The God Culture: Even More Stuff The God Culture Says

Timothy Schwab of The God Culture hasn't put out a new video in almost two month as of this writing. His last upload was June 23rd. What is he doing? Hopefully he is writing his book during this time of "rest" as he so glibly calls the nationwide economically crippling coronavirus lockdowns. No matter! There are hours and hours of him saying the most silly things which are worth taking a look at.

Did you know Tim wrote a screenplay? It's called Code 88 and it's about.....Hitler!??

https://www.linkedin.com/in/tim-schwab-a44173b5/

Code 88 Screenplay

publication description

LOG LINE:

In pursuit of answers about family health problems, two reporters expose the terrifying dimensions of an emerging dystopia. Risen like a monstrous Phoenix from the ruins of his Berlin bunker, Adolph Hitler and his malevolent shadow organization feed like parasites off global institutions of the cold war era until having finally achieved critical mass, he reveals himself to a doom-struck population on the verge of a new world order.

SNAPSHOT SUMMARY: 

Tucker and Ashley are investigative reporters with high personal stakes in getting to the bottom of a growing epidemic they suspect is being concealed. Why are more children exhibiting signs of a severe autism like condition while certain adults plunge into the semi conscious depths of catatonic depression? Is there a link between the two, what is the cause and why are both conditions so resistant to treatment? Their dangerous search for answers across three continents leads them to the shocking discovery of a powerful shadow organization on the verge of achieving world domination. Like a deadly parasite feeding off a host, CODE 88 has penetrated global institutions while creating a super race of Serum B fueled Hunter / Killers capable of extraordinary physical feats and eager to sacrifice themselves for the cause. But even Tucker and Ashley don’t realize the staggering dimensions of what the world confronts until in the process of exposing this danger Ashley is killed by the Hunter / Killers and Tucker plunges into Serum A induced catatonia. At which point mankind shudders to learn that history’s prince of darkness, Adolph Hitler himself, still paces vengefully upon the earth on the brink of unleashing his final solution.

Apparently he co-auotherd this script with Cliff James, whoever that may be.

While Tim does often name drop the Rothschilds, Jesuits, and other groups he never comes out and says just who is actually running the show. In this synopsis of his screenplay Tim paints Hilter as "history's prince of darkness" and as a man who wants nothing more than to control the world by wrecking vengeance upon it. This is based on a fake history which ironically enough Tim continues to vomit forth even though he tells his audience to test all things and challenge tradition. In Tim's worldview, at least according to this movie script, the organization pulling the strings behind the scenes is the Nazis. The reality is of course much different.

To call Hitler "history's prince of darkness" is to ignore all of human history. One has to forget about Stalin and Mao who killed far more people then Hitler has been accused of killing. They in fact killed THIER OWN people to further their goals. Hitler did not purposely starve millions of Germans like Stalin did to the Ukrainians. Does Tim know what the Holodomor is?

Some would say that Antiochus Epiphanies is also one of history's many princes of darkness, a type of the anti-Christ who slaughtered many people and also desecrated the temple by sacrificing a pig on the altar. Tim would disagree.

Psalm 83 War: The Hasmonean Connection. Lost Tribes 8B 

31:50 There is so much more to this story that we then what we've been told on every level. Even the book of macabees reveals more than we are told about the story. In 2 Maccabees 5:11 when these happenings were reported to the king, that's Antiochus Epiphanes who was in Egypt in war with the Ptolemies at the time, so doing pretty important work. But what does he do well he thought that Judea was in revolt. Why would he think that? Something was happening right? Raging like a wild animal. Well something was definitely happening then right? I mean was he just crazy? No. He set out from Egypt, so he ended his war, and goes and took Jerusalem by storm. He ordered his soldiers to cut down without mercy those whom they met and to slay those who took refuge in their houses. There was a massacre of young and old a killing of women and children. A slaughter of virgins an infants. 

Boy this guy must be incredibly evil or this is manufactured and lined with a whole lot of leaven and that seems far more obvious to us. In the space of three days eighty thousand were lost. Forty thousand meeting a violent death and the same number being sold into slavery. See and they're attempting to paint Antiochus as the evil villain, and perhaps he was we're not saying he was a good guy at all, they forget that they just told us that there was a civil war that broke out in Judea first before his return if the Maccabees revolted in response to Antiochus well this makes no sense.

According to Tim Antiochus Epiphanies was not a good guy but all the bad stuff we know about him is just leaven which is one of the many reasons he rejects Maccabees as scripture. So if all we know about Antiochus is just leaven how can Tim even say he was not a good guy? Tim thinks the history of Antiochus in Maccabees is falsified in a conspiracy to paint him as an evil villain.

Tim talks about conspiracies all the time in his videos. But the conspiracy he believes in does not exist. The overarching conspiracy which informs Tim's fake history and blasphemous theology is that the Israelites left Israel and were replaced by others pretending to be Israelites. The northern tribes became Kurds and Filipinos while the southern tribes magically metamorphosed from Semites into Hamitic Negroes! This is simply not the case. Neither according to biology or scripture.

Filipinos, Kurds, and sub-Saharan Hamitic Negroes are not Israelites whose identity has been usurped by Ashkenazi Jews who are really Edomites in disguise. Just look at these three people groups:

A Kurd, Filipino, and American slave. Do these people look like they are from the same genetic group?

These groups are not ethnically related in any way, shape, or form. Nor will they one day return to the land of Israel. A reading of the Gospels will bear this out because not one single time does Jesus Christ accuse the Levite priests or the Jews of being impostors! Not once! Tim says otherwise.

Psalm 83 War: Synagogue of Satan Exposed. Lost Tribes 8A

45:42 These are Samaritan priests who ultimately worship Ashima, Hasehm, not Yahuah. The Habakuk commentary is dated sometime between 120 BC and 111 AD. What are they responding to in this commentary as they act? Obviously the Hasmonean period as they should. The Hasmonean revolt occurred 165 AD (BC!!!) and the Hasomenas took over 140 AD (BC!!!) this was their era that this was written. So this was responding to them usurping the high priesthood and they did not have a right to do it. There are scholars out there who are literally trying to justify this behavior and it is completely uneducated to even think about heading in such a direction. Hasmoneans have never been proven to be Levites certainly not of Aaronic blood. And since they didn't even live in Judea...come on! They weren't even lost tribes or tribes of Israel.   

Also have you ever wondered why there is never any mention of the Pharisees nor even the Sadducees in all of the Old Testament? I mean they're not even there. So where did they come from? Well this is because both parties came to power around the same time as the Hasmoneans or Maccabees. And the Essene era is basically the same time period. Rather odd that in addition to Hasmoneans you now have these new, I repeat new, factions which end up opposing Messiah short after this. And what do they do? They have complete control of the temple. They even tired to murder Messiah in the temple or in the courtyard. So this is no joke. This is serious. The enemies of Israel inhabited the temple. They took it over and Messiah was very clear who they were. He said much about them and we'll cover that in the next videos as well. 

In the sequel to this video Tim proclaims that the Levites abandoned the temple and fled to the desert.

44:20 The Aaronic Levite bloodline fled into the desert of Judea and lived in a compound where they kept a library. It was called Bethabara in Greek, Betharaba in Hebrew and it is modern Qumran which is a fraudulent name still being applied  even though one can easily from scripture identify exactly what town that  was in scripture. Joshua nails it. It's nailed in the Greek. It's nailed on the Madaba map and other maps 

Psalm 83 War: The Hasmonean Connection. Lost Tribes 8B

Later Tim even goes on so far as to accuse at least some of the Pharisees as being Nephilim!

WAS PAUL THE SON OF PERDITION? Hebrew? Pharisee? Roman? Ravenous Wolf? What Did Paul Say?

24:46 There is no placing Paul in that category or one is saying even Yahushua was fooled because he thought Paul was human and pretty sure he knew the difference and he says Paul was saved and very sure he knows the difference. Now yes he called the Pharisees the seed of Satan he says that. And the group he was talking to may have actually been Nephilim bloodlines perhaps if in fact  he meant it literally and he may have. We don't have an issue with that point necessarily but applying it to Paul we have major issue because it's a lie.

This is part of a long section where Tim is attempting to prove that not only was the Apostle Paul a human being but also an Israelite. Funny how his slide says Benjamites are Jews when the tribe of Benjamin is actually separate from the tribe of Judah and are strictly speaking not Jews. The point of all this is that Tim teaches that Pharisees are not Israelites and some may in fact be Nephilim and thus not human.

All of this stands in stark contradiction to what the Gospels say about the Pharisees and the priests in the temple. Let's start with John the Baptist who Tim claims led the group at Bethabara and maintained the library which we know as the Dead Sea Scrolls. If Tim's interpretation of the Habakkuk commentary were true then Luke 1 is a lie.

5 There was in the days of Herod, the king of Judaea, a certain priest named Zacharias, of the course of Abia: and his wife was of the daughters of Aaron, and her name was Elisabeth. 

6 And they were both righteous before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless. 

7 And they had no child, because that Elisabeth was barren, and they both were now well stricken in years. 

8 And it came to pass, that while he executed the priest's office before God in the order of his course, 

9 According to the custom of the priest's office, his lot was to burn incense when he went into the temple of the Lord.

This passage alone refutes everything Tim has said. He says the Levites left the temple and hid out in the desert sometime around 140 BC. He says the enemies of Israel inhabited the temple in their stead. Yet here we have the father of John the Baptist burning incense in the temple according to the course of Abia which is one of the divisions of the priests made by David in 1 Chronicles 24. We have two choices: either Zachariah was a Levite or he was a usurper. If he was a usurper then John the Baptist is also a usurper pretending to be an Israelite. If he was a Levite then Tim's fake history crumbles into dust. The answer is obvious.

The fact that Elisabeth is said to be a daughter of Aaron also does not help Tim's case. He says the Aaronic Levite bloodline fled into the desert. If that is true then what is Elisabeth doing in Jerusalem? Does Mary her cousin, which means she too has the blood of Aaron in her veins, go all the way out to Bethabara to visit her? No.

Luke 1:39 - And Mary arose in those days, and went into the hill country with haste, into a city of Juda; 

40 And entered into the house of Zacharias, and saluted Elisabeth.

She went to a city and visited Elisabeth at her house. Mary did not make a trip to the caves of Qumran.

When John the Baptist was baptizing he condemned the Pharisees but he never called them impostors. Instead he told them to repent.

Matthew 3:7 - But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come? 

8 Bring forth therefore fruits meet for repentance: 

9 And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.

John recognized and admitted these Pharisees and Sadducees were blood descendants of Abraham and thus Israelites!

Likewise Jesus never condemned the Pharisees or priests as being fake Israelites and usurpers.

Matthew 23:1 Then spake Jesus to the multitude, and to his disciples, 

2 Saying The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat: 

3 All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not.

If the Pharisees were not Israelites how could they possibly be said to "sit in Moses' seat?" Why would Jesus say to observe what the Pharisees bade them to observe if they were strangers and enemies to Israel? Jesus said he was sent to the lost sheep of the house of Israel!

Matthew 15:24 But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.

But we read nothing of Christ sending any disciples across Asia to the Philippines or towards Kurdistan. Instead all the ministry they did was within the vicinity of Palestine. Of course Thomas did reach India and there are churches in India that trace their roots to his ministry. But Christianity never reached the Philippines until the arrival of the Spanish. Until then they worshipped the false god Bathala whom Tim claims is Yahuah, the creator God of Genesis!

https://youtu.be/7pmGkSWsIbo

Perhaps the clearest refutation of Tim's false history and theology is John 1:11.

John 1:11 He came unto his own, and his own received him not.

He came unto his own. Was Jesus a Jew or was he an Edomite, an Ashkenazi? He was a Jew and so were those who he came to including the Pharisees, Sadducees, and the common folk. When standing before the High Priest he never condemned him as being a usurper. Though in John 8 Jesus did in fact call the Pharisees vipers and say they were of their father the devil He also declares that He is a door! Is Jesus literally a door? If we take Tim's exegesis it could be that Jesus Christ is made of wood and has a handle which needs turning.

It is true that John Hyrcanus forced the Edomites to convert to Judaism and the Babylonians did put their people in the land and mixed the religion of Israel with their own. However this does not change the fact that Judah returned and when Christ was on earth he never called them out for being impostors. Nor did he reject worshipping at the temple as he even sent those he healed to the temple to make the proper sacrifices of thanksgiving.

Luke 5:14 - And he charged him to tell no man: but go, and shew thyself to the priest, and offer for thy cleansing, according as Moses commanded, for a testimony unto them. 

Mary even offered up the proper sacrifice for her purification after she gave birth.

Luke 2:24 - And to offer a sacrifice according to that which is said in the law of the Lord, A pair of turtledoves, or two young pigeons.

How could Jesus send a man to the temple to offer up a sacrifice and how could Mary be properly purified according to the law if the priests ministering in the temple were enemies of Israel and of Israel's God? It defies all logic and reason. There are many more examples one could bring up such as when Christ cleansed the temple he never condemned the priests as being impostors and said the real priesthood was sequestered in the desert at Bethabara. Nor did Paul indicate any such thing as he worshipped and participated in a purification ritual at the temple in Acts 21. A proper reading of the scriptures overturns all of Tim's nonsense just as Christ overturned the tables of the moneychangers.

Let's get back to Code 88. Do you know what 88 means? It means Heil Hitler! H is the 8th letter of the alphabet. Put 14 in front of that, which stands for the 14 words, and you get 1488 which means:

"We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children. Heil Hitler."

Without a script there is no way to tell if the 14 words makes it into the final cut. But the synopsis does have hints of the New World Order. In Tim's movie two intrepid investigative journalists, Tucker and Ashley, face the NWO all on their own. But according to Tim's fake history and theology the Filipinos and the Kurds will rise up in the end times to fight the NWO.

Two Witnesses of Revelation Explained. This Will Rock Your World. Ophir, Sheba, Tarshish

The Two Witnesses are coming and they will stand in the strongest of ways and we do believe that will be the first three and a half years of the tribulation when many will rise all over the world against the corruption. But the two lands which will lead this charge will be Kurdistan and Philippines according to the words of Yahusah Himself. And the Two Witnesses will come from there as well.  

In other words other governments around the earth will be preparing for the rise of their Messiah.  They already are.  The Beast or the anti-christ, the anti-Messiah to some, also known as the Mahdi in Islam, Maitreya in the New Age mythos, and the Jewish Messiah to come as well who is not Yahusha who they reject even still, who already came.  

But these two lands, Kurdistan, Philippines, will rise against that final generation and condemn it in Messiah's words. That means they will lead a charge to repentance all over the world. Though two of them, perhaps prophets, maybe even small groups, will go to Jerusalem and prophesy for 1260 days. We believe we are already beginning to see the stage set for this as these two lands especially are lost tribes areas as is Central Africa. 

Filipinos and Kurds won't simply rise up to fight the NWO, oh no!  They will do battle with the anti-Christ himself and they will prevail. To be sure there are unique and interesting aspects to Tim's heresies such as his claim that the stage being set for Filipinos to rise up around the world is the OFW problem/program which sends Pinoys into every country.

https://youtu.be/BJ4poOYWXOM?t=261

The lost ten tribes of the northern kingdom in the Philippines through its overseas workers programs have now spread literally into every nation on earth and from Kurdistan the lost tribes have scattered into 66 countries but they retain their Filipino and Kurdish identities mostly. 

Of course that big brain drain is very detrimental to the Philippines. But it's Bible prophecy so who cares?

If Tim's movie was ever committed to celluloid it might be good. But there is already a rather interesting sci-fi film about Nazis from 1978 which everyone should watch. It's called The Boys From Brazil.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvG_ORNxrO8

You can watch the entire movie at the link below the poster. With Laurence Olivier, Gregory Peck, and James Mason you can't go wrong. Even Steve Guttenberg plays a minor yet important role in this movie. It's a sci-fi film involving the Nazis and cloning. Did Tim take a few plot points from this film or any inspiration whatsoever?

Here's something that is not science fiction. Hitler really did promise to rise from the dead.

‘The Führer has agreed to this,’ Ribbentrop informed Karl-Hermann Frank by letter. For the first time Hitler now admitted to Ribbentrop that the war was lost. He dictated to Ribbentrop four secret negotiation points to put to the British if he got the chance. If the Continent was to survive in a world dominated by Bolshevism, then somehow London and Berlin must bury the hatchet. He instructed Ribbentrop to write secretly to Churchill in this sense. ‘You will see,’ Hitler predicted. ‘My spirit will arise from the grave. One day people will see that I was right.’

Hitler's War, pg, 823

It would take too much time to explain this quote to Tim but suffice to say Bolshevism means communism which Hitler was fighting against. And what happened when the allies won? Half of Europe, including East Germany, was sacrificed to the communists! We are told communism "died" in '89-'91 but Bolshevism still reigns supreme in the West through Cultural Marxism via the unscientific and destructive critical theory of the Frankfurt School which was forced out of Nazi Germany and ended up as part of Columbia University in New York City. 

Perhaps if one really wanted to "challenge tradition" and "prove all things" as Timothy Schwab encourages his listeners to do they would come to the conclusion that Hitler and the Nazis were right. But that is not a topic for this blog.