Saturday, June 10, 2017

Fake Honey

A few years back I bought a bottle of honey at the grocery store.  It was delicious.  It made my coffee taste sweet.  But then I was told that it was probably fake. Just sugar syrup. Not honey. I couldn't believe it but I couldn't shake the idea either so I ended up testing the honey by pouring a spoonful into a glass of water. The water test says if the honey dissolves then its not real honey.  

The honey dissolved and I was very disappointed.

But I really wanted honey so the search began. At one point I even bought a bottle from a guy on the street who had a bucket full of sweet sticky honey. There was even a honeycomb with a bee on it in the bucket.  He filled a bottle, I took it back home, and it turned out to be fake. Eventually I did find real honey from local sellers and direct from bee farms but it's usually expensive and so few and far between. A special treat.

A few months ago I found honey being sold at SM Bacolod at a store called "Sabor Illonggo."  It looked good.  It was fairly inexpensive. It was in a store selling local delicacies. So I bought it.  Great taste.  Just like honey.  And then, a few months later, it happened.

"That's probably not real honey."

What? After all this time I have been buying this stuff and now you tell me? But the bottle says real honey. From the island of Mindanao. And it tastes like honey. How can it be fake? Why would  specialty store selling regional delicacies be selling fake honey?

Today a few bottles of real honey from a bee farm in Dolores, Quezon in Luzon arrived. So it was time to put the honey to the test.


The bottle labeled Camiguin Honey is the honey I buy from the mall. The other bottle is raw honey recently arrived from Luzon.



Two glasses of cold water for the test.



Already it's not looking good for the Camiguin honey.  See how light the colour is and how it slides around the spoon?  The other honey is dark and forms an almost perfect circle while staying in place.




The results of the test:  the Camiguin honey completely dissolves in the water while the honey from Luzon sinks to the bottom of the glass.  The Camiguin honey is not honey. Not pure honey anyway.

The taste is different too. The Camiguin honey is sweet and mild while the Laguna raw honey is sharp and tangy. 

It's hard to believe that Camiguin Honey is fake honey but that appears to be the case.  I do not want to sweeten my coffee with sugar syrup so I won't be buying anymore bottles.

Fake honey seems to be a real problem in the Philippines. You can read all about it here: http://beephilippines.info/honey-fraud/.

Aside from companies manufacturing and selling fake honey it must be wondered how the large supermarkets allow this fake honey to be sold in their stores.  Don't they do any sort of quality control and inspection of the companies they deal with? Aren't they aware of FDA warnings and regulations? CEM is the king of fake honey and yet can be found in stores throughout the Philippines.  Why?

Because nobody cares.  The supermarkets and the suppliers only want the money.  They think their customers are too stupid to realise they are buying fake honey. With enforcement of the law being lax at every level of society it is not too far-fetched to say the FDA doesn't care either. And Filipinos do not complain. You sell a Filipino fake honey and they will try to find a way to make apples out of oranges rather than demand the store give a refund and discontinue selling the fake honey.

If you live in Iloilo or Bacolod do not shop at "Sabor Illonggo."  And definitely do not buy the fake honey they are selling.

Friday, June 9, 2017

Manila is The Worst Place in South East Asia

Manila tops a survey once again!

http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/lifestyle/travel/613535/manila-tops-worst-place-in-south-east-asia-survey/story/
That's got to be a slap in the face. 
Manila is the worst place they’ve ever been to, according to travelers polled by travel guide South East Asia Backpacker. 
Pollution, deficient infrastructure, lack of safety, and being overcrowded are among the many factors that helped us land at number 1 on the list that no country ever wants to top, obviously. 
While Manila got pogi points for its “friendly” and “lovely humans,” it’s hard to argue with 17 votes that included terrible tales of getting robbed by a taxi and getting grabbed while walking down a street. 
Cebu also made the unfortunate list, landing at number 10 with six votes. Travelers described the Queen City of the South as “dirty,” “noisy,” “polluted,” and “all shopping malls and no culture.”

Congratulations Manila!  

This is not the first time Manila or the Philippines has been number one at being the worst.  Did you know Manila has the worst traffic, the Philippines is the global epicentre of on-line child pronography, or that the Philippines tops Asia for the number of teen pregnancies?

To read more about what the Philippines and Manila are number one at follow the link below!

Thursday, June 8, 2017

Is ISIS in the Philippines or Not?

There are conflicting reports of whether or not ISIS is in the Philippines.  Let's take look at the timeline of ISIS in the Philippines.

October 02, 2014
http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2014/10/02/1375654/islamic-state-popularity-growing-philippines


December 21, 2015
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3368646/ISIS-unveil-Philippines-new-breeding-ground-jihadis-latest-propaganda-video-featuring-secret-Filipino-jungle-training-camp.html

January 14, 2016

http://globalnation.inquirer.net/135083/analysts-isis-a-real-threat-to-ph

February 04, 2016

http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2016/02/04/1549519/us-closely-monitoring-isis-threat-philippines-southeast-asia


February 17, 2016

http://www.rappler.com/nation/122649-jihadist-groups-allegiance-isis

April 14, 2016

http://time.com/4293395/isis-zamboanga-mindanao-moro-islamist-terrorist-asia-philippines-abu-sayyaf/

The caption of this photo reads:
Philippine army soldiers stage a counterterrorism operation against Maute terrorists, who are allegedly linked with ISIS, in Butig, the Philippine province of Lanao Del Sur, in Mindanao Island, on March 1, 2016
So the AFP knew that Maute was linked with ISIS back in March 2016 and likely even before that!


April 15, 2016

http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2016/04/15/1573113/there-isis-presence-philippines-experts-disagree

June 22, 2016

http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2016/06/22/1595580/isis-releases-first-propaganda-video-philippines


July 7, 2016
http://www.philstar.com/nation/2016/07/07/1600470/police-says-no-isis-presence-davao-city

Here we have the first official denial of ISIS being in the Philippines despite all the evidence to the contrary as seen in the headlines above.

November 28, 2016

http://globalnation.inquirer.net/150199/duterte-isis-creeping-ph-maute-group


February 27, 2017

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/02/27/philippine-militants-release-video-germans-beheading.html

April 06, 2017

http://globalnation.inquirer.net/154434/2-suspected-isis-members-arrested-ph

May 24, 2017

https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/news/nation/611906/no-isis-presence-in-phl-afp-pnp/story/

Given everything above how can the AFP and PNP make such an asinine and ludicrous statement as "We don't have ISIS in the Philippines?"  These people are either stupid or treacherous.  It is patently obvious to outside and inside observers that ISIS has been a growing threat in the Philippines for some time. Duterte explicitly linked Maute to ISIS in November 2016 based on intelligence reports he had received. DID the AFP not get these reports?

Did the AFP forget that Maute raised the black flag of ISIS in November 2016 when they took over the town of Butig?

http://news.abs-cbn.com/news/11/27/16/army-presses-offensive-in-maute-held-lanao-town

May 25, 2017

http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/news/nation/612140/mindanao-terrorist-groups-forged-unity-under-isis-security-analyst/story

May 29, 2017
http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2017/05/29/1704755/duterte-bestows-isis-status-maute-group

This article is very misleading. Maute group was known to have ISIS links long before Duterte "bestowed ISIS status on Maute group." Duterte said this explicitly in November 2016.


June 05, 2017

http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/902660/1200-is-operatives-in-ph-says-indonesia

http://www.sunstar.com.ph/manila/local-news/2017/06/05/afp-surprised-reported-presence-1200-isis-operatives-philippines-545751

How much more proof does one need?  These people say they are ISIS, they adhere to ISIS ideology, they fly the flag of ISIS, and ISIS has encouraged jihadis to flock to the Philippines. 

The conclusion is that ISIS is indeed in the Philippines and has been in the Philippines for a few years now silently growing in strength while the AFP has ignored them as not being really ISIS but only wannabes.

How can the public believe anything the AFP says regarding the presence of ISIS when they are either lying about or ignoring the threat?

http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/882639/afp-no-reported-presence-of-maute-group-in-metro-manila

Tuesday, June 6, 2017

Keep Calm and Remember Saudi Arabia Also Supports ISIS

Qatar has been accused of supporting Islamic terrorism by its neighbours and now everyone is freaking out because of the resulting backlash.  Especially hit with fear are all the OFWs in Qatar.

http://news.abs-cbn.com/overseas/06/05/17/ph-embassy-pinoys-in-qatar-should-remain-calm
Overseas Filipino workers based in Qatar should remain calm, the Philippine embassy in Doha said Tuesday after 7 countries cut ties and closed their borders with the kingdom. 
Philippine Ambassador to Qatar Alan Timbayan, in an advisory, said Filipinos in Qatar should "exercise prudence as we all closely monitor the situation". 
Doha alone is home to some 220,000 Filipino workers, according to the Qatar Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 
Arab nations including Saudi Arabia and Egypt on Monday cut ties with Qatar, accusing it of supporting extremism, in the biggest diplomatic crisis to hit the region in years.
With the recent visit to Qatar by Duterte and with the major inroads ISIS has made in the Philippines which has led directly to the declaration of martial law in Mindanao this situation intimately involves the Philippines. 

http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/902660/1200-is-operatives-in-ph-says-indonesia

Is Qatar supporting terrorism in the Middle East?  Is Qatar financing terrorism abroad?  The answer to both questions is yes. And they are not alone.

http://www.salon.com/2016/10/11/leaked-hillary-clinton-emails-show-u-s-allies-saudi-arabia-and-qatar-supported-isis/
“We need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and other radical Sunni groups in the region,” the document states. 
This adds to a growing body of evidence that theocratic Gulf monarchies have helped fuel the surge of extremist groups throughout the Middle East.
Another newly released email, from January 2016, includes an excerpt from a private October 2013 speech in which Clinton acknowledged that “the Saudis have exported more extreme ideology than any other place on earth over the course of the last 30 years.” 
In that same speech, Clinton noted that she wanted to pursue “a more robust, covert action trying to vet, identify, train and arm cadres of rebels” in Syria, that would have fought both the government of President Bashar al-Assad and “the Al-Qaeda-related jihadist groups that have, unfortunately, been attracted to Syria.” 
She added however, “That’s been complicated by the fact that the Saudis and others are shipping large amounts of weapons — and pretty indiscriminately — not at all targeted toward the people that we think would be the more moderate, least likely, to cause problems in the future.”

For Saudi Arabia to condemn it's neighbour for supporting terrorism is subterfuge.  It is the same old tactic of accusing your enemy of your crimes. Call it blame shifting or gas lighting or psychological projection, its the same song and a classic technique used by dubious groups looking to get the spotlight off them.

Not only does Saudi Arabia finance ISIS with money and weapons but they also share the same ideology, Wahhabism.


http://www.newstatesman.com/world-affairs/2014/11/wahhabism-isis-how-saudi-arabia-exported-main-source-global-terrorism

James Woolsey, CIA director in 2014 affirmed: ‘Wahhabi extremism today is the soil in which al-Qaeda and its sister terrorist organizations are growing’.  
Wahhabi petro-dollars finance so called “charities” and the madrassa system (Islamic schools) in many Middle and Far Eastern countries (such as Pakistan), contributing significantly to the rise of radicalism in those areas. 
The evidence for Saudi financing of its “hate” ideology around the world, even the support of ISIS, is clear. Currently living in Iraq, researching Islamic militancy, I’ve occasionally been invited by Asayaish (Kurdish Intelligence Agency) to sit in at interviews of captured ISIS fighters. 
Many of these jihadists openly state their warped Wahhabi beliefs; the support they receive from Riyadh, and their hatred of the West.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/what-wahhabism-puritanical-code-islam-10564342
Saudi Arabia also has direct ties to the events of 9/11.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/19/911-report-details-saudi-arabia-funding-of-muslim-/
Saudi Arabia was funding Muslim radicalism in mosques and charities at the time the Sept. 11, 2001, hijackers were gathering in the United States and making contacts with Saudi nationals, according to a declassified intelligence document. 
To jihad watchers, the paper confirms their charges that the Saudi government and its wealthy citizens fund extremist teachings in America. To this day, the kingdom is pressing its harsh Wahhabi Sunni Islam on American Muslims as it seeks to spread Islam around the world, they say. 
In the document, one Saudi who was receiving money from Prince Bandar bin SultanRiyadh’s ambassador to the U.S. at the time, made a startling statement to an FBI informant. The man, who had ties to some of the hijackers, told agents that it would do the U.S. no good to limit entry visas because a sufficient number of Muslims were already in the country to destroy it and create an Islamic state.
The short of it is that Saudi Arabia along with Qatar are both supporters, financially and ideologically, of terrorism through the region and the world.  To anyone who has been paying attention this is not new.  From the beginning the Muslims have been not a religion of peaceful men seeking God but a religion of warriors bent on conquering the world in the name of Allah.

Muslims consider non-Muslims as "kafir."
The Koran says that the Kafir may be deceived, plotted against, hated, enslaved, mocked, tortured and worse. The word is usually translated as “unbeliever” but this translation is wrong. The word “unbeliever” is logically and emotionally neutral, whereas, Kafir is the most abusive, prejudiced and hateful word in any language. 
There are many religious names for Kafirs: polytheists, idolaters, People of the Book (Christians and Jews), Buddhists, atheists, agnostics, and pagans. Kafir covers them all, because no matter what the religious name is, they can all be treated the same. What Mohammed said and did to polytheists can be done to any other category of Kafir.
https://www.politicalislam.com/sharia-law-for-non-muslims-chapter-5-the-kafir/
It's time for Filipinos to pull their heads out of the sand.  Islam is the same now as it was in 630 when under the leadership of Mohammed Mecca was captured and much blood was spilled in the desert sand.  Islam is a religion of war and not peace. They will never be at peace with non-believers.  

The OFWs in the Middle East experience much abuse at the hands of the Muslims because they are non-believers.  They are "kafir."  It is time to stop sending OFWs to the Middle East.

ISIS is in the Philippines and there should be no doubt that they are supported by Saudi Arabia and Qatar and who-knows-else. It is because of the support that Saudi Arabia and Qatar gives to ISIS that I wrote in a previous article that Duterte was on a fool's errand when he visited the Middle East and made huge economic deals with Saudi Arabia and promised Qatar that they can use the Philippine army if they need it.  You can read it here.

Martial Law in Mindanao: It Has to be Brand New

So much has happened during this second week of martial law in Mindanao which Duterte declared all on his own with no recommendation from anyone.

http://cnnphilippines.com/news/2017/05/31/duterte-no-one-recommended-martial-law-declaration.html


Remember that rape joke Duterte made to his troops?  Well Chelsea Clinton didn't like it.


And Duterte didn't care for her criticism.


But it turns out it was all a misunderstanding.  Duterte never made a rape joke. It was just sarcasm.


Is Duterte the most meta-comic or what? He's like a Filipino Mitch Hedberg.  

Martial law became official this week when Congress finally approved the decree.

http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/901512/martial-law-gets-congress-ok

The Supreme Court may also get a say but Duterte and his coalition in the Senate don't care.

http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/902817/senators-shrug-off-sc-case-vs-mindanao-martial-law

And now that its finally arrived don't expect it to be going anywhere anytime soon. 


Even IF the military can contain Maute?  IF??  Does he not have any faith in the fighting prowess of the Armed Forces of the Philippines? 

http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/901067/pnp-chief-confirms-maute-group-has-taken-saf-armored-personnel-carrier

http://www.sunstar.com.ph/manila/local-news/2017/06/02/afp-friendly-fire-killed-10-soldiers-not-11-545286

Well if the AFP can't fight the terrorists successfully maybe they need some help.  Who will they call since the USA has been told in no uncertain terms "yankee go home?"

https://www.yahoo.com/news/duterte-says-philippines-stop-taking-second-hand-u-153947161.html

"I will no longer accept second-hand military equipment," Duterte told soldiers at an army base on the southern island of Mindanao. "I do not want those given by the Americans. During my time, I will not have second-hand ships. It has to be brand new." 
Duterte said he would acquire new and modern weapons systems "even if I have to spend double the money," and would look at buying equipment such as planes, boats, drones and guns from China and Russia, traditional rivals of its closest ally, the United States.
Has to be brand new??  Spend double the money??  Of course he means borrow money from China and Russia to buy arms from China and Russia.  Does he realise that even US Army personnel use outdated equipment and is still a force to be reckoned with?  The Philippines is in the middle of a decades long war on terror with several groups and Duterte will spend double the money on weapons and further plunge the Philippines into debt just to spite the USA?

http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2017/06/05/1706972/us-turns-over-rifles-counterterrorism-equipment-marines
Let's hope he is just being sarcastic.

So he's demanding brand new weapons and the SAF and AFP can't contain the Maute group or even stop the threats posed by Abu Sayyaf or MNLF, MILF, or the NPA. Who will he get to bail him out of this mess?
http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/902628/duterte-accepts-misuari-offer-of-2000-men-to-fight-is

http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/902607/ph-govt-has-accepted-communists-offer-to-fight-maute-group
That's right. MNLF terrorists and communist NPA rebels will be fighting alongside the AFP whom they have been fighting and killing for years.

If the rape joke was intended to boost morale then this turn of events will surely put it through the roof!

Monday, June 5, 2017

Burning the Sugarcane Fields

The final step of the sugarcane harvest is burning the fields.  After the crop is gone a mess of dried and dead stalks is left over.  Burning the harvested fields gets rid of the dried stalks making ploughing and sowing the field anew much easier.  
"Field burning removes all post-harvest trash left on the soil surface," said Windell Jackson, senior agronomist with the American Sugar Cane League. "Leaving the cut sugar cane leaves to compost on the ground prevents the sun from heating up the soil. Leaving mulch in the field keeps the soil damp and promotes fungus and other plant disease growth — diseases that damage and kill the sugar cane root."
http://www.houmatoday.com/news/20121220/sugar-cane-burning-is-necessary 

The burning is controlled.  Unlike homeowners burning trash and leaves, the sugarcane workers do not abandon the fire but guide it properly so that the fire does not spread to other fields.  However they cannot control the smoke which covers the entire countryside choking the life out of anyone who wants to breathe.  


 



Aside from the nasty pollution the burning is usually safe because it is supervised.  But even supervision cannot render this burning completely safe since the fire is licking right up on an electrical tower.


There is nothing safe about this at all.  Even if a fence was placed around the tower the potential for danger would not be gone.  

At least the cell tower is protected by a wall.


But still the potential for something extremely dangerous to occur has not totally disappeared.  That wall is covered in graffiti.  Let's take a close up and read what it says.

"If you think this is bad you should see what our government is up to"

As George Takei would say, "Oh my!"

Saturday, June 3, 2017

Martial Law Was Always Duterte's Plan

It is the working thesis of this blog that President Duterte ran for office with the sole intention of implementing marital law. He declared his intentions for martial law in 2015, 2016, and 2017.  Never did he hide this desire of his to declare marital law as the way to fix the problems plaguing the Philippines.  An article  about this was posted back in March. And can be read here: http://philippinefails.blogspot.com/2017/03/to-martial-law-or-not-to-martial-law.html

It is also our belief that in order to steer the Philippines on a inevitable course towards marital law Duterte did not engage the threat of ISIS in Mindanao and he initiated a phoney peace process with the CPP-NPA , MILF, and MNLF which was doomed from the start. This article will seek to establish this thesis by analysing news articles in a chronological fashion.

2015 

Shortly before Duterte declared his candidacy he had a sit-down interview with Rappler.
http://www.rappler.com/nation/politics/elections/2016/110679-duterte-contradictions-dictatorship
The self-confessed leftist admits he is a dictator. It’s clear he has a vision for the country and that he built it on his lessons learned as Davao’s leader.  
The Philippines under Duterte’s leadership would be a dictatorship because “if you become the president, you do not only change leaders, you have to change the Filipino himself.” 
Kasi ang Filipino ngayon, hindi mo masabihan na obey the law.” Duterte changes his tone (Today, you can't even tell the Filipino to obey the law). “Sabihin mo sa kanya, THIS is the law. Putang ina, pag hindi mo sinunod ang batas, putang ina ka sa akin.” (You ought to tell him: This is the law. You'd be damned if you did not follow the law, you'd be damned.) 
“It’s going to be a dictatorship,” he added. “It’s the police and the military who will be the backbone. If they agree with you – if the right-thinking policemen and military men agree with you – then after 6 years, there will be a new set-up: maybe a federal type, less corruption, and a fresh air for the next generation.” 
“I’m telling the Filipino people, huwag ako. It’s going to be bloody,” he said. “Because I will not sit there as President and just like any other regime, sabihin ko, iyan lang ang kaya ko … pero pag nilagay ninyo ako, do not fuck with me.”
Here Duterte lays out his vision for the Philippines and how he will accomplish this vision.  Bluntly he says it will be a dictatorship and it will be bloody and that it will take 6 years to fully bring to pass "a new set-up." But being the President is not the same as being a dictator. There is still Congress and the Supreme Court in the way. How will he overcome those two obstacles?

2016

Duterte won the election and after he was sworn in one of his first acts was to resume peace talks with the communist rebels.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-philippines-politics-idUSKCN0Y819Y

In a show of good faith he released several NDF prisoners to join the peace talks.

http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/807871/release-of-tiamzon-couple-shows-duterte-sincerity-opapp
Duterete also ordered a ceasefire with the NPA which he was forced to rescind five days later.  But soon an indefinite ceasefire was agreed to by both sides and the NPA even released several hostages.

http://news.abs-cbn.com/focus/02/03/17/timeline-govt-cpp-npa-ceasefire-breakdown

At the same time as the peace talks with the CPP-NPA were about to begin Duterte made an absolutely stunning statement regarding Abu Sayyaf.

http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/795092/duterte-abu-sayyaf-are-not-criminals
He said the Abu Sayyaf—a group known for bombings, extortion and assassination—resorted to violence because “they were driven to desperation.” 
“Failed promises” to the Islamic separatist group caused their desperation, Duterte said. 
The al-Qaida-linked group seeks an independent Islamic state for the Muslims in the Mindanao region. 
Presidential Peace Adviser Jesus Dureza said the Duterte administration is open to a negotiation with the Abu Sayyaf leaders.
What's important to note is that Duterte is extending the olive branch to this terrorist group.  He is making overtures of peace.  But how can there be peace with a group who has aligned itself with ISIS and who's stated goal is to establish "an independent Islamic state for the Muslims in the Mindanao region?"

Duterte was aware that Abu Sayyaf pledged loyalty to ISIS and that ISIS was making deep inroads into Mindanao right?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3368646/ISIS-unveil-Philippines-new-breeding-ground-jihadis-latest-propaganda-video-featuring-secret-Filipino-jungle-training-camp.html

As shocking as Duterte's comments are they only serve to give the impression that he is a man of peace.  His tone changed drastically in just a few short weeks after Abu Sayyaf set off bombs in Davao City.

http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/813248/duterte-warns-abu-sayyaf-i-will-eat-you-alive-literally
At the same time Duterte was pretending to play nice with the CPP-NPA he was also making overtures to the MNLF terrorist organisation by inviting their leader to visit him at Malacañang Palace.
http://news.abs-cbn.com/news/11/03/16/misuari-meets-duterte-in-malacaang
“It is with great happiness that I announce to the nation that Chairman Nur Misuari, our brother, who heads the MNLF, has finally decided to just accept my invitation for him to talk to us,” Duterte said. 
“We would like to ask that we work together with our Moro brothers and create a country that is really just, good. And that would be for the next generations to come,” he said.
Isn't it interesting that Duterte refers to these terrorists as brothers? Not just fellow countrymen but brothers! Duterte is too much of a nationalist for "brotherhood" with terrorists to be a real sentiment.

The same language of brotherhood was used when Duterte meet leaders of MILF and MNLF in July 2016.

http://www.rappler.com/nation/136808-duterte-meets-milf-mnlf-leaders-davao
"Setting aside formalities, there is no substitute for a brother talking to a brother, with the MILF and the MNLF, and of course with President Duterte. That is a brotherhood," Alonto explained.
A few days after this meeting Duterte announced the roadmap for peace with the various rebel and terrorist groups.

http://news.abs-cbn.com/news/07/20/16/duterte-oks-peace-roadmap-with-rebel-groups
To sum up, 2016 was the year Duterte showed the world, the nation, and the terrorists that he is a man of peace.  He met with leaders from the CPP, MILF, and MNLF in an effort to initiate peace talks and bring an end to all the violence plaguing the Philippines.

Duterte ended the year with a Christmas message to everyone.

http://news.abs-cbn.com/video/news/12/17/16/watch-duterte-greets-abu-sayyaf-moros-and-reds-a-merry-christmas
"I'd like to greet everybody, the communists, Abu Sayyaf, lahat sila in behalf sa taong Pilipino, I greet everybody a merry Christmas and a prosperous new year for all," he said during a trip to a military headquarters in Zamboanga City to visit wounded soldiers.

Things were going great and they were only getting better.  Or so it seemed.

What does the CPP want?  What are their goals?
The CPP-NPA seeks to overthrow the Philippine government in favor of a new people’s democratic state led by the working class, and the group also seeks to expel U.S. influence from the Philippines. Its other goals include redistributing land to the landless poor and initiating a cultural revolution. The CPP-NPA primarily models its armed struggle on China’s Maoist movement, focusing especially on the idea of a protracted people’s war and mobilizing the masses in rural areas.
http://web.stanford.edu/group/mappingmilitants/cgi-bin/groups/view/149#n
How about the MILF?
In the 1980s, the MILF formulated a policy of gradually creating an Islamic society in the Moro regions. To accomplish this, the MILF applied Islamic law in the areas under its control and believed that the creation of an independent Moro state would eventually follow. 
Currently, the MILF seeks the ratification of the Basic Law on the Bangsamoro Autonomous Region, also known as the Bangsamoro Basic Law, which is under consideration in the Philippine Congress. This law will establish the new autonomous region of the Bangsamoro and effectively complete the peace negotiations between the MILF and the Philippine government
http://web.stanford.edu/group/mappingmilitants/cgi-bin/groups/view/309
The MNLF?
The Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) is an Islamic separatist organization based in the southern Philippines. It seeks an independent Islamic state or autonomous region for the Filipino Muslim minority, known as the Moro people, who live primarily in the Philippines’ Mindanao region. 
http://web.stanford.edu/group/mappingmilitants/cgi-bin/groups/view/379
Abu Sayyaf?
The ASG aims to establish an Islamic state in the Mindanao region, independent from the rest of the Philippines, for the Filipino minority known as the Moros. 
http://web.stanford.edu/group/mappingmilitants/cgi-bin/groups/view/152
How is there going to be any peace with the CPP whose avowed mission is the overthrow of the government?  The answer is simple.  There is not going to be any peace.  A read through the time line of events regarding the peace talks shows complete chaos.  No lasting agreements are reached. The NPA continues to initiate violent attacks and the peace process is revealed to be the sham which it is.

Likewise how is there going to be peace with the Muslim groups who want an independent Islamic state in Mindanao? There won't be any peace. These groups want to implement the BBL which will establish an autonomous Islamic region in Mindanao. Understandably Congress has not approved this law as it will split the Philippines apart and effectively end Philippine sovereignty in Mindanao and transfer it to the Muslim terrorist groups. Duterte has flip-flopped on this issue, at one time rejecting the BBL in favour of federalism and the peace roadmap and then back to encouraging Congress to pass the BBL.

http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2016/11/07/1641405/duterte-pushes-bangsamoro-basic-law
“If I could get a peace agreement with the communists and hammer out something for the [Moro National Liberation Front, Moro Islamic Liberation Front] and to all the Moro groupings and even to the Abu Sayyaf if I could just extend my hand to them and friendship and just tell them that it is time to just really have a country which is normal and peaceful and for our children to grow in peace then I would have succeeded,” he said Monday.
Peace is not an option with any of these groups who seek to grab a piece of the Philippines for their own. These groups do not want peace, they want the capitulation of the government to all their demands. Duterte knew full well that he neither could nor would ever give into the demands of any of the rebel or terrorist groups. Peace was never an option. It was only a show.

But that does not matter.  What matters above all else is that Duterte was showing the public his willingness to work with the terrorist groups for peace. If anyone was to blame for the peace process breaking down it would be the CPP-NPA, MNLF, and MILF and not Duterte.  The terrorists would get whatever was coming to them for being uncooperative.

2017

In 2016 Duterte made several remarks about martial law saying that marital law would solve the drug problem, martial law was pointless, and generally flip-flopping all over the issue very inconsistently. It is important to note that martial law was always brought up in relation to the drug problem and not the terrorist problem.

On January 14, 2017 he made his first remarks about martial law in the new year.

http://www.rappler.com/nation/158376-duterte-declare-martial-law-want-to
President Rodrigo Duterte said that if the situation in the Philippines becomes "virulent," he will declare martial law if he "wants" to. 
"Kung gusto ko (If I want to), and if it will deteriorate into something really very virulent, I will declare martial law if I want to. Walang makapigil sa akin (No one can stop me)," said Duterte on Saturday, January 14, in Davao City. 
The President was not specific about the potentially "virulent" situation in the country, but before the statement, he was defending his war against drugs.
"If I have to declare martial law, I will declare it, not because of invasion, insurrection, I will declare martial law to preserve my nation, period," he said  
In the 1987 Constitution, a President can only declare martial law "in case of invasion or rebellion, when the public safety requires it." 
In the Saturday speech, Duterte repeated his criticism of these safeguards, asking what would happen if Congress and the SC have differing positions on the martial law declaration. Duterte would then have to take a side. 
"Here is Congress and here is the Supreme Court drawn into a stalemate just to have the safety nets of an abusive despot or dictator. Where will I go then? So if the Supreme Court decides otherwise and here is Congress, what will I do now? There is no more control. The 3 great branches of government, two are against one another so I, as President, will decide," he said in a mix of English and Filipino.  
Duterte said if the drug problem calls for it, he would ignore the Supreme Court.  
"Wala akong pakialam diyan sa (I don't care about the) Supreme Court because of the right to preserve one's life and my nation. My country transcends everything else, even the limitation," he said.
Here we have Duterte, at the beginning of the year, laying out the plan he would eventually execute in May. He will declare martial law "if he wants to" as a means to preserve the nation and not for any necessarily constitutionally valid reasons and he will ignore both the Supreme Court and the Congress.  We will hear this same language again in only five months. 

Are drugs tearing the Philippines apart in such a way that martial law is needed to preserve the nation?  While the war on drugs has been particularly bloody Duterte has never been shy about accepting bloodshed as a natural result of the war on drugs. He has said publicly many times that he would gladly kill millions of drug users and dealers. So what is he talking about when he says "if it will deteriorate into something really very virulent, I will declare martial law if I want to?"

He is talking about the violence of the NPA and the various terrorist groups as well as ISIS which he knew posed a real threat. 

http://globalnation.inquirer.net/150199/duterte-isis-creeping-ph-maute-group
The extremist ISIS has crept into the country, President Duterte disclosed Monday night as he confirmed that the Abu Sayyaf faction of the Maute Group has allied itself with the violent Islamic group. 
“The intelligence community advised me that ISIS has… connected with the group in the Philippines called the Maute. There is a waging war now in Lanao,” the President said in a speech in Malacañang.
As a prelude to the forthcoming martial law and as a direct result of attacks carried out by Abu Sayyaf in Davao, Duterte signed a proclamation of national emergency in September 2016.

http://www.rappler.com/nation/145290-philippines-duterte-signs-state-national-emergency-lawless-violence-proclamation
Through the proclamation, Duterte ordered the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) and the Philippine National Police (PNP) to ensure two things. 
"It commands the AFP and PNP to undertake measures permitted by the Constitution and laws to, number one, suppress all forms of lawless violence in Mindanao and number two, prevent lawless violence from spreading and escalating elsewhere with due regard to fundamental and civil political rights," said Ablan.
Medialdea said the President's basis for declaring the state of lawlessness was the recent acts of terrorism in the country.
With a declaration of a state of national emergency already in place why amp up the rhetoric of martial law? Will marital law help the AFP and PNP in carrying out their goals? The reason is because martial law was always Duterte's goal and he is getting the people used to the idea of it.

As 2017 progressed the peace talks between the government and the CPP-NPA began to break down as the NPA initiated several daring attacks.

http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/878924/4-cops-killed-in-npa-attack

http://news.abs-cbn.com/news/04/11/17/several-killed-as-abu-sayyaf-military-clash-in-bohol

MILF was also growing restless.

http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/news/nation/605120/3-years-after-signing-of-peace-accord-milf-tells-gph-give-us-our-government/story/

This is the set-up which brings us to May 23, 2017. The Maute group, which he knows is allied with ISIS, takes over Marawi City.  Duterte then sees his big chance.  He makes his move and declares martial law.  Why did he do this?  Why did he not simply approve swift and harsh military action and send in more troops? The state of national emergency is still in effect.  What more can the AFP and PNP do under martial law than they are doing already? What is it about this particular event that led to the declaration of martial law?

http://cnnphilippines.com/news/2017/05/31/duterte-no-one-recommended-martial-law-declaration.html
Now it's clear. President Rodrigo Duterte confirms he acted on his own when he decided to declare Martial Law in Mindanao. 
Speaking at the commissioning of the Philippine Navy's brand new Landing Dock vessel BPR Davao del Sur, the President said there was no direct recommendation, but the police and military gave him enough information to convince him  martial law is needed. 
"While they did not say 'go ahead President Duterte,' they gave me sufficient informatjon and I asked them are we already in the critical level. And there was an almost unison and redundant even statement that delikado tayo sa Mindanao [the situation in Mindanao is dire] given the practice of the ISIS in the Middle East, just exploding everything in their hands," he said.
Duterte did it all on his own with no recommendation from the PNP or AFP.  This is exactly what he said he would do in his speech on January 14, 2017.
"if it will deteriorate into something really very virulent, I will declare martial law if I want to."
This declaration of martial law is not about  Marawi City.  It is about Duterte taking control just as he said he would.  It is about a dictatorship which he promised his presidency would be.

And now there is no turning back.

http://news.abs-cbn.com/news/05/31/17/mindanao-needs-martial-law-even-if-military-can-contain-maute-lorenzana
Defense Secretary Delfin N. Lorenzana on Wednesday said martial law in Mindanao is "imperative" even if government troops are capable of containing the Maute terrorist group without the iron-fisted rule. 
"The situation currently being dealt with by State security forces goes beyond Marawi City. President Duterte’s imposition of Martial Law aims to put an end to the long running rebellion in various provinces in the south, as evidenced by the incidents that happened in Zamboanga, Davao, Bohol, Lanao, Basilan, Sulu, Tawi-tawi and Maguindanao," Lorenzana said in a statement.
Lorenzana references several terrorist attacks made by groups to whom Duterte has extended offers of peace as justification for martial law throughout Mindanao. Because he has made offers of peace and because those groups have continued to attack, Duterte now has the moral authority to go after these groups. And not only that but he has also formally declared that the peace talks with the CPP-NPA have broken down.

http://globalnation.inquirer.net/157419/peace-talks-break-communists-order-npa-attack
The two sides had just opened formal talks when chief government negotiator Jesus Dureza objected to the communists’ telling guerrillas to intensify attacks in response to President Rodrigo Duterte’s declaration of martial law in parts of the country. 
“The government panel is now left without any other recourse but to announce… that it will not proceed to participate in the fifth round of peace negotiations,” he said.
In response to Duterte's declaration of martial law the NPA has been ordered to intensify their attacks. What more justification does Duterte need in the eyes of the public to expand martial law to cover the whole nation than to combat the NPA?  Duterte has done everything he could for peace.  

He has even asked the NPA and MNLF to fight ISIS alongside the AFP.

http://news.abs-cbn.com/news/05/28/17/duterte-asks-separatists-maoists-to-join-fight-against-maute-group
Having terrorists join the fight against terrorists is only asking for trouble. But once again this is not meant to be a real offer, it is meant to be a facade of peace and brotherhood in the face of a common enemy.  If the NPA, MNLF, and MILF join the fight and then suddenly turn on the government then all hell will break loose giving Duterte even more public support for extending the timeframe and coverage of martial law.

Whether or not the NPA and MNLF join the fight against ISIS they still remain terrorist groups who must be eradicated.  Their continuing existence and deadly activities justify any extension of martial law as Lorenzana has indicated.

The problems in Mindanao run deep.  Much deeper than Marawi. Yet: 
"Duterte vowed to solve "all the problems that ail Mindanao" during the length of martial law there." 
http://www.philstar.com/news-videos/2017/05/30/1705072/duterte-how-long-martial-law-will-last
All the problems? With such a vague mission statement it is probable martial law will be extended beyond the initial 60 days and even to the entire country.  But this is what Duterte has wanted from day one.  No one should be surprised that he has leapt at the chance to finally impose his vision on the Philippines.
-----------------------------

Let me offer a summary of this rather long article.
  1. Duterte declared his presidency would be a dictatorship.
  2. To bring about this dictatorship he would need to implement martial law.
  3. Duterte initiates phoney peace talks doomed to fail and to prove that he "did all he can" as a  cover for eventually declaring martial law after a serious terror attack.
  4. ISIS captures Marawi City and Duterte uses this event to declare martial law all on his own.
  5. This is just the beginning as Duterte has said he will extend martial law nationwide if he so chooses and the continuing existence of NPA, MNLF, MILF and other terror groups will justify martial law.