Timothy Jay Schwab who is The God Culture loves gold. Specifically he loves Philippine gold. He teaches that the Philippines is Ophir, Tarshish, Sheba, Havilah, and the Land of creation solely because of gold. Find the Land of Gold and you find Ophir, etc. The Philippines has lots of unmined gold in the ground therefore it is Ophir, etc.
But there is something special about Philippine gold to which no other gold can lay claim. Adam sacrificed Philippine gold to God for an atonement which makes that gold precious to God.
 |
| Two Witnesses of Revelation Explained. This Will Rock Your World. Ophir, Sheba, Tarshish |
41:00 This gold of Ophir was the fine gold or pure gold of that day not because it was necessarily of higher quality than other gold but because it had meaning to Yahuah from Adam's very first sacrifice once exiled from the Garden of Eden. It mattered then and it still matters now
Tim reiterates this in his book The Search for King Solomon's Treasure.
 |
| The Search For King Solomon's Treasure, pg. 71 |
This is the Genesis 2 gold Adam used in the first sacrifice of atonement when exiled from the Garden. It is precious to Yahuah and this is why Solomon knew to fetch it for the Temple project from this primordial estate.
Where does Tim get the idea Adam sacrificed gold to God as an atonement? Not from the Bible. From The Cave of Treasures.
 |
| The Estate of Adam: Solomon's Gold 2i. 100 Clues#50. |
16:30 We found a source a bit more specific and this is amazing as Adam actually offered gold, frankincense, and myrrh on that day in the first atonement sacrifice to Yahuah. This is why these have so much value. It's not about money.
Tim mentions The Cave of Treasures several times in his book The Search for Solomon's Treasure. He calls it a historic source.
 | |
|
There are historic sources..
Then he admits The Cave of Scriptures is NOT SCRIPTURE.
 |
| The Search for King Solomon's Treasure, pgs. 97-98 |
Finally, there is a book called the Cave of Treasures that we do not use as and reject as scripture but we glean a fact from. It actually makes the claim that upon leaving the Garden of Eden which means Adam was in Havilah, Philippines, he was able to find gold on the sides of the Mount of the East where he then made the first sacrifice of atonement.
 | |
|
We will use an historic reference outside of the Bible to further support this not for scripture but geography to better understand. This is not scripture.
Adam offered the first atonement and there is no passage to indicate he ever sinned again in his entire 930 years. He retrieved gold, frankincense and myrrh from the sides of the mountain meaning they grow there natively and all three are native to the Philippines.
What exactly is The Cave of Treasures?
The Cave of Treasures, sometimes referred to simply as The Treasure, is an apocryphal and pseudoepigraphical work, that contains various narratives related to the Christian Bible. It was written in the Syriac language, approximately at the end of the 6th, or at the beginning of the 7th century. Its authorship was traditionally attributed to Ephrem of Edessa (d. 373), but modern scholarly analyses have shown that the true author was some other person, who also lived in Upper Mesopotamia, but much later (c. 600).
It is an apocryphal book full of fictitious stories that Tim does not understand and which he misquotes. Adam does indeed place gold, myrrh, and frankincense inside a cave but the reason is not to atone for his sins. It is a kind of prerequisite for sleeping with his wife.
Now Adam and Eve were virgins, and Adam wished to know Eve his wife. And Adam took from the skirts of the mountain of Paradise, gold, and myrrh, and frankincense, and he placed them in the cave, and he blessed the cave, and consecrated it that it might be the house of prayer for himself and his sons
So Adam and Eve went down from that holy mountain [of Eden] to the slopes which were below it, and there Adam knew Eve his wife.
Those bolded parts are not quoted by Tim. He purposely omits them. That is kind of odd seeing as the whole paragraph shows up highlighted in his sourcebook.
.png) |
| Solomon's Treasure Sourcebook, pg. 91 |
According to The Cave of Treasures the three Magi retrieved those treasures to give to Christ.
And straightway, according to what they had received from the tradition which had been handed down to them by their fathers, they left the East, and went up to the mountains of Nôdh, which lie inside the entrances to the East from the lands on the skirts of the North, and they took from them gold, and myrrh, and frankincense.
The book is called the Cave of Treasures because the cave in which the gold, myrrh, and frankincense were placed connects Adam and Christ. That is the framework for the entire book.
 |
| Old Testament Pseudepigrapha: More Noncanonical Scriptures, pg. 531 |
Cave of treasures essentially takes Its name from a awe near paradise in which Adam is said to have deposited a number of items taken from paradise. These are called Treasures and later on will be carried by the magi to Bethlehem in order to be presented to the new-born Christ. This basic plot serves the author to construct a panoramic view of Christian salvation history spanning from creation to Pentecost.
The narration therefore starts in the same way as the first book of the Bible, describing the creation-week in tabular form, and then passes on to a lengthy account of Adam and Eve's creation and stay in paradise, their temptation, fall, expulsion and settlement at the outskirts of paradise, where the Cave of Treasures is introduced for the first time. On occasion of their first sexual act Adam and Eve deposit within the cave gold, myrrh and incense, that is, those items which were presented to Christ by the magi according to the Gospel narrative.
The gold, frankincense, and myrrh have nothing to do with an atonement sacrifice nor is it called or even alluded to as such. Tim is fundamentally wrong.
On what basis does Tim think The Cave of Treasures is a reliable account of history? Has he read it? Here is a passage from The Cave of Treasures about the circumcision of Jesus Christ.
Now Christ was eight days old when the Magi presented their offerings; and Mary received them at the very time when Joseph circumcised Christ. In truth, Joseph circumcised Him according to the Law, but he only went through (or imitated) the act of cutting, for no [flesh] whatsoever was cut off from Him. For as [a rod of] iron passeth through the fire and cutteth the rays thereof, without any part of it being cut off from it, so in like manner was Christ circumcised without anything being taken from Him.
The author says the circumcision of Jesus Christ involved no cutting of flesh. That means there was no real circumcision. But Christ was born under the Law and subject to all its ordinances. That includes circumcision. A real circumcision which involves the cutting of flesh. The passage reeks of the heresy of Docetism which teaches the flesh of Jesus Christ was only an illusion. Does Tim think this is reliable history too? Or will he pick and choose from this book? However, as I have shown he does not understand The Cave of Treasures and purposely misquotes it.
Timothy Jay Schwab's foundational story as to why the gold of the Philippines is Biblically important has no basis in fact. It is a concoction of his fevered brain which latches onto anything no matter how minute in order to make his system of exalting the Philippines to a status it does not have work.
In The Estate of Adam Tim says something else that is so ridiculous it must be laid out for all to see.
 | |
|
48:50 See this resource matters all the way to the end because it is sentimental to Yahuah God. Why is this so important? Well Yahuah certainly is sentimental. Adam used the gold of Havilah the land of Eve where he lived. Which became known as Ophir, Sheba, and Tarshish after the flood. Which is now known as the Philippines in modern times or the same pattern of three Luzon, Visayas, Mindanao: Ophir, Sheba, Tarshish.
God places a sentimental value on the gold of the Philippines, Ophir, because Adam placed it in a cave as an atonement. For one thing that story has already been torn to shreds above. For another God is not sentimental. God places no value on gold or any other commodity. The Bible certainly never says or indicates or infers such a thing. To say something like this is to turn God into a man with human emotions. Only one who has no idea who God is could say a thing like this. Of course Tim's denial of the Trinity saying the Holy Spirit is likely a creation along with his denial of the eternal sonship of Jesus Christ means he has no idea who God is. It is par for the course for Timothy Jay Schwab who is The God Culture.
Thank you for your efforts. May God bless you and your work.
ReplyDelete