Showing posts with label election. Show all posts
Showing posts with label election. Show all posts

Monday, October 7, 2024

No More Nuisance Candidates?

It's election season again. The first step in the 2025 elections is the filing of the Certificate of Candidacy. Lot's of people want in on the government gravy train. However, in the past it has not been so easy for the little guy to attempt a run for office without being disqualified for being a nuisance candidate. That is now a thing of the past. Perhaps. 

https://mb.com.ph/2024/10/2/comelec-in-a-tight-spot

The Commission on Elections (Comelec) finds itself in a tight spot when it comes to which election candidates should be declared as "nuisance".

This, after the Supreme Court (SC) ruled that the unpopularity of a candidate, or non-membership in a political party, as well as the lack of financial capacity to run a campaign, were not sufficient grounds to declare one a nuisance candidate.

"Although our chances of getting an opportunity to appeal for a declaration of disqualification as a nuisance candidate in the law department are limited, we still have two other options to determine if you're a bona fide candidate," Comelec spokesman lawyer John Rex Laudiangco told the media during the second day of filing of certificates of candidacy (COCs).

Many of the perennial poll aspirants who have so far filed their COC for senator have criticized Comelec for disqualifying them due to their lack of financial capacity or for being not well-known. 

With these two factors out of the picture, Laudiangco said that they will observe the aspirants during the filing to check their actions, or to find out if they know what they're running for.

"You may be running for senator, but the job you're referring to doesn't quite suit that of a senator. Perhaps there's a lack of full understanding of the position involved," he said.

The other thing Comelec is looking at is those who filed their COCs only to disrupt or confuse the voting public in an attempt to get votes at someone else's expense.

Laudiangco assured the public that they'll make a factual assessment to establish that someone does not have a bona fide intention for the position they're running for.

"Because we can see that, if he or she is really serious or if he or she just wants to be seen filing a COC, getting photographed, being on TV, because there are people like that," he added.

No longer is lack of membership in a political party or lack of financial capacity enough to consider someone a nuisance candidate. Instead the COMELEC will be looking at a would-be candidates actions and checking to see if they know what they have even filed for. 

How is that fair? All the candidates make big promises that exceed the office for which they aspire. Are we really supposed to believe the clowns who are actually in office understand their own office? 

This new doctrine from the Supreme Court could shake things up at the polls. I wouldn't expect the media to cover any so-called nuisance candidates in an honest or comprehensive way but at least it won't be the same-old, same-old. 

Take Eric Negapatan who has tried to run for office thrice and has been declared a nuisance each time. He wants to return the Marcos wealth to the Filipino people. Turns out it was actually willed to him by Marcos Sr's mom when he was her servant. 

https://www.inquirer.net/414924/senatorial-aspirant-vows-to-return-marcoses-alleged-p800-quadrillion-wealth/

A senatorial aspirant on Wednesday vowed to bring back the alleged wealth of the Marcos family, reportedly amounting to “800 quadrillion pesos” for the benefit of all Filipinos.

Eric Negapatan made the campaign pitch, which resembled the debunked Tallano Gold claims as he filed his certificate of candidacy (COC) at Manila Hotel Garden City on Wednesday.

Negapatan promised to distribute this amount, supposedly hidden somewhere in London, to all Filipinos for their basic needs.

(No one will need to buy rice anymore. No one will pay for water. No one will pay for electricity anymore.)

He claimed he inherited this “800 quadrillion” from Doña Josefa Marcos, mother of late former President Ferdinand Marcos Sr., when he was her servant in Batac City, Ilocos Norte.

(All of this was left in my name. In other words, it was not named after Marcos.)

(If the heir is a Marcos, the PCGG would have confiscated it.)

Negapatan said he previously ran for the presidency in 2016 and 2022 and in the senatorial polls in 2019, but he was declared a nuisance candidate in all these political attempts.

Of course he sounds crazy but why shouldn't he be able to run for office?

Likewise why should the COMELEC forbid the "chosen one of God" from running for the Senate?

https://www.inquirer.net/414985/senatorial-aspirant-to-curse-anyone-who-will-disqualify-her/

Senatorial aspirant Beth Lopez, who claimed to be the “chosen one of God,” on Wednesday said that she would “curse” anyone who would disqualify her from the 2025 elections.

Lopez said the Commission on Elections (Comelec) disqualified her in the previous polls due to poverty.

(This is my third time running for senator of our country. So brave. Thick-skinned despite being disqualified by Comelec because of being poor. I apologize for being emotional.)

When asked what she would do if Comelec disqualified her again, the teary-eyed senatorial aspirant raised her voice at the end of her answer.

(If Comelec does not allow me to run for senator, everyone who is involved in my disqualification will be cursed, and I will declare this government agency as nonsense.)

A Comelec official then went up to the stage to calm her down. She smiled and said that she was just being “emotional.”

Lopez also claimed that she is the “chosen one of God.”

(I hate politics. Now, who made a way for me to do something I don’t like? God. God made a way for me to not to run for public office.)

(I declare that of all the miracles in my life, I am the chosen one of God. If I die, I will declare that my soul will come back to punish you all.)

Lopez tried to run for senator in the 2019 elections, but she said she was not permitted to enter the Comlelc office to file her certificate of candidacy (COC).

The security forces at Comelec clarified that she was instructed to first secure a copy of the COC application form at the office.

Don't anybody get in her way.

Don't get in the way of this half-zombie either. 

https://www.inquirer.net/415733/rastaman-known-as-half-human-half-zombie-seeks-senate-seat/

Rastaman,” who usually passes himself off as “half-human, half-zombie,” is seeking a Senate seat after filing his certificate of candidacy (COC) on Saturday.

Rolando Plaza in real life, the tattooed-faced character filed his COC at the Manila Hotel Tent City.

Plaza previously filed his COC for senator in 2019 but was disqualified after being declared a nuisance candidate.

“Rastaman” gained virality overnight as a result of an interview where he claims to be “half-human, half-zombie.”

Media analytics firm Isentia PH says this man is a joke and the electorate needs such humor during election season. 

https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1516474/coping-mechanism-firm-says-rastaman-popularity-shows-humor-still-vital-to-ph-elections

Prior to COVID-19, the filing of certificates of candidacy (COCs) is one of the most colorful events in Philippine politics — not just because of rival politicians but due to some “out-of-this-world aspirants” often branded as nuisance candidates.

With lockdowns still present, Filipinos turned to the internet to put some color to an allegedly dull COC filing from October 1 to 8, through the culture of memes and shitposting — which eventually gave way to the resurgence of a person known in social media circles as the “Rastaman.”

It is unclear whether the man is indeed a follower of Rastafarianism, but the rise of this tattooed man deemed as an “alternative candidate” may be the best proof that humorous story lines are still very important for people vying for elective posts, a media analytics firm said.

Isentia PH said in their report titled “Prelude to the Polls” that the seemingly undying popularity of Ronaldo Plaza, the senatorial aspirant in the 2019 midterm elections, can be attributed to a yearning for a funny twist to an otherwise serious political exercise.

Plaza, sporting a bandana and with several tattoos on his face — including the words “Rasta” on his forehead, nose and upper lip and the word “Man” on his chin, plus a motorcycle on his temple — became an internet sensation among people supposedly tired of politics.

“A video of him filing his COC from the last elections, accompanied by an interview, resurfaced this period. Netizens began posting memes giving him their ironic support and earning traction across social media platforms. Rastaman gained virality overnight as a result of an interview wherein claims to be ‘half-human, half-zombie,’” Isentia PH said.

“His popularity may be attributed to Filipinos finding humor in the candidate amidst the seriousness of the election season,” it added.

According to Isentia PH, the Filipinos’ desire for some laughs may be an attempt to hide a great frustration over what has happened in the country — from the issues on the COVID-19 pandemic response and the effects of lockdown restrictions.

“The period leading to the polls has been marred with an overall sense of frustration in the middle of the pandemic, and the internet gave Rastaman a platform and his persona has ensued popularity because of a ‘comforting absurdity’ — a key element in getting audience’s attention,” the firm said.

“As the internet shifted from memes to serious conversations, a swing of emotions and sentiment could come from various factors especially with news coming the public’s way daily. Rastaman’s popularity is a clear showing of how important humor is to storytelling, messaging, narrative, public relations, leading to a comforting nature that drives engagement,” it added.

Now with the SC ruling he will have to be taken seriously. What's wrong with that?

What about the common man? An electrician wants to run for office and why shouldn't he? Why should the political class only be composed of well connected monied families? 

https://www.inquirer.net/414472/electrician-man-who-wants-to-marry-sen-marcos-to-run-for-senator/

An electrician and a man claiming to be Sen. Imee Marcos’ fiance said they would run for senator in the 2025 elections.

Alexander Encarnacion, an electrician and a carpenter, lodged his certificate of candidacy (COC) on Tuesday, the first day of COC filing.

(An electrician and carpenter can do many things for the country.)

Encarnacion said he filed COC in two previous elections but was disqualified as a nuisance candidate.

(I am penniless. They said I can’t launch a nationwide campaign.)

Daniel Magtira, who said he wanted to marry Marcos, also went to the COC filing venue at the Manila Hotel tent, but he has yet to lodge his COC as of posting.

In 2021, he also claimed to be the husband of actress and host Kris Aquino.

(I don’t know where Kris Aquino is, so I’ll just marry Imee Marcos.)

Pressed to disclose his plans should he win a Senate seat, Magtira said: “Let us implement the promise of salary increase.”

In 2021, he also filed a COC for president for the 2022 elections.

Magtira was alone when he faced the media on Tuesday. He was wearing a blue-green barong and a pin bearing the Philippine flag.

The man who wants to marry Imee Marcos may not be in his right mind but why stop the common laboring man from aspiring to do great things for his country? Don't forget men like Bato and Robinhood Padilla are in office. Both of them had no political training and only won because of their popularity.

The case of those two men illustrate the problem with elections in the Philippines. The COMELEC decides who can and cannot run and the people are forced to choose between who is left over. How exactly can voters be vigilant when so many unqualified men are on the ballot?

https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1234745

House of Representatives Speaker Ferdinand Martin G. Romualdez on Friday urged Filipino voters to “practice discernment” and exercise “perpetual vigilance” in choosing candidates for next year’s midterm elections, or suffer the consequences of more “Alice Guos” in the country’s electoral system.

“To the Filipino voters, I encourage you to exercise your right with discernment. Your role is crucial in this process. By remaining vigilant, we ensure a future where our leaders uphold the values of integrity, competence, and a commitment to the well-being of our nation,” Romualdez said in a statement as the filing of certificates of candidacies (COCs) for the May 2025 senatorial and synchronized local polls entered its fourth day.

He said the classic case of dismissed Bamban, Tarlac mayor Alice Guo, a certified Chinese national, should be a constant reminder to everyone to practice increased vigilance or face similar embarrassing consequences.

“The recent disqualification of Guo is a significant reminder of our challenges in ensuring that only qualified individuals are elected to public office. The Comelec (Commission on Elections) is crucial in accepting candidacy applications,” he said.

Romualdez appealed to the Comelec, under the leadership of Chairman George Garcia, that while the processing of COCs may be “ministerial” in nature, it is still important they safeguard the integrity of the electoral process.

“The law provides transparent processes for challenging unqualified candidates, and it is our collective responsibility to ensure that these mechanisms are used appropriately to maintain public trust. We all share the responsibility of safeguarding our democracy, and by working together, we can prevent any recurrence of past issues,” he said.

“Together, let us build a government that truly reflects the aspirations of the Filipino people – one that is transparent, accountable, and dedicated to genuine public service,” he said, noting that voters should always bear in mind that by choosing right, “we get the government we deserve.”

Romualdez's advice is well-intentioned but does not take into consideration the reality that voters do not choose who is on the ballot. In local elections the number of choices are usually low. Sometimes there is only one candidate. How can the people be discerning when the COMELEC allows suspended politicians to run for office merely because their suspension is not final?

https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1234695

The Commission on Elections (Comelec) here said the suspended board members of Antique province can still file their certificates of candidacy (COCs) and run for the 2025 midterm elections.

“The preventive suspension of the board members is not a problem or a ground for their disqualification because it is not yet a final decision from the Ombudsman,” said Acting Assistant Regional Election Director and concurrent Antique Provincial Election Supervisor Wil Arceño in an interview on Thursday.

He said that the Comelec, since the first day of the filing on Oct. 1, has been receiving COCs of suspended board members, citing, as the basis, Republic Act 3019 or the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act.

Suspended board members Mayella Mae Plameras-Ladislao, Egidio Elio, Alfie Jay Niquia, and Plaridel Sanchez IV filed their COCs on Oct. 1.  Ladislao is running for vice governor, while Elio, Niquia, and Sanchez IV are seeking reelection.

They were slapped with a six-month preventive suspension by the Office of the Ombudsman effective Aug. 5, 2024, pending the hearing of their administrative cases for oppression, grave misconduct, grave abuse of authority, and gross neglect of duty.  

Perhaps the Ombudsman should act more quickly on these matters. Or perhaps the COMELEC should change its rules so that suspended politicians are not allowed to run no matter what.

And what about self-confessed criminals?

https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1234603

Self-confessed drug lord Rolan “Kerwin” Espinosa filed his certificate of candidacy (COC) for mayor of his hometown, Albuera in Leyte province, the same post held by his slain father.

In a social media post by his official Facebook page, “Care Win," Espinosa was seen holding a copy of his COC filed on Oct. 1. 

He also posted photos and videos of his supporters who accompanied him in the COC filing. Joining him are candidates under the Bando Espinosa-Pundok Kausaban (BE-PK) party.

Supporters of the Espinosa camp were seen wearing blue shirts with BE-PK prints distributed during the first day of filing.

“I am running to help those who are oppressed regardless of your age and economic status,” he told the cheering supporters.

He is reportedly running against incumbent Mayor Sixto Dela Victoria.

Kerwin was released from jail after the Regional Trial Court in Baybay City junked a case against him for lack of evidence.

In 2016, he was one of the personalities linked by then President Rodrigo Duterte to the illegal drug trade in Eastern Visayas.

Duterte accused Espinosa and his father, Rolando Espinosa, Sr., then mayor of Albuera, of their involvement in the narcotics trade after a police raid that found PHP11 million worth of shabu near the family’s residence in Albuera town.

The elder Espinosa surrendered in mid-2016 but was later killed inside his jail cell in Baybay City.

Sure, Espinosa was found not guilty but that's not the point. The point is the COMELEC is allowed to decide who can and cannot run. When the people have to choose between a self-confessed criminal and someone equally worthless what are they to do? Not vote? 

The Supreme Court decision to allow candidates to run despite their financial ability or membership in a political party is a welcome decision for all. People talk a big game about democracy but denying people the right to run because they are poor is not very democratic. 

Are there nuisance candidates? Of course. The Duterte's, the Marcoses, and practically every political family have had their day in the sun and they have not done a very good job of running the Philippines except into the ground. Why not let the common man have his day in the sun?

Monday, November 13, 2023

Philippine Elections Are Violent Because Filipinos Lack Civic Virtue

Like the United States of America the Philippines is a Republic. Practically the whole system of governance was bequeathed to the Philippines by the USA during the colonial period. Why then is the political system in the Philippines so vastly different from the USA? Why, despite the gun and liquor bans during election season, are Philippine elections so incredibly violent? Because Filipinos lack civic virtue.

In The Story of Civilization Book 11 Will Durant writes the following:

https://bawar.net/data0/books/5cb1af64a9e1e/pdf/Durant_Will_-_The_story_of_civilization_11.pdf

He thought of virtue in Montesquieu's sense, as the indispensable basis of a successful republic; without unpurchasable voters and officials democracy would be a sham.

Montesquieu defines virtue thusly in Chapter 5 of In The Spirt of the Laws:

IT is in a republican government that the whole power of education is required. The fear of despotic governments naturally rises of itself amidst threats and punishments: the honour of monarchies is favoured by the passions, and favours them in its turn: but virtue is a self-renunciation, which is ever arduous and painful.

This virtue may be defined the love of the laws and of our country. As such love requires a constant preference of public to private interest, it is the source of all private virtues; for they are nothing more than this very preference itself.

This love is peculiar to democracies. In these alone the government is intrusted to private citizens. Now, government is like every thing else: to preserve it, we must love it.

https://oll.libertyfund.org/title/montesquieu-complete-works-vol-1-the-spirit-of-laws

The influence of Montesquieu on the founders of the United States of America and the framers of the Constitution of the United States would be hard to overstate. Every single one of those men are very clear that only a virtuous people are capable of freedom.

Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters. - Ben Franklin

“Is there no virtue among us? If there be not, we are in a wretched situation. No theoretical checks, no form of government, can render us secure. To suppose that any form of government will secure liberty or happiness without any virtue in the people, is a chimerical idea. If there be sufficient virtue and intelligence in the community, it will be exercised in the selection of these men; so that we do not depend upon their virtue, or put confidence in our rulers, but in the people who are to choose them.” - James Madison

"Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable  supports.” - George Washington

https://nccs.net/blogs/articles/only-a-virtuous-people-are-capable-of-freedom

Th big difference between the Philippines and the United States is that the USA is the culmination of 2,000 years of political history beginning with Greece. Americans, Western Europeans in general, fought tooth and nail against emperors, kings, and tyrants to eventually form what has been called the American Experiment of self-governance or as Abraham Lincoln said in his Gettysburg address:

Government of the people, by the people, and for the people.

The Philippines went from thousands of years of tribal leader ship to a colonial monarchy for 300 years and then to being given a republican form of government practically overnight. 

It's no wonder why the USA wanted to give Filipinos time to learn how to govern themselves before handing them the reigns. Teddy Roosevelt issued this stern warning about the dangers of giving the Philippines self-governance too soon:

In our anxiety for the welfare and progress of the Philippines, may be that here and there we have gone too rapidly in giving them local self-government. It is on this side that our error, if any, has been committed. No competent observer, sincerely desirous of finding out the facts and influenced only by a desire for the welfare of the natives, can assert that we have not gone far enough. We have gone to the very verge of safety in hastening the process. To have taken a single step farther or faster in advance would have been folly and weakness, and might well have been crime. We are extremely anxious that the natives shall show the power of governing themselves. We are anxious, first for their sakes, and next, because it relieves us of a great burden. There need not be the slightest fear of our not continuing to give them all the liberty for which they are fit.  
The only fear is lest in our over anxiety we give them a degree of independence for which they are unfit, thereby inviting reaction and disaster. As fast as there is any reasonable hope that in a given district the people can govern themselves, self-government has been given in that district. There is not a locality fitted for self-government which has not received it. But it may well be that in certain cases it will have to be withdrawn because the inhabitants show themselves unfit to exercise it; such instances have already occurred. In other words, there is not the slightest chance of our failing to show a sufficiently humanitarian spirit. The danger comes in the opposite direction.
https://www.infoplease.com/homework-help/us-documents/state-union-address-theodore-roosevelt-december-3-1901
The Philippines finally became independent on July 4th, 1946 and what have we seen since then? We have seen a fulfillment of Manuel Quezon's famous dictum that he would rather "have a government run like hell by Filipinos than a government run like heaven by Americans." He would later expound upon that remark.
It is true, and I am proud of it, that I once said, “I would rather have a government run like hell by Filipinos than a government run like heaven by Americans.” I want to tell you that I have, in my life, made no other remark which went around the world but that. There had been no paper in the United States, including a village paper, which did not print that statement, and I also had seen it printed in many newspapers in Europe. I would rather have a government run like hell by Filipinos than a government run like heaven by any foreigner. I said that once; I say it again, and I will always say it as long as I live.

But that is not an admission that a government run by Filipinos will be a government run like hell. Much less can it be an admission that a government run by Americans or by the people of any other foreign country, for that matter, can ever be a government run like heaven.

We have had four years of our government—the Government of the Commonwealth of the Philippines—a government run by Filipinos, and I defy anybody, American, foreigner or Filipino, to tell me that ours today is a government run like hell. I should say that this is the best government we have ever had in the Philippines, and I will now enumerate the facts to prove this to you.

This speech was made four years after the enactment of the Commonwealth when the Philippines was making its transition to full independence. Four years is not a time frame by which to judge a nation. The Commonwealth was set up in 1935 which is 88 years ago. What have we seen in that time frame if not a government run like hell with corruption in all levels of government culminating in the disastrous and dictatorial reign of Ferdinand Marcos Sr?

But this is less about political institutions and more about the common man because as the 1987 constitution makes clear:

The Philippines is a democratic and republican State. Sovereignty resides in the people and all government authority emanates from them.

https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/constitutions/1987-constitution/

Thus the burden of governance falls squarely on the shoulders of the Filipino people. In idea at least the Philippines is a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. 

Going back to Montesquieu can we really say that Filipinos love the laws of the country and put the public interest over their own?

This virtue may be defined the love of the laws and of our country. As such love requires a constant preference of public to private interest, it is the source of all private virtues; for they are nothing more than this very preference itself.

Absolutely not. 

Take a look at the recent local elections. There was vote buying. 

https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1213455

The Commission on Elections (Comelec) has disqualified 21 candidates, including 10 who won in the Barangay and Sangguniang Kabataan Elections (BSKE) on Oct. 30.

In a statement late Friday, the poll body said the BSKE bets were disqualified after the First and Second Division found them liable for premature campaigning and vote buying.

"The Commission on Elections has granted motu proprio Petitions for Disqualification against 21 candidates in the October 30, 2023 Barangay and Sangguniang Kabataan Elections," the statement read.

Of the 10 winning candidates, two are barangay chairpersons, three barangay kagawad (councilors), two SK chairpersons and three SK councilors.

Out of the 11 losing bets, nine ran for SK kagawad and two for barangay kagawad, the Comelec said.

The poll body said there are still 318 pending motu proprio disqualification cases against BSKE candidates. These include 292 disqualification cases for premature/illegal campaigning and 26 for vote-buying and/or vote selling.

Earlier, the Comelec ordered the suspension of the proclamation of winning candidates who have pending disqualification cases.

There was violence with 26 ending up dead. 

https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1213437

The number of validated election-related incidents (ERIs) from the Barangay and Sangguniang Kabataan Elections (BSKE) has climbed to 96, nearly two weeks after the polls.

In a press conference on Friday, PNP spokesperson Col. Jean Fajardo said there were actually 305 incidents recorded from Aug. 28 to Nov. 9.

Of the total, 13 were undergoing validation while 196 were classified as not related to the Oct. 30 polls.

The confirmed poll-related incidents left at least 26 dead and 96 injured, she added.

The Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao has the most number of validated ERIs at 55, followed by Northern Mindanao with 14; six in Eastern Visayas; five in Cordillera; four in Bicol; three each in Ilocos and Central Visayas; and one each in the National Capital Region, Calabarzon, Mimaropa, Western Visayas, Soccskargen and Zamboanga Peninsula.

The majority of the verified election-related incidents were shooting, mauling, and physical injury.

On the other hand, the police arrested 2,211 BSKE gun ban violators and confiscated 1,689 firearms.

A total of 2,425 firearms were also deposited to the PNP for safekeeping while 1,785 were surrendered.

The election period for the BSKE will end on Nov. 29.

And as of this writing 5 newly elected officials have been assassinated. 

https://www.sunstar.com.ph/cebu/5-newly-elected-brgy-officials-killed-a-week-after-polls

A TOTAL of five newly elected barangay officials were killed a little over a week following the just concluded Barangay and Sangguniang Kabataan Elections (BSKE), the Philippine National Police (PNP) reported.

Of the five victims, two were from villages in North Cotabato, and one each from Pasay City, Davao del Norte, and Pagadian City in Zamboanga.

In a press conference on Wednesday, Nov. 8, 2023, PNP spokesperson Colonel Jean Fajardo said they recorded six violent incidents involving newly elected government officials, which two were in Soccsksargen and one each in the National Capital Region, Calabarzon, Northern Mindanao and Davao Region.

Of the six victims, two were newly elected barangay chairmen, while four were barangay councilors.

On Nov. 1, Suharto Antillino was gunned down by a still unidentified suspect shortly after he was proclaimed as among the winning barangay council candidates of Barangay Poblacion in Midsayap town.

Barangay 37, Pasay City Kagawad Lina Camacho was also shot dead while inside the barangay hall on Nov. 6. One of the two suspects was arrested.

On Nov. 7, Barangay Datu Abdul Dadia in Panabo City chairman Paul Albert Saquian was gunned down while driving his car.

On the same day, Barangay Dolores, Antipas, North Cotabato councilman Edmar Perero was also shot dead while on board a tricycle.

The latest victim was newly elected Lapedian, Pagadian City village chief Rodolfo Dacol, who succumbed to a bullet wound in his abdomen on Thursday, Nov. 9.

Fajardo considered the first six incidents as election-related.

Fajardo said they are still monitoring post-election activities and scenarios.

He added that regional directors and field commanders were given the discretion to determine if they would lower their alert status, particularly their security deployments in areas where they see that the situation is still hot especially even after the election.

That is NOT the doings of a virtuous people. 

One has to wonder why there was so much violence over local elections. It comes down to power. Filipinos are clannish and so all the barangays in the nation as well as cities and various fiefdoms are run by families and they will do anything to keep their family in power. 

But this is nothing new. Filipinos have been terrorizing Filipinos since long before the Spanish arrived. The natives even thanked the Spanish from saving them from the tyranny and domination of their chiefs. 

“We answer that we wish the king of España to be our king and sovereign, for he has sent Castilians to us, who are freeing us from the tyranny and domination of our chiefs, as well as fathers who aid us against the same Castilians and protect us from them.

The Philippine Islands, 1493-1898, Volume XXIII, 1629-30, pg. 253

Manuel Quezon is wrong. The government of the Philippines, from barangay to Malacañang, is run like hell. The reason why is because Filipinos have no civic virtue. As it is the Philippines remains one of the most lawless nations on the planet. 

https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2023/10/26/2306513/rule-law-philippines-remains-one-weakest-region

Rule of law in the Philippines remained one of the weakest in East Asia and the Pacific, as the country fell one spot in the latest index of the World Justice Project. 

With a score of 0.46, the Philippines ranked 100th out of 142 countries in the WJP Rule of Law Index 2023. 

In the East Asia and Pacific region, Manila ranked 13th out of 15. Other nations with low scores in the region were Myanmar and Cambodia. 

Countries get a score of zero to one, with one indicating strongest adherence to rule of law. 

The Philippines scored 0.47 in constraints on government powers, 0.43 in absence of corruption, 0.47 in open government, 0.40 in fundamental rights, 0.67 in order and security, 0.47 in regulatory enforcement, 0.45 in civil justice, and 0.31 in criminal justice. 

Filipinos do not love let alone respect the laws of this nation. But they do love power. Especially the power that "grows out of a barrel of a gun."

Wednesday, March 9, 2022

"Is Rappler inciting another Ukraine in the Philippines?"

The hysteria surrounding the Rappler-COMELEC partnership is out of control. Both columnist Rigoberto Tiglao and Solicitor General Jose Calida claim that with this partnership the USA will effectively rig the election for Robredo. Now Mario Ferdinand Paison claims that Rappler will lead the Philippines to war. 

https://www.manilatimes.net/2022/03/06/opinion/columns/is-rappler-inciting-another-ukraine-in-the-philippines/1835221

Mario Ferdinand Paison is the director of Phil-BRICS Strategic Studies which describes itself thusly:

The PHILIPPINE – BRICS STRATEGIC STUDIES (Phil-BRICS) is a registered non-profit organization dedicated to promoting global multi-polarity and Philippine leadership in global peace and prosperity advocacy. 

Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa are important new global actors that the Philippines must learn to deal with. They are both collaborators and competitors to the traditional center economies of the United States and Europe. They offer both possibilities and perils for the Philippines should its leadership opt to pursue strategic development and an independent foreign policy. This will be most challenging when it comes to China, the leading BRICS country. 

It would seem that whatever this group does they should have a basic understanding of the intricacies of geopolitics.  Let's take a look at this article and see if that is the case.

WE may well be headed for war in the Philippines. The Philippines is letting inciters of revolutions into the heart of our election process. Why are we letting Rappler, which receives some $150,000 a year from the National Endowment for Democracy, or NED, the known funder of antigovernment protest groups, including violent rioters, in the Arab and Ukraine revolutions and Hong Kong protests, the financial arm of the CIA as admitted by the former head of NED, Alan Weinsten, himself, be the official media partner of the Commission on Elections (Comelec)? During the height of the Hong Kong protests, Dr. Michael Pillsbury of Hudson Institute admitted that the NED also funded "millions of dollars of programs" in Hong Kong. Sen. Francis "Kiko" Pangilinan had glorified the rioters as freedom fighters yet did not report on the rioters receiving foreign funding and training. Why should the US be allowed to be the official observer in our elections?

How do they incite revolutions? Aside from funding, training and organizing parties, western and NED-supported media will block almost all news unfavorable to the US and its allies, and will magnify criticisms of non-allies and create anger, hatred and ridicule. Examples?

Right off the bat Mario claims that because Rappler receives NED grants that means the US will be admitted "into the heart of our election process." He then asks, "Why should the US be allowed to be the official observer in our elections?" How is the US an official observer in the Philippine elections? He gives absolutely no proof for this claim and merely assumes it because Rappler receives NED grants. Does Mario not know that many other organizations in the Philippines receive NED grants and that they receive much more money than Rappler?

The elected Ukraine government was overthrown with US support, including with US white supremacist-supported neo-Nazis, such as the Azov Battalion attacking and burning people and government buildings, using swastikas and similar symbols, marching with torches evenings in 2014, and honoring as hero Stepan Bandera, who had collaborated with the Germans including in the ethnic cleansing of the Poles and Jews.

The Ukraine war was warned against already years ago by Kissinger, historians and diplomats, building up for over a decade due to acts from the West's five waves of NATO aggression. The US and NATO promised not to recruit and arm the European countries but entered over a dozen countries to the very border of Russia and refused to sign an agreement not to arm Ukraine against Russia, refusing to even put it on the agenda.

These two paragraphs correctly explains what has been happening in Ukraine for the past 30 years and why Russia has decided to invade. The US wanted Ukraine in NATO and Russia did not want NATO on his border. This war was a long time coming and can be directly traced to US meddling. How does that situation remotely relate to the Philippines? The only likely candidate to invade the Philippines would be China as they continue to encroach on Philippine territory in the WPS.

Russia and China immediately sent emergency weapons and bullets for our soldiers in the Marawi Crisis, when President Duterte requested for assistance after the US and Europe initially blocked much-needed arms delivery.

What an incredible lie that is. DND Secretary Lorenzana can clear that up for Mario.


The US was assisting from the beginning. Not to mention the US has been giving military assistance to the Philippines since 1898. 

Another threat to our elections, US-funded Rappler, with a record of biased news or selective reporting and foreign support in millions of dollars, being given an official role in the National Elections by the Comelec, should be unacceptable to any self-respecting country or even to an organization with any integrity.

Earlier in this piece Mario said Rappler gets $150,000 per year from the NED. Surely Rappler's expenses are more that $150,000. Yet Mario insists that Rappler is US-funded. Does he not know that both the PCOO and the Philippine News Agency are partnered with and receive assistance from China?

https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1064816

The Chinese Embassy is set to donate an additional PHP15 million worth of information technology equipment to the Presidential Communications Operations Office (PCOO) to help improve its services.

PCOO Secretary Martin Andanar bared this noting that his agency expects to receive the amount sometime in May or June.

This amount comes on top of the PHP140 million worth of radio and broadcasting equipment the Chinese Embassy previously donated to the agency.

Last month, Chinese Ambassador Zhao Jianhua also led the turn-over ceremony of computers, camcorders, teleprompters to state-run Philippine News Agency (PNA) and Radyo Pilipinas of the Philippine Broadcasting Service (PBS).

Does this mean China is meddling in the affairs of the Philippines in an attempt to shape public opinion about them? Does Mario not know that the Philippines receives millions in aid each year from a variety of nations including the USA, the EU, and Australia? It is a complete double standard to claim that Rappler receiving a paltry $150,000 NED grant is US funded and to not claim the Philippines is US funded when the  government receives even more in foreign funding.

Why are former associate justice Antonio Carpio, former Foreign Affairs secretary Albert del Rosario, UP professor Jay Batongbacal, DLSU professor Renato de Castro, et al. quiet on direct US meddling in our elections but raise a howl on unproven, "possibilities" of a "Manchurian Candidate"? Why have Rappler, Inquirer and ABS-CBS not reported on the US embassy lobbying in Comelec to have an official poll watchers role in our elections — when the US involved itself in Egyptian, Venezuelan, Iraqi, Ukrainian and other elections; when these nations saw coups, color revolutions, "Arab springs," "Ukrainian springs," and eventually collapse.

Is Mario unaware that foreign observers during an election is not a new thing? In 2016 their presence prevented voter fraud at some polling stations.

https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/785340/foreign-observers-report-incidents-of-vote-buying-violence

Besides several reports of vote-buying and violence in polling precincts, a group of foreign observers on Thursday concluded that the 2016 Philippine election was “generally orderly and peaceful.”

The Compact for Peaceful and Democratic Elections—International Observers Mission (Compact-IOM) detailed during a press conference in Manila the experience of 15 foreign delegates who were deployed to monitor 91 precincts in Cotabato, Maguindanao, Bohol, Dinagat Islands and Santiago in Isabela.

Coordinator Arnold Tarrobago said Compact-IOM has been organizing observation missions since 2004 to bring “positive influences on the election process.”

Citing people on the ground, he said, “The presence of election observers in their area prevented or helped prevent incidences of fraud and violence that they were expecting to happen.”

Despite this, the delegates observed crowded precincts where other people could easily see the ballots of people voting.

The group in Cotabato also received reports from the Parish Pastoral Council for Responsible Voting (PPCRV) that their poll watchers were pulled out from six precincts after  “threatening men came into the voting rooms, instructed them to take off their PPCRV identifying t-shirts then proceeded to order them out of the room.”

Batongbacal quoted the local PPCRV as saying that the men “took over the voting rooms and vote counting machine (VCM) machines. And they started shading and feeding ballots into the machine.”

They also visited a city hall and an elementary school in Maguindanao that were bombed before the elections.

In Bohol, German national Dominik Hammann said that most precincts were well-organized. It was mostly peaceful, he said, although there were claims of vote-buying, including threats to cut off  the beneficiaries’ access to the government’s conditional cash transfer program.

Were these delegates from the USA, Germany, Sweden, and Japan meddling with the election? No. In fact their presence was a good thing. 

"Rappler is the 'least trusted' media entity in the country. This is like a 'free-pass' on Rappler to mold public opinion. And given their known bias toward other candidates, their participation can only heighten the public's apprehension that the coming election would not be fair, credible and transparent," argued National Press Club President Paul Gutierrez. How was the spokesman for Comelec James Jimenez able to get the Comelec Acting Chairman Socorro Inting to sign the memorandum of agreement with Rappler?

How the heck would Rappler mold public opinion if they are the least trusted media entity in the country? That makes no sense and it is this ability to craft the news and shape public opinion that Mario is claiming will lead to war. But apparently no one believes them. So, how will it work? It won't.

After Ukraine, the Philippines is next. We should avoid becoming the Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen of Asia.

What a conclusion.  What a baseless and ridiculous conclusion. Mario did not offer a shred of proof for his claim that the Philippines may be headed for war because of the Rappler/COMELEC partnership. The Philippines is a strategic ally of the United States. Why in the world would they want to turn it into a battle zone? The only country marching towards war in this region of the world is China. North Korea is too but they do not pose the same threat to the Philippines as China does and there are many in this country who would let them have their way. 

This opinion piece is stupid. Mario is entitled to his opinion but since it is not rooted in reality it is best to toss it in the garbage.

Let's look at another article about the Rappler/COMELEC partnership which is more grounded than the gibberish Mario has pulled out of his hat.

https://www.manilatimes.net/2022/03/06/opinion/columns/the-disturbing-comelec-rappler-partnership/1835223

IS there a plot to get the presidential elections in May declared a failure if survey-topping candidate Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr. looks set to win?

This column will address a related and crucial question: Will the nation and the world, especially the tens of millions voting for Marcos, assuming he wins, accept the claim of election failure?

After all, in a Marcos victory, especially a landslide, there would probably be far more Filipinos disputing claims of poll irregularities than supporting them. How can their collective voices be countered or silenced?

In this column Ricardo Saludo assumes that in the event Bongbong Marcos Jr wins the election Rappler will declare that the election was a failure claiming Bongbong did not legitimately win. He then looks at a few ways how those who would dispute any declared failure of elections would be silenced.

First, the Comelec partnership projects Rappler as an impartial, expert election news and information source, despite its widely perceived leanings against the Duterte administration and the Marcos family, and in favor of the opposition, especially Vice President Maria Leonor "Leni" Robredo.

Second, Rappler has the most powerful ally in projecting and propagating its reports and views as valid, fair and true, especially on the biggest and most influential social media platform wielding immense sway across the Philippines and the planet: Facebook.

Since 2018, Rappler has been FB's fact-checking partner in the country. Hence, in social media jousts between Rappler and groups disputing its accounts, no prizes for guessing which of them FB's fact-checking partner would likely disparage as dubious or even block altogether.

The third and perhaps biggest factor in propagating Rappler's perspective on the elections is the West's agenda for the Philippines, which is now dominated by the geopolitical rivalry between America and China.

While American Embassy charges d'affaires Heather Variava maintains that the United States can work with whoever becomes the next Philippine President, it much prefers a leader who would fully implement the 2014 Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA), allowing massive rotations of US forces in the country with access to our military bases, starting with those in Pampanga, Nueva Ecija, Cebu, Puerto Princesa and Cagayan de Oro.

Will Western media and tech giants go along with the West's agenda and affirm claims of election failure in the Philippines? Well, that same media adopted as gospel truth one untruth disseminated by Rappler for years: the false report that the Philippine National Police (PNP) had killed tens of thousands of people in President Duterte's anti-narcotics campaign.

Now, if the West decides that voiding a Marcos victory and supporting a power grab by a losing candidate willing to implement EDCA is in its geopolitical interest, then we may see Rappler's claims of election anomalies played up across the world, while contrary reports and opinions are silenced, just like perspectives supporting Russia or opposing mass Covid vaccination.

At that point, the only question remaining is whether the Armed Forces of the Philippines, with its decades of close relations with the US military, would back another "people power" uprising, fueled by claims of election fraud.

In such a scenario, which would hopefully never happen, Philippine democracy and independence may well be lost.

This scenario is at least more thoughtful and realistic than the one given by Mario of the Philippines turning into another Ukraine. Though it's not very plausible. Ricardo says because Rappler has a partnership with Facebook and Western media that means any reporting of election failure would be amplified around the world and seen as truthful and any contrary report as being fake news. He uses the example of Rappler's reporting the number of drug deaths by the PNP being in the tens of thousands which was believed by Western media despite it being wrong. But this is exactly what the PNP reported.

https://philippinefails.blogspot.com/2019/07/how-many-people-have-died-as-result-of.html

No reasonable reading of this report would lead one to believe that the 16,355 HCUIs are anything but related to the drug war. The numbers are on a page titled "Fighting Illegal Drugs." If people are confused about the #RealNumbers the PNP have themselves to blame for appending the dubious label "Deaths Under Investigation" to unsolved homicides and including those numbers in the drug war data.

Ricardo Saludo's scenario ends with the AFP having to decide if they will back another "people power" which would be fueled by reports of election failure. But how exactly would it escalate to that point? Rappler does not control all the media in the Philippines. There are many media organizations such as GMA, ABS-CBN, PNA, Philstar, and The Manila Times. If Rappler is the least trusted news organization and is reporting something provably false and everyone else is contradicting them how could a claim of election failure rise to the level of a new "people power" involving the AFP? Why would the AFP forcibly oust Marcos if they knew Rappler was lying and he legitimately won?

Not to mention that the US envoy said the US would work with whoever is elected. So, why would the US incite actions to remove Marcos if he wins? There are also ten candidates on the ballot. Which one would the US pick to be the winner? Why does it have to be Robredo? What if Pacquiao wins? Will this scenario kick into high gear in order to get Robredo in the Palace?

This article is a lot more sober than the first one warning that Rappler is turning the Philippines into another Ukraine which will inevitably result in war. It is not any less paranoid and ridiculous.