It's your weekly compendium of foolishness and corruption in the Philippine government.
| https://mb.com.ph/2026/09/30/sandiganbayan-orders-90-day-suspension-of-tarlac-solon |
The Sandiganbayan Sixth Division has ordered the 90-day preventive suspension of Tarlac 3rd District Rep. Noel Rivera in connection with graft cases filed against him.
The cases stem from allegations that Rivera had financial interests in nine government infrastructure projects awarded to Tarlac 3-G Construction and Development Corporation during his term as congressman from 2022 to 2025.
In a resolution promulgated on Sept. 29, the court ordered Rivera's preventive suspension as a member of the House of Representatives.
During the Sept. 16 hearing, the prosecution moved for Rivera's suspension, prompting the court to give him five days to show cause why he should not be preventively suspended in connection with the cases.
Rivera argued that “the facts alleged in the Informations do not charge an offense because they are bereft of allegations showing the acts constituting his intervention.”
He also argued that “the defect in the Informations cannot be cured by the evidence the prosecution intends to present during the trial.”
Rivera further said that “the malfeasance sought to be prevented by suspension has been eliminated by his divestment of his interest in Tarlac 3-G Construction and Development Corporation.”
He said he is no longer a shareholder, officer, or director of the corporation and that he cannot influence any witness or tamper with documentary evidence.
Rivera also said that, as a member of the House of Representatives, he exercises no control over the Department of Public Works and Highways.
He argued that his suspension “would deprive his constituents of representation in the House of Representatives.”
However, the court said Rivera had already been given the opportunity to challenge the validity of the Informations through his previous motions to quash.
The Sandiganbayan denied those motions on Sept. 9 for lack of merit.
“The arguments as to the validity of Informations raised by accused Rivera in his instant Comment are merely substantial reiterations of this in his previous Motions to Quash,” the court said.
“The Court already considered the same and found them to be without merit when it denied the said Motions to Quash in the said Resolutions. Thus there is no more question as to the validity of the Informations,” it added.
The court said the requirements for preventive suspension under Section 13 of Republic Act No. 3019, or the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, had been met, thus “the Court must order the suspension of accused Rivera.”
The Sandiganbayan Sixth Division has ordered the 90-day preventive suspension of Tarlac 3rd District Rep. Noel Rivera in connection with graft cases filed against him.
| https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/2315110/ex-dswd-official-found-guilty-of-graft-malversation-over-pdaf-misuse |
The Sandiganbayan Fifth Division found a former Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) official guilty of graft and malversation over the misuse of P5 million in Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) in 2007.
In a decision promulgated on Oct. 1, the court found former DSWD-National Capital Region (NCR) Regional Director Honorita Bayudan guilty beyond reasonable doubt of violating Section 3(e) of Republic Act No. 3019, or the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, and of malversation of public funds.
Bayudan was sentenced to a maximum of 10 years in prison for graft and a maximum of 18 years for malversation. She was also ordered to pay P5 million, representing the amount malversed.
The case stemmed from the misuse of PDAF allocated to former Pasay Rep. Consuelo Dy.
According to the court’s decision, Dy had a PDAF allocation of P8 million for the first tranche of fiscal year 2007. The amount was released to the DSWD-NCR for the implementation of its Comprehensive Integrated Delivery of Social Services project.
The court said the DSWD-NCR, represented by Bayudan, and Dy entered into a memorandum of agreement (MOA) with Unlad Pinoy Organization, Inc. (UPOI) to implement the project in Pasay City.
The project aimed to provide various skills training and livelihood assistance to indigent residents from January to March 2007, with a total funding of P5 million.
Under the MOA, the P5-million budget was supposed to be released in two tranches: 30% upon approval and signing of the agreement, and 70% upon submission of an accomplishment report or inspection by the DSWD-NCR.However, the court said the DSWD-NCR, with Bayudan’s approval, released the entire P5 million to UPOI on the same day.
The field investigation office of the Office of the Ombudsman and the Commission on Audit (COA) then conducted validation and verification of the transactions involving the P5-million fund. They found that its transfer to UPOI violated the MOA and the rules on the transfer of funds to nongovernmental organizations (NGOs).
The Ombudsman and COA also found the “legal and physical existence of UPOI as well as its suppliers,” and the “reported distribution of financial assistance and conduct of trainings” questionable.
Following these findings, the Ombudsman filed graft and malversation charges against Bayudan.
In its ruling, the court said Bayudan “committed glaring irregularities that reflect manifest partiality and evident bad faith on her part, or at the very least, gross inexcusable negligence” in her involvement in the execution of the MOA, transfer of funds, and implementation and monitoring of the CIDSS project.
The court questioned why UPOI was chosen to conduct the project, noting that it was not an accredited NGO under Section 3.3 of COA Circular No. 96-003 and had been registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission only a few days before the MOA was executed.
The court added that the execution of the MOA was “procedurally infirm” because only Bayudan’s name and signature appeared on the agreement. It was not signed by the PDAF focal person and the officer in charge of the DSWD-NCR Standards Unit.
Moreover, the court said the transfer of funds to UPOI was “not in accordance with COA Circular 96-2003 and the MOA.”
The court also found the project’s implementation “questionable,” with several barangay officials testifying that no workshop program or training had been conducted in their areas.
Several barangay officials also testified that some individuals on the beneficiary list were not residents of their respective barangays.
Former DSWD-National Capital Region Regional Director Honorita Bayudan has benn found guilty beyond reasonable doubt of violating Section 3(e) of Republic Act No. 3019, or the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, and of malversation of public funds.
| https://mb.com.ph/2026/10/02/village-dad-held-for-p35-m-shabu |
Police arrested a barangay councilor after suspected shabu was found in his possession in Barangay Poblacion 7, this town, on Thursday, Oct. 1.
The Catanauan Municipal Police Station (MPS) enforced a search warrant search issued by the Regional Trial Court Branch 96, Catanauan, Quezon against the 36-year-old suspect.
Recovered from the suspect was 517 grams of shabu valued at P3.5 million.
The suspect is in the custody of the Catanauan MPS and faces cases for violating Republic Act 9165 or the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002.
Meanwhile, three rape suspects were arrested in Laguna, Batangas, and Quezon on Oct. 1.
The Police Regional Office 4-A identified the suspects as Ali who was apprehended by the San Pablo City police in Barangay Cahilan 1, Lemery, Batangas; Mark Joe, who was arrested in Barangay Escribano, San Juan, Batangas, and Wilfredo, who was nabbed in Barangay Poblacion, Mansalay, Oriental Mindoro.
A barangay councilor has been busted for drugs.
| https://mb.com.ph/2026/10/02/caloocan-cop-relieved-over-alleged-groping |
A police master sergeant assigned in Caloocan City was relieved from his post after he was accused of groping a woman at a sari-sari store in Barangay 171, Bagumbong on Sept. 8.
The incident occurred at around 8:20 p.m. and was caught on CCTV, reportedly showing the policeman touching the woman’s buttocks while she was inside the store.
The policeman was also disarmed and placed under restrictive custody pending the appropriate disposition of the criminal and administrative complaints.
Caloocan City Police Station chief Col. Joey T. Goforth ordered immediate action upon learning of the incident.
Goforth also ordered a full and in-depth investigation into the circumstances surrounding the incident.
The suspect faces charges of acts of lasciviousness and violation of Republic Act No. 11313, the Safe Spaces Act.
The police said any violation or administrative lapse established through the investigation will be dealt with in accordance with the law and applicable PNP rules and regulations.
A police master sergeant was relieved from his post after he was accused of groping a woman at a sari-sari store.
| https://cebudailynews.inquirer.net/772142/coa-flags-cebu-city-over-unserved-typhoon-tino-relief-goods |
The Commission on Audit (COA) has flagged the Cebu City government over substantial quantities of donated relief goods for Typhoon Tino victims that remained undistributed.
The finding was disclosed in COA’s audit report on Cebu City’s 2025 accounts and operations, released on September 29, 2026, which reviewed the city government’s handling of donated relief goods following the typhoon.
Among the donated supplies that remained in storage were canned goods, rice, bottled water, modular tents, hygiene kits, tool kits and other essentials intended for residents affected by the Nov. 4, 2025 typhoon.
COA said its review of the Report on Physical Count of Inventories (RPCI) submitted by the Department of General Services (DGS) showed that significant quantities of donated relief goods remained undistributed as of Dec. 31, 2025, nearly two months after the typhoon struck the city.
The inventory included 4,800 cans of NR Virginia Beef Loaf and 4,800 cans of Vinta Sardines, along with 160 boxes of Nutri Star Meats, 100 boxes of Don Primo Tuna Flakes, and other canned goods.
The list also included 160 sacks of 50-kilogram rice, 125 sacks of 50-kilogram white rice, 20 packs of 5-kilogram Lion Ivory Rice, as well as smaller quantities of other rice products. There were also 128 bottles of 6.6-liter Nature Spring water and 97 bottles of 1.5-liter water.
For non-food supplies, the inventory listed 368 small modular tents, 221 big modular tents, 358 hygiene kits and 220 tool kits, along with corrugated GI sheets, tarpaulins and sando bags.
COA’s Audit Team also conducted a warehouse inspection on Jan. 29, 2026, and found that a considerable number of donated relief goods were still stored despite the lapse of what it considered a reasonable period for relief operations.
COA said the non-distribution ran counter to the intent of donors who entrusted their contributions to the city government. It also said the delay deprived affected residents of timely relief that could have been provided through the donations.
The audit team cited Section IV.C.8 of COA Circular No. 2014-002, which provides that donated relief goods should be sorted, inventoried or counted and recorded upon receipt and before repacking. It also states that distribution should be undertaken immediately, particularly for perishable goods or items.
COA said the DGS Warehouse Office explained that the donated goods were being kept in the warehouse pending their eventual disposition or distribution.
Several of the non-food supplies, it noted, had been donated by external partners, including the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and other foundations.
Still, COA said the goods should have been distributed promptly when the need arose to minimize the risk of loss, wastage or possible misappropriation. It added that prolonged storage could undermine public trust and confidence in the city government’s stewardship and management of donated resources.
COA recommended that the city management, through the City Local Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Officer and in coordination with the City Social Welfare Services Officer and City General Services Officer, submit a written explanation identifying the reasons and factors behind the non-distribution of the donations.
It also recommended the immediate issuance and distribution of the donated relief goods to their intended beneficiaries, with the process properly documented in accordance with COA Circular No. 2014-002.
In response, the DGS said its inventory records had been updated to reflect actual withdrawals from the warehouse based on duly approved requests from concerned offices.
The office also said it would maintain coordination with concerned offices and release goods only upon receipt of duly approved requisition and issuance documents.
During the April 8, 2026 Exit Conference, the Department of Social Welfare Services (DSWS), which was assigned to distribute the relief goods, explained that delays in the distribution of the donated items were caused by its delayed arrival. By then, the initial distribution to affected victims had already been completed, according to the DSWS.
For the remaining tools and goods, the DSWS said it was consolidating the supplies and identifying appropriate beneficiaries, with priority given to severely affected individuals.
COA, however, said the quantities of donated goods that remained in storage during its inspection indicated a need for more timely coordination, beneficiary identification and distribution planning.
The Audit Team requested supporting documents and a corresponding distribution timeline for validation and verification.
The Commission on Audit has flagged the Cebu City government over substantial quantities of donated relief goods for Typhoon Tino victims that remained undistributed.
More than ₱413.7 million released for the Cebu City Bus Rapid Transit (CBRT) project remained unused after more than eight years, with the Commission on Audit (COA) citing planning and operational inefficiencies that delayed the project’s implementation.
Of the ₱460.26 million released to the Cebu City government in April 2017 as the first tranche for the project’s road right-of-way and site acquisition, only ₱46.55 million, or 10.11 percent, had been disbursed as of Dec. 31, 2025. This left an unutilized balance of ₱413.71 million.
COA said the prolonged underutilization was linked to the absence of clear timelines, lack of prioritization and inadequate manpower, alongside delays in key project components.
These conditions, the audit said, significantly impeded the implementation of the CBRT project and delayed the acquisition of road right-of-way and project sites.
The ₱460.26-million allocation covered several components under the CBRT’s Phase I program of works, namely:
- ₱231.70 million for land acquisition
- ₱62.87 million for structures and improvements
- ₱42.73 million for transaction costs
- ₱29.73 million for resettlement and development
- ₱5.97 million for livelihood and capability development
- ₱27.22 million for income restoration and
- ₱60.03 million for contingency expenses.
As of Dec. 31, 2025, only ₱30.51 million had been disbursed for land acquisition, while the allocation for structures and improvements, transaction costs, resettlement and development, livelihood and capability development, and income restoration had recorded zero utilization.
The contingency fund had recorded ₱16.04 million in expenses, bringing total disbursements to ₱46.55 million and the overall utilization rate to 10.11 percent.
According to COA’s inquiry with the Cebu BRT Office, several events contributed to the minimal utilization of the funds.
These include changes in the project’s alignment or route in 2019, restrictions brought by the covid-19 pandemic in 2020, securing permits for the demolition of existing skywalks from 2023 to 2024, continuing public consultations and validation of affected properties and establishments in 2024, approval of the Resettlement Action Plan in 2024, and the election period in 2025.
COA acknowledged that these issues contributed to delays in completing the project’s road right-of-way and site acquisition.
However, the audit team noted that some identified work items could still have been acted upon despite these challenges, particularly since more than eight years had already passed since the release of the first tranche.
COA also noted the absence of clear timelines for accomplishing the work items, coupled with a lack of prioritization and manpower, which it said greatly contributed to the project’s delay and continued non-completion.
The audit identified 120 properties affected by the CBRT project, with 39 properties under negotiated sale and 81 subject to expropriation.
Of the 39 properties under negotiated sale, only eight lots had been released in 2025, with payments totaling ₱30.51 million. COA noted that payments for land acquisition only began in 2025, with eight of the 24 lots under the negotiated-sale category acquired.
For properties that remained unpaid under negotiated sale, the CBRT Project Management Office said disbursements were stopped in 2025 because of the election ban.
The office also said documents for the remaining lots and structures needed revisions to reflect the current city officials as official signatories.
Meanwhile, documents covering the 81 properties subject to expropriation were only endorsed by the CBRT Project Management Office to the Department of Transportation on March 10, 2026, for review of their documentary requirements.
The audit also found that the ₱42.73 million allocation for transaction costs had zero utilization as of Dec. 31, 2025.
The CBRT Project Management Office said payments had already been made to eight lot owners, but the related transaction costs remained unpaid pending notarization of the Deeds of Absolute Sale. COA said these transactions had not yet been processed because of a lack of prioritization.
For the ₱29.73 million resettlement and development allocation, the Cebu City Sangguniang Panlungsod approved the Resettlement Action Plan in October 2024, more than seven years after the city received the funds.
The CBRT Project Management Office later explained that the Department of Transportation would assume responsibility for the resettlement site, meaning the city would no longer utilize the allocation for that component.
The ₱5.97 million livelihood and capability development allocation and ₱27.22 million income restoration allocation also remained unused as of the audit date.
The CBRT Project Management Office said it had recently conducted another joint revalidation survey with the City Transportation Office and the DOTr to identify affected business establishments.
While most of the project funds remained unused, the audit noted that the contingency fund had recorded ₱16.04 million in expenses.
These included:
- ₱11.53 million for salaries and wages of job-order workers assigned to the CBRT Project Management Office from 2021 to 2025
- ₱2.79 million for appraisal services
- ₱1.58 million for equipment
- ₱121,500 in honoraria for the Technical Working Group and Secretariat and
- ₱21,313 for office supplies.
COA noted that despite these expenses, the accomplishment of the CBRT Project Management Office had not been substantial compared with the different work items in the approved program of works.
The CBRT Project Management Office also cited limited personnel at times, saying the office was handling complicated legal matters and other responsibilities that required additional competent personnel. The audit said this situation slowed the office’s overall efficiency.
COA said the conditions showed that the CBRT project had been significantly delayed by planning and operational inefficiencies despite the availability of funds.
The audit team said the continued idleness of ₱413.71 million did not align with the intended purpose of the funds and undermined the timely delivery of the project’s expected benefits.
The CBRT Project Management Office, in a letter dated April 20, 2026, also cited changes in administration as a significant factor in the project’s continued non-completion, saying each change resulted in changes in office heads and the prioritization of programs, projects and activities.
It also identified other factors, including the failure to include protection of historical buildings in the feasibility study, removal of two skywalks, changes in project alignment and increased project costs, delayed approval of the Resettlement Action Plan, issues involving the Tejero resettlement site, and insufficient manpower and equipment.
The CBRT Project Management Office nevertheless concurred with COA’s final recommendations.
COA recommended that the CBRT Project Management Office establish and strictly implement clear timelines and milestones for all remaining work items, while concerned offices provide adequate technical and administrative support, including additional competent personnel.
It also called for stronger coordination with the DOTr and the creation of an oversight or monitoring committee to regularly assess the project’s progress and performance.
COA said several critical activities, including land acquisition, transaction cost processing, livelihood restoration and income restoration, remained substantially unimplemented despite the availability of funds and the considerable period that had elapsed since the first tranche was released in 2017.
It reiterated that the prolonged inactivity in several work components highlighted the need for stronger project management, clearer implementation schedules, enhanced coordination and adequate staffing to facilitate the timely utilization of the funds and realization of the CBRT project’s intended objectives and benefits.
Over ₱413.7 million for the Cebu City BRT project sat unused for more than eight years due to planning and operational inefficiencies, COA found.
| https://www.abs-cbn.com/news/nation/2026/10/6/barangay-chairman-wife-shot-in-isabela-ambush-1547 |
A barangay chairman and his wife were seriously wounded after being shot in San Juan, Isabela, on Saturday, October 3.
Philippine National Police (PNP) Public Information Office chief Col. Allen Rae Co said the victims were reportedly on their way home after attending a wake when they were ambushed.
Authorities are still investigating the motive behind the attack, while two suspects have been arrested in connection with the shooting.
"We are investigating and looking at this. We are doing our own police investigative work, not just relying on what they are saying. We are looking at their connection with other people in the area," Co said.
According to Co, the suspects have previous cases, some of which were dismissed while others remain under investigation.
One of the suspects had a murder case filed in October 2014, but this was dismissed for lack of probable cause.
He was also linked to another murder case filed in January this year, but the case did not push through after the victim refused to file charges.
"The other one had a murder case in February 2019. Again, dismissed due to insufficiency in evidence and a serious physical injury case," Co added.
Police are also looking into the possibility that the attack was a case of gun-for-hire.
Authorities are also investigating who may have ordered the attack and whether the suspects have links to other individuals in the area.
Police are also checking whether the couple had received threats prior to the incident.
"We are still looking at this. They are still recovering from their injuries and are still recovering," Co said.
A barangay chairman and his wife have survived an assassination attempt.