Showing posts with label USA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label USA. Show all posts

Monday, September 18, 2023

Alfred McCoy on How the Philippines Really Lost the West Philippine Sea

China's aggression in the West Philippine Sea is totally ridiculous. If the Philippines were united then perhaps something could be done about it. But as it is the situation has become a blame game with some pundits like Rigoberto Tiglao claiming that President Benigno Aquino III basically gave it away when he withdrew the Philippine Navy. Of course China was also supposed to withdraw but he will never mention that.

But let's get to the root of the matter. How is it China has been able to build military bases within Philippine sovereign territory and how is it that China has been able to run off Philippine fishermen and strut all over the WPS like it owns the place? It all goes back to the expulsion of the US military in 1991. 

Historian and Southeastern Asian expert Alfred McCoy writes the following in his book To Govern the Globe.

 


“As the US became the world’s sole superpower after the Cold War, Brzezinski, a specialist in Eurasia’s elusive geopolitics, warned that Washington should take care to avoid three conditions that could erode its global power—first, the loss of its strategic “perch on the Western periphery” in Europe; next, the rise of “an assertive single entity” in the “middle space” of Eurasia; and finally, “the expulsion of America from its offshore bases” in Asia.

The weakening of those “offshore bases” had already started in 1991 when the Philippines, unwilling to accept Washington’s ambiguous commitment to its defense, refused to extend the lease on the Seventh Fleet’s bastion at Subic Bay. As US Navy tugs towed Subic’s floating dry docks homeward to Pearl Harbor, the Philippines gained full responsibility for its own defense, which it largely failed to fund. As a result, during a raging typhoon three years later, China occupied some shoals in the Spratly Islands—the first step in what would be a stealthy bid for control over the South China Sea and its later challenge to US power in the Pacific. Instead of air and navy patrols, the Philippine military grounded a rusting US-surplus ship on nearby Ayungin Shoal in 1998 to serve as a base for a squad of barefoot soldiers, who were forced to fish for their rations. Meanwhile, in those years the US Navy underwent a 40 percent reduction in its pool of surface warships and attack submarines, further weakening the US position on the Pacific littoral.

Excerpt From: McCoy, Alfred W. “To Govern the Globe," pg. 604-605 ebook version

Why is it so hard for the pundits to get the root of the matter? Because it reveals that the Philippines is totally incompetent and does not have the resources to defend itself. This matter continues to this day with EDCA and detractors saying it is a bad idea. Even Duterte thinks it's a bad idea despite the fact that he signed on to it. 

One sentiment floating around is that the USA wants war with China and the Philippines will simply be a pawn.

https://philippinerevolution.nu/statements/with-new-edca-sites-ph-to-become-us-pawn-in-war-strategy-vs-china/

The Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP) joins the Filipino people in condemning the Marcos regime for colluding with the United States in its plan to construct four more military bases in the country as part of its war preparations against China.

By agreeing to let the US military construct more bases and facilities in these sites, the Marcos regime is allowing the United States to use the Philippines as a pawn in its war strategy against China. The Indo-Pacific Security Strategy of the US government aims to encircle China to stifle the growth of its economic and military power.

Marcos is fooling Filipinos when he claimed yesterday that these US military bases and facilities will be “used for humanitarian and relief operations.” The so-called disaster response program of the US military is, in fact, a big screen to obscure the aggressive push of the US to extend and project its military power. To see through the lies of the claim that these facilities will bring jobs to communities, one need only to look at how US military bases in any part of the world have promoted prostitution and other anti-social activities.

In all likelihood, the US will construct facilities to launch long-range missiles in one or more of these EDCA locations. Since 2021, the US Indo-Pacific Command has been planning to construct a network of ground-based missile launching systems along what it calls the “First Island Chain” which includes Japan, Korea, the Philippines and other islands closest to China.

The war theater preparations of the US are centered on stoking Taiwan “independence” in order to provoke China to “own the starting gun” and thus justify its plans to “come to Taiwan’s defense.” In such an event, the Lal-lo international airport will likely serve as a launching pad and rear service area for US jet fighters that will be used by the US in its war against China.

Yeah. So, the USA wants to stoke Taiwan independence so China invades and they come to Taiwan's aid and....then what? Invade China while using the Philippines as a launching pad? Why? It's dumb even if true.

But we don't need conspiracy theories. 

The fact is once the USA was summarily booted from Subic Bay China bided its time and then took over the WPS at the first opportunity. Western historians can acknowledge this fact why can't Philippine politicians also acknowledge it? 

Monday, October 19, 2020

US Has Become A Failed State, Irrelevant Now to the Philippines?

Has the US become a failed state, irrelevant now to the Philippines? That's what Manila Times muckraker Rigoberto Tiglao claims. 

https://www.manilatimes.net/2020/10/14/opinion/columnists/topanalysis/us-has-become-a-failed-state-irrelevant-now-to-the-philippines/780284/

THIS year is historic for us not just because of the unprecedented devastation to the world economy and humankind brought about by the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic. This year is historic to us in a more specific, or unique, way: Since our liberation in 1946, the United States of America — big brother to our elites — has become irrelevant to us.

This year is the start of our total liberation from the American eagle. This is partly due to President Rodrigo Duterte’s audacious pivot towards an independent foreign policy that drew us closer to America’s rivals, China and Russia.

This is also partly due to the demise of the Yellow Cult, whose founders Benigno Aquino Jr. and his late widow Corazon Aquino after all owed much to US sponsorship, providing the former with his Harvard refuge and the latter with the might of US diplomacy and propaganda apparatus to grab power in 1986.

But it is also partly due to the fact that the US has unraveled, nearly imploding this year, with its institutions which our intellectuals and politicians had looked up to for decades proving to be so flawed.

Whether the pandemic overwhelms the US and triggers its fragmentation, whether Donald Trump or Joe Biden wins, and even, I dare say, its economy collapses or not, would not be as relevant now as it was just 10 years ago. Japan, China, Asean, the Middle East and now even Russia will fill the vacuum and become our main economic partners. Only forever-US-fans like Albert del Rosario and Antonio Carpio insist that we needthe US Navy to prevent the Chinese from invading us.

This is unbelievably baseless propaganda. Does Tiglao know that Marcos was supported by the US government and found refuge in Hawaii? Does he know that every single president of the Philippines has enjoyed the support of the USA in one form or another? 

Far from being irrelevant the USA remains the Philippines' number one financier as this latest report from USAID shows.

US COVID-19 Assistance to the Philippines

Since March 2020, the United States, through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), Department of Defense, and State Department, has invested more than Php1 billion ($22.6 million) to the Philippines' COVID-19 response. Additionally, many of USAID's ongoing development projects valued at more than Php5 billion ($100 million) a year across the health, economic development, governance, education, and environment sectors have mobilized to address the impacts of the virus. The assistance builds upon the longstanding U.S.-Philippines development partnership in the Philippines. Over the past 20 years, the United States — the world's largest provider of bilateral assistance in health — has invested nearly Php29.6 billion ($582 million) in the Philippine health sector,and has provided nearly Php228.8 billion ($4.5 billion) in total assistance to advance the country’sdevelopment goals.

One could cite the many millions of dollars worth of military training and equipment as well as the various social programs supported by the USA to refute this stupid assertion that the US has now become irrelevant to the Philippines. However nothing in his column seeks to prove that the US is irrelevant to the Philippines. Instead Tiglao focuses on the USA being a failed state.

He cites two articles, one from Salon and one from The Nation in his defense that the USA is a failed state. The article from The Nation is basically an anti-Trump harangue. Only the article from Salon offers any insightful critiques about America's demise.

"The American economic system has waltzed itself into a network of problems in large part because it really lived a charmed life," said Dr. Richard D. Wolff, professor emeritus of economics at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. "But the charmed life ended around the 1970s, after which it went on a kind of extended life support." 

Americans have maintained the illusion of prosperity by accruing massive debt, Wolff told Salon, comparing the nation's situation to that of "a patient who has had a really bad cancer or a heart attack, and is now kept alive with tubes and chemicals and all the rest of it. He is not dead, but is in deep trouble. That problem is compounded, Wolff said, "by the fact that this is a society cannot, to this day, face what I just said."

https://www.salon.com/2020/08/05/is-the-us-a-failed-state-in-2020-experts-answers-range-from-maybe-to-hell-yes/ 

At this point one could go all Ron Paul and launch into a speech about the Federal Reserve, private banks, and debt-based fiat currency. Since Tiglao does not go there, indeed hardly anyone goes there, it is not necessary. One wonders if he is as ignorant as most people are about who controls the economy and how they do it which is through debt. Probably.

Tiglao's thesis is that the USA's status as a failed state is evidenced by their response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Guess what, the US is the nation worst hit by Covid-19, by any measure: 8 million cases, 3 million active cases and 220,000 deaths. We have just 343,000 cases, 43,0000 active cases and 6.000 deaths. Thailand, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and many other countries that are listed as states worse off than the US in the failed-state department are all doing much, much better than the US.

The proof of the pudding is certainly in the eating. What better measure of a failed state than its performance in addressing the pandemic?

The US has become a failed state. With all the institutions it has been boasting about, it has failed its citizens big-time.

Tiglao opines that democracy is the root of the problem. It is democracy that has caused the pandemic to spread and it is democracy which has failed to confront the pandemic. 

It has failed to confront the pandemic not because of any inherent natural weaknesses of its people nor its environment but because of institutions which it had been claiming since World War 2 as its strength that other countries should follow .

Foremost of these is its set of institutions called “democracy.” Democracy was invented largely for small communities, most of whose members could inter-react among themselves, and in which there was no “mediator,” no interpreter for their views. But there is now that powerful prism for people’s views — media.

Democratic theory that people have the right and wisdom to choose their leaders cannot take into account the power of media to mold how people see things, and how the owners of that media can choose what kind of views the masses would hold.

Donald Trump became, to use that phrase Americans are fond of saying, the “leader of the free world” because of his hugely successful reality TV show “The Apprentice.” Americans were fooled tinto thinking that the tough, all-knowing chief executive pfficer that was Trump’s role in the show could become the tough, all-knowing CEO of the US of A. Exactly in the same way Filipinos voted for Fernando Poe Jr. thinking he was the movie hero “Panday.”

Note that he says it was "institutions" which the USA claimed "as its strength" that contributed to the failure. But he never tells what those institutions are. Instead he focuses on the abstract concept of democracy. Democracy is not an American institution. It is an idea which is Greek in origin. His origin story for democracy is bizarre to say the least. 

Democratic theory is not "that people have the right and wisdom to choose their leaders." Democratic theory is that the people are the rulers. Demos meaning people and arche meaning rule. Tiglao is under the mistaken impression that the USA is a democracy when it is in fact a constitutional republic. It has never been and never will be a democracy. Same as the Republic of the Philippines. I encourage Tiglao and all my readers to read Plato's Republic where democracy is touted as the worst form of government just above tyranny.

As for why Donald Trump was elected...surely it is more than his TV show that put him the White House. He was saying things the other candidates were not. Then when he was the last man standing and his opponent was Hillary Clinton...well perhaps Tiglao is not so informed as to how corrupt she really is. To be fair basically every American presidential election is an exercise in an appeal to the lowest common denominator but what election isn't? Philippines included. Why was Bato elected to the Senate? Not because he is a wise statesman.

Tiglao further betrays a misunderstanding of what democracy is by confusing it with federalism.

Other facets of US “democracy “proved to be obstacles to that country’s response to the pandemic. States asserted their independence from the central government and from each other — resulting in a chaotic response to the pandemic. States at the start of the pandemic even tried to outbid each other and the federal government itself to secure masks and other medical equipment needed for the pandemic.

One state would enforce lockdown restrictions. But residents could move from one state to another freely — resulting in such a super-spreader event as a motorcyclists’ festival in South Dakota.

Aside from being a constitutional republic the USA is also a federation. Sovereign states entered into an agreement to form a federal government to assist with issues like defense. While the overriding supremacy of states rights has largely deteriorated since the Civil War each state continues to possess its own sovereignty and expresses that through their own laws. Gun laws, drug laws, driving laws, these and other laws differ from state to state. 

The Philippines is not a federation but has a national government. Each province and town can enact their own laws of course but decrees from the Palace and laws from the Congress trump them. That is why the IATF can dictate what is happening around the country. 

It's ironic that Tiglao would mistakenly criticize federalism when he has advocated for a federal system in the Philippines. A true federal system would be almost impossible in the Philippines because rather than disparate states uniting to form a more perfect union the nation would first have to be divided up into sections. Then a degree of sovereignty would have to be imparted into whatever districts or states were formed so such a system could be implemented. That would mean each district enacting its own laws and not following a national top down system. Does Tiglao even know what federalism is? It seems he does not.

As for Sturigs being a super spreader event, it's always best to get a second opinion in medical matters. Johns Hopkins says the study which attributed 260,000 COVID-19 cases to Sturgis was not peer reviewed, used questionable methods, and ought to be interpreted cautiously.

https://ncrc.jhsph.edu/research/the-contagion-externality-of-a-superspreading-event-the-sturgis-motorcycle-rally-and-covid-19/

This study, which was available as a preprint and thus had not yet been peer reviewed, uses county-level SARS-CoV-2 testing data to show that the Sturgis motorcycle rally likely led to substantial increases in cases in the local community where the rally took place. However, there is considerable uncertainty surrounding the broader, national impact of the rally and its associated costs given limitations in the methodological approaches used. Results from this study should be interpreted cautiously. 

Next he confuses democracy with personal liberty.

And of course, the democracy dogma was so ingrained among Americans that they claimed it was their right to wear or not wear a mask, the scientifically proven first and necessary step in containing the virus.

The fact is the government has no right to dictate how you live your life. If you want to engage in certain activities, like driving a car, then you have to follow the rules of course because that involves other people and not just the mere existence of the individual. But just existing should not include any laws one has to follow such as wearing a mask. Incidentally there is a great degree of personal liberty in the Philippines when it comes to operating a motor vehicle of any kind. That is because driving laws are hardly enforced.

As for face masks being scientifically proven to contain the virus let's see what the U.S Surgeon General and the CDC said back in February.

https://twitter.com/surgeon_general/status/1233725785283932160?lang=en

Seriously people- STOP BUYING MASKS!  


They are NOT effective in preventing general public from catching Coronavirus, but if healthcare providers can’t get them to care for sick patients, it puts them and our communities at risk! 


https://twitter.com/CDCgov/status/1233134710638825473

CDC does not currently recommend the use of facemasks to help prevent novel coronavirus. Take everyday preventive actions, like staying home when you are sick and washing hands with soap and water, to help slow the spread of respiratory illness.

So what happened that they changed their mind? Science or politics? Here is a May 2020 article from the New England Journal of Medicine.
We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to Covid-19 as face-to-face contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic Covid-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes). The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.
That is science. Masks are ineffective at preventing infection. Want some more science proving the ineffectiveness of masks?  Then click this link: https://cv19.fr/eng/english/

Next Tiglao confuses democracy with political infighting

That American democracy is such a huge obstacle to securing the welfare of its people was demonstrated recently by the fact that the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives cannot agree with the Republican-controlled Senate to enact a law to address the pandemic. The term for it — stimulus bill — hides the sad fact that without it, at least a million Americans thrown out of jobs by the pandemic (or the lockdowns) won’t have food on their table.

Partisanship is simply a fact of political life. That is not how the founders envisioned America but that is how it has become even in the 19th century when Senator Charles Sumner was attacked by Senator Preston Brooks who beat him with his cane in the Senate chamber! Even the Philippines is divided along ideological and party lines. That is why Tiglao refers so derisively to the Liberal party as the Yellow Cult! 

Finally Tiglao closes by praising the communist government of China and saying that its present success in battling COVID-19 and allegedly lifting 850 million people out of poverty makes up for its past failures.

China’s authoritarian system has certainly exacted a huge cost in lives. Its Great Leap Forward from 1958 to 1962, Mao Zedong’s ill-conceived program for his country to rapidly industrialize is estimated to have resulted in 30 million to 55 million Chinese deaths from the resulting famine. That kind of disastrous policy would never have been maintained in a democratic system.

But the question is valid: Would China’s success in lifting out of poverty 850 million Chinese between 1981 to 2015 (going by the World Bank’s studies) make up for its past mistakes, even if horrific, that it is a better system of government?

Using the pandemic as the litmus test, the answer to that is certainly yes. It is unquestionably spectacular that from 85,600 cases in February, China has now just 228 cases; deaths peaked at 4,600 in April, and none since then.

Now be honest: If no vaccine after all is invented and the pandemic becomes worse than the Spanish flu pandemic that killed more than 100 million, which country would you prefer to live in – the US or China?

It's the ol' bait and switch! The headline claims that the US is a failed state and is irrelevant to the Philippines. This article is really about the greatness of China. Tiglao's argument for the US being a failed state is that it has not handled the COVID-19 pandemic in a timely manner. But China has. Thus China is superior. In fact anyone with a lick of sense would rather live in China. 

Actually no one with any sense would want to live in China. China's encroachment on Hong Kong and her people's liberties is why there has been so much protesting there over the past few years. China may look sleek and clean but with its system of social credit designed to control everyone it is a nightmare. 

https://www.businessinsider.com/china-social-credit-system-punishments-and-rewards-explained-2018-4

The Chinese state is setting up a vast ranking system that will monitor the behavior of its enormous population, and rank them all based on their "social credit."   

The program is due to be fully operational nationwide by 2020, but is being piloted for millions of people across the country already. The scheme will be mandatory. 

Like private credit scores, a person's social score can move up and down depending on their behavior. The exact methodology is a secret — but examples of infractions include bad driving, smoking in non-smoking zones, buying too many video games and posting fake news online. 

1. Banning you from flying or getting the train. 

2. Throttling your internet speeds. 

3. Banning you — or your kids — from the best schools. 

4. Stopping you getting the best jobs. 

5. Keeping you out of the best hotels. 

6. Getting your dog taken away.

7. Being publicly named as a bad citizen.


Is Tiglao even aware that this program exists and seeks to control every aspect of a person's life? It is clear from his article that Tiglao does not value personal freedom above all which is an important facet of America's founding ideology and should be held dear by any healthy and sane individual. Who wants to be a slave to a totalitarian dictatorship like the Chinese Communist Party? Who wants to live in a country where one can be punished for thoughtcrimes and wrongthink?

This man has written many columns condemning the CPP-NPA (who are Maoists), accusing Globe and PLDT of paying NPA extortion fees (which Globe emphatically denies), accusing Benigno Aquino of being in league with the Reds, and now he wants to praise communist China as having a better system of government that the USA because they have a lower number of COVID-19 cases? How much more hypocritical and ill-informed can Rigoberto Tiglao possibly be?

The fact is China lied to the entire world about COVID-19 and it is because of these lies that the world is now under lockdowns of various degrees.

https://nypost.com/2020/09/21/congressional-report-reveals-how-china-could-have-prevented-covid-19/

The coronavirus pandemic might have been prevented if not for Chinese cover-ups in the early days of the outbreak and the World Health Organization “parroting” Beijing propaganda, according to a damning audit from the House Foreign Affairs Committee. 

The 96-page report — obtained by The Post ahead of its planned Monday release — says the Chinese Communist Party destroyed evidence and buried troubling data, while nationalizing the supply chains and limiting exports of US companies 3M and General Motors, keeping key goods in the country. 

“It is beyond doubt that the CCP actively engaged in a cover-up designed to obfuscate data, hide relevant public health information, and suppress doctors and journalists who attempted to warn the world,” reads the report, authored by Republican members of the Democrat-held committee. 

Had China been more transparent and proactive when the first signs of the burgeoning health crisis emerged in Wuhan in late 2019, the outbreak could have been largely contained — potentially saving hundreds of thousands of lives worldwide, the pols wrote. 

“Research shows the CCP could have reduced the number of cases in China by up to 95 percent had it fulfilled its obligations under international law and responded to the outbreak in a manner consistent with best practices,” the report said, citing a study on Medrxiv, a Yale University-linked online clearinghouse for medical manuscripts. 

“It is highly likely the ongoing pandemic could have been prevented,” the report said. 

Instead, on Jan. 1, CCP officials ordered that the Wuhan wet market from which the contagion is believed to have sprung “be closed and sanitized, destroying forensic evidence that may have provided insight into the origins of the outbreak,” the report said.

On Jan. 2, scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology completed a full genetic sequence of COVID-19 which indicated that it was likely highly contagious, but did not immediately share that data with the WHO.

This is a such a stupid and deceptive article from a ridiculous man and all those in the comment section thinking it is great and awesome spewing out so many hard truths have been hoodwinked because they are ill-informed. Why did Tiglao really write this article? Sure the Manila Times pays him but who else has him on their payroll?

If Tiglao wants to talk about COVID-19 response as a litmus test for failed states well the Philippines has the longest lockdown in the world! Where else in the world are people required to wear face shields? Where else are there age restrictions on who can leave their house? Of course there are more measures of a failed state than just COVID-19 response and the Philippines fails at most of them which is why this nation remains high on the index of failed states.

Wednesday, May 1, 2019

CIA Front Groups in the Philippines

CIA adventuring in the Philippines is as old as the organisation itself. The list of CIA actions in the Philippines is rather extensive and if you want a quick rundown then read the Wikipedia page on the subject. This post is about CIA fronts in the Philippines and in particular groups that receive money from the National Endowment for Democracy which is linked to the CIA.


Recently well known blogger Thinking Pinoy has put his research skills to the test to unmask the covert CIA funding of Rappler, Vera Files, the PCIJ (Philippine Centre for Investigative Journalism), and the CMFR (Centre for Media Freedom and Responsibility) through NED awards. These organisations have received a substantial amount of money via NED in increasing increments since 2016.  TP's thesis is very cut and dry. These organisations receive funding to write anti-Duterte black propaganda which is in the interests of the US.
I have always wondered why Rappler, PCIJ, Vera Files, and CMFR have been very critical of the Duterte Administration since Day One.  
In light of the massive funding these four outfits have been receiving from the US Government, however, I finally stopped asking why. 
Will these four outfits ever dare to write anything that’s blatantly against US interests?
http://www.thinkingpinoy.net/2019/04/how-much-has-vera-files-pcij-rappler.html
Of course he neglects to tell us exactly what they are writing which is blatantly in the interests of the US. Why are news articles critical of Duterte pro-US? Why are accusations that Duterte has billions in hidden wealth really in the interests of the US? Is he aware that the Duterte administration is still heavily dependent on the US especially in the war on terrorism? Does he even know what Operation Pacific Eagle is? Why would a destabilised Philippines be in the interest of the US when the Philippines acts as barrier between China and the greater Pacific? He also neglects to tell us that there are quite a few other organisations in the Philippines receiving NED funding.  Let us take a look at all of them except for the four he has cited.


2014 - $208,230
2015 - $168,754
2016 - $213,712
2017 - $322,036

Total - $912,732

This organisation has several projects with various goals which run from fighting corruption in the private sector to developing market economy.
In 2005, 2006 and 2009, respectively, CIPE launched public governance, corporate governance and anti-corruption initiatives in the Philippines. These were distinct yet complementary components of CIPE’s comprehensive strategy of making democracy deliver in the Philippines through an improved governance climate. Through CIPE’s public governance work, which saw the creation of a government reform methodology never before attempted in the country, dramatic improvements were realized both in governance outcomes and in sustainable reforms of governance processes. Through CIPE’s work on corporate governance, CIPE’s Corporate Governance Scorecard initiative both drove and documented steady improvements in corporate governance standards year over year in the Philippines – improvements that contributed to the ability of the Philippine marketplace to weather the global financial crisis of the late 2000s, as compared with the country’s struggles with the Asian crisis 10 years prior. In the area of anti-corruption, CIPE launched an innovative project to help small businesses combat bribery – an initiative that continues to this day.
https://www.cipe.org/projects/philippines/


2014 -$73,118

Total -$73,118

This group only has one award listed and it is for a project described thusly:
To strengthen civil society engagement in security sector reform and involve local communities in peace and security debates. The Security Reform Initiative will support a nationwide network of civil society organizations to monitor and recommend ways to address gaps in the implementation of the Philippine military's internal peace and security plan in accordance with human rights standards and the democratic accountability and transparency standards. Local chapters across the country will organize meetings to report on monitoring results and coordinate dialogues with military officials and other stakeholders.
Their stated official mission is as follows:
The SRI  conducts peace and security policy research, based on scholastic foundations, that resonates recommendations from the ground, creates dialogue spaces, builds constituency for peace and security issues at the local and national levels, and mainstreams and advocates for security policy reforms.
http://www.securityreforminitiative.org/about-us/who-we-are/

2014 - $90,000
2015 - $90,000
2016 - $90,000
2017 - $150,000
2018 - $91,670

Total - $511,670

The description of each project is the same:
To empower and mobilize an informed public and a community of reformers dedicated to advancing sustainable, democratic reform. The program will conduct activities to foster active citizenship, political participation, and democratic governance, as well as provide secretariat support to constituency networks of youth and citizen volunteers who focus on strengthening democratic processes and institutions.
Their official mission:
INCITEGov commits to build a force for democratic reform in the Philippines from a community of champions dedicated to increasing public awareness and understanding of key reform policy issues. It anchors this commitment on its core institutional P-G-D framework that connects the dots between the practice of democratic politics to good governance and the achievement of development outcomes at scale, to break the boom and bust cycle of Philippine reform.
http://incitegov.com/about
4. Caucus of Development NGO Networks

2015 - $70,000
2016 - $66,434
2017 - $76,555

Total - $212,989

From their website we read:
CODE-NGO is the largest coalition of development NGOs in the Philippines, which, because of its scale and synergy, influences public policy, provides leadership in civil society and increases the effectiveness of social development work in the country. We commit ourselves to taking civil society leadership in policy advocacy and partnership building in the public arena, as well as developing the capacity and accountability of our member networks, towards the realization of apeaceful, just and sustainable Philippine society.
https://www.devex.com/organizations/caucus-of-development-ngo-networks-code-ngo-47165

2015 - $25,904
2018 - $90,670

Total - $116,574

There is not an official page for this group but searching we find this:
Lawyers’ League for Liberty (LIBERTAS) is comprised of individuals mostly in the Philippines who are in the legal and allied professions, including law students, advocating for transparency and accountability in Government; political and electoral reforms; respect for human rights; access to justice, and the promotion of the rule of law
http://www.hustisyanatin.org/about-us/

2016 - $300,000
2018 - $300,010

Total - $600,010

From the description in the NED website:
To support the development of young, newly elected officials to serve as effective representatives and implement good governance reforms in their communities. The institute will work with local partners to coordinate the second year of a fellowship program called Young Leaders for Good Governance (YLGG). The YLGG fellows from Luzon and Mindanao will gain knowledge and skills for defending human rights principles and will develop cross-regional, local, and national connections necessary to champion responsive governance.
From their official website:
For more than 30 years, we have been helping to strengthen democracy through workshops by volunteer experts from all over the world on multi-party political systems, democratic governance practices, women's empowerment, civil society development, youth leadership, strengthening electoral processes and public opinion research. 
We have conducted programs in more than 100 countries and, along with our Women’s Democracy Network and Arab Women’s Leadership Institute, are currently active in more than 85 countries. You can see where we work on our interactive map
RI is a 501(c)(3) and receives funding through grants from the U.S. State DepartmentU.S. Agency for International Development, the National Endowment for Democracy, a number of European foundations and aid agencies and other Western countries, and the United Nations.  Less than one percent of IRI’s funding comes from private donations.  We do not receive any money from the Republican Party or any other U.S. partisan entity.
https://www.iri.org/who-we-are/faqs

2016 - $29,467

Total - $29,467
To promote respect for human rights during the 2016 electoral process and contribute to the mitigation of violations. Leading up to the May national elections, the project will coordinate a coalition of human rights and election monitoring groups to introduce a human rights framework into the electoral process. Activities will include interviewing stakeholders, monitoring incidents and posting them on a web reporting platform, disseminating information to the public, and coordinating with the election and human rights commissions to address violations.
This seems to have been a one time award just for the 2016 elections.


2017 - $80,000
2018 - $46,667

Total - $126,667

From their webpage:
The Initiatives for Dialogue and Empowerment through Alternative Legal Services (IDEALS) is a local non-profit, non-stock legal focused advocacy and service institution. We help address the legal and technical needs of the marginalized, disempowered, and vulnerable groups particularly farmers, persons and communities affected by disasters, and victims of human rights violations. 
We envision a Philippine society with an empowered citizenry sustained by participatory and accountable governance, equitable enjoyment of resources and opportunities, and accessible justice. We aim to empower the marginalized sectors, and with them, work for a policy and legal environment oriented towards the realization of their rights and participation in governance.
https://ideals.org.ph/index.php/about-us/

2017 - $75,000
2018 - $68,946

Total - $143,946

From the description on NED:
To strengthen civic engagement by empowering local communities to participate in public debates on key policy issues and to amplify their voices in support of democracy. Activities will include capacity-building for local leaders on advocacy and partnership building; town hall meetings on democracy-related topics; and awareness-raising initiatives to promote more civic and political participation.
From their website:
The Affiliated Network for Social Accountability in East Asia and the Pacific (Foundation) is a networking facility that helps improve governance by connecting citizens and governments. ANSA–EAP seeks to build a constituency of social accountability practitioners in the EAP region.
http://www.ansa-eap.net/about-us/who-we-are/mission/
10. Mindanao Institute of Journalism Inc.

2017 - $34,149
2018 - $35,000

Total -$69,149

From the description on NED:
To provide the public with a credible source of independent news reporting. The organization will publish an online daily newspaper that covers critical and underreported issues in the southern region of the country, including the peace process, governance, business, and the environment. The publication will feature articles and reports that examine in more depth the impacts of local- and national-level policies on communities in the region.
This organisation is also known as Mindanews.
The Mindanao Institute of Journalism (MinJourn), a non-stock, non-profit media organization registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission, is composed of independent, professional journalists who believe and practice people empowerment through media. 
Minjourn started as the Mindanao News and Information Cooperative Center in 2001 and  continues to adhere to the principles of professionalism and social responsibility on which it was founded. 
Minjourn seeks to promote knowledge and public awareness of Mindanao issues through publication, training, databank and research services; provide news and information to news organizations and the general public through its news service, MindaNews; and help improve the journalism profession in Mindanao.
https://www.mindanews.com/about/

2017 - $76,050
2018 - $85,000

Total - $161,050

From the NED description:

To foster public awareness of human rights and mobilize policy support for rights protection. The network will strengthen citizens' understanding of democracy and human rights; encourage citizen participation in dialogues to promote rights; and engage decision-makers to bolster defense of rights. Activities will include human rights education initiatives, awareness-raising campaigns, and advocacy.

From their webpage:
PAHRA envisions a just, democratic, and peaceful Philippines founded on human rights culture. It envisions a society where there is gender equity, recognition of multiculturalism, environmental protection, and sustainable development. As such, all individuals and peoples are able to fully realize their potentials, participate and contribute in the economic, political, social and cultural life of society, and share equitably in the benefits of economic progress. 
To achieve its vision, PAHRA commits itself to the development of a strong, progressive, dynamic, and pluralist human rights movement that engages the state to comply with its HR obligations and non-state actors to fulfill their HR responsibilities. To do this, PAHRA constitutes itself as a campaign and advocacy center and develops an education and information center in partnership with its member organizations and other NGOs, POs and individual members, and in the government at all levels.
https://philippinehumanrights.org/about

2018 - $70,000

Total - $70,000

From the NED description:

To promote accountability for human rights violations by strengthening medical documentation and investigation practices. The organization will conduct trainings for health care professionals to sharpen their understanding and application of international guidelines for the investigation, documentation, and reporting of human rights violations. The organization will also collaborate with partners to address and document these abuses.
From their webpage:
At the height of the Marcos Dictatorship, a group of doctors and concerned individuals saw the need for the health sector to collectively respond and speak against the grave human rights violations perpetuated by the regime. Thus, in April 16, 1982, the Medical Action Group was born. 
As a non-stock, non-profit organization of physicians, nurses, dentists, psychologists, health students, and health workkers, MAG promotes and defends the human rights of all peoples. Since its inception, it has rendered total health services to the urban poor, political prisoners, internally displaced peoples and workers. 
MAG continues to work for a society whose citizens can freely exercise their rights without fear of repression. This society, however, is far from being realized as human rights violations escalate. In the 1990's not only civil and political rights but also economic, social and cultural rights were trampled upon. As of September 30, 2004, 283 political prisoners languish in jail for common crimes. 
As we move forward in the next millenium, MAG is committed to consolidate the ranks of health care providers from the community to the national level to define a health care agenda that recognizes the capacities of all peoples of the Philippines to shape a health program that is relevant and responsive to their needs.
https://magph.org/about

2018 - $70,000

Total - $70,000

From the NED description:

To strengthen the capacity of community-based organizations to promote human rights and democracy. The organization will conduct a series of trainings for grassroots activists on topics related to democracy and human rights principles, being a human rights defender, and advocacy. Participants will conduct follow-on activities to share their knowledge, expand their networks, and collaborate with one another in advocacy campaigns to support human rights.
14. PILIPINA Inc.

2018 - $21,600

Total - $21,600

From the NED description:

To strengthen women's political participation and empower women to take action to support democratic processes and institutions. Through its network, the organization will bolster the ability of women to speak out collectively against threats to democracy, hold public officials accountable, and engage key stakeholders, the broader democracy movement, and the public to advance democracy and human rights. Activities will include trainings and learning sessions, advocacy initiatives, awareness-raising campaigns, and engagement with public officials
15.  Center for Youth Advocacy and Networking, Inc.

2018 - $41,000

Total - $41,000

From their website:
The Center for Youth Advocacy and Networking (CYAN) is a youth-led and youth-serving institution of  youth organizations and individuals that share a common aspiration for empowered young people for societal change. 
CYAN is guided by the principles of democratic persuasion, shared accountabilities, mutual trust and collective leadership. 
CYAN is a community of learners who openly shares ideas, competencies and knowledge to effectively engage institutional processes and meaningfully contribute in social change. 
It is an institution that facilitates organizational growth, gender-fair initiatives, grassroots approaches, creative strategies and overcoming challenges among network organizations. 
As a non-stock, non-profit non-governmental organization, CYAN was established in 15 January 2005.
https://cyanpilipinas.com/about/

2018 - $60,000

Total - $60,000
Generation Peace is a network of organizations and individuals engaging a youth-led advocacy towards a just and sustainable peace. Its inception can be traced back to the Waging Peace Conference 2005 where a proposal was made to gather the next generation to continue the work of building a society grounded on the culture of peace. 
Generation Peace regularly provides fundamental peace and human rights trainings for local/sub-national youth organizations from Luzon, Visayas and Mindanao. When emerging peace issues arise, Generation Peace acts in solidarity with civil society peace advocates in promoting awareness and helping increase the discourse on the peace processes.
https://youthpeacenetwork.wordpress.com/about/

Total of all 16 - $3,219,972

With these additional 16 groups that makes 20 Filipino organisations receiving funding from the NED.  That is 20 alleged CIA front organisations in the Philippines. But how many of these groups have you heard of?  I have only heard of the four TP cites.  If the CIA is looking to subvert the Philippines through these organisations then they are not doing a good job. Some of these groups do not even have a proper webpage.

Most of these groups are human rights organisations. Only one, Mindanews, is a journalistic enterprise.  Are they publishing anti-Duterte and pro-US propaganda or are they publishing real news from Mindanao? If I am to believe TP's analysis then they must be publishing anti-Duterte black propaganda.
I have always wondered why Rappler, PCIJ, Vera Files, and CMFR have been very critical of the Duterte Administration since Day One.  
In light of the massive funding these four outfits have been receiving from the US Government, however, I finally stopped asking why. 
There are problems with this snarky assessment because Rappler did not even begin receiving money from the NED until 2018 and then it was a paltry $142,000 compared to other organisations which have been receiving funding for years. VeraFiles has only received $197,600 since 2016. The PCIJ has received $242,631 since 2015.  The CMFR has received $349,034 since 2014.

In contrast the CIPE has received $912,732 since 2015, INCITEgov has received $511,670 since 2014, and IRI has received $600,010 since 2016. Those are the top three biggest receivers of donations and with a total of $2,024,412 they dwarf the combined total of the big four TP cites which sits at a paltry $931,265.

The big four who are allegedly publishing all this black propaganda which is anti-Duterte and pro-US have not even received half of what INCITEgov, IRI, and the CIPE have received. Does this make sense? If the goal of the NED in funding these groups is to be a backdoor CIA organisation with the purpose of overthrowing Duterte why would they underfund these four organisations? Shouldn't Rappler have been getting big bucks for years now?  Why have they only been receiving funding since 2018?

Thinking Pinoy is not thinking very well.  Let's take this observation for instance:
President Rodrigo Duterte assumed office in 2016. A known US critic, Duterte has made it clear from the onset of his term that he wants a independent foreign policy [TheDiplomat], characterized by lesser dependence on the US and greater co-operation with China. 
This is a total departure from the historically pro-US stance of all of Duterte's predecessors since 1946, or when the US recognized Philippine independence, as discussed in the 09 September 2016 ThinkingPinoy article "Duterte's Philippines breaking away from the United States?"
http://www.thinkingpinoy.net/2019/04/how-much-has-vera-files-pcij-rappler.html
The USA absolutely did not RECOGNISE Philippine independence in 1946. In 1946 the USA withdrew all claims to the Philippines and the Philippines BECAME independent. This was the result of a 12 year process beginning in 1934 with Manuel Quezon and others visiting the USA and lobbying for independence. A plebiscite was held thus making independence the resultant will of people. I have written about this here. To say otherwise is to obfuscate history and deny the hard work of Quezon and the will of the Filipino people. Thinking Pinoy does not even know the history of his own nation.

It is also not true that Duterte has attempted to depend less on the US.  The Marawi siege was won because US forces helped the AFP.  DND Secretary Lorenzana admitted this.



For all his research skills in digging up these figures TP fails to provide any evidence that Rappler, the PCIJ, Vera Files, and the CMFR were critical of the Duterte administration from day one BECAUSE they receive funding from the NED. Many have been critical of Duterte since day one and it has nothing to do with the CIA. On the contrary it has to do with his constantly foul mouth, his disdain for human rights, his disdain for the constitution, his flirtation with martial law and revolutionary government, his bloody drug war which has killed thousands, his unwillingness to stand up to China in regards to the WPS, and his willingness to shuffle around the cabinet his friends who are tainted with corruption. Can TP pull up a single article from Rappler, the PCIJ, Vera Files, and the CMFR that is critical of Duterte and is wholly without basis and is outright slander? Can he pull up any article that is written at the direction of the CIA or promotes American foreign policy? If he can then Duterte should sue for libel. But he has not done so because such articles do not exist.

TP is not alone in his criticism of these organisations receiving funding from CIA fronts. Bob Tiglao, a man who has praised TP for being part of "a new breed of real investigative reporters" had this to say about the NED:
THE National Endowment For Democracy (NED), accused of being a channel for Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) propaganda and destabilization operations in Eastern Europe and elsewhere, has stepped up its funding for three local media outfits that have been publishing articles in the Internet very critical of President Duterte and his administration. 
These media outfits getting substantial amounts from NED are the Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism (PCIJ), the Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility (CMFR), and Vera Files. 
Even if NED wasn’t a CIA conduit, it is an institution funded by the US government, and therefore advances US interests. Shouldn’t we be outraged that the US government is funding anti-Duterte media outfits here?
https://www.manilatimes.net/cia-conduit-funding-anti-duterte-media-outfits/355377/
Bob does mention Rappler saying:
PCIJ, Vera, and CMFR appear to be 90 percent funded by foreign entities, while Rappler,  about 50 percent.
He offers no proof for these allegations.

Bob ends his piece with this:
They claim to be objective, but any casual reading of the posts of these outfits will show beyond any doubt that they are merely following the agenda of the Yellow Cult based on that worn-out EDSA playbook: To demonize Duterte so much for public outrage to unseat him. That they are funded by an alleged CIA conduit is huge slap on our nation, and my profession.
He fails to provide any post or article to verify his statement that the goal of these groups is to demonise Duterte in a bid to unseat him.

Now let me be real clear here.  I am not apologising for these organisations. I am not excusing anyone for receiving funding from CIA front organisations. I am not apologising for the CIA. I am not denying that the CIA as well as other spy organisations such as Mossad regularly and clandestinely interfere in the affairs of foreign governments. I am not denying that the CIA is involved in shenanigans in the Philippines. What I am questioning is the conclusion of TP that BECAUSE these four groups receive funding from the NED they are thus critical of the Duterte administration.  TP has not provided a shred of evidence to back up that assertion.

In a follow-up post focusing exclusively on the funding of Vera Files which he claims receive more than 50% of their funding from CIA fronts TP writes:
That is, NED and TAF tripled Vera Files’ revenues starting in 2016 which, by the way, is the same year President Rodrigo Duterte assumed office. 
This is especially relevant in Vera Files context because the Duterte Administration, i.e. the government of the jurisdiction within which Vera Files operates, is currently clashing with US Foreign Policy as Duterte’s independent foreign policy “upends Washington’s Pivot to Asia”.
http://www.thinkingpinoy.net/2019/04/fact-checking-fact-checker-over-50-of.html
Again Duterte's foreign policy is pretty scattershot but it is by no means one that clashes with the US as the US remains intimately involved with this nation especially in a defence capacity. It's a bit hard to ferret out what he is getting at in this article because he doesn't make any bold or snarky claims but it seems that his point is that Vera Files is critical of the Duterte administration BECAUSE they receive funding from CIA linked organisations. He does not provide a shred of proof for that accusation. Basically all he does in this follow-up article is detail Vera Files funding and the reader is supposed to be shocked and think Vera Files is a CIA front doing the bidding of the CIA. It is a classic case of guilt by association.

What is TP's real goal? Because he fails to discuss all the other groups receiving funding from the NED, much more substantial funding, I think all he wants to do is muckrake. He is a muckraker not interested in truth for truth's sake. He only wants to unmask Duterte's detractors. That is exactly why Bob Tiglao praised him. If he were interested in truth for truth's sake he would discuss the CIPE, INCITEgov, and IRI and investigate just how the CIA is using those groups to subvert the Philippines and promote US foreign policy. Heck if he were really interested in truth he would investigate prior knowledge and intelligence failures in the lead up to the Marawi siege which information I have repeatedly posted on his FB page and Twitter feed. No one, not even Rappler, wants to touch the subject of Marawi prior knowledge.

But that is TP for you.  What else can you expect from a guy who was tapped by the AFP to give a presentation on "The Power of Social Media in Influencing Perception?"


Sounds like TP knows a thing or two about psyops. Perhaps he is one.