Monday, April 27, 2020

The God Culture: Attempted Copyright Takedown

Over several lengthy blog posts I have taken up The God Culture's challenge to test them to see if what they are saying is true.  In each post I have documented that they are in fact not telling the truth.  They have manipulated sources, copy/pasted from other people's research and blogs, discussed at length texts (Dionysius Perigeretes for example) as if they had read them but in fact have not, and that their whole paradigm is false and unfounded with no legitimate historian or historical maps and documents to back them up. I have also peppered each post with screenshots from their videos to illustrate their views.

What has been The God Culture's response? They cry out in pain even as they strike me. That is to say they post comment after whiny comment insisting I have proven nothing and accusing me of libel and breaking the law all the while impugning my motives and character. They accuse me of that which they are guilty which is one of the oldest propaganda tricks in the book.

But that is not all.  Behind the scenes they have been attempting to use the law to bring down my exposés.

https://www.lumendatabase.org/notices/search?utf8=✓&sender_name=The+God+Culture&sender_name-require-all=true&sort_by=

There are actually seven DMCA complaints that The God Culture has filed against this blog.  DMCA means Digital Millennium Copyright Act. They have accused me of using copyrighted material and wish to have it removed.  Here are their complaints in order from top to bottom:
1. "Lost Tribes of Israel in the Philippines" copyrighted slide from our copyrighted YouTube video including our Trademarked logo without authorization. 
2. Trademarked logo is used first by itself and that is ILLEGAL. Then, multiple copyrighted slides. This guy is one big copyright infringement with no regard for the law. He then commits libel, gross negligence, fraud, harassment and bullying to name a few. Disgusting! 
3. "Balangay" copyrighted slide from our YouTube video and several others. All our videos are legally copyrighted and all content as well as our Trademarked logo to which this blogger has no permission to use. Plus he uses our personal images as well as others without our permission. 
4. "Philippine Gold in Ancient Egypt" slide from our copyrighted YouTube videos along with our trademarked logo is being used without our permission. 
5."Isle of Chryse" slide from our copyrighted YouTube video with Trademarked logo used without our permission. 
6. "Who lived in Qumran? Essenes." copyrighted slide from our YouTube video with our trademarked logo without our permission. 
7. "100 Clues the Philippines is Ophir" copyrighted slide from our copyrighted YouTube video including trademarked logo without our permission.
Copyrighted slides?  These people are so stupid that they think using screenshots of their videos infringes on their copyright.  However on every single one of their videos we find the following disclaimer:
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
There it is. By their own admission I am perfectly within my rights to use screenshots of their videos as I criticize and comment on them.  

found out The God Culture has filed these complaints because Google sent an email notifying me that a claim had been made against me.  That is ONE claim out of seven making its way to me. That means even Google knows The God Culture's  DMCA complaints are without merit.
Blogger has been notified, according to the terms of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), that certain content in your blog is alleged to infringe upon the copyrights of others. As a result, we have reset the post(s) to "draft" status. (If we did not do so, we would be subject to a claim of copyright infringement, regardless of its merits. The URL(s) of the allegedly infringing post(s) may be found at the end of this message.) This means your post - and any images, links or other content - is not gone. You may edit the post to remove the offending content and republish, at which point the post in question will be visible to your readers again. 
A bit of background: the DMCA is a United States copyright law that provides guidelines for online service provider liability in case of copyright infringement. If you believe you have the rights to post the content at issue here, you can file a counter-claim. In order to file a counter-claim, please see https://support.google.com/legal/contact/lr_counternotice?product=blogger. 
The notice that we received, with any personally identifying information removed, will be posted online by a service called Lumen at https://www.lumendatabase.org. We do this in accordance with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). You can search for the DMCA notice associated with the removal of your content by going to the Lumen page, and entering in the URL of the blog post that was removed. 
If it is brought to our attention that you have republished the post without removing the content/link in question, then we will delete your post and count it as a violation on your account. Repeated violations to our Terms of Service may result in further remedial action taken against your Blogger account including deleting your blog and/or terminating your account. DMCA notices concerning content on your blog may also result in action taken against any associated AdSense accounts. If you have legal questions about this notification, you should retain your own legal counsel. 
Sincerely, 
The Blogger Team 
Affected URLs:
http://philippinefails.blogspot.com/2020/02/the-god-culture-dishonestly-edited.html
For some reason Google neglected to inform me of what material on the page is alleged to be infringing The God Culture's copyright. I am not going to wager a guess either.

I of course filed a counter-claim and Google responded thusly:
As described in 17 U.S.C. 512(g), we will forward the counter notification to the complainant. If we do not receive notice from the complainant that they have brought an action in the district court within 14 days, we will reinstate the material in question on Blogger. We appreciate your patience in this process. 
Regards,

The Google Team
Is The God Culture really going to file a suit in US District Court? Over screenshots which even they admit are perfectly fine and legal? No they aren't.

These people are amazing. Instead of going head to head in the blogosphere or the vlogosphere they have decided to use the law to shut me up. That is very dirty. It is also very Filipino. Recall Gaspar de San Augustin writing in 1720 about the character of Filipinos.
50. They are revengeful to an excessive degree—so much so that they are vile and cowardly; and the ministers have great trouble in reconciling them with their enemies; and although they do it through fear, it is never with the whole heart, for this passion has great influence over them. And since they need magnanimity and manliness to overcome it, and these virtues are foreign to them, hate generally forces its roots into them so deeply that it is impossible to eradicate it in a whole lifetime.
This is the reason why they are so inclined to litigation, and to going before the audiencias and courts with their quarrels, in which they willingly spend their possessions for the sole purpose of making others spend theirs and of causing them harm and trouble. For that they are even wont to pledge their sons and daughters.
Here we see this 300 year old observation in full swing today. It's understandable they want to remove my presence from the internet.  A Google search for The God Culture has this blog on the very first page of results.




The God Culture is so worried and paranoid about my blog that they have left the following disclaimer on several of their Youtube videos.




The God Culture is not affiliated with any other YouTube Channel nor any organization. If you see our logo or slides being used or even reloading of our videos on another channel, this is without our permission and illegal. If you hear another channel claiming affiliation in any sense, they are being untruthful. Always seek out The God Culture logo from The God Culture YouTube Channel as we have no other. The same with our Facebook, The God Culutre - Original is our only Facebook and we have no affiliation with any other. Though some are valid followers, others are attempting to mix in their communist propaganda with our findings which they screw up every time. That is the manner in which satan has operated for thousands of years and he most certainly is using them as well. Beware these channels as they will lead you away from Yahuah and into slavery which is their intent.
That is clearly a warning against me.  Are they are too scared to even mention the name of this blog?

If using screenshots of their videos infringes on their copyrights then what about these videos The God Culture has posted using copyrighted material which does not belong to them?


Is using footage from the Museum of the Bible's video Experience the Bible  in their video "BOOK OF JUBILEES: Scripture? Inspired? What does the Bible Say? Enoch, Jasher, Dead Sea Scrolls" a violation of copyright?


https://youtu.be/ehXPBXwIxio

It is only by playing the video full screen that the tiny text in the corner becomes anywhere near legible.



"Editorial Use Only" in small font. "The views of this video are in no way associated with the Museum of the Bible" in minuscule font!  If The God Culture is so scrupulous about protecting copyrights why would they write this disclaimer in an illegible font? How does "Editorial use only" absolve them from a copyright claim? According to them the bare use should be enough for a lawsuit.

How about this next video using the poster for the animated film Elcano and Magellan?

https://youtu.be/RaygO6E5ZKw

Is this violating someone's copyright?  Does the small text which blends into the background and reads:
"With commentary on "Elcano and Magellan" film poster for editorial use only per fair use"
absolve The God Culture of any legal problems? How about this next video?


https://youtu.be/4K4vALpt4Fw

Is using the Dolittle movie poster without a disclaimer to promote their video asserting that animals did in fact used to talk, which is one reason among many why the Book of Jubilees is pure nonsense, violating someone's copyright?  

Definitely using Kyle Jennerman's entire video minus 30 seconds sure is a violation of copyright. 

https://youtu.be/2wOr9SHludQ

Especially when you take into consideration that this video is monetized!




The God Culture is making money off Kyle Jennerman's video! What a bunch of hypocrites!

The God Culture, including their leader Timothy Jay Schwab, are an intellectually bankrupt "group" who cannot beat me in the arena of words and facts so they resort to the law hoping to shut me down. I use the word group lightly because there has been no evidence that they are in fact a group. No names, photos, or anything else proving the existence of a team of researchers has surfaced. Despite this lack of evidence The God Culture continues to insist they are a team and even left the following comment recently:
Tim does not conduct all research himself as we are a team and likely one of us just sent him the link to the source which is support for maps we already had. We represented the reference exactly as it is written and no, we do not require going deeper to confirm something that matches maps we already have for a YouTube video.
This was in response to my assertion that Tim had used a source thirdhand from J.G. Cheock. If they are a team and Tim was sent the link then he did not take the time to do as he tells us and "confirm all things." That is bad teamwork. If Tim took that source from Cheock himself, as I believe is the case, then he is lazy and dishonest. Either way this comment does not put Tim or The God Culture in a good light.

There is also no evidence that The God Culture has been engaged in "deep research including history, geography, archeology, science, language, etc." Rather than investigating various archeological sites in the Philippines or poring over primary sources in their original languages (be it Hebrew, Greek, Italian, Spanish, French, or English) which have been kept hidden away in musty libraries The God Culture has instead mined the internet for material. You cannot do archeology by surfing the web. Schliemann did not find Troy just by reading books.  He went out and dug in the ground. If the Philippines is Ophir that evidence can be dug out of the ground just like Nineveh, Ur, and Babylon were dug out of the desert. Is Tim going out to dig for Ophir anytime soon? No, he is not.

The God Culture has liberally used AncientPhilippines, Wikipedia, and other blogs as sources without bothering to even check if those websites are using the sources they cite correctly. Again and agin they quote sources second and third hand with no concern for digging up the primary sources. They have utilized some scholarly material by authors like Thomas Suarez and Charles Nowell but dismiss whatever conclusions do not fit their thesis as being the work of unscholarly agents blinded by a false paradigm and spouting the Rothschild line.

Timothy Jay Schwab openly admits his disdain for scholars and academia in general in many of his videos. His disregard for scholarly methods reveals itself in his clumsy methods such as claiming that because a Tagalog word sounds like a Hebrew word that means it has a Hebrew origin. Or because Magellan claimed he was going to find Ophir he actually did find it when he landed in the Philippines.

That is not deep research. That is quote mining to affirm preconceived notions. Everything The God Culture has to say is a claim with no proof except whatever quotes they have harvested from dubious corners of the internet. They gather a lot of circumstantial evidence, throw it at the unsuspecting listener with a lot of bluster, and claim they have proven their thesis. They then tell the listener to test and see if they are correct. 

Pray tell how is anyone really supposed to test the claims they make? How is anyone supposed to test what direction the Israelites took when they wandered off? How is anyone supposed to test and see if the underwater sea trenches are the rivers of Eden?  How is anyone supposed to test and see if the Dead Sea Scrolls are really the library of John the Baptist? How is anyone supposed to test and see if Chryse is Luzon? What are the methods to test such claims? The fact is you CANNOT TEST those kinds of things. You can gather evidence and make claims that best fit the evidence but you cannot test them in the same way you can perform a science experiment in your kitchen. Tim's untestable historical claims are not unlike those made by Neil deGrasse Tyson who makes claims about what happened on earth billions of years ago when no one was around. Not to mention Tim constantly resorts to conspiracy theories which make many of his claims unfalsifiable or untestable and epistemically irrational. If there has been a conspiracy to cover up the truth about the Philippines then how does he know that? He can't because it's been covered up!

The best one can do is look up their sources and see if they say what The God Culture claims. Sadly it appears that I am the only one who has actually taken up their challenge with any seriousness but when I point out all their errors they scream out in rage and post nonsense in the comment section. I am called a communist agitator, a demon, a yellowtard, ignorant, libelous, and a fool. They say we are done with you and will not be responding.  Then they respond again and again.


An actual photograph of The God Culture representative who comments on this blog

Believe it or not there is a lot more to say not just about The God Culture but also about the fake history of the Philippines being Ophir. There is a lot of literature on the subject. Some of it new, some of it centuries old. I think it bears looking at because in our time there is a whole industry pushing this line that the Philippines is Ophir and Filipinos are part of the Lost Tribes of Israel. It is not merely a lunatic fringe like The God Culture pushing this narrative but includes respectable people like Sofroni Dulay who is the Grand Patriarch of the Royal Houses of the Philippines and a Roman Catholic.

There is a thread that links The God Culture directly to Pedro Paterno and his blatantly false history of the Philippines. Did you know he invented a pseudo-Christian Filipino religion that he claimed existed before the arrival of the Spanish and that it is largely based on codes allegedly found within the letters of the ancient Baybayin script? The God Culture whole-heartedly endorses that nonsense.

https://youtu.be/7pmGkSWsIbo

In this video Timothy Schwab identifies Bathala with Yahweh (or as Tim calls Him Yahuah). He also shows how the Baybayin spelling for Bathala allegedly contains a hidden code.

Tim could never say this with a straight face unless he denies the doctrine of the Trinity.

"In EVERY SENSE the creator God of Genesis." EVERY SENSE?? With this blasphemous statement Tim has denied the Trinity. The creation of the world is the act of the triune God and not a monad or singular God such as Bathala. Colossians 1:16-17 tells us Jesus Christ created the world and sustains it by his power. Jesus Christ is not Bathala. It just prompts more questions about Tim's beliefs and teaching concerning the Trinity and Jesus Christ.

There is a lot in that video which merits discussing but it will have to be passed over for now. Listening to Tim speak one can hear echoes of Paterno and his fake Bathalismo religion. I want to trace this link to the best of my ability. A lot of it is connected with the propaganda and nationalist movements of the late nineteenth century which resonate even until today. Filipinos are still a people without a past thanks to colonialism and the dreams of Ophir are quite seductive. This is exactly what I pointed out in my very first post about The God Culture.
What if you were part of a people group who have been essentially colonised for 500 years and have practically lost all real sense of culture from before that time? What if someone came along and said, "You have been lied to all this while and I can give you the answers to who you are"? Don't you think those people would prick up their ears and listen?
https://philippinefails.blogspot.com/2019/06/the-god-culture-philippines-is-garden.html
Right now with the country on lockdown I cannot visit any libraries or order the books I need so it will be some time before any real fruit on this subject is born. There is a lot of work to be done including reading the available documents and sifting them all for similarities in substance and sources. There is also The God Culture whose videos must be closely searched for what sources they use and then following them to where they lead back.



I also cannot do this alone.  That is why I have assembled a team of researchers.


These good boys are very loyal and will fetch me anything I need. Together we can do it!

Update:

I published this post with the full confidence knowing The God Culture would not be filing any lawsuit in US District Court and I was correct.  I just received the following email on April 30th from Google:
Hello, 
In accordance with the DMCA, we have completed processing your counter notice and we have reinstated the content in question. 
This post has been restored in draft version. You will need to sign into your account and republish it. Please let us know if we can assist you further. 

Regards,
The Google team
So there you go. The God Culture is all bluster. They talk the talk but have nothing to back it up. 

107 comments:

  1. Nothing new here. ALL religions think themselves exempt from criticism and having their flaws pointed out or debunked..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This blog has never debunked nor touched our position Michael. If you could read, you would know this. PhilippineFails has failed yet again. Funny how all you do is respond like a crony as if you are a puppet. Hope you have plenty gel.

      Delete
  2. Don't you have any real topics to cover? Well, you haven't actually covered anything yet with truth anyway so why would this be any different. This is a joke and you have wasted people's time yet again. This is the same blog who has lost every debate with TGC royally. The one who has had the floor wiped with their nonsense and proven a liar and a fraud. We don't call them names, they have been proven to be so as fact. One proven to be intellectually challenged in reading and comprehending even a sentence which is proven fact. One who has treated history and the Bible with fraud, been caught and exposed as proven fact. And one who commits Cyber Libel as proven fact. In fact, we have answered all his useless garbage and set him straight. Go look at the blogs in which he should be embarrassed but he's not because he's just a communist-style agitator who wishes to disrupt. However, he has had no impact. Our points have vetted as he does not disprove our position in the slightest. His have not and PhilippineFails Fails the Philippines again. He cannot actually read history or the Bible and all this fool has done is reinforce our position and lose. Now he's crying because we took a soft approach with copyrights as we get such claims on almost every video we produce by the way and we challenge them. All content uploaded to YouTube is legally copyrighted according to Google and we do not have to place a symbol on the slide to invoke such and some of his blogs included many of our slides in which he misrepresents every one he touches pretty much. We have the right to invoke our copyright and Google agrees there is an infringement in fact as that is not in question. The question is whether his use meets criteria for exceptions and we defer to Google on that issue. We of course believe he does not meet such requirement but Google will decide and we'll accept it. We have answered all of his challenges, go back and look at the other blogs in which we obliterate his nonsense. However, you think he is crying now? Just wait because we have not even begun.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "In EVERY SENSE the creator God of Genesis." EVERY SENSE?? With this blasphemous statement Tim has denied the Trinity. The creation of the world is the act of the triune God and not a monad or singular God such as Bathala. Colossians 1:16-17 tells us Jesus Christ created the world and sustains it by his power. Jesus Christ is not Bathala. It just prompts more questions about Tim's beliefs and teaching concerning the Trinity and Jesus Christ.

      Delete
    2. This is called baiting. Yet this loser is incapable of understanding a coherent answer nor does he seek one but just wants to play his charade which is finished. This fraud is incapable of watching more than a few videos but then tries to get us to engage on very detailed issues such as Trinity which has nothing to do with the topic of his blog even. Why? Because he loses actual debate so he needs to resort to canned debate where he attempts to place us in a box he can argue with with his programmed responses and idioms so he can manipulate and twist and lie which he has done over and over again and we have proven. He is incapable of watching a video in which we explore a word that appears very strongly of Hebrew origin but he prefers Jesuit double speak instead because he is a programmed idiot who is incapable of thought nor reading comprehension for that matter as he has misread most quotes cutting them off and chopping them up completely hacking the context because truth is not his aim. The, he lies to you and we prove him wrong and he leaves his trash lying around for you to trip on to make you stumble and doubt. He continues to comment on videos he has never watched, a massive series and position he has never reviewed like an utter fool and it shows. No one with brains would behave so but this buffoon is not interested in how ridiculous he looks because he is here to agitate, mock, ridicule and lie. In debate, he has been shredded and yet he just keeps coming despite the massive embarrassment. Why? Because he is just an insignificant communist-style blogger only capable of harassment having to resort to Cyber Libel in his frustration as he loses every time. He can't even Cyber Libel effectively as he has to lie to even to do that is leaving out almost all of our leaders 30+ years of ministry exerience for instance and when caught, does he apologize? No. Does he correct this to his viewers? No. He just doubles down on stupidity and ignorance because that is what fools do. The dog returns to his vomit. The fool returns to his folly and this blog, more folly indeed. This blog however is about nothing and says nothing and we are done with this stupidity.

      Delete
    3. Only one who denies the Trinity could dare strictly identify the Philippines' hermaphroditic pagan deity with a messenger bird (Odin is also a God with a messenger bird!) as Yahuah by declaring that he is in EVERY SENSE the creator God of Genesis. Tim is not so ignorant as to be unaware that Jesus Christ created all things and is thus the Creator God of Genesis. Why would he identify Jesus Christ as Bathala? How much more blasphemous could Tim be?

      Delete
    4. What can be said for sure is that The God Culture is just another anti-trinitarian cult in the Philippines. Timothy Schwab is no better than a charlatan of the likes of Felix Manalo, Brother Eli Soriano, and Apollo Quiboloy. All those men are founders of anti-trinitarian cults in the Philippines. All of them, just like Tim, believe they were sent to restore the Word of God.

      Delete
    5. "He is incapable of watching a video in which we explore a word that appears very strongly of Hebrew origin"

      His disregard for scholarly methods reveals itself in his clumsy methods such as claiming that because a Tagalog word sounds like a Hebrew word that means it has a Hebrew origin.

      Delete
    6. He's still talking... Imagine that. Saliva. He should be embarrassed. See he attempts to create a false paradigm on a question we didn't even answer in this blog. Why? He failed again. This blog is stupid and has no point. See how he agitates like a communist gnat? Pathethic. Our so-called "scholarly methods" for a YouTube Channel are far above average. As we are releasing a book very soon, all will find we have done our homework. However, this blog has failed to do anything but attempt to question sources in which prove to say what they say against his ignorant assumption of British propaganda he represent. In fact, in the last couple of blogs he boxed himself into a corner admitting that his position all along was wrong. He misuses source after source because he cannot read. For instance, he attempted to say the Philippines did not trade with Egypt in ancient times and the sources he attempts to exploit and manipulate actually confirm this. He had no point and is proven wrong and on every one of his little feeble attempts. What a joke. Go back and read the very long accusations in fraud of his and read our responses and you will find this fraud is proven a fool and a liar. He then commits Cyber libel attacking our leaders who don't even answer him but he keeps attacking and agitating and harassing in ignorance having not even bothered to watch the series which he condemns. That is defined as a fool and even Einstein said "Condemnation without investigation is the HEIGHT OF IGNORANCE." You are reading a blogger who operates from such a tower of utter ignorance. He knows very little and what he thinks he knows is based in fraudulent interpretation.

      Delete
    7. "For instance, he attempted to say the Philippines did not trade with Egypt in ancient times and the sources he attempts to exploit and manipulate actually confirm this."

      LOL that is a blatant historical lie. The Philippines did not trade with Egypt or Greece for that matter thousands of years ago. Nor does the source I quote say such a thing. It is YOU who cited that source again and again but never actually quoting from it. Just copy/pasting from AncientPhilippines. It was I who spent my own money to actually find out what it and the other two sources said.

      The Philippines NEVER traded with ancient Egypt directly in ancient times. No Egyptian boats sailed to the PHL, no Philippine boats sailed to Egypt, and no Greek boats sailed to the PHL because they knew nothing beyond the Golden Cherosnesus which ALL OF ANTIQUITY known as the Malay Peninsula.

      Delete
    8. Just saliva as this fraud is already disproven and cannot accept it but those who can read are laughing at him already. What an embarrassment but again, he doesn’t care because he is commissioned to agitate as a communist. What a loser. You know his tactic and it is obvious. This will be dealt with soon. Again this fool cannot read and he seems only capable of telling lies as he is here. He forgets the entire blog where he was smacked down on this as our sources most certainly say there was trade with Egypt, Africa and the Philippines in the first century and even as early as 200 BC. They say this is established fact, proven, etc. Here's the actual history from credible sources this fool can't seem to be able to read. Everyone can read for themselves and you will see how incredibly ignorant this blogger is…

      “Hellenistic trade beads of West Asiatic and Egyptian origins found in early burials in many places in the Philippines, prove that such early trade contacts, no matter how irregular, existed between the Philippine archipelago and West Asia by the first centuries of the first millennium A.D.”
      –Laszlo Legeza
      “Apart from India and China, Butuan is known to have had extensive trading connections with Arabia and in all probability with Sumatra and Java. The locally produced gold necklaces comprising of dentate interlocking beads seem to have reached Egypt, later to be mistakenly identified by European collectors as Egyptian.”
      –Laszlo Legeza

      “Some of the non-Indian borrowed designs found only in their original sources and in the Philippine area suggest direct linkages with other cultural currents from the Indian Ocean. Among these are kamagi necklaces(Aldred 1978: 105) and penannular, barter rings which both show Egyptian influence(Aldred 1978: 20, 94). The earliest insular Southeast Asian products reached the Mediterranean through a port on the Arabian Gulf, which were transported overland to the headwaters of the Nile, then shipped down to Alexandria. Austronesian traders are also known to have reached Madagascar(Miller 1969; Taylor 1976), so the African connection is an established fact.”
      –Villegas, Bangko Sentral

      Of course his fraudulent view was to waive his hand and say nuh-uh which is really all he’s actually done all along because this source he harped and harped over at least over 3 stupid blogs vetted as accurate as all have thus far. Oops! He has demonstrated nothing but the willingness to lie and continue to double down on such fraud because he is proven a fraud. He behaves like a forgetful child but let’s not pretend that is not on purpose as this is just a communist-style agitator and you will gain no value from this blogpost. Anyone who will fraud history cutting off the directions of Mela, the Periplus, Dionysius the Tourist and deny very clear quotes such as the above and many others, is just an agitating fool not one series about the truth and certainly no scholar.

      Delete
    9. What a stupid fool this David Roxas at PhilippineFails is. He misrepresents himself as scholar which he is far below such level, misrepresents himself as a minister which he has no such experience he has ever produced, misrepresents himself as one who can even read and comprehend. It is a sad learning disability.

      The Malay Peninsula was labeled erroneously by Ptolemy yet the writings of the Periplus, Dionysius the Tourist even Pliny the Elder are very clear Chryse is an island not a Peninsula and it is located “directly under the line of Cancer” in the China Sea. That’s called the Philippines and his maps show exactly that including the one this stupid blogger used but couldn’t read. Who would be surprised though at one who puts up a Greek map of no detail from 550 BC or so which has no islands on the map at all and then concludes in utter ignorance that that means Chryse did not exist to the Greeks because they drew no islands. This fool couldn’t even see that in his stupidity framing his false narrative, he was also accusing Greek cartographers of that era of not knowing that Greece nor the Mediterranean had isles as they are not on that map either. Only a fraud would attempt such stupidity. Chryse is under the very North to the South and East of China – that’s called the Philippines. His own maps he attempted to manipulate showed this as well. Mela offers ancient quotes from “olden writers” – the Greeks. He mentions Chryse and Argyre as isles and places them between the Malay tip and China in the sea of course. That’s called the Philippines. This fool is forgetting he already proved himself wrong on that issue as he showed the map of Dionysius showing this and he showed the 1492 Portuguese-commissioned map of Behaim which demonstrated Chryse was where Luzon even by shape is to the East of the Malay Peninsula. He then tried to conclude the Malay Peninsula was Burma which only an ignorant fool would attempt such and the Malay Peninsula has markings of the such, has Indochina placed above it accurately and China North of that as Cathaia. Only a fool would say no that’s not the Malay Peninsula. Then, there’s Sumatra, Java Major and Minor to the South of it but he claims it is a fictional peninsula in blatant fraud and misrepresentation because that is what he does. What a fraud this PhilippineFails blog David Roxas continues to be. He has failed the Philippines yet again.

      Delete
    10. Can you read? The article says items from Egypt and Greece reached the Philippines. That is because yes there was trade coming from the West. That does not mean Philippine boats sailed to Egypt or vice versa. It also does not mean Greek trade ships came to the Philippines. They DID NOT DO SO because they knew nothing beyond the Malay Peninsula as all the maps show.

      You are inserting your own fictions and twisting these quotes to say much more than they do. That is how you operate and you do it over and over again. Romans and Greeks traded with India and those items made their way to the Philippines. That is all those quotes affirm.

      The whole claim that Philippine gold jewelry was found in 1st century Egypt is based on this one sentence:

      "The locally produced gold necklaces comprising of dentate interlocking beads seem to have reached Egypt, later to be mistakenly identified by European collectors as Egyptian"

      SEEMS! With nothing to back that statement up. No discussion of what might have been found or where or when. Very flimsy to build on.

      Delete
    11. So his answer is NOPE he can't read. Yup, we know and so do the viewers here who can see he is ignorant and even on purpose. Sad. He can't even read plain english and how sad. What part of this PROVES does he not understand? Well, he does not want the truth as he likes lies and propagates them. What part of established fact does he seem to misunderstand. What a fool you this David Roxas of PhilippineFails is. The WHOLE claim comes from the WHOLE context of the WHOLE quotes stupid fool. You don't pull out one word in fraud and misrepresent it so and get away with it. You are a fool. It says the trade is proven!
      "prove that such early trade contacts, no matter how irregular, existed between the Philippine archipelago and West Asia by the first centuries of the first millennium A.D."

      It says the necklaces reached Egypt:
      "The locally produced gold necklaces comprising of dentate interlocking beads seem to have reached Egypt, later to be mistakenly identified by European collectors as Egyptian.”

      Then the 2nd article establishes the route to Africa especially Egypt specifically! How stupid you are!
      "The earliest insular Southeast Asian products reached the Mediterranean through a port on the Arabian Gulf, which were transported overland to the headwaters of the Nile, then shipped down to Alexandria."

      Then, it records trade with Africa with Philippine ships arriving in Africa as ESTABLISHED FACT!
      "Austronesian traders are also known to have reached Madagascar(Miller 1969; Taylor 1976), so the African connection is an established fact.”

      That is not flimsy, it is ESTABLISHED FACT and PROVEN stupid. You just can't read and what a worthless agitator you are fraud. That is enough to prove you are a fraud just right there but then you ignore everything regarding Chryse as an utter fool.

      This according to Bangko Sentral's Villegas and Legeza which you know better because... well, you are unqualified period and what a ridiculously stupid illiterate blogger you have turned out to be. You continue to be a fraud hacking history in negligence as a loser. Pathetic. These articles don't address the Greek portion stupid. Are you really even that illiterate as you didn't even read the rest. That part is supported by Dionysius the Tourist whom you frauded and there are maps including the one you showed fool demonstrating Chryse as the Philippines which fits his actual directions especially "directly below the line (Tropic) of Cancer" which committed fraud and omitted of course attempting to mislead in your communist-style agitation. What a liar you are. Then, it is support but The Periplus which places Chryse SE of China in the South China Sea under the very North or Tropic of Cancer as well. There are maps that prove this definitely if you could only read a map that is. However, from your last blogs, you are very challenged there as well. Mela, Dionysius, The Periplus, Pliny, Columbus, Behaim, Magellan, Pinto, de Laval, King of Spain and on and on and on all affirm the Philippines is Ophir and you whom? Nobody with 0 ammunition as you have lost every debate. What a fraud you are.

      Delete
    12. NONE OF THOSE SOURCES say the Philippines sent ships to Egypt. You are adding that bit of historical nonsense because it fits your views. It is not an established fact that the PHL sent boats to Egypt but that there was a trade route between east and west. None of them say that Greeks actually went to the PHL. They only say that objects from greece and egypt ended up in the PHL. That could have happened any number of ways which these sources DO NOT explore.

      Delete
    13. You keep calling me a fraud but it was YOU who kept citing those three sources about Philippine gold being found in Egypt without actually quoting them!! AND you cited one of them wrong!!! That is because you copy/pasted it from AncientPhilippines. I am the only one on the internet who has looked at these sources and quoted from them. And you DARE call me a fraud???? YOU USED SOURCES WITH OUT EVEN READING THEM!!!!!!! YOU ARE THE FRAUD NOT ME!!!

      Delete
    14. You are proven a fraud. You frauded Mela, the Periplus, Dionysius, Legeza, Villegas, Horridge, and more. You misrepresent everything you touch even personal attacks in fraud and with such disgusting, distasteful, inexcusable arrogance with nothing to back it up. Our sources prove to say what we report, you however, attempt the opposite in fraud. You are a fraud. The trade between Africa and the Philippines is proven and established fact. You provide nothing but nuh-uh. What a fraud.

      Stupid says: "NONE OF THOSE SOURCES say the Philippines sent ships to Egypt."
      Again, this buffoon cannot read:
      "Austronesian traders are also known to have reached Madagascar(Miller 1969; Taylor 1976), so the African connection is an established fact.”
      Did they take spaceships? Are you just brain damaged? Only a fool would look at a statement that says Austronesians reached Africa and then say it doesn't say they went in ships. That is fraud and you are a fraud. Our sources vet, your staments prove false. You are a fraud.

      Delete
    15. Austronesian traders are also known to have reached Madagascar(Miller 1969; Taylor 1976), so the African connection is an established fact.”

      MADAGASCAR is not EGYPT. And while all Filipinos are Austronesians not all Austronesians are Filipinso. You assume way too much.

      Delete
    16. We assume? You haven't even watched our series. All you do is assume in fraud and ignorance out of context. How worthless. Look at you agitate and agitate and agitate in utter ignorance. Who has the oldest boats found in Austronesia? The Philippines you stupid fool and by far. Who traded with Vietnam and Thailand as early as 1500 BC according to archaeology? The Philippines fool while others have no such history. You know nothing and misrepresent and commit fraud and Cyber Libel every turn you can. You are disgusting.

      Delete
    17. Yes you do assume. You assume many things. There is no record of Filipinos going to Egypt or of Greeks coming to the Philippines. That is just a historical fact that you continue to twist.

      Delete
    18. Enough of your stupidity loser. You are done. You will be shut down now. All you do is Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud. Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.
      Typical communist-style agitation and that is all you have and all you are.

      Delete
    19. So is the Holy Spirit a person or a force or what?

      Delete
    20. And there's the communist tactic... Deflect loser because you lose debate as usual. Enough of your stupidity loser. You are done. You will be shut down now. All you do is Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud. Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.
      Typical communist-style agitation and that is all you have and all you are.

      Delete
    21. So i take it you believe the Holy Spirit is not a person and just a force or active power?

      Delete
    22. We believe you are a communist-style agitator who will lie, fraud and libel to your unethical, demonic ends. Then, you wish to discuss theology? What a fool. You are forfeited such right liar. Deflect loser because you lose debate as usual. Enough of your stupidity loser. You are done. You will be shut down now. All you do is Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud. Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.
      Typical communist-style agitation and that is all you have and all you are.

      Delete
    23. From what The God Culture has to say about the role of the Holy Spirit it seems they consider Him as the active force of God and not a person. Though they do use personal language referring to the Holy Spirit as He and Him they are not clear on his personhood or lack thereof. If the Spirit is a person and is not God then He is a creature. It would not make sense for the Spirit of the uncreated God to be a creature. Even if they believe Holy Spirit is merely an active force or power if He lacks divinity then he is still a creature. It would not make sense for the active power or force of the uncreated God to be a creature. It seems this is something The God Culture has not thought through.

      In anywise they do not believe He is God and admit they are not clear on His role. If The God Culture does deny the personality of the Holy Spirit then they are in agreement with the INC and the JW's concerning Him.

      Delete
    24. Now you see his true colors... So he draws a conclusion based on nothing. Duh! The epitome of ignorance for a fraud. This is not a topic for a blog comment and only an utter fool would try to take such a significant topic and boil it down to a comment in their blog about copyrights. It's outright insane in fact. However, let's all not overlook that this is an insignificant communist-style agitator who is employing his communist tactics in fraud, ignorance and even libel. He has committed such libel many times and even in this blog, committed fraud over and over and even in this blog and his negligence is profound but he is not seeking the truth but to agitate as this comment shows. Like a gnat. Rather gross and very overt. You can all see this for yourself. We aren't answering stupid any further in this blog but we'll continue to remind everyone he is just a communist-style agitator.
      Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud. Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.
      Typical communist-style agitation and that is all you have and all you are.

      Delete
    25. "So he draws a conclusion based on nothing."

      Actually based upon your own words.

      "The Father and Son are definitely equated in scripture. The Holy Spirit not exactly but His role never-the-less is crucial and He is Yahuah's spirit indeed."

      "The Father and Son are equated but separate as they both (Us) created according to John 1 and even the Genesis Creation account. The Holy Spirit was there as well in presence and His role is not equated nor defined in that passage. You have failed to produce a scripture that equates the Holy Spirit with the Father and Son. Do they work together? Yes. Are they a Trinity and Triune Begin? Not in scripture."

      See how you use personal words to refer to the Holy Spirit (he, him) but deny his divinity. It is not clear from this passage that you affirm his personhood either. In fact you are not sure about his role at all according to your own words.

      So is the Holy Spirit a person or a force?

      Delete
    26. Look at how he continues to agitate as a communist. He just can't help himself. He does not know how to behave like a sane person and certainly not as a gentleman and he will pay the price for his criminal behavior. All this blog is is a whole lot of fluff about nothing, he proves nothing and he says nothing. Worthless waste of space and he does not deserve this platform. Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud. Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.
      Typical communist-style agitation and that is all you have and all you are. The Philippines is tired of this kind of communist-style behavior and this will be ousted very soon.

      Delete
    27. Well if you don't want to respond you should simply not respond at all. Responding with that copy/paste nonsense only makes you look more foolish.

      This is what The God Culture is all about. Rather than teaching what scripture teaches and what the Church teaches, scripture belongs to the Church after all, they have concocted a phony spiritual history of the Philippines and focus almost exclusively on that. They bring in all kinds of extra-biblical books which contradict scripture, such as The Book of Jubilees, in order to prove their teachings. They also attempt to correct the Bible when it does not fit their views. Tim thinks the issue of our day is restoring God's Word. As if it has been lost!

      In the comment section on their Youtube page they actually claim the early church was wiped out and replaced with the synagogue of Satan.

      "The synagogue of satan was installed and their doctrines as what we call the early church today but the true early church was wiped out."
      New Sabbath Series Trailer

      That is total nonsense and at odds with the promise of Jesus Christ that he will build his church and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. But here comes The God Culture sent to restore the truth. Just like Joseph Smith, Felix Manalo, and every other kooky cult leader who rejected the church.

      Delete
    28. Look at how he continues to agitate as a communist. He just can't help himself. He does not know how to behave like a sane person and certainly not as a gentleman and he will pay the price for his criminal behavior. All this blog is is a whole lot of fluff about nothing, he proves nothing and he says nothing. Worthless waste of space and he does not deserve this platform. Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud. Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.
      Typical communist-style agitation and that is all you have and all you are. The Philippines is tired of this kind of communist-style behavior and this will be ousted very soon.

      Delete
    29. The God Culture themselves shows the stupidity of denying a doctrine because a word is not in the scripture. Take the word omnipotent. It means all powerful. Is God all powerful? Yes. Is the word in the scripture? No. Yet The God Culture accepts this word along with the doctrine.

      "We have never said Yahuah was anything less than omnipotent yet you go on in your own false paradigm of ignorance."

      Though it would be nice to get the utmost clarity on what The God Culture teaches about the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit they are loathe to discuss the issue. They do not think it is important. One is left to guess and their listeners are left in the dark as to what they really believe about God. Perhaps if their listeners knew Timothy and The God Culture denied the Trinity they would abandon them.

      Delete
    30. Look bud I get it. You don't want to talk about your doctrine of God. You don't want people to know you are an anti-trinitarian cult. I understand. So tell me something else. Did Jacob kill Esau?

      Delete
    31. Look at how he continues to agitate as a communist. He just can't help himself. He does not know how to behave like a sane person and certainly not as a gentleman and he will pay the price for his criminal behavior. All this blog is is a whole lot of fluff about nothing, he proves nothing and he says nothing. Worthless waste of space and he does not deserve this platform. Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud. Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.
      Typical communist-style agitation and that is all you have and all you are. The Philippines is tired of this kind of communist-style behavior and this will be ousted very soon.

      Delete
    32. The real question is did Esau commit copyright infringement because that is the topic of this blog. You are not entitled to answers fraud agitator and you aren't getting any more. We are done with this blog and we will answer like this from now on. You are done and you have failed yet again even in your attempt at continued Cyber Libel but you will pay for that. You have forfeited all right to ask question. You are proven a libelous fraud and you are done.

      Delete
    33. Did Jacob copyright his new name Israel? Now that is a question for this blog.

      Delete
    34. Is the Trinity copyrighted? That is the question for this blog. In fact, is the word Trinity even in the Bible even once? Oops! How about Triune Being? Oops! Nope. Wonder if those are copyrighted though because that is the subject of this blog. Seems this blogger can't even read his own title. What ignorance.

      Delete
    35. Oh yeah and I admit, I am actually a pink alien who cries red tears but that photo of me is copyrighted. Could you be more stupid? Well, you never cease to raise the bar on stupid that is for sure. Well, lover the bar is more like it because you have sunk into incredibly low demonic depths. It is so sad to see a Filipino who hates his country so much he would resort to this kind of libel, fraud, negligence and aggressive harassing behavior. What does anyone expect though from a blog that wishes for the Philippines to Fail. It does not however, and it will not.

      Delete
    36. "Oh yeah and I admit, I am actually a pink alien who cries red tears but that photo of me is copyrighted. "

      LOL you have no idea what a meme is. So much for your deep research. A simple image search would pull up everything you could want to know about what that meme means.

      So did Jacob kill Esau?

      Delete
    37. Was that copyright infringement? That is the question for this blog as that is it's topic. Look at how he continues to agitate as a communist. He just can't help himself. He does not know how to behave like a sane person and certainly not as a gentleman and he will pay the price for his criminal behavior. All this blog is is a whole lot of fluff about nothing, he proves nothing and he says nothing. Worthless waste of space and he does not deserve this platform. Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud. Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.
      Typical communist-style agitation and that is all you have and all you are. The Philippines is tired of this kind of communist-style behavior and this will be ousted very soon.

      Delete
    38. Was the birthright a copyright and did Jacob infringe on it or did Esau's selling it indemnify Jacob? Now that's a question worthy of this stupid blog. We aren't answering this agitating fool

      Delete
    39. Have you even read the Book of Jubilees which you consider to be canon?

      In chapters 35- 36 Esau and Jacob visit their dying father Isaac. He admonishes Esau to be at peace with Jacob and not to hate him. Brotherly love and affection are appealed to in 36:8. in chapter 37 the sons of Esau become very angry with their father because Isaac had given the portion of the elder to the younger. They declare war against Jacob and provoke Esau to join them. A huge army then confronts Jacob. In chapter 38 Judah tells Jacob to slay the enemy. In 38:2 Jacob kills Esau with a bowshot. Jacob's sons prevail over the sons of Esau and they become their servants paying tribute until the day Jacob left for Egypt.

      The killing of Esau by Jacob is a major departure from the narrative in Genesis. Why is it included? What clarity does this horrendous story of fratricide shed upon Genesis? What are we supposed to learn from this story?

      Delete
    40. Must be copyright infringement you fraud. What are you ever going to learn about anything, you have an acute disability in comprehension. The Book of Jubilees is not about copyright infringement though thus not pertinent to your stupid, meaningless blog that obviously you think has no value because you have to change the topic many times. That means you have no topic. Pretty pathetic loser.

      Delete
    41. There he goes again. Has to change the topic because he doesn't actually have one. Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud. Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.
      Typical communist-style agitation.

      Delete
    42. And please tell your viewers exactly how Genesis says Esau died. Enlighten us.

      Delete
    43. "And please tell your viewers exactly how Genesis says Esau died. Enlighten us"

      It does not tel us. Nor is that event recorded ANYWHERE ELSE in scripture. Jacob kills Esau and then his sons defeat them in battle and make them pay tribute and the WHOLE OF SCRIPTURE is silent about that matter?

      The events in Jubilees never happened.

      Delete
    44. Ok bud you want to talk about copyright infringement?

      Copyrighted slides? These people are so stupid that they think using screenshots of their videos infringes on their copyright. However on every single one of their videos we find the following disclaimer:

      Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

      There it is. By their own admission I am perfectly within my rights to use screenshots of their videos as I criticize and comment on them.

      Definitely using Kyle Jennerman's entire video minus 30 seconds sure is a violation of copyright.
      Especially when you take into consideration that this video is monetized!
      The God Culture is making money off Kyle Jennerman's video! What a bunch of hypocrites!

      Delete
    45. You have a massive fallacy in your thinking. You don't know the Bible nor context of anything you have represented pretty ignorantly as you just did Esau. You said Jubilees tells a different story than Genesis and that is a lie as usual and you misrepresent because you have something very broken in your thinking. Absolutely shattered in your ability to reason and it is profound and very ignorant. Jubilees tells the same story of the brothers coming together and reconciling for a time. They separate and go their way in peace with Esau to Edom at Mt. Seir and Jacob to Canaan/Israel. Genesis records the lineage of Esau and does not mention him again but that is not the end of the story is it? Esau died somehow and much more happened somehow because the rest of the Bible does not fit where this is left off in Genesis and you are a fool to attempt challenge without context yet again. But here's your massive problem of being unable to connect things as your Biblical aptitude is less than elementary. Esau is Edom and the Edomites are not at peace with Israel/Jacob. In fact, they are one of the largest enemies of Israel throughout scripture even in Psalm 83, the minor prophets record this as well and they are the enemy of Israel and believers all the way to the very end in the final battle. This is an extremely deep-rooted hatred of Israel yet your buffoonery leaves it at the brothers reconciled which is ignorance. Jesus will defeat them in the end by the way. However, what happened? How does one get from reconciled brothers to complete opposites and enemies again? Have you even thought this thru? Nope, you're incapable of such thought clearly. Obviously there is more to the story and Jubilees is the record of that story very consistent not only with Genesis but with the entire Bible on this. Remove it from scripture as it was Torah even, and you will lose context and make dumb assumptions which is your norm. Jubilees connects this story and fills in blanks in a very logic and very Biblical way that fits Genesis and the whole of scripture and yet you said the opposite once again in ignorance. This is how Edom became so evil and why the deep-rooted hatred remains so strong. These things don't just happen one day. Without the Book of Jubilees, Genesis and the Torah and the Bible are incomplete. It was in the Bible of John the Baptist and the community of Levite Priests who kept scripture in Bethabara, now fraudulently referred to as Qumran. You just don't get it as you seemingly never do. You are illiterate of scripture, an ignorant fraud on history and an absolute court jester in your misuse of maps and proven so in each case. Yet you write blogs representing yourself as a journalist and expert and all you know how to do is dramatize stupidly, Agitate, Deceive, Deflect, Libel and Fraud. Communism101 and you are even poor at that. You have attacked the wrong group and you will reap the rewards of your actions.

      Delete
    46. Again there is not mention of Jacob killing Esau, which is pretty big if true, in any literature except Jubilees. Not even Josephus records it and he records all kinds of things not found in Genesis or Exodus such as Moses going to war with the Ethiopians. How would scripture miss this monumental event if it actually happened?

      Here's another one for you buddy:

      Did Satan instigate God to tempt Abraham to sacrifice Isaac?

      Delete
    47. On copyrights, have you considered that Kyle appreciates the plug to his blog and program from a real channel with a real following? Of course you haven't because you are a fool and no one would ever view your illegitimate uneducated nonsense in such a way. That's how it works when you have a real platform which obviously you wouldn't know. It brings a belly laugh when you actually say things like no one likes one of our videos and that video has 1,200 likes and over 40,000 views. You are such an idiot, you can't even hold your demon tongue to tell the truth on something very publicly recorded. What a liar you are. See we provide actual commentary in a real platform with real viewers not your fraud and libel which many agree is not commentary nor protected. It matters not what Google decides. Of course your stupidity opens it's big mouth as you are a fool who is accustomed to misleading thinking you are protected – you are not. You don't even understand the format. You are not teaching and this is not commentary. This is communist fraud and agitation and fake news including illegal Cyber Libel, gross negligence, fraud, harassment and abuse, etc. You are what the Philippines is about to run out of this country. Enjoy the trip. We will continue to assert our copyright, get over it you big baby.

      Delete
    48. In fact, let's look at your pattern of infringement you disrespectful agitator with no class in any sense. Even the founder of PhilippineFailBlog which you couldn't even come up with your own name or logo, real creative, called you out for stealing his logo. You are such a fraud. The amazing question any rational person has though is why you would be so stupid as to continue a failed blog and under such a ridiculously stupid name which alienates most of your audience. Well, because you are a fool who doesn't know what he is doing. Here is the founder's comment to your announcement that you were taking his blog and stealing his logo in his words:

      "You think you can make your own logo? Don't steal mine? Thanks."

      Of course, he is a gentleman about it but did you make your own logo? Of course not, you still steal his if one applies your own logic. What a hypocrite you are. This is illegitimate nonsense and you have lost every debate and you will be shut down now as I am done with your stupidity.

      Delete
    49. "On copyrights, have you considered that Kyle appreciates the plug to his blog and program from a real channel with a real following? "

      Wow well I guess it's a good thing you violate his copyright and even make money off his entire video minus 30 seconds! I am sure he loves that you are doing that.

      "when you actually say things like no one likes one of our videos"

      I don't believe I ever said such a thing.

      "We will continue to assert our copyright, get over it you big baby."

      It's called fair use and even YOU admit it on all your videos:

      Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

      There it is. By your own admission I am perfectly within my rights to use screenshots of your videos as I criticize and comment on them.

      Listen buddy get it over with and file a case against me in US district court. Go ahead big guy. I am waiting. And I will be waiting forever because you will never do such a thing as you know I am in the right via fair use.

      Delete
    50. Seems you do not know the law and make stupid assumptions as is your norm. We have the right to use any clip we wish to teach which is what we do. You do not as you are not us and not doing what we are doing. We don't see your disclaimer on your blog in fact. Where is your disclaimer? You can't use ours as it is ours and applies to our use. Another rookie mistake of an ignorant fool. Kyle appreciates our use but perhaps we should contact him and let him know that you committed libel and racism against him as well when you disparaged him for being Jewish in your "The God Culture: Jewish Fables" blog. Yeah, that might be a good idea. Keep running your big mouth demon. You are done.

      Delete
    51. "We don't see your disclaimer on your blog in fact. Where is your disclaimer?"

      I don't need a disclaimer nor do you!! Fair use is always in play.

      I didn't call Kyle Jewish at all. Read closer. I said:

      "My take is that Kyle hates himself. He has grown up in Canada being bombarded by all the propaganda telling him that the White Man is the bane of all existence, the root of all evil and he has taken that to heart. He is alienated from himself and his culture which the media has constantly told him is the worst thing on Earth. You see Kyle, just like Tim, has also believed in Jewish fables."

      Delete
    52. Enough of this fake news trash littering the internet. All this blog is is a whole lot of fluff about nothing, he proves nothing and he says nothing. Worthless waste of space and he does not deserve this platform. Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud. Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.
      Typical communist-style agitation and that is all you have and all you are. The Philippines is tired of this kind of communist-style behavior and this will be ousted very soon.

      Delete
    53. So why did God tempt Abraham to sacrifice Isaac? Did he do it at the prodding of Satan?

      Delete
    54. As if that precedence is not already set in Job (written before Genesis and Jubilees by the way). What a clueless, agitating, fool you are which once again is exactly how you look to your readers. You can't even look at a scripture and notice that the precedent is already established. Stop pretending to know scripture, history nor maps. What is your denomination? Are you a communist?

      Delete
    55. Chapter 17 verse 16 tells us that Mastema, Satan, instigated God to command Abraham to sacrifice Isaac as a test of his obedience. This account is similar to the book of Job where Satan persuades God to allow him to tempt Job as a test of his righteousness. It also turns the Genesis narrative on its head as the temptation of Abraham now become a contest between God and Satan. Chapter 18 verse 12 says Mastema was put to shame after Abraham passes the test. Introducing Mastema gets rid of the messianic type of this story. Isaac is no longer a type of Christ and the focus is on Satan instead of Abraham. It is highly likely that Satan is injected into the story here to absolve God of any blame for tempting Abraham to sacrifice his son. This story does not clarify the Genesis narrative but only muddies it.

      I am in fact not a communist. Are you Anna's son? Is Tim your stepfather?

      Delete
    56. On and on you go further into the rabbit hole of stupidity. It is insanity. There is no conflict in that whatsoever but people are supposed to accept that you say so? That you say nuh-uh? You are an idiot with no points but agitation. The same dynamic in Job existed in the story of Abraham and it is very Biblical and in no way flies in the face of anything Genesis says unless you make things up like you do of course in fraud. That's not testing, it's fraud. Once again, extremely poor. You think you are smart yet your comprehension is pathetic just as it is with history and geography. Otherwise, you are accusing Yahuah of coming up with the idea which is out of character and illegitimate as this blog is. Jubilees actually rectifies a very serious theological question because without it, fools like you are blaming Yahuah for something satan instigated. Real bright. It turns nothing on it's head and stands consistent and you are no one to say otherwise and unqualified to render such opinion nor write this blog by your own standards you have laid out over and over in ignorance. You have actually attempted the ridiculous point that over 30 years of ministry and almost 30 years of publishing is not enough for one to even speak. Well, then you need to shut your mouth by your own standard. You have yet to offer anything in this blog. But again, this blog is about copyrights so the real question is did God have a copyright on the concept of testing Abraham or did satan? That is the question and the only legitimate direction for this nonsensical blog about nothing in which you continue to attempt to deflect and agitate. You are a communist-style agitator.

      You sure do act like a communist. Are you a Jesuit? What is your denomination? You have made that such a point. You owe readers to tell them who you are and your name David Roxas. What is your background? What qualifies you to ridicule so especially one's resume especially a very good one and you are a coward not tell the people yours. What a fraud you are. Back to copyrights.

      Why did you "Steal" the logo of the previous founder of this blog?

      Am I Anna's son? How does that apply to copyrights I wonder? Hmmm... Would that mean Anna has a copyright on the matter then? Hmmmm... So deep you are...

      Delete
    57. So when God said it is not good for the man to be alone and then he created Eve out of Adam's rib was Adam still alone for a number of days afterwards?

      Chapter 3 is about the formation of Eve and the expulsion from the garden. Adam and Eve were created in the same week but Eve was not shown to Adam until 14 days had passed. After 40 days Adam was placed into the Garden of Eden but Eve was not brought into the Garden of Eden util 80 days had passed. So Adam was alone in the Garden of Eden for 40 days! Verse 10 tells us the reason for all this is in regards to the purity laws after a woman had given birth. These laws can be found in Leviticus 12.

      How does this addition clarify Genesis? God says it is not good for man to be alone so he created woman from the man's rib. Now man had a helpmeet. But in Jubilees man is still alone even after woman had been created. The Book of Jubilees contradicts the Genesis account of the formation of man.

      Delete
    58. Now that's definitely a copyright issue as Eve was a copy from Adam's rib. We are nto your punching bag for stupid theological assumptions on your part. We are done responding to your questions and I'm not even reading this. You have abused any right to ask questions, committed fraud and cyber libel and you will be dealt with. Enough wasted time. You get no more. This blog is done. We will only answer with canned responses in this blog from here.
      Enough of this fake news trash littering the internet. All this blog is is a whole lot of fluff about nothing, he proves nothing and he says nothing. Worthless waste of space and he does not deserve this platform. Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud. Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.
      Typical communist-style agitation and that is all you have and all you are. The Philippines is tired of this kind of communist-style behavior and this will be ousted very soon.

      Delete
    59. So how does the creation account in Jubilees agree with Genesis? Why was Adam alone for 40 days in the Garden of Eden?

      Delete
    60. Update:

      I published this post with the full confidence knowing The God Culture would not be filing any lawsuit in US District Court and I was correct. I just received the following email on April 30th from Google:

      Hello,

      In accordance with the DMCA, we have completed processing your counter notice and we have reinstated the content in question.

      This post has been restored in draft version. You will need to sign into your account and republish it. Please let us know if we can assist you further.

      Regards,
      The Google team

      So there you go. The God Culture is all bluster. They talk the talk but have nothing to back it up.

      Delete
    61. So you published this entire blog wasting people's time for nothing. Well, not just this one but all of your garbage. You simply can't read. From my first response, we deferred to Google period as to copyrights as that is their call and this is insignificant to us. You infringed on our copyright and Google agreed you did but they were considering an exception we do not agree you qualify. We could care less what you think on the matter. We said nothing of filing a copyright case in district court and have no intention of doing so for that minor infraction. Oh no, that is not our issue with this trash you peddle in ignorance and we wouldn't waste that for something so insignificant. Coming very soon. We'll see if it's bluster indeed. Unfortunately for you, you will find it is not.

      Delete
    62. "We said nothing of filing a copyright case in district court and have no intention of doing so for that minor infraction."

      Then stop wasting people's time with DMCA takedown requests. If it is insignificant to you you would not have filed SEVEN DMCA requests. Google did what any company did, proceed with caution. YOU failed to act. It is on YOU to follow through and you did not and you will not. Just bluster.

      "You infringed on our copyright and Google agreed you did"

      If Goole thought anything illegal was happening they would not have reinstated the blog post. Again YOU failed to act.

      "If we do not receive notice from the complainant that they have brought an action in the district court within 14 days, we will reinstate the material in question on Blogger."

      So how does the creation account in Jubilees agree with Genesis? Why was Adam alone for 40 days in the Garden of Eden?

      Delete
    63. Doesn't Tim consider Jubilees to be scripture? Jubilees sys the sabbath is not for keeping by the Gentiles.

      Chapter 2 is about creation. In verse 19 God says he will choose a people to keep the Sabbath day. Verse 20 tells us God chose Jacob. Verse 31 says that God "did not sanctify all peoples and nations to keep the Sabbath" but only Israel. Verse 33 says this law and testimony of the Sabbath were given to the children of Israel forever. This would mean that Tim, being a Gentile, is under no obligation to keep the Sabbath. So why does he teach that all men must keep the Sabbath? Why contradict Jubilees if he considers it to be canon?

      So what's the deal with the new Sabbath Series videos when Jubilees says its not for Tim or any other Gentiles to keep?

      Delete
    64. The question for this blog is did Tim copyright Jubilees and the answer is no. This blog is not about Jubilees nor is that a topic for a blog comment and then you want to get into Sabbath? What a fool you are and you can't even read in context yet again but no surprise as you are a fool. Only a fool would attempt such stupidity in shallow ignorance. But you.... Well, that is where you live. It seems you do not understand I will not be answering any more of your ignorant questions especially regarding a book you haven't read, videos you haven't reviewed. Watch the Sabbath Series ignorant fool. You are so lazy trying to snake your way out of watching so maybe I'll say something you can take out of context and manipulate claiming you actually reviewed a position you have not. Grow up unethical, badgering, libeling loser and fraud. Watch or don't but you are done here.

      Delete
    65. You stop wasting people's time with this ignorance of your poor manipulations you call questions.

      Delete
    66. One item not on Bickle's list of marks which identify a cult is legalism as opposed to faith. One must keep the law in all it's exactitude. Keeping the law is what marks one as part of the community and to forsake the law is to forsake the community. We see this paradigm of works as opposed to faith very clearly in Timothy's new video series about the Sabbath.

      From "Sabbath Series: Introduction Commentary Only" we hear the following at 16:44

      "Abraham kept the law and the sabbath. And so did Isaac and Jacob. I mean how can they be called righteous if there was no law by which they could be judged as righteous? The very notion is ridiculous from the start."

      How can one be declared righteous apart from the law? Is Tim really this ignorant of the Bible? We are declared righteous through faith in the Gospel of Christ!

      The God Culture teaches a doctrine 100% opposite to what Paul teaches. On their Youtube page they actually say law IS grace!

      "His law is grace and always has been. Salvation was available to even gentiles in Exodus and has been all along. The gospel of grace is a manipulation we will deal with. We are saved by grace but we have to do something. We cannot claim to make Him our Lord but then ignore that which He is Lord of especially the Sabbath. The Sabbath is a perfect example of His grace from the 7th Day when He created it as He realized man needed a Day of Rest set aside and set apart for Him. The notion that the law is absent grace is outright fraud on the part of so-called scholars. It is Pharisee leaven and we will deal with this. Yah Bless."

      Sabbath Series: Part 1. What is the Sabbath? Did it pass away? The Biblical Truth.

      "We are saved by grace but we have to do something."

      There it is. A total denial of the Gospel and an important hallmark of a cult. We have to do something which is keep the law.

      Delete
    67. Matthew 5:17-20 King James Version (KJV)
      17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.

      18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.

      19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.

      20 For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.

      Heaven and earth don't pass until the day of Judgment thus the law remains as Messiah has not fulfilled it all yet but will soon. However, your teaching lawlessness makes you the least in His kingdom assuming you are even saved.

      “...on the contrary,
      we establish the law”
      Paul in Romans 3:31 KJV

      “I delight in the law of God...”
      Paul in Romans 7:22 KJV

      “Therefore the law is holy,
      and the commandment
      holy and just and good”
      Paul in Romans 7:12 KJV

      Except Paul kept, reinforced and taught the law and you have a massive problem. He criticized the Pharisee application of leaven of the law but never the law. To say so is illiterate but that fits you too well. He and the Apostles kept the Sabbath after Messiah's ascension so according to you they are hypocrites and judaizers. What a fraud. Every little dig you attempt is already being dealt with in this series and we obliterate this fraudulent traditional paradigm of ignorance. We already know these ignorant traditional points and we obliterate their unbiblical interpretation. Yours however is even more profound. That's called commentary stupid. Now, watch us prove it because we do. You will never disprove the Word and you most certainly are unqualified and illiterate Biblically as proven in this very blog and all of yours really. You go and watch just to see if you can find something in sheer fraud in stupidity and in fragments as you are Mr. Fragment not only with the Bible but with history and geography in fraud. Then, you overdramatize like a weak, feeble, nagging woman attempting to invoke reaction. What a fraud you are. Of course, you being a law-breaking satanist who calls yourself a Christian, a pagan name for believers unknowingly and in ignorance as the Apostles were not Christians, would not want to hear that there is a law you are supposed to be keeping. Yet, Messiah never abolished the law nor the prophets and Paul cannot nor does he ever overrule Messiah and nor will you fool.

      Delete
    68. If the Sabbath were insignificant, why is it mentioned 137 times in the Bible? If Messiah had done away with it, why is it observed by the disciples after His ascension? (Acts 2:1-4, 13:14-16,13:42-44,18:4, 1 Cor. 7:19, 11:1) Why did the early church keep it as well? If it was temporary, why does scripture profess the Sabbath is forever in your generations for a perpetual and everlasting covenant by a statute forever? (Ex. 31:13, 16, Lev. 16:31, 24:8) Why did Jesus(Yahusha) say he did not come to abolish it? (Matt. 5:17-20) In fact, why does He declare Himself “Lord of the Sabbath” (Mark 2:28) only to abolish it which He says He would not? (Matt. 5:17-20) Why would He create a day for man and then eliminate that day altogether? (Mark 2:27)
      For this is the Day of Rest created for man (Mark 2:27) to rejuvenate in the presence of our Creator. He knows we need that and without it, we will never have the needed fuel nor will we ever apply our full armor. (Mark 2:27) This is never a suggestion but in Israel, to defile this day in many references, would mean death (Ex. 31:14-15, 35:2). On this day, we are to conduct no work not even cooking, nor to indulge in pleasure but strictly to focus on Him in a state of rest (Ex. 35:3, Lev. 23:3, Deut. 5). Even when Yahuah rained manna from Heaven, He refrained on the seventh day (Ex. 16:26).
      Did Messiah void the law? No, (Matt. 5:17-20). Did Paul? No, (Rom. 3:31, 2:13, 7:12, 7:22). Did Luke? No, (Acts 24:14, 25:8). Paul’s responses to gnostic teachings are never repudiating the law which he says is holy, just and good. His context is one of application of the law which is not the Pharisee nor gnostic way of additives and leaven.
      It is time to restore His Sabbath in your life.

      Delete
    69. I see you changed your website and got rid of the reference to Tim re-entering the evangelistic ministry in the Philippines. Looks like that article asking about Tim's missionary status really really got under your skin. I have the original saved.

      The promise of Jesus Christ is that we will participate in his righteousness. Not a created or human righteousness that comes from Him keeping the law which is then imputed to us but His real, essential, eternal righteousness. The same glory that he shares with the Father.

      John 17:20 Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on me through their word;

      21 That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me.

      22 And the glory which thou gavest me I have given them; that they may be one, even as we are one:

      We participate in the divine nature as Peter says.

      1 Peter 1:4 Whereby are given unto us exceeding great and precious promises: that by these ye might be partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust.

      Keeping the sabbath or any part of the law won't grant you participation in Christ's divinity. We become partakers of the divine nature by faith and by Christ's graciousness to us. As Galatians 3:18 says the inheritance comes through the promises and not through the law. The "great and precious promises" by which Peter says we become "partakers of the divine nature" are not fulfilled by the keeping of the law but by faith in Christ who kept and fulfilled the law for us. Paul says further in Galatians 2:

      Galatians 2:16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.

      Galatians 2:21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.

      The God Culture rejects this truth when they say: "His law is grace." For Tim and the rest of his cult, The God Culture, Christ is dead in vain.


      "calls yourself a Christian, a pagan name for believers unknowingly and in ignorance as the Apostles were not Christians,"

      LOL!! You are the golden goose who keeps laying them golden eggs!! Keep it coming Mr Myers! Keep it coming! Never stop never stopping!!

      Delete
    70. None of your business frankly. That point was incredibly stupid and libelous but go ahead kepp going in that direction and see where it leads.

      TGC embraces every word Paul said but in context not this hack job of Mr. Fragment who can only absorb less than a sentence at a time incapable of action understanding in full context as he has proven over and over again even in this blog. For our take on Paul, you will find Part 4 will deal with him fully. Paul kept the law and and the Sabbath and so did the other Apostles thus to say they then somehow came up with a new doctrine redefining the whole of scripture and the words of Messiah is utter fraud in interpretation and that we most certainly reject. We certainly don't attempt to boil down such complex topics to 4 words like this absolute moron and fraud does.

      A cult is exactly what this blog represents. He can't think for himself nor even process. He represents the traditional cult narratives against scripture. Cults misrepresent scripture as this guy does. We do not. What we do is challenge the doctrines of men and some such as this fail. We will stick with scripture no matter what names a buffoon may attempt in his ignorance. We are done with this discussion here. This blog is about copyrights and copyright law not the Law of Yahuah and to make it about that is absolutely stupid as you can see he is desperate because he loses every debate. We are done with this nonsense. He will be dealt with soon.

      Delete
    71. "That point was incredibly stupid and libelous but go ahead kepp going in that direction and see where it leads"

      Libelous to quote what was on your webpage? You do have a strange reading of the law. I added a screenshot of the original.

      https://philippinefails.blogspot.com/2020/03/god-culture-does-timothy-schwab-have.html


      Delete
    72. 25:21 of Sabbath series part 2B:

      "We had a blogger point this one out"

      It's great to know that Timmy is reading these comments and responding to me in his videos. It means I have really got under his skin and he knows these arguments are weighty and must be responded to. But still he does not address Jub 2:31-33. In fact he keeps contradicting it by saying the sabbath is for everyone!

      And the Creator of all things blessed it, but he did not sanctify all peoples and nations to keep Sabbath thereon, but Israel alone: them alone he permitted to eat and drink and to keep Sabbath thereon on the earth.

      And the Creator of all things blessed this day which He had created for blessing and holiness and glory above all days.

      This law and testimony was given to the children of Israel as a law for ever unto their generations.

      The Sabbath is only for Israel and not the Gentiles. The context is not at all about a spiritual Israel to whom the Gentiles can be grafted into. Why doesn't Tim take Jubilees seriously and for what it says? The sabbath is not for the Gentiles.

      Delete
    73. I sent it to him so he would be aware and he's seen that objection and all of yours because you just look up a blog and use other's materials representing an inability to think at all. He belly laughed at how foolish you look. It means you are a great example of stupid and you have given so much such material indeed. You are done in this blog talking about issues far too deep for your immature point-counterpoint fraudulent approach Mr. Fragment. Enough. It is incredibly childish for you to think you could resolve a topic like the Sabbath in a blog comment nor we. Everyone can watch our series and test it for themselves. No one is forced to watch nor even agree though any challenges will always have their hands full as you have found. As it has only begun with 3 full videos, we have a ways to go but we will deal with the manipulation of Paul's words in detail from tradition and it is really wrecked and these are many manipulations in fraud and ignorance some even as bad as your nonsense but we'll fix it. So-called tradition (actually new ear-tickling doctrine) requires one to ignore who Paul was, what he even practiced and what he was dealing with in his day. You are calling him a hypocrite, judaizer and a liar and the funny thing is you are too inept to even know it.
      Regarding Jubilees, Part 2A&B which you have not watched yet comment yet again in ignorance foolishly, obliterates your stupidity completely and you really should watch before commenting because you look like a fool especially saying Tim doesn't take Jubilees seriously when we have covered it much and continue to as well. How stupid you remain spouting off your big mouth in ignorance consistently. Your diarrhea mouth just doesn't stop yet you never actually say anything because your context is missing and ignorant most of the time. Then, you lash out as the true passive-aggressive, demonic agitator that you are, emerges in cyber libel as a criminal. It is not just the Bible in which you have a below elementary level, but history and geography which you royally misrepresent and screw up. It is very sad and embarrassing. This blog is a travesty.

      Delete
    74. Tim: 36:59 sabbath 2a So the true Bible which it would include part of the Torah that's missing right now called The Book of Jubilees has said all along right here the sabbath is for everyone including all in heaven and on earth.

      Book of Jubilees 2:31 - And the Creator of all things blessed it, but he did not sanctify all peoples and nations to keep Sabbath thereon, but Israel alone: them alone he permitted to eat and drink and to keep Sabbath thereon on the earth.

      Both Tim's and Exodus' doctrine of the sabbath is a clear contradiction of Jubilees! Jesus is also contradicted by Jubilees. If the sabbath was created for man as Christ says then it cannot be an enteral ordinance being kept by angels in heaven before it was revealed to man.

      Tim's statement does not agree wit Jubilees at all in any respect. He is not taking it seriously and you have not covered Jubilees much at all. You have ONE video devoted to Jubilees. ONE!!

      This video is chock full of nonsense and I will have to pass by practically all of it. At 36:52 Tim begins a harangue against the government. He brings up the IRS and tax codes calling them part of the world's Pharisaic leavened government. Is that a clue as to why he left the USA? Was he having tax problems? It's a rather odd topic to insert in a video about the Book of Jubilees.

      This video is also infuriating and disappointing. Tim does not begin to discuss the actual contents of the Book of Jubilees until halfway through. He promises more videos to come which will discuss the Book of Jubilees in depth but it has been over a year and there has been nothing. Tim's discussion of the book's contents is limited to comparing the wording of New Testament passages with those in the Jubilees. His thesis is that the the Apostles were familiar with the book and used it for formulating doctrine. If you were expecting anything like a systematic perusal of The Book of Jubilees' contents as I was then you will be sorely disappointed.

      Delete
    75. "because you just look up a blog and use other's materials"

      Please tell me which blog I took that from. Be very specific and exact.

      Delete
    76. We are done with this nonsense. Picking at slides and words in ignorance. You have been proven to be an uneducated, communist-style agitator willing to commit cyber libel which somehow you think we are just supposed to swallow you bully nature. We do not. We reject the premise of every blog you have written on this topic as wholly ignorant and we have proven you as a liar and a fraud. You have no right to engage in your idiotic, childish ridicule. You are done.

      Delete
    77. "We reject the premise of every blog you have written on this topic as wholly ignorant and we have proven you as a liar and a fraud."

      LOL! You edited your videos and your website because of me. Even wrote an "official biography" of Tim. Even excised any the reference to Tim coming to the PHL to engage in ministry.

      Delete
  3. He frauded Pomponius Mela's quote cutting off the remaining directions, he frauded The Periplus of the Erythaean Sea omitting half of the directions so he could stop at the Malay Peninsula which is not an island as it says nor in the right place nor is it mapped at all on almost every map he used. Then, he takes Dionysius in which he shows you a map showing Chryse just Southeast of China directly below the Tropic of Cancer but he omits the remaining directions from the text that it is located "directly below the line (Tropic) of Cancer." He just can't read. It is an acute learning disability or this is hollow propaganda which the latter is far more likely. He has done this with just about everything and when caught what does he do? Well, this is the true test of character folks. He does nothing but double down on stupidity proven so. Why would anyone wish to look so foolish? Because he is a communist-style agitator and that is what he is commissioned to do. He is not worried about how foolish this David Roxas of PhilippineFails looks. It is truly demonic and the demon does not care about how this behavior harms especially the perpetrator but David Roxas cannot see that. He has lost all debate so what does he do? Well you see it here. He attacks even on a personal level especially our leaders who don't even acknowledge him. I do that for them to keep this blog in check and to prove just how ignorant it is. It is laughable when one looks back to his beginnings in his first attack having not watched 3 different series which he attacked. 9 months later and he still has not watched 1 series. Talk about moronic ignorance of the highest levels. He continues to represent himself as even knowing our position which he does not. Only little pieces he attempts to reform a false narrative and debate in ignorance. However, this leaves him with his pants down, exposed in embarrassing fashion and look at him. A weak, pathetic little communist-style agitator with not even a point. The Bathala video is not a "sounds like" stupid so-called scholarly position, it is an extra observation in which Bath and Ala most certainly are Hebrew words which just so happen to the meaning of Bathala in Tagalog. No one has to agree with that nor is it a position but again, one who has not actually reviewed our position would be stupid enough to comment on a far later video of extra thoughts. However, our point remains and he has none. He doesn't even understand nor know Hebrew but keeps wanting to represent himself as if he does and he is utter ignorant on yet another topic adding to his inability to read history nor the Bible. Here we go again, PhilippineFails fails the Philippines yet again. He can't even make a point and has never touched the conclusions of our Solomon's Gold Series which he has not watched yet continues to spout off in ignorance. You can follow a fool to his folly if you wish.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "The Bathala video is not a "sounds like" stupid so-called scholarly position, it is an extra observation in which Bath and Ala most certainly are Hebrew words which just so happen to the meaning of Bathala in Tagalog."

      LOL Paterno's thesis, which you are using, was shot down over a hundred years ago as utter nonsense and it remains so to this day. I hope this nonsense is in your book. Will make you look like the uneducated fools you really are. I have watched plenty of your videos to know what you teach and its all bunk. All unhistorical crap. And your research methods literally consist of quote mining from blogs and Wikipedia.

      You aren't archaeologists, you aren't historians, you aren't geographers, you aren't linguists, you aren't even Christians. Timothy Jay Schwab is a failed magazine publisher who's company went bankrupt! Neither he nor his wife nor you nor anyone else in this alleged group has any credentials whatsoever except knowing how to use the internet and that is suspect because you couldn't take twenty minutes to find an English translation of Dionysus Perigretes or check any of your sources to see if they were valid!

      Delete
    2. You didn't even watch the video pathetic, uninformed loser. That is an extra video which makes a Hebrew connection in linguistics that is accurate. You do not have to agree with our conclusion in that extra video but to say Bath is not Hebrew is illiterate as well as ala and one sees they both lead to Creation for what was known as the Creator God, that is worthy of note. We could care less what your unscholarly, uneducated, communist agitation has to say about it. You are a fraud and a criminal guilty of Cyber Libel among other things.

      Delete
    3. I watched your whole video thank you very much. Bathala is not Jesus Christ. He is not the creator God and hebrew and tagalog are not related languages.

      Delete
    4. And Pigafetta is not a Jesuit historian! What a laughable claim!

      Delete
    5. No you did not watch the video as you have no clue what you are talking about and you have proven you are a fraud. We do not believe Pigafetta was a Jesuit nor is he what we were quoting in that portion of the video fool. The historian who wrote the account we covered was certainly of that ilk. You can’t represent anything with accuracy fraud. You are the dumbest we have ever encountered.

      Delete
    6. "We do not believe Pigafetta was a Jesuit"

      Tim says in the video that Pigafetta is a Jesuit historian!

      Delete
    7. "No you did not watch the video as you have no clue what you are talking about and you have proven you are a fraud."

      I really did listen to the entire thing. It is pretty ridiculous and deserves its own blog post. Probably won't get that treatment though. Tim goes through a painstaking process to prove that the hermaphordite god with a messenger bird named Bathala is Jesus Christ. BLASPHEMOUS!

      Delete
    8. You have no point yet again fool. You did not watch that video as you are incapable of such comprehension. We know better. Filipinos did not say they worshipped that bird nor that Bathala was a hermaphrodite. That's Jesuit leaven of nonsense we reject because Filipinos did in their responses to those Jesuits. You are such a fraud. Maybe you can get someone to watch it for you and explain it to you including the context of what an extra video is. You misrepresent it and everything you touch you blasphemous, libelous, demonic fraud.

      Delete
    9. "We know better. Filipinos did not say they worshipped that bird nor that Bathala was a hermaphrodite."

      Oh I'm so sorry I guess I was wrong. Turns out Bathala is Jesus Christ. Who knew that Pinoys were worshipping Jesus Christ before they ever heard of him??? LOL you call me blasphemous and demonic but you think Bathala is the creator God of Genesis in EVERY SENSE! That is too funny.

      Delete
    10. You are the dumbest blogger we have ever encountered. So thick in the head and incapable of reason and logic. You are a fraud misrepresenting everything you touch. You will pay for your Cyber Libel and reap the rewards for your demonic behavior.

      Delete
  4. Who is David Roxas of PhilippineFails? Is he an archaeologist? No. Historian? No. Linguist? No. By his own standard, he has no right to speak thus to use such illegitimate, utterly stupid logic is nonsense but nonsense is all you get here from this blog. Is he a communist? Well, you decide by his behavior. Is he a liar? He is prove to be so. Is he credible in any sense? He has been disproven on practically every one of these ignorant attempts at debate. He fails every time. So, in his frustration he breaks the law into Cyber Libel and he will be dealt with for that criminal behavior.

    We began with a YouTube channel which accurately reflects history and the sources he claims to have debunked prove to be accurate. What a fraud he is for even alluding to such. He has lost all debate and has not made any significant points whatsoever.

    We are so tired of hearing the stupid, unscholarly line of something being shot down which was not nor would it matter as we do not propagate Paterno. It's amazing. Paterno is not our case. We mentioned he believed the Philippines was Ophir and that's it and he did and that is a fact accurately represented. Why did he believe so? There was abundant history that says so but Roxas ignores that history and then say, see there's no history. Well, when one ignores it perhaps but that's simply ignorance certainly not scholarly. What a stupid misrepresentation in fraud yet again. It's all he does. The fact is the case we make is so multifaceted and deep he can't even review it as he has not watched the series but briefs because he is incapable of absorbing all the overwhelming facts as proven from this blog where he gets hooked up on side notes like Paterno said the Philippines is Ophir which he did and that is seconds of over 100 videos on this topic. He does not know anything except some screenshots he took and tried to take issue with in a failed attempt. It is the epitome of ignorance. Our findings remain and this blog has not touched our case in the slightest. Everything he attempted to take issue is either the opposite of his misrepresentation in challenged reading comprehension or insignificant and not even more than a side note. What he does is applies the standard of a scientific journal to a YouTube channel which he clearly does not understand the format in the slightest as this blog shows he doesn't even realize that all YouTube content is considered copyrighted by Google and the legal system. Either this is the most profound learning disability we have ever encountered or this is just a communist-style agitator of as our viewer called it "saliva." What an anemic, pathetic display of nothing once again. Notice he even has to attempt to deflect because his blog doesn't actually say anything nor make a point. This is a fraud folks and don't worry, he will not be employing others to attack us and others offering you the truth as he will be gone soon with no platform. He is a criminal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Who is David Roxas of PhilippineFails? Is he an archaeologist? No. Historian? No. Linguist?"

      I am a man checking up on your facts. Doing what you tell all your listeners to do and which none of them have done.

      "we do not propagate Paterno"

      Yes you do. The whole Bathalismo thing originates WITH HIM. You may no realize that but it is the case. The DNA of Paterno is in your videos and in all the blogs and PDFs out there which discuss this issue.

      "What he does is applies the standard of a scientific journal to a YouTube channel"

      Funny how you always denigrate your channel and put yourself on a low standard. You your claim to be doing archaeology, history, linguistics, etc and yet you don't want to be held to a high standard of accuracy and scholarship.

      "he will be gone soon with no platform. He is a criminal."

      I am not going anywhere. I am staying right here and there is much more to come concerning you and Tim. You keep saying I am a criminal as if that makes it so. It does not. Just like declaring the Philippines is Ophir does not make it so either.

      Delete
    2. The only thing we have covered on Paterno is he believed the Philippines is Ophir for a few seconds and that is it. He certainly did you fraud and you are wrong. If he did or not believe something else we cover, we could care less as he is impertinent other than a Former Prime Minster of the Philippines believed the Philippines was Ophir in the 1890s which is worthy of note and we will continue to note it over and over and over again. You are a fraud for suggesting such stupidity. We have no DNA from him and what a stupid assertion yet again of which you are full. We cover Bathala because we know Hebrew and you do not. Linguists, rabbis, seminarians, Hebrew speakers who watch our channel have affirmed our use of Hebrew. What is your linguistic background? You have none and all you are saying is nuh-uh. You can and that is fine because that is an extra video never our case and we stand behind it as it is a fact that Bath and ala are most certainly Hebrew words and ones tied in meaning to Creation. You are a fraud and you will be dealt with.

      Delete
    3. "The only thing we have covered on Paterno is he believed the Philippines is Ophir for a few seconds and that is it."]

      I don't care what YOU said about Paterno. The fact is that EVERYTHING YOU HAVE TO SAY comes straight from him. The fact that you do not realize that shows how oblivious you are and how SHALLOW your research actually is!!!

      "We have no DNA from him and what a stupid assertion yet again of which you are full."

      I don't even know how to respond to such idiocy. Yes ALL your theses comes directly from Paterno. Go read up on him!!! Go read what he wrote. DO SOME ACTUAL RESEARCH!!!!!!!!!

      Delete
    4. No it doesn't fraud. You can't get anything right. Our research includes over 100 videos almost ALL of which you have never reviewed and you are still commenting in utter ignorance as a complete and utter fool. You don't even know our position but pieces from screenshots mostly. What a fraud. You have misrepresented yourself as even knowing our case and you do not and what a stupid misrepresentation as our case is built on a Biblical foundation like NO one has ever done in all of history for this topic. No one has found the things we have and your are still stuck on things you were already disproven. What a fool. You can't even graduate to our actual case because you are hung up on sources which turn out to be accurate unfortunately for you. You have proven nothing, offered nothing but fraud, negligence and cyber libel and you are a criminal. Your libel especially far surpasses any such test and you will soon find out. You haven't been able to prove us wrong fraud and no one has in over 3 years. Whether or not there are some commonalities with Paterno is impertinent because you can't prove it wrong. You are a fraud misrepresenting and an outright liar.

      Delete
    5. "No one has found the things we have"

      That's because a lot of it is in your imagination. Like ocean trenches being the rivers of Eden.

      Delete
    6. You are full of BS. How would you even know because you have not even reviewed our case yet blog over and over in utter ignorance. How much more foolish could a person be. Now that would be hard to beat. You truly deserve a reward and it is coming don't worry as you will be dealt with.

      Delete
  5. Then you read yet another libelous attack on our leader who had a successful publishing career of about 30 years and his last positions before deciding to move to the Philippines were successful and he turned down a very large multi-million dollar fund wanting him to go out and acquire other magazines even which was his own plan. Instead he followed the call of his heart to the Philippines. How terrible. What an awful person he must be right? No, the person accusing his is from the lowest ilk imaginable and this is illegal harassment even further. What an ignorant fool this David Roxas is, he fails consistently and lies much of the time. He can't even represent such an awesome resume in which he found nothing but good really. Only a fraud would treat facts like this. One brief attempt at a small magazine does not characterize Tim's career where he was a Publisher with one of the largest newsstand publications on Earth in fact. Oops! See you only get misrepresentations in this blog from this fraud. However, Timothy never makes this about his career nor his 30+ years of ministry that, oops!, this reckless, irresponsible blogger missed in his previous blog along with this incredibly stupid, communist ploy he just attempted. He just keeps piling on nonsense on top of nonsense but he has failed to ever make a point. This is a complete waste of your time and frankly, we wouldn't read any of his lousy material. You decide.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "had a successful publishing career of about 30 years and his last positions before deciding to move to the Philippines"

      WOW!! he worked for other very successful companies. But when he went off on his own and started Raffine LLC he was bankrupt within two years!! Could being almost 20k in arrears for child support be the problem?? Hmmmmmmm.........

      Motion: 67 Sequence: 0 Create Initials: BRM Create Date: 03/23/2012 Update Initials: JM Update Date: 09/28/2012 FOCP - 4D Open Court Proceedings: Contempt Hearing Hon William S Horne, presiding Carol Spedden, Court Reporter. Deft appeared pro se & sworn. $20,335.27 Arrears Continued to April 27th. Notice given. Filed: 03/23/2012

      And LOOK AT THAT!!! A publishing career that spanned 30 years??? You mean Tim is not an archaeologist or a linguist or a historian or even a minister in any meaningful sense of the term??? Say it ain't so!!

      Delete
    2. What a fraud you are! You can't even review a successful resume and understand it. What books, magazines and other publications have you published? Tim has no child support as it is paid in full and you don't even know what you are reading yet again. Tim's child support was awaiting modification back then as accumulated but when all was adjusted, it evened out pretty much. However, that is impertinent anyway as Tim's kids are grown and his child support is paid in full. Did you pay over $250,000 in child support loser? Even make that much? You can't research anything with accuracy you fraud. I dare you to keep that track up you libelous abuser. It will cost you as your other statements will. Surprise you couldn't even get thru a blog without libeling Tim yet again. What a disgusting demonic display of filth. You will reap the rewards for what you have sewn. You said Anna should be put away you fraud – Time for you to be put away demon.

      Delete
    3. "Did you pay over $250,000 in child support loser? "

      He paid that much and I am the loser? LOL!!!! So tell us all why Sumner got a restraining order against him and moved to North Carolina with the children back in 2004?

      Case Type: Domestic Violence
      Filing Date: 03/08/2004

      Delete
    4. You are the one losing every debate not Tim who doesn't even hardly pay attention to your stupidity. Typical marriage posturing. Welcome to America. You really are the dumbest fraud we have ever encountered. You are such a liar and misrepresent everything you touch. But by all means, keep up your libeling because your penalty is growing by the word. You will pay for your cyber libel especially. What a fraud you are. You have lost every debate and then, you go after our leader who is one of the most amazing people I have ever known and many agree. You will be dealt with loser.

      Delete
    5. "you go after our leader who is one of the most amazing people I have ever known"

      Yeah I bet he is amazing. So tell us why his wife got a restraining order against him and fled with the children to North Carolian. This should be.....amazing!!

      Delete
    6. "Tim who doesn't even hardly pay attention to your stupidity. "

      I am the only one who has written out methodical and meticulous critiques of your videos. And you are right! Tim doest care!! But some nobody makes two 3 min videos about nothing and Tim takes 80 minutes to respond in Solomon's Gold part 1 B! It's no wonder he does not want to deal with a substantial criticism like mine but focuses on a nobody like in that video.

      But even so you edited 3 of your videos because of me and because you know I am right.

      Delete
    7. That is false, we have had thousands of thoughtful critiques of our videos from people who have actually watched including pastors, rabbis, scholars, academics, government officials, doctors, lawyers, etc. - actual educated people which clearly you weren't paying attention in class because your comprehension is sorely lacking. This nonsense is not thoughtful, you can't even reason or show a little bit of logic as evidenced above when you say that Philippine-Egypt trade did not exist when the quotes reaffirm that point several times. Only a stupid, agitating fool can be so ignorant. You can't read history and comprehend and you misrepresent and commit fraud consistently hacking up history. You do the same with the Bible. You can't even look at a video on YouTube and see that it has over 1,200 likes stupid and then actually make the fraudulent statement that no one likes it. As an added video it has 42,000 views even which is very good for an extra teaching video. You are such a fool and you misrepresent everything you touch and there you go yet again, you are caught again fraud. You just keep demonstrating the point over and over retuning to your folly just as a dog returns to his vomit. You did the same with maps which was an absolutely atrocious demonstration of just how foolish you really are. You even disproved yourself and what is sad is you don't even seem to be able to comprehend that even. You are many levels below this channel in intellect and you mislead greatly that you have remotely challenged our conclusions. You have lost every debate including this one. We updated sources which you then tried to stupidly and fraudulent exploit and take credit in communist fashion as you always employ. You are a disgrace to this platform and you do not deserve it. What a disgusting show of only agitation with no logic involved. Filthy. You are done. You will be shut down now. All you do is Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud. Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.Agitate. Deceive. Deflect. Libel. Fraud.
      Typical communist-style agitation and that is all you have and all you are.

      Delete
  6. We have proven over and over from his own words and deeds, this is a libelous, abusive, harassing, lying, fraud who offers nothing of value. He only knows how to corrupt and fraud and we have proven that with quote after quote, map after map, scripture after scripture… This shows how pathetic he is and he has identified his foundation now, we have it. David Roxas of PhilippineFails hates God in his own words. He blames him for the state of the Philippines instead of looking at how the Filipino people have lost covenant relationship which we are working to restore. Yet, he mischaracterizes and misrepresents yet claims he cares but he hates the Philippines and he is a racist, bigot who hates Filipinos and Americans. Seems he just hates everyone but this is common with those whose father is the devil. We live in the End Times when evil is painted as good and good as evil and this persecution is welcomed as it demonstrates we are in the Will of Yahuah. This fraud is in the will of his father, satan. They are liars incapable of truth, haters oblivious to love, demonizers who are the ones with demons, accusers yet guilty themselves… these are hypocrites and yes, the Philippines is not perfect but mostly because of the influence of these Jesuit and Communist-style agitators… They read scripture and then ignore it reframing it in fragments to manipulate to their Pharisee leaven which this fraud represents. They read history and outright lie and commit fraud to reframe it and cover it up but no longer. They are exposed. David Roxas of PhilippineFails has failed the Philippines.

    ReplyDelete