Infantry Division (ID) in Camp Teodulfo Bautista in Jolo, Sulu, on Friday, July 5.

In his speech, the President saluted the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) for their achievement but asked them to not be complacent as the mission to destroy the government’s nemesis is not yet over.

“I have to congratulate all of you who have worked to achieve this success, who have worked very hard and have made many sacrifices so that we can now say that the capabilities of the main threat, which is the ASG, have been severely reduced,” he said.

"Now, that does not mean that the mission is over. As you can imagine, there are still people coming in who might want to organize again, so we still have to watch," he added.

According to Marcos, he was briefed by the military command in Sulu on the very constant drop in the insurgents’ capabilities, manpower, and number of firearms they possess.

“The assessment is the threat is only from individual actors. They are no longer working as a unit," he said.

"They are … basically (neutralized)... We have dismantled their machinery for causing, for bringing terror,” he added.

Marcos said he was also informed about the diminishing threat posed by other terrorist groups, particularly those inspired by Al Qaeda or ISIS that used to enter the country before.

"We're no longer threatened as we used to,” he said.

"Basically neutralized" is not neutralized. It is interesting that Marcos says people are still coming to Mindanao to organize. 

Operations continue against the remaining NPA. The AFP urging those stragglers to surrender.

https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1228176

The Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) on Wednesday called on all remaining New People's Army (NPA) members to surrender peacefully and return to the fold of society.

This comes in the wake of last week's clash that resulted in the death of 10 communist rebels in Pantabangan, Nueva Ecija.

"We are urging you to surrender your weapons and walk towards the path of peace and progress. The government has programs that will allow you to reintegrate yourself to mainstream society and provide a better future for you and your families," AFP spokesperson Col. Francel Margareth Padilla said in a message to reporters.

Padilla was referring to programs such as the Local Peace Engagement (LPE) and the Enhanced Comprehensive Local Integration Program (E-CLIP).

The LPE is a collective effort of the security sector, local government units, and communities in conflict-affected areas to encourage NPA remnants to surrender, regain the human dignity stolen from them by the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP) and live peacefully with their families.

The E-CLIP offers a multifaceted transformation program for capacity building and sustainable livelihood, not only cash incentives.

"With unity, we can strengthen our defenses and protect our sovereignty. We need to help one another to ensure a peaceful and safe Philippines," she added.

Yes, the AFP is urging the remaining rebels surrender to unite with the military and defend the nation against China. 

The AFP has been saying the NPA is leaderless but they keep killing high-ranking NPA leaders.

https://mb.com.ph/2024/7/3/high-ranking-npa-leader-in-sorsogon-killed-in-encounter

A high-ranking New People's Army (NPA) leader was killed in an encounter with the military in Juban town, Sorsogon province on Tuesday morning, July 2.

The 9th Infantry Division (ID) identified the slain communist fighter as Arnel Estiller, alias Mando, Arnel, and Ariston, secretary of Sub-regional Committee 3 (SRC3), Bicol Regional Party Committee (BRPC).

Estiller died in a 30-minute gunfight with the 22nd Infantry Battalion in Barangay Biriran.

He was the father of Jose Marie Estiller, alias Maria and Bagi, the leader of Panlabang Yunit Gerilya-Sorsogon, who was arrested in Batangas recently.

Arnel is facing murder and frustrated murder charges. He was tagged in extortion activities and violence in Sorsogon.

“Estiller entered the movement in 1985 and eventually became the secretary of the communist group in Sorsogon,” the 9th ID said.

Estiller did not heed the call of authorities and his family to surrender because of his benefits as member of the communist movement, the 9th ID added.

The 9th ID said his death is a victory is not just for authorities but also for the people of Sorsogon and peace-loving Filipinos.

One high-ranking leader has been captured and the AFP is holding peace talks with his family to convince him to surrender. 

https://www.sunstar.com.ph/iloilo/army-lgu-engage-family-of-captured-npa-leader-in-peace-talks

THE Philippine Army's 3rd Infantry (Spearhead) Division joined a Localized Peace Engagement (LPE) with the family of a captured rebel leader in a bid to encourage his surrender and promote peace in the region on July 1, 2024.

The LPE, initiated by the Local Government of Tapaz, Capiz, brought together family members of Ka Tonying, with representatives from the government and former rebels. 

Communist New People's Army (NPA) Terrorist (CNT) Ka Tonying, 56, a squad leader for the NPA's Madia-as Dos unit under the Komiteng Rehiyon-Panay (CF, KR-P), was captured in a joint military and police operation on June 25, 2024.

The LPE team comprised Tapaz Mayor Roberto O. Palomar, Department of Justice (DOJ) Prosecutor Lawyer Flosemer Chris I. Gonzales, 3ID officers, Capiz Police Provincial Office (CPPO) led by Police Colonel Jerome Afuyog, and former rebels. 

Ka Tonying's family members, including sons, daughters, brothers, and sisters, participated in the dialogue.

During the talks, Ka Tonying's family expressed their appreciation to the government, particularly Palomar, for past assistance they had received. 

They highlighted that two of Ka Tonying's children are employed by the Local Government Unit (LGU) of Tapaz.

"LGU Tapaz offered us help even before my father was caught, and we are thankful for that. We'll try our best to share what we learned today with our family and associates. We will encourage them to join the government's peace programs," Ka Tonying said.

Palomar assured the family of government support and emphasized the importance of communication in resolving the insurgency. 

"We are committed to helping you reintegrate into society. Encourage those still in the mountains to avail of the E-CLIP and Amnesty programs. We will help them return to their families and live peacefully," the Mayor said.

Major General Marion R. Sison, 3ID commander, commended Palomar's proactive approach to assisting former rebels and their families.

Sison praised the Mayor of Tapaz for his genuine efforts in ending local armed conflict, highlighting his role as a strong alligator in the pursuit of peace and development in Capiz and Western Visayas.

“I must admit, we cannot end this insurgency problem alone. We need the support of the LGU and, most importantly, the support of the whole of society. With every one of us on the peace table, sooner rather than later, we shall reap the fruits of our labor and realize the dreams of those who came before us. By then, we shall be able to declare the whole island of Panay stable internal peace and security," Sison concluded.

If the guy is already captured why does he need to surrender? Another NPA leader gave himself up. 

https://mb.com.ph/2024/7/5/wanted-npa-leader-surrenders-in-negros-occidental

A wanted New People’s Army (NPA) leader surrendered to the police in Don Salvador Benedicto, Negros Occidental on July 1.

Police Capt. Ignacio Javier, deputy chief of the Don Salvador Benedicto Municipal Police Station, said that it took them years to negotiate the surrender of the 29-year-old communist rebel whose name was withheld for his security.

The surrenderer was a vice commanding officer of the dismantled North Negros Front (NNF) of the Komiteng Rehiyon-Negros, Cebu, Bohol, Siquijor (KR-NCBS) operating in Don Salvador Benedicto, Toboso, and Calatrava.

He was an NPA for 10 years before he decided to return to his family.

The rebel returnee turned over a homemade .357 revolver, five .357 rounds, four 40mm ammunition, and a two-meter detonating cord. 

He had been served warrants of arrest for various crimes he had committed while he was in the armed struggle.

Javier said that he was placed under their custody pending an assessment that would enable him to avail of assistance from government programs.

This guy is wanted for crimes but he might still be able to avail of E-CLIP benefits. How about throw him in prison for his crimes with no free money? 

How many more leaders are left in the "leaderless" NPA? 

Regular NPA fighters continue to surrender as well. 

https://mb.com.ph/2024/7/5/3-communist-rebels-surrender-in-cordillera

Police said three communist rebels in the Cordillera region surrendered from June 30 to July 1.

The Police Regional Office-Cordillera said the surrenderers were members of the New People’s Army (NPA) in the Barrios.

One of them surrendered in Benguet.

The rebel returnee was a 44-year-old farmer and construction worker. He turned over one caliber .38 revolver with six bullets, a 2.5-meter detonation cord, three inert blasting caps, and two dynamite sticks.

Another surrendered in Baguio City. The 57-year-old laborer surrendered an Armscor caliber .45 handgun with five bullets and one grenade.

The third rebel returnee was a 38-year-old laborer from Mountain Province.

Their surrender was made possible by the series of negotiations facilitated by authorities.

They are now under the custody of operating units in charge of custodial debriefing and proper disposition.

Police said their voluntary return to mainstream society to embrace peace and freedom signifies their personal redemption and highlights the effectiveness of the National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict (NTF-ELCAC) program of the government.

No doubt they are guilty of various crimes perhaps even murder but the government will give them all the money they need. 

Monday, July 8, 2024

Unjust Vexation is Justly Vexatious

Apparently a fat lady was told to get off the jeepney recently. This resulted in a complaint filed by her and a reminder from the LTFRB that fat people cannot be refused passage.

https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1226739

The Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board (LTFRB) on Tuesday reminded transport operators and drivers that they cannot force a passenger to get out of a vehicle due to body size or physical appearance.

In a statement, the LTFRB said body shaming and discrimination of passengers is against the agency's policies.

"PUV drivers are not allowed to double or triple the fare depending on the passengers' physique," the statement read.

The LTFRB issued the statement after a female passenger was forced off a jeepney by the driver due to her physical size in Parañaque City. 

The passenger, who filed a police report against the driver for unjust vexation, also reached out to the LTFRB on Monday and was assisted by the agency's legal department. 

While the driver violated LTFRB policy he certainly did not commit a crime. Yet the offended lady "filed a police report against the driver for unjust vexation." What is unjust vexation? Essentially it is annoying someone.

Did you know that the act of annoying someone is a crime? Yes, it is and we certainly are not pulling your leg.  The act of annoying someone is called unjust vexation and considered a form of light coercion punishable under Article 287 of the Revised Penal Code, to wit:

“Art. 287. Light coercions. — Any person who, by means of violence, shall seize anything belonging to his debtor for the purpose of applying the same to the payment of the debt, shall suffer the penalty of arresto mayor in its minimum period and a fine equivalent to the value of the thing, but in no case less than 75 pesos.”

Any other coercions or unjust vexations shall be punished by arresto menor or a fine ranging from One Thousand Pesos (P1,000.00) to not more than Forty Thousand (P40,000.00), or both.

Consequently, unjust vexation is punishable by imprisonment ranging from 1 day to 30 days and/or a fine of P1,000.00 to P40,000.00.  Yes, you read it right – an annoying person can be imprisoned or slapped with a fine that should have just been used to buy a new cellphone.

Oh, and yes.  You can sue that annoying neighbor who sings at the top of his lungs every night for unjust vexation.

https://ndvlaw.com/annoying-someone-is-a-crime-updated-last-10-june-2020/

The fat lady who was mocked by the jeepeney driver for her extra poundage claims she was traumatised.

The 29-year-old complainant, Joysh Gutierrez, recounted her ordeal in a post on Facebook, which has since become viral.

Gutierrez said that she and a co-worker got on a Baclaran-bound jeepney with license plate NWJ 221 at a passenger stop in Multinational Village along Dr. A Santos Avenue. However, the driver and his wife, who was also on board, told her to alight from the vehicle because she was chubby, saying that the vehicle might suffer a flat tire.

According to Gutierrez, she vehemently protested being discriminated against and even offered to pay a higher fare. The other passengers came to her defense but she said the jeepney driver and his wife continued to shame and insult her. The driver also deliberately slowed down the vehicle in an apparent attempt to mock her weight.

In an interview over radio station dwPM, Gutierrez said she was traumatized by her experience, adding that she would always remember it whenever she gets on a jeepney. She also said that she was determined to pursue charges against the respondents. In a TV interview, Gutierrez added that while she was used to being bullied over her weight, what the jeepney driver did was far worse than she had experienced before.

https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1950645/body-shamed-passenger-files-complaint-vs-jeepney-driver-owners

Does being traumatized meet the definition of unjust vexation? A close reading of the law says no because the term unjust vexation is not defined. In 2009 Senator Miriam Defensor Santiago filed a resolution to amend RPC article 287 to define unjust vexation. 

Unjust vexation is punished under the 2nd paragraph of Article 287 of the Revised Peiial Code:

“Any other coercions or unjust vexations shall be punished by arrest0 menor or a fine ranging from pesos to 200 pesos, or both.”

It is a well-established doctrine that a criminal or penal legislation must clearly define or specify the particular acts or omissions punished.

Unlike the crimes of theft, murder and rape that are specifically defined in the Revised Penal Code, the definition of the crime of unjust vexation is conspicuously absent. Because of this Article 287, paragraph 2 of the Revised Penal Code that punishes “unjust vexation” suffers from congenital defects and may be declared unconstitutional for the following reasons:

a) Article 287, paragraph 2 of the Revised Penal Code condemns no specific or definite act or omission thus failing to define any crime or felony;

b) Said penal provision is so indefinite, vague and overbroad as not to enable it to be known what act is forbidden;

c) Such vagueness and overbreadth result to violation of the due process clause and the right to be informed of the nature of the offense charged; and 

d) Such vagueness and overbreadth likewise amount to an invalid delegation by Congress of its legislative power to the courts to determine what acts should be held criminal and punishable.

The state having the right to declare what acts are criminal, within certain well defined limitations, has a right to specify what act or acts shall constitute a crime, as well as what act or acts shall constitute a crime. Hence, the instant bill seeks to provide a legal defiiiitioii for the crime of “unjust vexation” and provide the corresponding penalty for its commission.

https://legacy.senate.gov.ph/lisdata/1176810353!.pdf

This resolution was never acted on and unjust vexation remains an undefined crime to this day. However, in 2006 the Supreme Court took it upon themselves to define unjust vexation in a ruling. 

The second paragraph of the Article is broad enough to include any human conduct which, although not productive of some physical or material harm, could unjustifiably annoy or vex an innocent person. Compulsion or restraint need not be alleged in the Information, for the crime of unjust vexation may exist without compulsion or restraint. However, in unjust vexation, being a felony by dolo, malice is an inherent element of the crime. Good faith is a good defense to a charge for unjust vexation because good faith negates malice. The paramount question to be considered is whether the offender’s act caused annoyance, irritation, torment, distress or disturbance to the mind of the person to whom it is directed. The main purpose of the law penalizing coercion and unjust vexation is precisely to enforce the principle that no person may take the law into his hands and that our government is one of law, not of men. It is unlawful for any person to take into his own hands the administration of justice. 

https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2006/sep2006/gr_165065_2006.html

In 2021 the SC issued another ruling defining unjust vexation saying "it basically penalizes acts intended to cause emotional distress."

The petition is without merit. Herein petitioner insists on his innocence and alleges that the ruling of the CA is not in accord with applicable law and jurisprudence. Herein petitioner claims that based on the account of the minor victim, the act of masturbation was not done with the participation of and was not directed at her, hence, he should be penalized with unjust vexation under Article 287 of the Revised Penal Code (RPC) as it basically punishes acts which is intended to cause emotional distress.

https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2021/jan2021/gr_246231_2021.html

Where in RPH article 287 is a single word said about "emotional distress?" No where. The SC is basically making it up as they go. 

What we see is that not even the Supreme Court can give a precise definition of RPC article 287. Unjust vexation remains a very broad term subject to interpretation not on objective facts but on circumstance. That is what one Philippine law firm says. 

Definition and Scope

Unjust vexation is a catch-all offense under Philippine law, often utilized when specific crimes cannot be easily categorized. Under Article 287 of the Revised Penal Code, unjust vexation is defined as any human conduct that causes annoyance, irritation, torment, distress, or disturbance to the mind of another person.

Elements of the Offense

To successfully prosecute someone for unjust vexation, the following elements must typically be present:

  1. Act or Omission: An action or a failure to act by the accused that causes vexation to another person.

  2. Intent: A general criminal intent to vex, annoy, or irritate must be present.

Interpretations and Case Law

Due to its broad scope, jurisprudence on unjust vexation is varied. Courts consider the social and psychological impact on the complainant, the intent of the accused, and the surrounding circumstances when determining guilt or innocence.

Conclusion

Unjust vexation serves as an adaptable tool within the Philippine legal framework for addressing minor offenses that cause emotional or psychological harm. Understanding its scope and limitations can be crucial for both complainants and defendants navigating the legal landscape.

https://www.respicio.ph/features/unjust-vexation-philippines

Unjust vexation is an adaptable tool to address minor offenses that cause emotional or psychological distress?  It's as catch-all used when the crime cannot be categorized?  That's not law. Laws are defined offenses. They are objective.  A law is not a catch-all or adaptable tool for alleged crimes that cannot be categorized or defined. To go by that admission is to admit there is no such crime as unjust vexation that can be categorized or defined. 

Note that while this law firm says RPH article 287 "unjust vexation is defined as any human conduct that causes annoyance, irritation, torment, distress, or disturbance to the mind of another person" that is simply not the case. The law offers no such definition. Doesn't every crime contain an element of "annoyance, irritation, torment, distress, or disturbance to the mind?" Of course they do. 

Funny that the late Senator Miriam Defensor Santiago was sharp enough to point out the fact that unjust vexation is undefined and so broad  "as not to enable it to be known what act is forbidden." She also authored her resolution 3 years after the Supreme Court gave a tenuous definition in a 2006 ruling. Why has no one else pointed out this fact? Why do Philippine law firms claim that RPC article 287 is defined when it is not? 

Unjust vexation is simply a way for aggrieved parties to vex the alleged perpetrators. And why then shouldn't those charged with unjust vexation counter file for the same? After all being charged with a crime can cause emotional and psychological distress. In fact this jeepney driver says he was defamed by this obese woman. 


https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1950890/driver-on-body-shaming-issue-is-sorry-but-claims-his-image-was-also-ruined

"We apologize sincerely. But what about the defamation that almost ruined our reputation around the world?"

The driver’s partner stressed that Gutierrez also needs to apologize to them.

"For me, she also made a mistake. As a person, she needs to apologize. What she did was defamation. It could have been settled by talking."

But the driver and his partner claimed that the incident in the video was not their first encounter with Gutierrez.

"She once rode with us in the small jeep. We already had arguments. In that small jeep, during our first argument, I asked her to move, but she refused to do so."

In the viral video, the driver’s partner said that she reminded Gutierrez of their first encounter.

"I said, “Miss, you might get angry again.”

According to her, Gutierrez replied with confusion, saying that it was her first time to ride their jeepney.

"She became hysterical when I was explaining things to her. When she became hysterical, she was out of control. There was no video of that."

She stressed that Gutierrez even cursed the driver and mocked his source of livelihood.

“You only work as a driver yet your attitude is like that.”

Sounds like there is more to the story and the driver was unjustly vexed by the passenger. 

But since the crime of unjust vexation is not defined it does not exist. It is quite ridiculous that in the Philippines being rude is a crime the courts are too ready to prosecute. The existence of this undefined statue in RPC article 287 is another proof the Philippine justice system is broken.