Tuesday, August 25, 2026

Insurgency: Safe Supportive Space

For the third week in a row the AFP has released an update and how many Reds and supporters have been neutralized since the beginning of the year. Last week it was 970. This week it is 1,045.


https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1282213

The government's campaign against communist insurgents is gaining momentum as the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) reported neutralizing 1,045 New People's Army (NPA) rebels and their supporters during operations conducted from Jan. 1 to Aug. 13 this year.

Of the total, 935 surrendered, 38 were arrested, and 72 were killed in various military operations, AFP spokesperson Col. Francel Margareth Padilla said in a media interview late Tuesday.

"A total of 661 firearms and 255 anti-personnel mines were either seized or surrendered, and 38 encampments were seized (in the same period)," she said.

Neutralized is a military term that refers to the surrender, capture, or killing of enemy troops.

"The numbers give us an indication of the operational situation, but we should look beyond the numbers. The more significant story is that 935 CTG (communist terrorist group) members and supporters chose to surrender," Padilla pointed out.

In 2025, the military said it neutralized around 2,018 NPA members and their supporters. The bulk of whom were surrenderers, at 1,798, while 93 were arrested and 127 were killed.

Around 1,134 firearms and 531 anti-personnel mines were either seized or surrendered, and 149 NPA encampments were captured.

As with each previous update, the numbers are not broken down. Not knowing exactly how many actually NPA rebels have been neutralized makes this data worthless. At last count there were only 780 actual NPA rebels left. 

In Surigao Sur 3 former NPA rebels surrendered and yielded their arms. 

https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1282220

Three former members of the communist New People’s Army (NPA) have surrendered on separate occasions, turning over firearms, ammunition, and war materiel to the Army’s 36th Infantry Battalion (36IB), military officials reported Wednesday.

One former NPA combatant yielded to the 36IB on Monday in Barangay Bitaugan, San Miguel town, handing over an M1 Carbine rifle, a magazine, and 14 rounds of ammunition.

Over the weekend, two other former members of the NPA’s Militia ng Bayan surrendered in Barangay Awasian, Tandag City.

The pair turned over 557 assorted rounds of ammunition, five rifle grenades, 12 magazines, three intravenous (IV) fluid drip sets, and a hand-held radio.

“The series of surrenders is the result of sustained activities conducted by the Community Development Support Teams (CDSTs) of the Army in the province,” said 36IB commander Lt. Col. Joselito Ante Jr. in a statement.

Ante noted that CDSTs are working closely with government line agencies and local government units to protect and preserve the peace gains achieved in Surigao del Sur.

“The voluntary surrender also reflects the cooperation and trust of the people of Surigao del Sur in the government,” Ante added.

On June 18, Surigao del Sur and the rest of the Caraga Region were declared to be under Stable Internal Peace and Security, following the dismantling of guerrilla fronts and the collapse of the NPA’s North Eastern Mindanao Regional Committee, which the Philippine government designates as a terrorist organization.

Of course, they will now be able to avail of all the E-CLIP benefits such as free housing, job training, and money. 

Since they are not from Negros they will not be able to avail of this new safe space. 

https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1282273

Former communist rebels in Negros Occidental can now seek shelter at the “Balay Pagbag-o” for Peace and Reintegration, a halfway house built by the provincial government in collaboration with the Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG).

Located in Barangay Sta. Rosa in Murcia town just east of this city, the facility, which was inaugurated Tuesday afternoon, provides a safe and supportive space for individuals undergoing the process of peace and reintegration.

The development was welcomed by groups of former members of the Communist Party of the Philippines - New People’s Army - National Democratic Front (CPP-NPA-NDF) now advocating for peace and development.

In a statement on Wednesday, the Buklod Kapayapaan Federation, Inc. said the establishment of the halfway house is vital in fostering peace and reintegration.

“Returning to a peaceful life is not an end, but a new beginning – an opportunity for former members of the CPP-NPA-NDF to rebuild their lives with dignity and hope. In peace, there is a second chance. In reintegration, there is a new future,” it added.

Egan Dañoso, president of the Negros Island Region Federation of Peace Advocates, who was among the guests during the unveiling ceremony, said they are honored to be part of such an important event.

“We extend our heartfelt gratitude to everyone who played a part in and supported its establishment,” Dañoso said.

In his message, Governor Eugenio Jose Lacson said the establishment of the halfway house shows the provincial government’s support not only for peace but also in giving hope, opportunity, and a second chance to those who have decided to return to the fold of the law and to a peaceful life.

“This is part of our support for the Enhanced Comprehensive Local Integration Program or E-CLIP, which is part of the national government's peacebuilding and reintegration efforts. The halfway house we built is not just a building. This is a symbol of a second chance in life,” he added.

The “Balay Pagbag-o” will provide the beneficiaries with a temporary shelter or a secure place to stay while military or police units are processing their registration papers for the E-CLIP.

It will serve as a place for healing and recovery, or a space for peace-building, social healing, and deradicalization activities, and also extend support services to beneficiaries through access to initial medical evaluations, counseling, and preparation for civilian life.

“Within a few months, we will provide them with psychosocial interventions, livelihood trainings, and other activities to help them get back up and to build a better future,” Lacson said.

DILG - Negros Occidental Provincial Director Teodora Sumagaysay said that in Western Visayas and the Negros Island Region, Negros Occidental is the first to establish a halfway house for former rebels.

“We hope this halfway house will stand as a lasting symbol of hope, second chances, and new beginnings,” she added.

The halfway house was proposed in 2023 with an estimated PHP15 million budget – PHP10 million from the provincial government and PHP5 million from the DILG.

"The establishment of the halfway house is vital in fostering peace and reintegration." Indeed. Every thing the NTF-ELCAC does is "vital in fostering peace and reintegration."

One NPA rebel in Negros Oriental was found dead after a clash with the Army. 

https://mb.com.ph/2026/08/18/npa-rebel-found-dead-after-negros-oriental-clash

A New People’s Army (NPA) rebel was found dead, following an encounter with troops of the Army 62nd Infantry Battalion (IB) in Sitio Calambia, Barangay Trinidad, Guihulngan City, Negros Oriental on Monday, August 17.

The 3rd Infantry Division (ID) identified the fatality as Cristito Nilles Sr., alias Dagohoy, an alleged member of Squad 2 and acting secretary of Section Guerilla Unit 3 of the dismantled Central Negros 1 (CN1). 

Based on a report from the 3ID released on Tuesday, August 18, the encounter broke out when military troopers were fired upon by NPA remnants while conducting security operations in response to reports of the group’s suspected armed elements in the area. 

Nilles was reportedly wounded during a five-minute firefight and was reportedly abandoned by his comrades in Sitio Uyangan, Barangay Budlasan, Canlaon City, Negros Oriental. 

Military troopers recovered his remains during subsequent pursuit and clearing operations.

Government forces also recovered an M16 rifle, three long magazines, ammunition, and personal belongings from the encounter site.

Major General Joey Escanillas, 3ID commander, commended the troops and the community for their vigilance. 

He continue to call on the remaining NPA rebels to abandon armed struggle, embrace peace, and return to their families, assuring them of government assistance.

Sadly, he will not be able to stay at the safe space house. 

The Toboso-19 operation from April 19th, 2026 is not going away anytime soon.  A new fact-finding mission says the military did not follow protocol. 

https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/2289264/fact-finding-mission-military-fired-indiscriminately-on-toboso-19

A fact-finding mission has flagged serious violations of the international humanitarian and human rights laws in the killing of the “Toboso 19” in Negros Occidental, saying the military could clearly see who was armed and who was not even as residents confirmed that nine of the fatalities in the alleged encounter on April 19 were civilians, not communist combatants.

Speaking at a press briefing on Wednesday, National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers lawyer Julianne Agpalo said “the military were already in an advantageous position,” adding that some of them were on top of the hill overlooking the fishpond where the victims were, while another group of soldiers was near the fishpond.

The 44-page report of the National Fact-Finding and Solidarity Mission (NFFSM) said the soldiers from the 79th Infantry Battalion (IB) had a clear view of the scene and could distinguish between those who were armed and firing back, and those who were unarmed. Instead, they fired indiscriminately, resulting in the deaths of nine civilians, it added.

“In terms of the physical inspection of the fishpond area, it was a clear, open space. There was nowhere to hide and no cover for anyone being pursued by the military,” Agpalo said.

Matty Miguel, a spokesperson for Defend Negros, a group advocating for human rights and land reform, told the Inquirer, “It can also be seen that, from the military’s standpoint, they should have been able to distinguish who were civilians and who were not, given that they were already in a vantage point.”

Agpalo said that residents in Taboso town who were interviewed by the fact-finding mission “essentially proved what the families [of the victims] have been saying—that nine of the 19 were civilians” who were there to learn about farming.

In May, Defense Secretary Gilberto Teodoro Jr. maintained that the Taboso 19 were all members of the New People’s Army (NPA). The NPA, on the other hand, said that while some of those killed were rebels, others were civilians and human rights advocates.

The mission report identified some of the dead civilians as RJ Nichole Ledesma, 30, a community journalist from Bacolod City; Alyssa Alano, 22, a University of the Philippines Diliman Student Council leader; Maureen Keil Santuyo, 24, a member of the National Network of Agrarian Reform Advocates; and Errol Wendel, 24, a member of the Unyon ng mga Manggagawa sa Agrikultura.

Also killed were Lyle Prijoles, 40, of the International Coalition for Human Rights in the Philippines from San Francisco, California; and Kai Sorem, 26, from Seattle, Washington.

Miguel said that Santuyo and Wendel, whose body has yet to be returned to his family, worked as peasant organizers. They were the primary individuals helping the farmers with their land-related concerns in Hacienda Bedonia.

Miguel, who personally knew Santuyo, said she was always willing to go where she was needed most, particularly to support farmers and farm workers in marginalized communities in Negros.

“Knowing that someone so close to you willingly went there to understand the situation on the ground, only to be killed by state forces, is heartbreaking and infuriating,” she told the Inquirer.

The NFFSM, which was conducted in May, was composed of more than 100 participants from national, local and international organizations.

They interviewed residents and witnesses, visited the sites of the killings, examined physical evidence and documented the effects of military operations on civilian communities.

“The mission’s findings challenge the Armed Forces of the Philippines, and other state agencies like the notorious NTF-Elcac [National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict] of their portrayal of the incident as a legitimate series of armed encounters,” said Cristina Palabay, Karapatan secretary general, at a press conference.

The NFFSM report also cited alleged violations of International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law, including the killing of individuals who may have been rendered hors de combat and the treatment of civilians during the military operation.

Hors de combat refers to combatants who are unable to fight because they are wounded, sick, captured or have surrendered.

The mission documented searches of at least 24 houses, the detention and interrogation of civilians at gunpoint, and the displacement of around 800 residents whose access to food and livelihood was disrupted.

“Alyssa Alano, was shot in the knee. She did not sustain a fatal wound but died due to the lack of medical treatment. She bled to death. Alyssa’s case indicates that the soldiers had the option not to kill the victims,” it said in its report.

The report also noted that the bodies of the victims brought to the funeral home showed severe burns, swelling and decomposition caused by neglect and prolonged exposure to extreme heat, with some of the bodies reportedly recovered from fishponds.

“This reflects a failure in the care and lawful handling of human remains, revealing unprofessional management by the military and police forces,” it said.

Karapatan, meanwhile, called for the immediate and proper identification of Wendel’s body so that it could be returned to his family.

“Every day, we pray that we can bring Errol home. Four months have passed, and we still don’t have our son. We just want to bring him home and give him the proper burial he deserves,” said his mother, Elizabeth Chen.

Among the mission’s recommendations were the filing of criminal and administrative charges against military personnel involved in the killings and their superiors; full access for the families and legal representatives of the victims to records of the Armed Forces of the Philippines and 79th IB, including mission orders, drone footage and after-operation reports.

Moreover, Karapatan called for the immediate withdrawal of the 79th IB from communities in Negros to facilitate investigations.

The report says: "had a clear view of the scene and could distinguish between those who were armed and firing back, and those who were unarmed. Instead, they fired indiscriminately, resulting in the deaths of nine civilians." That sounds reasonable enough but in such circumstances aren't soldiers supposed to assume everyone is a potential threat? And what were civilians doing mixing with the NPA? Learning about farming? They could have done that far from a known conflict zone. This is not the last we have heard from this incident. 

Monday, August 24, 2026

Week 7 of Vice President Sara Duterte's Impeachment Trial

Just like last week, week 7 of Vice President Sara Duterte's impeachment trial was cut short due to inclement weather. Only one day of testimony was held. However, the prosecution was able to present another witness with even more testimony implicating VP Sara Duterte in the misuse of confidential funds. The twist this time is that the witness was VP Sara's former special disbursing officer.

https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1282022

The Senate impeachment court on Monday declared Gina Acosta, Vice President Sara Duterte’s former special disbursing officer at the Office of the Vice President, a hostile witness in the trial over the alleged misuse of confidential funds.

Presiding Officer Senator Francis Escudero granted the prosecution’s motion after questioning Acosta about her current position at the OVP and her employment relationship with Duterte.

Acosta confirmed that Duterte is her boss and that she currently holds a coterminous position as Vice Presidential Staff Officer VI.

Asked by Escudero whether she would lose her OVP post if Duterte were impeached or removed from office, Acosta replied: “I no longer have a job at the OVP.”

Escudero then formally declared Acosta a hostile witness, citing both her employment circumstances and the position she took in a counter-affidavit filed before the Office of the Ombudsman.

“In addition to the ground raised by Attorney (Amando Virgil) Ligutan that the witness has taken a position by virtue of her counter-affidavit filed before the Office of the Ombudsman, the court hereby declares the witness to be a hostile witness under and in accordance with Rule 132, Section 13,” Escudero ruled.

The ruling allows private prosecutor Ligutan to ask Acosta leading questions during her examination.

Escudero stressed, however, that misleading questions remain prohibited.

Acosta is the first witness formally declared hostile in Duterte’s impeachment trial.

Ligutan sought the declaration after presenting Acosta’s counter-affidavit in a complaint involving the alleged misuse of confidential funds.

He argued that Acosta’s position in the counter-affidavit was directly “adverse” to the prosecution’s case against Duterte.

According to Ligutan, Acosta maintained in her counter-affidavit that Duterte complied with the rules governing confidential funds and should not be held liable for their alleged misuse.

The defense opposed the prosecution’s motion, arguing that Acosta’s adverse interest should first be established through her examination and that the pendency of a complaint against her did not by itself make her hostile to the prosecution.

Escudero rejected the defense's argument and allowed Ligutan to proceed with Acosta as a hostile witness.

In offering her testimony, Ligutan said the prosecution intends to establish that Duterte instructed Acosta to encash PHP500 million in OVP confidential funds in four tranches from December 2022 to July 2023 and turn over the cash to an OVP security officer.

The prosecution also intends to establish that the PHP500 million was not properly liquidated and that its disbursement was riddled with violations of Joint Circular No. 2015-01, governing the use of confidential and intelligence funds.

These assertions remain part of the prosecution’s offer and are subject to Acosta’s testimony and the defense’s cross-examination.

The PHP500 million is part of the PHP612.5 million in confidential funds at the center of Article I of the impeachment complaint. The amount comprises PHP500 million released to the OVP and PHP112.5 million allocated to the Department of Education while Duterte was education secretary.

Being hostile means she does not agree with the prosecution's characterization of confidential funds as misuse. While she gave the same testimony back in 2024 she apparently had a hard time speaking while on the stand. 

https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1282028

Senator-judge Erwin Tulfo on Monday questioned why former Office of the Vice President (OVP) special disbursing officer Gina Acosta appeared to have difficulty answering in Tagalog during Vice President Sara Duterte’s impeachment trial despite previously doing so before the House of Representatives.

Acosta, who handled cash advances involving the OVP’s confidential funds, was declared a hostile witness by the Senate impeachment court upon the request of the House prosecution. She opted to answer in Bisaya during her testimony.

“I don't understand why she seems to be having such difficulty speaking Tagalog here when, in fact, in Congress last November, she answered in Tagalog,” Tulfo said.

Tulfo presented a transcript of Acosta’s November 2024 House testimony, citing exchanges in which she answered questions in Tagalog and English on the handling of confidential funds.

Among the portions he cited were Acosta’s responses concerning incentive payments, her authority as special disbursing officer, and funds she said were returned to her by then Vice Presidential Security and Protection Group chief Col. Raymund Dante Lachica.

Tulfo also read an exchange involving the name “Piattos,” which figured in the House inquiry into acknowledgment receipts for confidential fund expenditures.

He asked the impeachment court to have Acosta answer in Tagalog, arguing that repeatedly translating questions and answers between Filipino and Bisaya could unnecessarily lengthen the trial.

“We could take a year here, Mr. President,” Tulfo said.

Tulfo maintained that Acosta’s previous congressional testimony showed she could understand and respond to questions in Tagalog.

“Mr. President, enough of this deception,” he said.

Senate presiding officer Francis “Chiz” Escudero acknowledged Tulfo’s concern and directed prosecution lawyer Amando Ligutan to stick to one language when questioning Acosta instead of translating every question automatically.

“Point well taken. Atty. Ligutan, to abbreviate the proceedings, kindly choose one language: English or Filipino in asking the question. You don't have to translate each time unless the witness requests you to do so,” Escudero said.

“Preferably use Filipino, Atty. Ligutan, as I'm sure you are well versed with it as well pso Ms. Gina can understand it better,” he added.

The House prosecution panel also said they were puzzled by Acosta’s apparent difficulty speaking Filipino during her impeachment trial testimony despite having readily answered questions in the national language during a 2024 House inquiry.

In a press briefing, House prosecutor and San Juan City Rep. Ysabel Maria Zamora said the prosecution noticed the contrast after Tulfo first raised the issue.

“We were wondering about the difficulty earlier. During the hearing in Congress, she understands questions in English, Filipino. And she would answer in mixed English, Filipino, and Bisaya,” she said.

Zamora, however, stopped short of attributing any motive to Acosta.

“But of course, I don’t want to say that there was some malice involved,” she said, noting that Acosta made a greater effort to answer in Filipino after Tulfo’s intervention.

“I think that made the witness try a little harder pagkatapos mag-manifest ni (after the manifestation of) Sen. Erwin Tulfo,” Zamora said.

Former Surigao del Norte Rep. Robert Ace Barbers, House impeachment adviser and spokesperson, gave Acosta the benefit of the doubt saying she may simply have been nervous because she was testifying in an impeachment trial.

“She knows how to speak Tagalog. The transcript of the Committee on Good Government shows that she can reply, respond to a question either in English or in Tagalog,” Barbers said.

“She might be a little nervous. We will give her that benefit of the doubt, so to speak,” he added.

Barbers also said Acosta’s Cebuano responses did not pose a major problem because Ligutan could understand and translate them.

Acosta remains an aide at the Office of the Vice President but formerly served as Duterte’s special disbursing officer, handling PHP500 million in OVP confidential funds in 2022 and 2023.

She was declared a hostile prosecution witness earlier Monday as prosecutors began questioning her on the handling and liquidation of the funds.

While the prosecution has decided to give Acotsa the benefit of the doubt and chalk it up to nerves the explanation that she was playing dumb to slow the trial and protect her former boss should not be dismissed.

Acosta's testimony boils down to one thing. Vice President Sara Duterte ordered her to cash to 125 million pesos and deliver it to Col. Raymund Dante Lachica. The money was cellophane wrapped in 1 million peso bundles by the bank and placed in four large bags by Acosta. 

https://mb.com.ph/2026/08/17/damning-testimony-acosta-details-how-p125m-confidential-funds-were-encashed-given-to-lachica

Former Office of the Vice President (OVP) special disbursing officer (SDO) Gina Acosta told the Senate impeachment court Monday, Aug. 17 how she was able to encash P125 million in confidential funds, which she then released to Col. Raymund Dante Lachica upon the instructions of respondent Vice President Sara Duterte.

Acosta's testimony as a hostile witness--given during day 16 of the Senate impeachment trial--allowed House prosecutors to trace the physical movement of the money from the preparation of the OVP documents to its encashment at Land Bank’s Shaw Boulevard branch and eventual turnover to Lachica.

Acosta, currently vice presidential staff officer VI, testified that she packed the money into four traveling bags and brought it to the OVP. These were then given to Lachica, then-chief of the Vice Presidential Security and Protection Group (VPSPG).

After private prosecutor Amando Virgil Ligutan presented the disbursement voucher and check covering the fourth-quarter 2022 confidential funds, Acosta confirmed that the voucher’s processing, preparation and release of the check, and encashment all happened on Dec. 20, 2022.

Ligutan asked whether or not completing all these steps on the same day showed that the transaction had been fast-tracked. However, Acosta rejected such characterization.

"The disbursement was not rushed. It went through our regular office process, Your Honor," she said. 

According to Acosta, she reached the bank betwen 2 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. after the OVP cash division informed her that the check was ready for encashment. She confirmed that Land Bank had been notified in advance to prepare the P125 million.

Presiding officer Senator Francis "Chiz" Escudero later sustained the defense’s objection when Ligutan tried to establish that the notice necessarily preceded approval of the voucher and preparation of the check.

"It was placed in a box. Bundled, each bundle worth P1 million, wrapped in sealed cellophane," Acosta further testified regarding the encashment.

She told the court that she counted 125 sealed bundles but did not open the plastic wrapping. She also did not count the P1,000 bills individually.

The money was then transferred from the boxes into four black, oblong-shaped traveling bags. "I was the one, Your Honor, who placed the money in the bag. "Acosta admitted.

Ligutan used physical mock-ups and an artificial intelligence (AI)-generated simulated image to illustrate the volume of P125 million in cash but defense counsel Lindon Miguel Bacquel questioned whether the representations had adequate factual basis.

The court overruled an initial objection and later noted the defense’s continuing objection to the AI-generated visuals.

Over at the OVP, two VPSPG personnel helped remove the bags from a vehicle after seeing that Acosta could not lift one herself. The bags were placed on a trolley, taken through a service elevator and brought to an extension office.

Upon Duterte’s instructions, Acosta said she called Lachica after encashing the check to inform him that the funds were ready.

Prosecutors highlighted in a press conference after the hearing that Acosta's testimony directly implicated Duterte to the turnover of P125 million in confidential funds to Lachica.

"It became clear earlier that the statements of the Landbank managers we first heard were confirmed — that these bundles of cash were received by [SDO], Gina Acosta," private prosecutor Benjamin Tolosa Jr. said.

The prosecution’s position is that Lachica had no authority to receive and disburse the confidential funds since he was not an organic employee. Worse, he was not the OVP's designated SDO.

Bicol Saro Party-list Rep. Terry Ridon, a solon-prosecutor said the moment produced a visible, audible reaction inside the trial venue.

"There was a palpable gasp when Ms. Gina Acosta pointed to the Vice President as the one who gave her instructions to hand over the P125 million to Mr. Lachica," Ridon said.

Ridon underscored that Acosta was an OVP official called as a hostile witness by the prosecution, and that she had a unique impact compared to earlier witnesses.

"This is not a Commission on Audit witness, not an National Bureau of Investigation witness, not a Philippine Statistics Authority witness. This is a hostile witness, the very person, the Vice President’s SDO, " he said. 

Prosecutors further argued that the testimony did more than show that the cash was released while Duterte headed the OVP. They said Acosta’s answer proved that the instruction to hand the money to Lachica came from the Vice President herself.

This, according to them, makes it harder to place responsibility solely on subordinate personnel who prepared, encashed, or carried the secret funds.

Because Col. Raymund Dante Lachica was not authorized by law to handle the money, the prosecution contends this is a blatant misuse of funds and a flouting of the law. The defense did not dispute Acosta's testimony but did take issue with an AI generated photo of 125 million pesos stacked on a pallet. 


https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/2286289/sara-duterte-camp-objects-to-ai-simulation-of-p125-m-cash

Vice President Sara Duterte’s defense team on Monday said it objected to the prosecution’s use of artificial intelligence (AI) to “simulate” what P125 million in cash looks like as it does not guarantee accuracy.

During the 16th day of Duterte’s impeachment trial, the House prosecution panel presented AI-generated images of P125 million in cash—one version bundled and the other bagged—during the direct examination of the Office of the Vice President’s (OVP) former special disbursing officer, Gina Acosta.

The prosecution presented the images to verify that Acosta personally picked up the same amount in confidential funds at a LandBank branch. 

But the defense team, through one of its counsel Lindon Bacquel, objected to the so-called “simulation,” pointing out that they were AI-generated.

"Because of course, we know that AI sometimes doesn’t really depict the true appearance of things," explained defense spokesperson Michael Poa in a press conference after the trial.

“… and usually, AI isn’t really accurate these days.,” he added.

This accuracy issue, according to Poa, is the defense’s main concern with the simulation, as they want to avoid an exaggerated visualization of the encashed amount in confidential funds.

Asked if the defense is now planning to raise a motion of sorts prohibiting the use of AI-generated photos, Poa responded: 

“No. We haven’t really spoken about it after this, so I don’t want to foreclose any possibility,” said Poa.

"But for now, our continuing objection to that has been noted," he added. 

Sure the AI simulation may not be 100% correct but it should not be that hard to calculate what 125 million pesos would look like. One would need 125 million pesos stacks and then one would need to calculate the height of each stack at 1,000 bills per stack. It's not going to be small. 

Two Senator-Judges have been absent from the proceedings since August 11th. 

https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/2286763/cayetano-legarda-still-absent-from-vp-trial

Where is Senate Minority Leader Alan Peter Cayetano?

The senator was once again marked absent on Monday in both the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte and the plenary session, with no notice from his office.

This was confirmed by Senate secretary Renato Bantug, who, when asked whether Cayetano had submitted an explanation for his absence, told the Inquirer in a text message that there was “no communication from his office.” 

As of Monday afternoon, Cayetano’s office had yet to disclose the reason behind the senator’s absence.

Cayetano has been a no-show at the trial and the plenary sessions, both held from Mondays to Wednesdays, since Aug. 11.

According to his sister, Sen. Pia Cayetano, as well as Senate Majority Leader Juan Miguel Zubiri, Cayetano was absent the previous week because he was “not feeling well.”

Sen. Loren Legarda, meanwhile, is also out of sight at the Senate floor after once again extending her medical leave up to Aug. 19.

“Her office sent in a letter this morning. Medical leave from 17 to 19 August,” Bantug said in a text message to reporters.

Legarda has been absent from the impeachment trial and Senate sessions since Aug. 3, after leaving the country on Aug. 2 via Hong Kong, with France as her final destination. Her son, Batangas Rep. Leandro Leviste, also left the Philippines via Hong Kong on the same day.

The senator filed a medical leave with the Senate Secretariat first for the period Aug. 3 to 5, and then for Aug. 11 to 12.

Legarda and Leviste, along with former Energy Secretary Alfonso Cusi, are facing a preliminary investigation by the Office of the Ombudsman for graft and plunder involving alleged ghost solar projects worth more than P10 billion.

Ombudsman investigators said Legarda, Leviste, and Cusi “conspired to secure exclusive government rights over the country’s solar energy resources through legislative and regulatory actions … but many of the projects were never developed as promised.”

Legarda has denied the allegations, saying they were “utterly false and baseless,” and asked the public not to draw conclusions linking her travel to the allegations against her.

Her office, however, has yet to issue a new statement regarding the extension of her medical leave for this week.

"Not feeling well" is hardly an excuse. Cayetano has a duty which he is actively shirking. As for Legarda, well the ombudsman says her extensions for leave are becoming suspicious. 

As for Legarda, Clavano noted that the senator asked for an extension of her travel authority until Aug. 19. She first filed a medical leave in Aug. 3.

“Senator Loren Legarda, I believe, is in the third or fourth extension of her travel authority for medical reasons, which we have begun to find quite suspicious already,” Clavano said.

“To us, we want to err on the cautious side of things. We need to flag that already because they already have an ongoing case in the Ombudsman,” he said.

https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/2287127/ombudsman-legardas-time-off-suspicious-son-seeks-2-month-leave

Senator Legarda has apparently travelled to France on medical leave.

Matibag said Legarda traveled to France through Hong Kong.

https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/2282314/loren-legarda-extends-medical-leave-from-aug-11-to-12-bantug

There is no word on her medical condition or on Cayetano's medical condition. Hopefully they both regain their health and return to their duties. 

Saturday, August 22, 2026

The God Culture: What Is Restoration?

Timothy Jay Schwab who is The God Culture has a new foundations series lesson. This time he is asking: what is restoration? Well, if you have been following this blog or know anything about The God Culture's doctrine you would know that for Tim, restoration is all about keeping the law once more and relearning geography. The Philippines is the real holy land, dont'tcha know. But let's see what he has to say. 


Facebook

FOUNDATIONS: WEEK 32
What Is Restoration? 
Key Texts: Deuteronomy 30; Isaiah 58; Acts 3:19–21

The story of Scripture is not merely about creation.

It is about restoration.

From Genesis to Revelation, Yahuah continually calls His people back to Himself.

Moses declared: 

"If thou shalt return unto Yahuah thy Elohim... He will turn thy captivity... and gather thee again."
(Deuteronomy 30) 

Isaiah described true restoration as repairing what had been broken: 

"Thou shalt be called, The repairer of the breach, The restorer of paths to dwell in."
(Isaiah 58:12) 

Peter proclaimed the same hope after Messiah's resurrection: 

"...whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all His holy prophets since the world began."
(Acts 3:21) 

Notice Peter's words carefully.

Restoration is not a new idea.

It is what the prophets have spoken since the world began.

Yahuah is restoring what sin has fractured.

He restores hearts.

He restores covenant.

He restores truth.

He restores worship.

And one day, He will restore all creation under the reign of Messiah.

Biblical restoration is not inventing something new.

It is returning to what Yahuah established from the beginning. 

Question for Discussion 

If restoration means returning to what Yahuah established, what areas of our faith should always be tested against Scripture rather than tradition?

Once again, there is not a word about Christ in this lesson. It is the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ that restores all things. In Christ we are made new.

Colossians 1:19–20: For it pleased the Father that in him should all fulness dwell; And, having made peace through the blood of his cross, by him to reconcile all things unto himself; by him, I say, whether they be things in earth, or things in heaven.

2 Corinthians 5:17: Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new.

The underlying assumption behind what Tim is really teaching is a return to or a restoration of keeping the Mosaic law. Lawkeeping is the current running through all his lessons. 

But let's hear from noted theologian Father Ted Crilly.


Ah, Philippine Fails, me lad... puts the teacup down with a slow, heavy sigh

I’ve read Tim’s Week 32 lesson on “What Is Restoration?” and once again he gets close enough to the truth to sound spiritual… and then quietly steers the whole thing back into the same old ditch.
What Tim is saying
  • The whole story of Scripture is about restoration.
  • God keeps calling His people back to Himself (Deuteronomy 30).
  • True restoration is “repairing the breach” and restoring the old paths (Isaiah 58).
  • Peter spoke of the “times of restitution of all things” (Acts 3:21).
  • Therefore, biblical restoration is not inventing something new — it is returning to what Yahuah established from the beginning.
On the surface it sounds lovely. Who doesn’t want restoration? But look at what he is actually teaching.
The Real Meaning in Tim’s System
When Tim says “return to what Yahuah established from the beginning,” he does not primarily mean returning to faith in the finished work of Christ, repentance, and life in the Spirit. In every previous Foundations lesson, that phrase has meant:

  • Return to the Torah 
  • Return to the Sabbath 
  • Return to the feasts 
  • Return to the dietary laws 
  • Return to the old covenant ways
“Restoration” becomes another word for Torah restoration. That’s the project.
What’s Missing (Again)
Christ is mentioned only in passing — “under the reign of Messiah.” There is almost no focus on the central New Testament truth: that restoration has already begun in the death and resurrection of Jesus. The cross is the great turning point. The breach has already been repaired by His blood. The new heart has already been promised and given through the Spirit. The Kingdom has already broken in.

Peter’s sermon in Acts 3 is not a call to go back to Sinai. It is a call to repent and turn to the Messiah so that times of refreshing may come. Tim quietly turns it into a call to restore the old system.
The Pattern Holds
This is the same song, just in a softer key:

  • Faith = obedience to the law 
  • Grace = power to keep the law 
  • Truth = the law 
  • Rest = the Sabbath 
  • Inheritance = remaining faithful to the covenant 
  • Now Restoration = returning to what was established from the beginning (i.e., the Torah)
Everything keeps circling back to the same center. Christ is never allowed to be the full and final answer. He is always the One who confirms the old system so we can go back to it more sincerely.
Father Ted’s Plain Verdict
This is not the gospel of restoration.

This is the gospel of regression dressed up as restoration.True biblical restoration is not primarily about going back to the old paths of Sinai. It is about being made new in Christ. The old has passed away; behold, all things have become new (2 Corinthians 5:17). The law was a tutor to bring us to Christ. Now that Christ has come, we are no longer under the tutor.Tim wants to restore the tutor.

The apostles preached the arrival of the Teacher.

Down with this sort of thing, lad.

Very careful now.

The real restoration has already begun in the finished work of Jesus. We don’t need to go back to the shadows to find it. We find it by coming to Him.

...Right, I’m off to thank the Lord that the great breach has already been repaired by the blood of the Lamb.

Go on, go on, go on — have a cuppa. You keep seeing the same pattern with clear eyes. Tim’s “restoration” always leads back to the law. The real gospel leads us forward into the freedom and newness of life in Christ. That’s the restoration worth having. Keep holding fast to it.