Tuesday, December 23, 2025

Insurgency: Christmas, New Year Ceasfire

It's that time of the year again. The Tim when the CPP-NPA declares a holiday truce.  Much like the Christmas truce of 1914 when the German, French, and British cased hostilities and even crossed through no man's land to mingle and exchange gifts, and even engage in caroling and then went back to killing each other, the CPP-NPA has decided to silence their guns in celebration of the birth of Jesus and the ushering in of the new year after which they will go back to killing government forces. 


https://cebudailynews.inquirer.net/678934/ph-communist-party-declare-christmas-new-year-ceasefire

The Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP) on Monday declared a four-day ceasefire for Christmas and New Year — an order which prompted the New People’s Army (NPA) to be on the defensive during this period.

The central committee of the Maoist communist ruling party will hold a ceasefire from 00:00 hours of December 25, 2025 to 23:59 hours of December 26, 2025; and 00:00 hours of December 31, 2025 to 23:59 hours of January 1, 2026. 

“This temporary ceasefire order is being issued in solidarity with the Filipino people as they conduct simple celebrations of their traditional holidays amid grave social and economic conditions,” CPP information officer Marco Valbuena said in a statement.

The Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) has yet to release a statement on CPP’s pronouncement.

Nevertheless, during the four days, Valbuena said the NPA rebels are ordered to be in “active defense mode” and to be on “high alert” against ground and aerial attacks of the AFP.

Aside from the commemoration of the holidays, Valbuena said the ceasefire is also to mark the 57th anniversary of the CPP on December 26, 1968.

CPP’s armed wing, NPA, was later established on March 29, 1969, waging the world’s longest Maoist insurgency to date.

The total number of NPA members has dropped to around 780, far from its peak in 1987 when the Maoist guerrillas had up to 25,000 members, according to the anticommunist task force’s estimates, which Valbuena disputed without giving an exact estimate, citing strategic reasons.

As of this month, the National Amnesty Commission also said over 5,043 former NPA members have applied to local amnesty boards nationwide.

In 2023, the government and the CPP’s political wing, the National Democratic Front, agreed to a “principled and peaceful resolution of the armed conflict,” as stated in the Oslo Joint Communique.

It's funny because communism is a materialist, atheistic philosophy and because government forces will not be honoring this unilateral ceasefire. 

The AFP calls it propaganda.

https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1265197

The Department of National Defense (DND) and the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) on Monday dubbed as "propaganda" the four-day unilateral ceasefire declared by the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP).

"The CPP statement should be taken as it is —a sad propaganda stunt of a terrorist organization," the DND said in a statement, stressing that the move will not be reciprocated by the government.

"Military duties are not subject to pause or seasons, thus the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) shall continue to support the Philippine National Police in keeping peace and order this holiday season," it said.

In a separate statement, the AFP vowed to continue with its operations despite the CPP's pronouncement.

"Military responsibilities are continuous and are not subject to unilateral pronouncements by armed groups. In close coordination with other law enforcement agencies, the AFP will continue lawful security operations to ensure peace and order and prevent armed groups from exploiting the situation to regroup, rearm, or threaten public safety," it said.

The DND reiterated its call for the remaining members of the New People's Army (NPA), the CPP's armed wing, to shun violence and find ways to pursue lasting peace and development.

"We urge the remaining members of the armed groups to abandon violence, lay down their arms, and return to the fold of the law in the interest of lasting peace and development," it said.

The DND and the AFP issued their statements after the CPP ordered the NPA to implement a four-day ceasefire in observance of its 57th anniversary and the holidays.

The ceasefire will take effect on Dec. 25 and 26, 2025 and on Dec. 31, 2025 and Jan. 1, 2026.

The CPP was established by the late Jose Maria "Joma" Sison on Dec. 26, 1968.

The AFP says laying down their weapons and surrendering would be more inducive to bringing about lasting peace. 

The NTF-ELCAC has also downplayed the holiday truce. 


https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2025/12/17/2494835/ntf-elcac-downplays-cpp-holiday-truce

The National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict (NTF-ELCAC) has played down the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP)’s declaration of a unilateral holiday ceasefire, saying it lacks credibility and does not show a real commitment to peace during the Christmas and New Year season.

In a statement, NTF-ELCAC said the ceasefire was announced without any coordination with the government and has no clear system to ensure it will be followed. The task force said this makes the truce difficult to verify and unreliable.

NTF-ELCAC also noted that CPP orders reportedly keep New People’s Army (NPA) units on “active defense mode” and “high alert,” which it said goes against the idea of a ceasefire and could still endanger communities and local officials.

The task force stressed that public safety is not limited to the holiday season. It said the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) and the Philippine National Police will continue to perform their duty to protect the public, especially as people travel and gather during the holidays.

NTF-ELCAC pointed out that the NPA is now much weaker compared to its strength in the 1980s, citing sustained government efforts, better governance, and the choice of many former rebels to return to peaceful civilian life.

It appears that the NTF-ELCAC thinks the ceasefire would be valid if it had been run by the Philippine government. They have previously participated in the annual holiday truce.

Westmincom has also mocked the CPP ceasefire. 

https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1265389

The Western Mindanao Command on Wednesday dismissed the Communist Party of the Philippines' unilateral ceasefire declaration, stating that a temporary pause without abandoning armed struggle does not constitute genuine peace.

Lt. Gen. Donald Gumiran, Westmincom commander, said the four-day ceasefire scheduled for Christmas and New Year's does not change the security situation on the ground.

“Peace is not proven by unilateral ceasefire declaration, but by laying down arms and returning to the fold of the law,” Gumiran said.

The CPP central committee announced the ceasefire on Monday, to take effect from December 25 to 26 and from December 31 to January 1, 2026.

Gumiran called on remaining New People's Army members to surrender and avail themselves of government reintegration programs, while warning that military operations will continue to protect civilians from lawless armed groups.

He appealed to communities and local leaders to help convince rebels to surrender, emphasizing that lasting peace requires collective action and the complete abandonment of armed rebellion.

Being that Western Mindanao Command is under the AFP its not surprising they are also urging the remaining NPA rebels to surrender. 

Every time an NPA leader is killed in battle the AFP says it is a crucial blow to the insurgency and proof that they are dying out. Now they are saying the same about a recently discovered weapons cache. 


https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1265356

Police and military personnel recovered a New People's Army (NPA) arms cache containing high-powered firearms in Labo, Camarines Norte, the 9th Infantry Division (9ID) reported on Tuesday night.

In an interview on Wednesday, 9ID spokesperson Maj. Frank Roldan said the firearms seized include 26 M14 rifles, ammunition, M14 and M16 magazines, following a tip-off from local residents from a remote area of Barangay Exciban.

"The information about the area was provided by the residents and confirmed by a former rebel. Our troops went to verify the information, and their efforts paid off when they unearthed the weapons," he said.

He added that the NPA is hiding its weapons due to the extreme shortage of its members.

"This also proves that there are only a few members of the New People's Army (NPA) left in our area because after a series of confrontations, some surrendered and were arrested," he added.

In a separate interview, 9ID Commander Maj. Gen. Aldwine Almase assured Bicolanos of the division's campaign to eradicate terrorism in the region.

"While we achieve success through collaboration with various agencies and the community, we urge those still affected by terrorist groups to come forward and join us in embracing peace.

The AFP has been uncovering weapons caches for years while the NPA continues to fight. The recovery of these weapons is by no means an indicator that they are suffering an "extreme shortage" of members. 

The NTF-ELCAC's barangay fund has been under scrutiny.  Some say the funds are a "reward for peace." The NTF-ELCAC denies that accusation. 


https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/2156371/ntf-elcac-denies-8-08b-barangay-funds-are-reward-for-peace-amid-church-criticism

The National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict (NTF-Elcac) on Thursday pushed back against criticism from Catholic groups, denying claims that a proposed P8.08 billion allocation for conflict-affected barangays was a discretionary fund or a “reward for peace” tied to counterinsurgency efforts.

The task force said the amount refers to the Barangay Development Program (BDP), a multi-agency initiative implemented by regular government departments, not by the NTF-Elcac itself.

NTF-Elcac Executive Director Undersecretary Ernesto Torres Jr. said in a statement that portraying the allocation as an “NTF-Elcac fund” was misleading. He emphasized that the task force does not handle or disburse the money and has no operational control over the projects.

The clarification followed concerns raised by Caritas Philippines and the Episcopal Commission on Social Action, Justice and Peace, which questioned whether the funds functioned as incentives for communities to support the government’s anti-insurgency campaign.

Torres said the barangay program is carried out by line agencies, including the Department of Public Works and Highways, the Department of Social Welfare and Development, the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Health, and the Department of Education, among others.

He said the program was not a payoff but was intended to address long-standing shortages in basic services in geographically isolated and disadvantaged areas, including roads, schools, health facilities, water systems, and electrification.

“The BDP is not a prize handed out after compliance. It is a corrective intervention — belated state action to address historical exclusion and governance failure,” Torres said.

He added that projects are identified by barangays, endorsed by local development councils, and implemented by local governments and national agencies.

The P8.08 billion allocation, Torres said, is not a discretionary fund or political reward but part of broader government programs aimed at delivering basic services to long-neglected barangays.

Torres also addressed human rights concerns linked to counterinsurgency operations, saying violations were not government policy and should be investigated through existing accountability mechanisms.

He said rights discussions should also include abuses attributed to the communist movement led by the Communist Party of the Philippines–New People’s Army–National Democratic Front, including intimidation and killings of civilians.

He warned that framing development programs in former conflict areas as inherently coercive risks undermining efforts to reduce poverty and underdevelopment, which the government says fuel armed rebellion.

The NTF-Elcac said it remains open to dialogue with church groups and other critics, urging discussions grounded in the roles of implementing agencies and the experiences of beneficiary communities.

The problem with this answer is that it is only after areas are declared insurgency-free that these funds are opened up. 

The Barangay Development Program is a hallmark program of the NTF-ELCAC with the end goal of bringing development to former conflict-prone communities, or those cleared from the influence of the Communist Party of the Philippines-New People's Army.

Under the program, each insurgency-cleared village is expected to receive funds for the construction of farm-to-market roads, classrooms, water and sanitation systems, health stations, and the implementation of livelihood projects.

https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1186420

The BDP is indeed a sort of rewards program.Development should not be a counterinsurgency program. Development should have been ongoing but it has not. That is why the Philippines is largely a backwards nation with some areas lacking roads, electricity, and running water.  

The muslim insurgency is down to 50 members according to the AFP.

https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1265377

Members of local terrorist groups (LTGs) in the country have dropped to just about 50 compared to 1,257 nine years ago, the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) said Wednesday.

In a press briefing in Camp Aguinaldo, AFP spokesperson Col. Francel Margareth Padilla attributed the decline to "sustained security operations, peacebuilding efforts, and strong community engagement."

The AFP official also said 28 "high value individuals" (HVIs), including 10 "amirs" or LTG group leaders, were neutralized through armed encounters and security operations from 2016 to 2025, resulting in a significant improvement in the country's domestic security, particularly in Mindanao, where the LTGs are mostly based.

"Focused government operations have resulted in the neutralization, arrest, or surrender of key terrorist leaders, creating a leadership vacuum within the remaining LTGs," Padilla said.

"The loss of senior figures has weakened command structures and reduced the ability of these groups to plan, direct, and sustain operations."

LTGs refer to the Abu Sayyaf Group, Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Fighters, Dawlah Islamiya, and Maute Terrorist Group.

Padilla said available indicators show a steady decline in LTG manpower, firearms, territorial influence, and violent incidents since 2016.

"Remaining groups are fragmented and largely defensive, with diminished operational reach and limited ability to regroup," she said.

Padilla also said there have been no recorded terrorist training activities, recruitment efforts, or large-scale attacks by domestic LTGs since 2016.

"This underscores the erosion of their operational capacity and the effectiveness of sustained security monitoring," she said.

Aside from focused government operations, programs for preventing and countering violent extremism continue to encourage peaceful surrender, reintegration, and community participation among LTG members, the AFP spokesperson said. The programs include localized peace initiatives, livelihood support, and cooperation with local leaders.

"Basilan is now free of ASG presence, while Jolo, Sulu, and other areas are experiencing renewed economic activity and tourism, reflecting increased public confidence and normalized daily life," Padilla said, highlighting the marked improvement in the security situation in the Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao.

She also said terrorism threat levels in several areas of Western and Central Mindanao have shifted from high to low.

"While global extremist networks continue to exploit cyberspace, there is no indication of imminent domestic terrorist threats at this time. Government forces remain vigilant and committed to sustaining peace, security, and development nationwide," Padilla said.

At the global level, Padilla said the AFP remains engaged in information-sharing and regular coordination with government and international partners to support early awareness and timely responses.

It's funny how this is supposed to mean there is no terrorism threat in Mindanao when the MILF, a terrorist organization, has been given control of the BARMM. It's literally a terrorist state within the Philippines!

Monday, December 22, 2025

No More Hell Run By Filipinos 17: Keeping The City An Absolute Mess

Have you ever gotten into a panic because people are coming over and your house is a mess? So, you run around cleaning up all you can before anyone can set foot inside your home and judge you negatively. That's an apt description of the Philippines. It looks like trash for most of the year but then a festival happens and the government gets to work cleaning up the city so visitors don't judge them harshly. 

Case in point, the Metro Manila Film Festival Float Parade on Dec. 19.


https://mb.com.ph/2025/12/15/pasay-lgu-conducts-wire-clearing-ahead-of-mmff-float-parade

The Pasay City government has started a wire-clearing operation, including the bundling of internet and cable lines, as part of preparations for the upcoming Metro Manila Film Festival Float Parade on Dec. 19.

Pasay City Mayor Emi Calixto-Rubiano said the wire-clearing activities were conducted from Dec. 13 to 16 along Sen. Gil Puyat Avenue, in coordination with utility providers, to ensure public safety and the smooth passage of MMFF parade floats which are expected to be taller and wider than regular vehicles.

Rubiano said utility providers removed and organized low-hanging and tangled overhead cables along the parade route to prevent possible obstructions.

She added that the wire-clearing operation serves as a preventive safety measure to avoid potential accidents involving parade floats, performers, and spectators. The activity also helps improve road visibility and maintain order during the event.

The city government advised motorists and residents to expect temporary traffic disruptions while clearing activities are ongoing and urged the public to cooperate with authorities and utility crews.

The MMFF Float Parade, also known as the Parade of Stars, is one of the highlights of the annual film festival and draws thousands of spectators to Pasay City and neighboring areas during the holiday season.

Pasay City Mayor Emi Calixto-Rubiano is concerned that low-hanging wires will cause accidents so they are being cleared "as a preventive safety measure." Why not do that year round? Why not enforce any laws that might be not the books and fine the utility companies for causing a mess of tangles wires? 

Every city in the Philippines is like this. Low-hanging wires, jumbled wires, and frayed wires are a fixture throughout the nation. Once in a while there will be stories in the news, like this one, about the city removing them. Big deal! This should be a regular occurrence. And then once the wires are removed they should never be allowed to be a tangled mess again. 

It's indicative that the city does not care about safety as much as they care about the perception of looking good to visitors. That is just one more reason to declare No More Hell Run By Filipinos!

Sunday, December 21, 2025

The God Culture: The Lequios Islands in Blair and Robertson's Philippine Islands 1493-1803 v. 32

While Timothy Jay Schwab who is The God Culture is on a mission to prove the Lequios Islands are the Philippines by distorting irrelevant 16th and 17th century maps as well as perverting the writings of European explorers, I propose a different course. That course is to use the words of the Spanish colonizers of the Philippines who differentiated between the Lequios Islands and the Philippines. 

In volume 32 of Blair and Robertson's Philippine Islands there are several mentions of the Lequios Islands. One mention says directly that the Lequios Islands are subject to the Japanese. Several mentions are stories of priests clandestinely making their way to Japan via the Lequios Islands. 

They could not have done that if the Lequios Islands were the Philippines. These firsthand narratives confirm Pinto’s claim that Japan could be seen from the Lequios. Tim’s attempt to collapse the distinct regions of the Lequios Islands and Luzon into one is not only historically unfounded, it is geographically incoherent. He ignores the testimony of those who sailed these seas and the geopolitical realities of the time in favor of a revisionist fantasy built on speculation, not evidence.

I know Tim will dismiss all these eyewitness testimonies by responding:

Over time, colonial mapping and Manila’s administrative dominance buried this duality under a singular label: "Luzon." But the smoking quill still writes in the margins of old maps and forgotten chronicles. 

https://thegodculturephilippines.com/the-bifurcated-island-of-luzon-lequios-and-lucoes-rediscovered/

However, there is no documentary evidence for such a cartographic or administrative conspiracy. Tim may also allege that the original Spanish is ambiguous or that the English translations are unreliable. Yet there is no linguistic or historical analysis to support this, and such speculation would indicate a refusal to engage seriously with the texts themselves.

Here are all the references to the Lequios Islands from volume 32. All of these citations are from a document dated to 1640 which begins in volume 30. 

There are near the province of Nueva Segovia certain islands, called Babuianes, following each other in a line toward the northeast until they approach near those which are called Lequios, which are near Japon. These latter are innumerable, and some of them are very large and very fertile. Their inhabitants are of excellent natural dispositions, so that, being heathen, they cause wonder in all of those who go there

pg. 91

A note on this section says the following.

The Babuyan and Batan Islands, groups lying north of Luzon, extend northward to near the southern end of Formosa. From near the northern end of that island, the Riu-Kiu Island stretches in a long northeastward curve to the vicinity of Kiushiu Island, in southern Japan. 

 

They followed the course by the Babuyanes and the islands of the Lequiosfrom which they were driven by a storm to the coast of China, where they took on water and wood at a point named Sombor.

pg. 139

Father Fray Juan de Rueda was a native of the mountains of Burgos, and had assumed the habit in San Pablo at Valladolid, whence he came to the Philippinas in the year 1603, being sent, as soon as he arrived, to the kingdom of Japon. Here he assumed the name of Fray Juan de los Angeles. When the priests were banished, father Fray Juan was one of those who remained in hiding to aid and fortify the Christians there. In 1619 he came to Manila in order to obtain more religious. He reaped a great harvest in Arima. He was devoted to the holy rosary. He translated into Japanese the devotion of the holy rosary while he was in Manila. His anxiety to return was such that he strove to make his way back by the islands of the Lequios, where his arguments in favor of Christianity convinced those who heard them that he was a Spanish priest. He was therefore imprisoned for a time in an island called Avaguni, where he profaned a thicket which was dedicated to an idol, and for this suffered death, but on what day was never known.

pg. 146

The emperor of Japon in 1615, after his victory over Fideyori, sent an expedition against the island. It left Nangasaque in 1616 and wintered in the Lequios Islands.

pg. 155

Among the fathers in Japon at this time was a native Japanese, who had completed his course in arts and theology in the college of Sancto Thomas at Manila. He profited well by his studies, and had been given the habit, had professed, and had passed through all the orders. He had been taken by father Fray Bartholome Martinez, during his term as provincial, to the island of Hermosa-not to remain, but to make his way from there to Japan, if possible, by the islands of the Lequios. He was dressed after the Japanese fashion, with two swords, and succeeded in making his entry into Japon, from which he wrote a letter to the provincial, dated January 3, 1630. In this he says that he reached his country on the eve of St. Martin; but that he has been unable to get into communication with his superior, who was at that time father Fray Domingo de Erquicia. He later writes that it is dangerous to send letters, because of the severe punishment of those who are caught with letters of the fathers upon them. If it had not been for the return of this father in this way, no information would have been received with regard to the fate of Father Juan de Rueda in the islands of the Lequios.

pg. 181

Father Fray Jacobo de Sancta Maria, a Japanese by nation, who had assumed the habit in our convent of Manila, August 15, 1624, was martyred in this year. He had returned to Japon in 1632. He went by way of the islands of the Lequios; and the champan in which he traveled with some Japanese fathers of the Society encountered storms, and was cast upon the shores of Coria.

pg. 218-219

There was great difficulty in sending religious to Japon; but father Fray Thomas went, disguised in Japanese dress, to the island of the Lequios, which is subject to the Japanese. Here by the death of his companion he was left alone, with ornaments and money, and with the direction to go to Japon at the first opportunity and to present himself to his superior, at that time the holy martyr Fray Domingo de Erquicia. In the letter which father Fray Thomas wrote back, he briefly mentions being in the island of the Lequios, making no allusion to the great sufferings which he must have passed through on this journey

pg. 241

There was great difficulty in sending these four religious to Japon, which was finally overcome by the determination of the religious. In the year 1634, some Spaniards had been cast on shore  on the islands of the Lequios, which are subject to Japon. They were examined to see if they were religious or no; but, as it did not appear that they were, they were set free. Many Japanese came to them by night, asking them if they were priests to hear their confessions; and, being assured that they were not, they begged for priests to come to them. Father Fray Vincente de la Cruz and a Christian Japanese offered to take the religious whom the province might send and to make their way from the Lequios Islands to Japon. The governor, learning that the expedition was about to be equipped, burned the vessel which had been prepared, and set sentinels at the mouth of the bay to prevent the religious from setting out. By God's aid they succeeded in eluding him, and after meeting with storms made their way to the islands of the Lequios, where they landed July 11, 1636. No certain reports have been received as to what occurred in the islands; but the fathers seem to have been arrested as soon as they revealed themselves, and to have been sent as prisoners to Japon.

pg. 286

Saturday, December 20, 2025

The God Culture: What The Bible Says About Tim's Remarriage

Timothy Jay Schwab who is The God Culture does not believe in salvation by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone, to the glory of God alone. Instead he believes that for a man to abide in Christ he must be doing something which is keeping the law. Specifically he is to keep the sabbath and the feasts. A man is not secure in his salvation because he can lose it at any moment if he is not keeping the law. In effect Tim is not a Christian in any sense of the word nor does he believe Jesus Christ actually saves. 

It is this legalistic doctrine which led me to remark that Tim, being married to a twice divorced woman, is in a constant state of adultery and is thus a hypocrite. Jesus condemns marriage to a divorced woman as adultery. Tim did not take too kindly to that truth and he has written a whole article to justify the unjustifiable. Let's take a look at his arguments. 

https://thegodculturephilippines.com/what-does-the-bible-really-say-about-divorce/

The topic of divorce has been debated throughout the centuries. While many sincere believers have wrestled with its implications, Scripture is not silent, and it is certainly not open to endless interpretation. When Moses wrote the Law concerning marriage and divorce, he did not preach flexible theology or moral relativism. He gave clear parameters — ones affirmed directly by Yahusha Himself. 

In recent days, an anonymous blogger has weaponized these passages — not for theological clarity, but as ammunition for personal attacks. This must be addressed. Not because we are concerned with his opinions, but because truth matters — and so does protecting the integrity of Scripture from those who twist it to justify their own sin.

As can be seen this article is a response to me. And no I have not weaponized the words of Christ. I have only used them to expose Tim and his false soteriology. Soteriology is the primary issue here. 

1. Yahusha Affirms Moses’ Law (Matthew 5, Matthew 19, Luke 16) 

Each time Yahusha addresses divorce, He begins with what the Pharisees or people had said, then corrects their twisted version of the Law. 

  • Matthew 5:31-32
    “It hath been said, Whosoever shall put away his wife, let him give her a writing of divorcement: But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication...”
    → Yahusha affirms Deuteronomy 24 by allowing divorce in the case of adultery.

  • Matthew 19:9
    “And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery…”
    → Again, the exception clause is clear. Divorce and remarriage are not adultery when caused by the other’s fornication.

  • Luke 16:18
    Taken alone, this verse seems hard—until we read verse 17 first:
    “It is easier for heaven and earth to pass, than one tittle of the law to fail.”
    → Yahusha reaffirms the Law of Moses, not abolishing it. 

So what does the Law of Moses say about divorce? Oops! That origin of Messiah's words is negligently omitted from the questionable attack blog. Another example of malicious intent in willful defamation. Yahusha brings us Moses and the Blogger ignore the Son of Yahuah and calls himself the judge... Hmmmm...

This section is completely irrelevant. The issue is not divorce, which Jesus said was justified in the matter of fornication (adultery), but the issue of marrying a divorced woman. If Tim's wife committed adultery he is free to divorce her and remarry as long as the woman is not a divorcee. 

It is interesting that Tim does not cite Luke 16:18. He only mentions it and then says verse 17 affirms the Mosaic Law. Here is the passage in context:

Luke 16:14 And the Pharisees also, who were covetous, heard all these things: and they derided him.

15 And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God.

16 The law and the prophets were until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it.

17 And it is easier for heaven and earth to pass, than one tittle of the law to fail.

18 Whosoever putteth away his wife, and marrieth another, committeth adultery: and whosoever marrieth her that is put away from her husband committeth adultery.

Note that Jesus says the law and prophets were until John. That means the law and the prophets have reached their proper end. John was born to prepare the way of the Lord, to proclaim the arrival of Jesus Christ. The law stands as a schoolmaster to lead us to Christ and not as a way of life for us to follow. 

Galatians 3:24 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.

25 But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.

Tim rejects this doctrine and teaches the exact opposite. 

19:30 So this is another example that we aren't to just have faith in Yahusha. That’s not enough. That’s not it.  No, no, no, no. We are to keep His commandments.
Sabbath Series: Part 5: The End Times Sabbath
40:11 The law is what redeems us.

He rejects justification by faith in Jesus Christ and says the law is what redeems us. 

2. The Law of Moses on Divorce and Remarriage (Deuteronomy 24:1–4) 

“When a man hath taken a wife... and it come to pass that she find no favour in his eyes, because he hath found some uncleanness in her: then let him write her a bill of divorcement... and when she is departed... she may go and be another man's wife.” 

Moses, under the inspiration of Yahuah, made clear that a woman may remarry after a lawful divorce due to “uncleanness” (i.e., adultery). Yahusha never nullified this law—He reaffirmed its moral integrity and corrected the abuse by the Pharisees, who were divorcing women for “every cause” (Matthew 19:3).

The argument here is that the Mosaic Law allows divorce and remarriage and even allows the divorced woman to remarry. Tim claims Jesus reaffirmed Deuteronomy 24. He quotes it in a choppy manner with plenty of ellipses to hide what the law actually says. Here it is in full:

Deuteronomy 24:1 When a man hath taken a wife, and married her, and it come to pass that she find no favour in his eyes, because he hath found some uncleanness in her: then let him write her a bill of divorcement, and give it in her hand, and send her out of his house.

2 And when she is departed out of his house, she may go and be another man's wife.

3 And if the latter husband hate her, and write her a bill of divorcement, and giveth it in her hand, and sendeth her out of his house; or if the latter husband die, which took her to be his wife;

4 Her former husband, which sent her away, may not take her again to be his wife, after that she is defiled; for that is abomination before the LORD: and thou shalt not cause the land to sin, which the LORD thy God giveth thee for an inheritance.

Moses allows divorce for any reason, not adultery. In fact, adultery is actually punishable by DEATH, not divorce.

Deuteronomy 22:22 If a man be found lying with a woman married to an husband, then they shall both of them die, both the man that lay with the woman, and the woman: so shalt thou put away evil from Israel.

So, uncleanness cannot mean adultery. 

If the husband grows to hate his wife he can give her a bill of divorcement and send her on her way. True, she can become another man's wife. However, she cannot become a priest's wife. 

Leviticus 21:7 They shall not take a wife that is a whore, or profane; neither shall they take a woman put away from her husband: for he is holy unto his God.

In this verse a whore is equated with a divorcee. Both profane the priest. Tim, as a minister, should take heed to this verse. 

Tim claims Jesus "never nullified this law." That is not true. Jesus overturns the Mosaic Law in Matthew 19 saying the law of divorce for any cause was given because of the hardness of their hearts. 

Matthew 19:3 The Pharisees also came unto him, tempting him, and saying unto him, Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause?

4 And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female,

5 And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?

6 Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.

7 They say unto him, Why did Moses then command to give a writing of divorcement, and to put her away?

8 He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so.

9 And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery.

There it is as plain as day. Jesus overturns Moses saying divorce is only permissible in the case of adultery and forbidding marrying a divorced woman because it is adultery. He does not qualify the status of the divorced woman as having been wronged by an adulterous husband. He does not say "whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery except she was put away because her husband committed adultery." It is a total ban. Jesus does not cite Deuteronomy 24 but refers to the creation ordinance in Genesis 2 for this doctrine! This proves the law is not the final moral authority.

Marriage is not merely a legal recognition of the union of a man and woman but an unbreakable, spiritual covenant bond which reflects the union of Christ and His Church.

Ephesians 5:22 Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.

23 For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body.

24 Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing.

25 Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it;

26 That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word,

27 That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish.

28 So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself.

29 For no man ever yet hated his own flesh; but nourisheth and cherisheth it, even as the Lord the church:

30 For we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones.

31 For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh.

32 This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church.

33 Nevertheless let every one of you in particular so love his wife even as himself; and the wife see that she reverence her husband.

This being the case how much more should spouses forgive one another even in the face of adultery? We sin against Jesus Christ every day and yet he does not and never will divorce his Church. He forgives and loves her. Do note that Jesus permits divorce in the case of adultery and does not command it. Forgiveness is also a remedy for broken marriages.

The bond of marriage is only dissolved by death. 

Romans 7:1 Know ye not, brethren, (for I speak to them that know the law,) how that the law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth?

2 For the woman which hath an husband is bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth; but if the husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of her husband.

3 So then if, while her husband liveth, she be married to another man, she shall be called an adulteress: but if her husband be dead, she is free from that law; so that she is no adulteress, though she be married to another man.

4 Wherefore, my brethren, ye also are become dead to the law by the body of Christ; that ye should be married to another, even to him who is raised from the dead, that we should bring forth fruit unto God.

The depth of those verses is beyond this article but they show that Christians have ONE spiritual husband: Jesus Christ. As a woman is bound to her husband so long as he lives and is freed by his death, so we are dead to the law through Christ and married to Him. We are not divorced from the law, we are DEAD to the law and married to Jesus Christ. 

The indissoluble nature of the marriage bond is why Jesus Christ declares marrying a divorced woman is adultery regardless of the cause of her divorce.  

📜 What the Bible Actually Teaches About Divorce and Remarriage

The topic of divorce has often been mishandled—not just by critics, but sometimes even by churches, theologians, and bloggers who cherry-pick verses without understanding their Torah context or Messiah's intent. 

Let’s walk through this properly and Biblically: 

📖 1. The Law of Moses – Divorce Is Not Ideal, but Permitted for Infidelity

Deuteronomy 24:1-2 (KJV)
"When a man hath taken a wife, and married her, and it come to pass that she find no favour in his eyes, because he hath found some uncleannessin her: then let him write her a bill of divorcement, and give it in her hand, and send her out of his house.
And when she is departed out of his house, she may go and be another man's wife."

✅ Moses permits remarriage after a legal divorce, especially in the case of "uncleanness" (which Hebrew scholars widely agree refers to sexual sin such as adultery or fornication).

Wrong. Moses allows divorce for ANY CAUSE, not just adultery. If this law is still in force today then a man can divorce his wife because he has grown to hate her and not only because she committed adultery. We saw above Jesus tells the Pharisees that Moses gave this law due to the hardness of their hearts. 

📖 2. Yahusha’s Words – Affirming Moses, Not Overriding

Matthew 5:32 (KJV)
"But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery." 
Matthew 19:9 (KJV)
"And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery..." 

✴️ Yahusha explicitly affirms that adultery or fornication is a legitimate cause for divorce.
He is not introducing a new law, but reinforcing the intent of Moses’ Torah—clarifying it against Pharisaic abuse and misuse of divorce for “any reason” (Matthew 19:3).

Wrong! While Jesus Christ allows divorce in the case of adultery he does not affirm the law of Moses. He overrides it, says the law was given because of the hardness of their hearts, and limits adultery as the only reason for divorce. There is no "clarifying it against Pharisaic abuse and misuse of divorce for “any reason”" because the law itself allows divorce for any reason. 

Deuteronomy 24:3 And if the latter husband hate her, and write her a bill of divorcement, and giveth it in her hand, and sendeth her out of his house

Moses said you can divorce your wife if you hate her for being fat, lazy, and unable to cook or clean. Jesus forbids this part of the law by referring to creation.

If Jesus really did reaffirm the Mosaic law concerning marriage and divorce then then polygamy remains regulated. 

Exodus 21:10 If he take him another wife; her food, her raiment, and her duty of marriage, shall he not diminish.

But Jesus never affirms this. Likewise, Tim never brings up this part of the law. He is focused on sabbath and feast keeping and ignores most of the other laws such as the necessity of washing after relations with one's wife and the prohibition on shaving. 

Leviticus 15:18 The woman also with whom man shall lie with seed of copulation, they shall both bathe themselves in water, and be unclean until the even.

Leviticus 19:27 Ye shall not round the corners of your heads, neither shalt thou mar the corners of thy beard.

Therefore Tim's legalism is false because it is selective. He does not follow the law. That is why we need the grace of Jesus Christ and why righteousness comes from Him alone. 

📖 3. Messiah Defends the Integrity of the Torah 

Luke 16:17-18 (KJV)
"And it is easier for heaven and earth to pass, than one tittle of the law to fail.
Whosoever putteth away his wife, and marrieth another, committeth adultery..."

Here again, context matters. Yahusha just said that not even one letter of Torah will pass away. He is not abolishing Moses’ law—He is calling people back to its righteous use, not its perversion. Think about. That was the very message John the Baptist was called to preach, a return to the law as lawlessness is the definition of sin (1 John 3:4). A church teaching there is no law is teaching lawlessness. John the Beloved said that is the definition of sin.   

Yes, context matters. Here it is again:

Luke 16:16 The law and the prophets were until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it.

17 And it is easier for heaven and earth to pass, than one tittle of the law to fail.

The law and the prophets were until John. John came to proclaim the Messiah, not to return people to the law. He came to prepare the way of the Lord!

Matthew 3:1 In those days came John the Baptist, preaching in the wilderness of Judaea,

2 And saying, Repent ye: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.

3 For this is he that was spoken of by the prophet Esaias, saying, The voice of one crying in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make his paths straight.

That is basic Bible teaching and Tim, a Bible teacher for 30 years, messes it all up saying John the Baptist was sent, not to prepare the way of the Lord but to return people to keeping the law correctly. And he dares to claim he is not legalistic!

⚖️ Legalism as a Weapon

...the difference between a teacher and a bully. 
The God Culture is not legalistic, but accused as such by an extreme legalist by his own behavior. Hypocrisy! A continued double standard by an imposter whose only interest is to defame and defile. 

Wrong! Tim's teaching is legalistic through and through. It's been documented in his own words in many articles and it is documented in this article once again. I am only judging Tim by his own standards in order to show the weakness of his graceless soteriology. Tim is contradicted by his own theological commitments.

Finally, Tim offers a justification for his and Anna's "marriage."

🛡️ The Truth About Tim and Anna – A Biblically Grounded Union 

Let us now address the reckless accusation made by the anonymous blogger, who publicly labeled Tim and Anna adulterers without knowing the facts—and worse, without any regard for the biblical standards of judgmenttruth, or love. 

✅ Tim and Anna’s Marriage Is Biblically Valid 

  • Anna was divorced due to infidelity—a matter well-documented and confirmed by experts in Biblical unions. This blogger is not. 

  • Tim did not break up any marriage, nor did Anna. 

  • Their marriage came after a lawful, biblically justified divorce under the condition Yahusha and Moses both affirmed—fornication/adultery. 

  • Thus, they were free to marry in the eyes of Torah and Messiah. And it is a good thing they did. 

📖 Deuteronomy 24:2 – “...she may go and be another man’s wife.”
📖 Matthew 19:9 – “...except it be for fornication...”
📖 Luke 16:17 – “...not one tittle of the law shall fail.” 

If these verses hold true—and they do—then Tim and Anna’s marriage is righteous, and anyone declaring otherwise is bearing false witness and violating Torah themselves.

Instead of justifying why it is ok to trample on the words of Jesus Christ who forbade marriage to a divorced woman as adultery Tim justifies his and Anna's divorces. But that's not the subject. The subject is: is it allowable for a man to marry a divorced woman? Jesus answers resoundingly NO, and calls it adultery. It is also ridiculous for Tim to appeal to Church authorities having "vetted" his second marriage to a twice divorced woman and approving it when he rejects everything the Church teaches. If they are wrong about the Trinity and the nature of salvation, as Tim believes, then he ought not to trust their judgement about his marriage. 

Certainly divorce and remarriage is a very painful topic for many thanks especially to the no-fault divorce laws in the USA and around the world. Millions of people are currently living in adultery because they married divorced women. It is a tragedy. That does not change the fact that those marriages, including Tim's, constitute adultery. Once again, let me reiterate that Tim's adulterous marriage would never have been brought up if he did not teach righteousness comes not from Jesus Christ but from the law and the law is what redeems us. 

16:44 Abraham kept the law and the sabbath. And so did Isaac and Jacob.  I mean how can they be called righteous if there was no law by which they could be judged as righteous? The very notion is ridiculous from the start.

Sabbath Series: Introduction Commentary Only

Soteriology is the primary doctrine undergirding this issue. As a man who lives day-to-day in adultery Tim is in no place to speak of righteousness via the law. One who teaches that righteousness comes through the law cannot dismiss Christ’s explicit prohibition on remarriage without collapsing his entire legalistic system. What he needs is the grace of God. It is too bad that Timothy Jay Schwab who is the God Culture exhibits every trait of a vessel of wrath fitted to destruction.