I did not want to write about the God Culture again so soon but here I am writing about the God Culture again so soon. The impetus is a comment Anna Rose Lipshy or Timothy Schwab or Justin Hester or whoever left on the last entry about Philippine gold jewelry allegedly being found in first century Egypt.
First of all the commenter says the Philippines traded with Egypt 2,000 years ago as if that is an established fact but that is not what the three sources I looked at claim. While they mention trade contacts between Southeast Asia and Africa they do not say the Philippines traded directly with Egypt or that Filipino balangays sailed to Africa or Egypt. However the content of those sources do not matter to the God Culture because they say the conclusions of those scholars are illogical and unfounded and that they have crushed this "scholarly false paradigm." It's another instance of Tim and the God Culture discarding what a source actually says and substituting their own opinions and inferences despite citing the source as proof of their claims.
Secondly the commenter cites Professor Adrian Horridge as documenting Philippine balangays "going to Sri Lanka and India back in 200 BC at least." This claim is cited in their video "Solomon's Gold Series Part 1D: Testing the RESOURCES of Ancient Ophir, Tarshish, Sheba" beginning at 44:55.
Thirdly the commenter says "Wikipedia stakes a claim of Philippines mining gold since 1000 BC." Here is the reference:
I can imagine the commenter reading all that and thinking its a big nothing burger and that I am a fool who is nitpicking and being a libeling communist agitator yada, yada, yada. But getting your sources right is very crucial and time and again we see that Tim gets his sources wrong. In this same video Tim says:
Now let's talk about Timothy Jay Schwab. He claims he is challenging tradition and is not part of any organization or denomination.
Anna Rose Lipshy even says that she and Tim were evangelists touring the USA.
Here are the requirements of a missionary visa. I admit this is not the Bureau of Immigration's webpage but it is from a company who specializes in assisting people to obtain Philippine visas and is more forthright and clear than the information on the BI's webpage.
In your attempt to create doubt you further entrench this 1 point you attempt to attack. Foolish. So, not only did the Philippines trade with Egypt 2000 years ago which was our only point on this 1 slide of about 1 minute but so did West Asia/Persia. Wow! That’s even better. This point becomes even stronger in a timeline of concurrent gold trading in the Philippines. The assumptions in these articles that India had to be a mediator between the Philippines and Egypt is illogical and unfounded even by their own admission. That is the exact scholarly false paradigm we have crushed and you are going to have to deal with whether you like it or not. For one to mention the Philippines trading with Egypt and West Asia even recognizing they had the large balangay ships at least (some 80’ long according to Pigafetta and actual archaeology in Butuan some dated as early as 320 AD), is willing ignorance. Professor Adrian Horridge even documents those balangay in operation going to Sri Lanka and India back in 200 BC at least. Wikipedia stakes a claim of Philippines mining gold since 1000 BC and we test that.
http://philippinefails.blogspot.com/2020/03/the-god-culture-philippine-gold-jewelry.html?showComment=1584100051224#c4938809290190470428Responding to this comment will also give me space to write about another and more important aspect of the God Culture pertaining personally to Timothy Jay Schwab. As Tim says, "We'll get to that."
First of all the commenter says the Philippines traded with Egypt 2,000 years ago as if that is an established fact but that is not what the three sources I looked at claim. While they mention trade contacts between Southeast Asia and Africa they do not say the Philippines traded directly with Egypt or that Filipino balangays sailed to Africa or Egypt. However the content of those sources do not matter to the God Culture because they say the conclusions of those scholars are illogical and unfounded and that they have crushed this "scholarly false paradigm." It's another instance of Tim and the God Culture discarding what a source actually says and substituting their own opinions and inferences despite citing the source as proof of their claims.
Secondly the commenter cites Professor Adrian Horridge as documenting Philippine balangays "going to Sri Lanka and India back in 200 BC at least." This claim is cited in their video "Solomon's Gold Series Part 1D: Testing the RESOURCES of Ancient Ophir, Tarshish, Sheba" beginning at 44:55.
 |
| https://youtu.be/gG39WFEYfiU?t=2695 |
"Now, Professor Adrian Horridge believes that by 200 BC, now we're way back to the same date we gave you for being able to firmly establish that gold was being traded, mined and traded from the Philippines and here you have Austronesian sailors were regularly carrying cloves and cinnamon to India and Sri Lanka. Funny because everybody says Sri Lanka is the origin of cinnamon. Yeah because that's where the Filipinos took their cinnamon. Does it have a lot still? Yes. Do they grow it there? Yes. No doubt. But does it only come from Sri Lanka? It's another one of those things. No it does not. It may today for instance but it cerintaly did not in ancient times.
And perhaps even as far as the coast of Africa in sailboats with outriggers he says. I know he must be crazy too except they have built replicas of these ships now and actually this balangay has been sailed all the way around the world. So they most certainly could have taken that journey."
The source for this quote from Professor Horridge comes from a document titled "The South China Sea Dispute: Philippine Sovereign Rights and Jurisdiction in the West Philippine Sea," by Antonio T. Carpio.
Prof. Adrian Horridge believes that by 200 BCE, Austronesian sailors were regularly carrying cloves and cinnamon to India and Sri Lanka, and perhaps even as far as the coast of Africa in sailboats with outriggers.
The South China Sea Dispute: Philippine Sovereign Rights and Jurisdiction in the West Philippine Sea," pg.3
This is another instance of secondhand quoting from Tim instead of using primary sources. If he had followed the footnotes he would have found that Carpio's source for this quote comes from a book titled "The Austronesians: Historical and Comparative Perspectives." A copy of that book can be downloaded here. On page 146 we read the following:
Although influences from the Indian Ocean were too late to influence the Pacific Austronesians, Sanskrit words and possibly some rigging techniques could have started to spread east of Peninsular Malaysia by 200 BC. Trade routes were also open between Vietnam and eastern Indonesia about 200 BC, as shown by the distribution of the Dong Son bronze drums along the natural sea route dictated by the monsoons in the South China and Java Seas. Recent excavations at Sembiran in Bali have also revealed evidence of drum casting and deposits of South Asian rouletted ware pottery, most likely dated before AD 200 (Ardika and Bellwood 1991). Annual trade between China and India through the Malacca Straits had opened by about 200 BC. Perhaps by that time Austronesian sailors were regularly carrying cloves and cinnamon to India and Sri Lanka, and perhaps even as far as the coast of Africa in boats with outriggers. Certainly they have left numerous traces in canoe design, rigs, outriggers and fishing techniques, and a mention in Greek literature (Christie 1957).
Both Carpio and Tim cite Horridge wrong. Professor Horridge does not say that Austronesian sailors were regularly sailing to India. What he says is perhaps they were. That word perhaps is very important and Carpio and Tim both omit it. Perhaps is very different than I believe. Professor Horridge is speculating and not stating a fact. Horridge's reference to Christie is also very important because it leads to a discussion of the Periplus which is a central text to Tim's thesis.
The obscure passage in question is the following:
60. Among the market-towns of these countries, and the harbors where the ships put in from Damirica [=Limyrike] and from the north, the most important are, in order as they lie, first Camara, then Poduca, then Sopatma; in which there are ships of the country coasting along the shore as far as Damirica; and other very large vessels made of single logs bound together, called sangara: but those which make the voyage to Chryse and to the Ganges are called colandia, and are very large. There are imported into these places everything made in Damirica, and the greatest part of what is brought at any time from Egypt comes here, together with most kinds of all the things that are brought from Damirica and of those that are carried through Paralia.
https://depts.washington.edu/silkroad/texts/periplus/periplus.html
This brief paper says that some consider this passage in the Periplus to be corrupt. The problem lies in the interpretation of the word highlighted above, colandia. Anthony Christie spends nine pages identifying what kind of ship a colandia is even investigating Chinese documents concerning these ships. Needless to say he does not identify it as a balangay or anything Filipino. In fact both Horridge and Christie use the all encompassing term Austronesian which could mean any number of people groups and not necessarily Filipinos.
It is interesting to note that the commenter says Professor Horridge documents Filipino balangays as making trips to India and Sri Lanka in 200 BC when he does not mention balangays at all. That is an addition the commenter makes because Tim makes the connection with his slide. Now in the mind of the commenter, as well as the mind of anyone who watched the video, Professor Horridge is saying that Filipino balangays made the trip to India in 200 BC. It's a very subtle trick Tim has played on his unsuspecting audience to associate the balangay with the quote from Professor Horridge. It's an instance of personal biases and inferences becoming fact.
It's the same kind of trick Tim played in his video Clue #3 where he says Philippine gold jewelry was found in Egypt, asks how did it get there, and then proceeds to talk about Philippine ships. Anyone watching that video would think Filipinos sailed to Egypt even though Tim never says that.
Taken as a whole along with the paper by Anthony Christie Professor Horridge does not support Tim's thesis that balangays were making ports of call to India by 200 BC. Tim is also wrong when he says that a balangay has sailed around the world. The Balangay Voyage project did build a balangay but they only sailed to China and around Southeast Asia. They did not circumnavigate the globe.
Thirdly the commenter says "Wikipedia stakes a claim of Philippines mining gold since 1000 BC." Here is the reference:
Mining in the Philippines began around 1000 BC. The early Filipinos worked various mines of gold, silver, copper and iron. Jewels, gold ingots, chains, calombigas and earrings were handed down from antiquity and inherited from their ancestors. Gold dagger handles, gold dishes, tooth plating, and huge gold ornaments were also used. In Laszlo Legeza's "Tantric elements in pre-Hispanic Philippines Gold Art", he mentioned that gold jewelry of Philippine origin was found in Ancient Egypt. According to Antonio Pigafetta, the people of Mindoro possessed great skill in mixing gold with other metals and gave it a natural and perfect appearance that could deceive even the best of silversmiths. The natives were also known for the pieces of jewelry made of other precious stones such as carnelian, agate and pearl. Some outstanding examples of Philippine jewelry included necklaces, belts, armlets and rings placed around the waist.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mining#Classical_Philippine_civilization
Right away this reference is suspect because it also includes the false claim that Legeza mentions Philippine gold jewelry being found in ancient Egypt. He does not. He says it appears this is so and he does not source his claim. The source for the claim that mining in the Philippines began in 1,000 BC is traced to a defunct Geocities page.
Mines dating back to at least 1,000 B.C. have been found in the Philippines. When the Spanish arrived the Filipinos worked various mines of gold, silver, copper and iron. They also seemed to have worked in brass using tin that was likely imported from the Malay Peninsula. The iron work in particular was said to be of very high quality in some cases, and occassionaly in some areas, even better than that found in Europe.
https://web.archive.org/web/20071201054321/http://www.geocities.com/Tokyo/Temple/9845/tech.htm#jew
This website appears to be the personal blog of Paul Sekai Manansala who is the author of "Quests of the Dragon and Bird Clan" which is a revisionist history about the Nusantao. This guy even believes Prester John was a real king! Seeing as this page was first captured in the internet archive back in 1999 it would seem likely that it is the source of the erroneous citation of Peralta which is among the three sources cited to prove that Philippine gold was found in ancient Egypt.
Paul neglects to provide a source for his claim that mines dating to 1,000 BC have been found in the Philippines. Who discovered these mines and where are they located? The Wikipedia page also does not quote Paul correctly. Wikipedia says mining in the Philippines began around 1,000 BC while Paul only says mines dating to 1,000 BC have been found in the Philippines.
If mining began in the Philippines in 1,000 BC that would not be enough time for Filipinos to become miners of international renown whose gold King Solomon coveted. King Solomon's dates are 990-931. Yet Tim takes this Wikipedia article as Gospel even mapping it out on a timeline.
Paul neglects to provide a source for his claim that mines dating to 1,000 BC have been found in the Philippines. Who discovered these mines and where are they located? The Wikipedia page also does not quote Paul correctly. Wikipedia says mining in the Philippines began around 1,000 BC while Paul only says mines dating to 1,000 BC have been found in the Philippines.
If mining began in the Philippines in 1,000 BC that would not be enough time for Filipinos to become miners of international renown whose gold King Solomon coveted. King Solomon's dates are 990-931. Yet Tim takes this Wikipedia article as Gospel even mapping it out on a timeline.
 |
| https://youtu.be/gG39WFEYfiU?t=1371 |
"Again Wikipedia says the Philippines has been mining gold since 1000 BC..."I am not going to deny that Filipinos were mining gold back in 1,000 BC but Tim needs a better source to prove his claims than what Wikipedia is "staking." As it stands a date of 1,000 BC for the beginning of mining in the Philippines is too late for the Philippines to have been recognized as the land of gold to where King Solomon sent his ships. For the Philippines to be the premier land of gold in the way Tim claims it is the mining industry needs to be much, much older. Tim offers no proof or suggestion that this is the case but sticks with the date 1,000 BC.
I can imagine the commenter reading all that and thinking its a big nothing burger and that I am a fool who is nitpicking and being a libeling communist agitator yada, yada, yada. But getting your sources right is very crucial and time and again we see that Tim gets his sources wrong. In this same video Tim says:
 |
| https://youtu.be/gG39WFEYfiU |
This is why gold jewelry of Philippine origin was found in a dig in Egypt dating first century AD.I have already looked at the three sources cited to make this claim and shown it to be vastly overstated. It's funny that Tim adds the detail about the jewelry being found in a dig. None of those sources mention such a thing. It is very clear that Tim has not even read these three sources but is citing them secondhand just as he uses some sources but twists what they say to fit his paradigm. Thomas Suarez, Charles Nowell, and Rev. Thomas Stackhouse are three examples of men from whose writings he "gleans" what supports his thesis and ignores the rest. I have made it abundantly clear in these posts about the God Culture that Tim is not an honest or objective researcher. He has an agenda and shoehorns in the facts to support it. As they say, "Never let the truth get in the way of a good story."
Now let's talk about Timothy Jay Schwab. He claims he is challenging tradition and is not part of any organization or denomination.
We are The God Culture, a group of independent researchers with no affiliation to any denomination nor organization whatsoever.
The God Culture is a group of independent researchers not affiliated with any denomination nor organization. This team focuses solely on relationship with the Father through His Son testing all things using scripture as it’s foundation.
https://www.thegodculture.comYet he also claims he is here in the Philippines conducting conferences as part of an evangelistic ministry.
(EDIT and UPDATE) The God Culture has deleted this passage from their website. Here is the original:They chose the platform of YouTube to share their research initially in order to gather a following and after 2 years and over 5 million views from 214 countries on a teaching channel, The God Culture now re-enters the evangelistic ministry in conducting conferences beginning in the Philippines as much of the geography the Holy Spirit has restored leads to that land. Married to a Filipina, Timothy desires to spend much more time in the Philippines, the land of Ophir and the Garden of Eden (try to disprove it) and on their first tour, The God Culture already has over 15 conferences booked in their first month in May 2019 alone from North Luzon to Visayas to Mindanao
Anna Rose Lipshy even says that she and Tim were evangelists touring the USA.
We used to be evangelist touring the US for a number of years conducting altar calls consistently (oh forgot, we don't have any ministry experience according to this ignorant blog) and our experience in follow up was a whole lot of people who did not continue in relationship.
https://philippinefails.blogspot.com/2020/02/the-god-culture-100-clues-philippines.html?showComment=1580699091074#c7458184243698567772If Tim is doing the work of an evangelist in the Philippines surely he has a missionary visa, right? I don't think so. He has said he is not part of any organization, not part of any denomination. That means no one sent him to do religious work in the Philippines. By his own admission he stands completely outside of the Church.
Here are the requirements of a missionary visa. I admit this is not the Bureau of Immigration's webpage but it is from a company who specializes in assisting people to obtain Philippine visas and is more forthright and clear than the information on the BI's webpage.
This visa is issued to a foreigner who:
1. is a member of a religious denomination that is a bonafide non-profit organization in the Philippines
2. is a minister or a religious worker of a non-profit religious denomination
3. is requested by his religious organization to carry out a religious occupation in the Philippines
4. is going to study a fixed curriculum in order to accomplish and undergo a proper formation trainingDo any of those four qualifications apply to Timothy Schwab? Not according to what he says about himself. He is a foreigner having no affiliation with any religious organization yet he is in the Philippines acting as a missionary. His webpage shows him posing with Bishop Rod and Ruth Cubos at a conference in Davao.
In fact it appears that all of his conferences are held in tandem with a local church as this video shows:
The God Culture deleted the video above in order to cover their tracks. Clearly they do not want people to know that they are doing missionary work in this country. But someone uploaded it on Facebook so here it is:
Despite the fact that Tim is obviously involved in missionary work it is very doubtful he has a missionary visa. If he does have one that would mean he either belongs to a religious organization, which he admits he does not, or someone invited him to the Philippines which seems unlikely because his ministry is that of a wandering evangelist and he is interacting with a wide variety of Filipino churches and pastors. The only way to be sure is to actually see his missionary visa. I dare him to post it if he has one. I dare him to tell us what organization he belongs to and sent him here or who requested that he come to the Philippines to evangelize. If he doesn't have a missionary visa then he is in flagrant violation of Philippine immigration law for doing the work of a missionary without the proper and necessary credentials.
That's is it for the God Culture. I don't want to bore my regular readers with this "cult" and I don't want to harp on these guys either. I have said basically everything that needs saying about them. The only things left to do in regards to the God Culture are to review their book when it is published and to post a write-up after attending a conference. Hopefully the coronavirus pandemic doesn't cancel any of their upcoming conferences.
That's is it for the God Culture. I don't want to bore my regular readers with this "cult" and I don't want to harp on these guys either. I have said basically everything that needs saying about them. The only things left to do in regards to the God Culture are to review their book when it is published and to post a write-up after attending a conference. Hopefully the coronavirus pandemic doesn't cancel any of their upcoming conferences.
Mark 16 King James Version (KJV)
ReplyDelete15 And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.
Bangko Sentral and Lazslo Legeza say otherwise and this pontificating blowhard simply cannot read. There is nothing in this blog worth reading nor responding and he already attempted and failed this same debate in his previous blog which you will see a pattern with him. His debate is obliterated. Read our full responses and you will find we have obliterated every stupid claim this liar attempts and watch the below videos which crush this completely. Now, he resorts to more deception desperately. He now cites Part 60 of The Periplus and claims it is in question by some yet Part 63 and 64 are the directions we cite and they are not in question as they are confirmed as accurate in that era by contemporaries. He would like you to ignore that of course. However, there is no debating them because they match those of Pomponius Mela who even mapped the area of the Philippines as Chryse and Argyre in 43 A.D., Dionysus the Tourist who also provided like directions and mapped them in 124 A.D. as the Philippines essentially, Christopher Columbus' notes and journal affirm and the first globe of Behaim of 1492 specifically identify Luzon and Mindanao. Magellan nailed it and Pigafetta also affirms along with Pinot, Barbosa, de Laval, Fidalgo, Indian History, Chinese History, and others. He cannot disprove this so he has to go on and on even talking about incredibly stupid things like Tim's Visa which is impertinent.
What he does not do is identify himself. Ask him who he is? What is his name, David whom? Is he a communist? What is his agenda? Why does he hate the Philippines and want it to fail? Why does he keep attacking The God Culture unprovoked who has only responded and never attacked him? Who wants to tear down a group who is clearly offering a revelation that is a game-changer? Why does he want things to remain the same? Why does he want to keep Filipinos down? Why does he espouse the lines of British propagandists rather than actually reading history which he is clearly incapable? Is he associated with Ophirian Heritage? How much do they pay him to attack The God Culture? How does he think he can tell so many lies, commit libel, harassment, gross negligence and get away with it?
Tim's visa status is incredibly pertinent. He is either here as a missionary with the proper visa being sent by an organization or requested by a Filipino organization or he is breaking the law by doing m missionary work without a visa. Mark 16:15 does not give Timothy Schwab license to break Philippine immigration law.
DeleteYou continually spout off your big mouth and you know nothing. Who are you? What is your name? Where do you live? Did you live in America? Are you a communist? Who is funding you? What is your agenda? Why do you wish for the Philippines to Fail?
DeleteWho is funding Tim? If he is taking up collection offering at his meetings and has no missionary visa than he is in double trouble. Look at it this way:
DeleteA. Timothy Schwab is a missionary to the Philippines
B. To be a missionary in the Philippines you need a missionary visa
C. To obtain a missionary visa you need to be part of a religious organization
D. Tim claims he is part of no religious organization
E. Therefore Tim cannot have obtained a missionary visa and does not have one.
You can't seem to answer questions coward. Who are you? What is your name? Where do you live? Did you live in America? Are you a communist? Who is funding you? What is your agenda? Why do you wish for the Philippines to Fail?
DeleteI don't know what Tim's visa is as I have never asked him and I am not going to do so because some stupid fool who can't even form a coherent point demands something for which he is not entitled. You are no one. And you are way over the line here into illegal harassment, libel, gross negligence, etc. and I am really going to push Tim now to pursue you because he does not deserve to be harassed by such a fool illegally.
The God Culture offers it's conferences free with no registration and no offering. They require no fees and contribute toward the venue and even buy lunch for as many as 1000 people. What a stupid fool you are. We have told you this before and there you go again. Why? Because you aren't interested in the truth. Just a communist-style agitator and a coward. You owe it to your viewers to come clean on what your agenda is and who you are.
DeleteHowever, who is funding you?
What is your full name?
Why is there no About Us page on your Blog?
What are you hiding?
What is your agenda?
Are you a communist?
What are your credentials?
Who cares if you offer your conferences for free? If Timmy does not have a missionary visa then he should not be doing religious work in the Philippines. End of story.
DeleteWell stupid, you asked. So don't ask if you don't care. What a trashy person you are. Timothy can do whatever he wants and it is none of your business. His lawyer got him the visa he needed and you are not a lawyer nor a scholar nor a theologian so stop pretending to be. You are a fraud whose opinion has 0 value. You have not produced any credentials, no name for your viewers, no agenda. Are you a communist? You sure do act like one.
DeleteI didn't ask if your conferences were free or not. Just because the conferences are free does not mean a donation is not taken up. You do know nothing is FREE right? Someone had to pay to rent the space, make the food, and Tim had to pay for lodgings and airfare. Religious meetings always have a donation time.
DeleteI asked if Tim had a missionary visa. If his lawyer got him a missionary visa then Tim belongs to a religious organization. But he claims he does not belong to any religious organizations.
Would Tim approve of you calling me stupid, trashy, a communist style agitator, excrement mouth, fool, etc etc etc? Would he approve of you representing him and the God Culture in this way?
First, we aren't religious nor do we teach religion and we try to keep our conferences outside of churches in public arenas in fact, which you would know if you actually watched these videos in which you comment which you have not. It is amazing how you have formed such a nasty opinion of us especially Tim and you are wrong about practically everything you have assumed yet you just keep assuming stupidly. Yes, you are stupid as you behave so. We do not take offerings at our conferences. Did you get that. Let me type it slowly for your... we do not take offerings at our conferences. Tim especially wanted to get away from that standard model and we all agree and he and Anna live by faith instead. They also often support their own airfare among other things. We even stopped the churches from doing so and even had some pastors turn us away because of that which is fine with us. What part of that don't you understand? We even try to give to the coordinators and in some cases when we can even the worship teams and sometimes even buy lunch for the attendees. Tim isn't trying to make money. You just don’t get it. He is done with the American way of Mammon. If you knew him, you would understand just how ridiculous you are. Many applaud us for that but you instead lie and misrepresent and then push back when you are clueless not only about our conferences but about our entire case in which you continue to open your big mouth when you still have not reviewed but maybe 1% of it. That's called ignorance by every definition.
DeleteYou keep blabbing away calling Tim a Zionist when he's the opposite even exposing Ashkenazi Jews as not being Hebrew even teaching the word Jew can't even be Ancient Hebrew and is a fraudulent word and yes, he knows Hebrew word study very well as do others in the group and you do not. You accused him of American propaganda when you are the one guilty of supporting the British and American position yet Tim has condemned the US and Britain as the seat of Gog of Magog which further leads to the condemning of modern Israel yet you still stupidly comment. That's called trashy indeed. Excrement most certainly is flowing from your keyboard.
DeleteYes, you did ask about our taking offerings at our meetings. You forgot already? You asked:
"Who is funding Tim? If he is taking up collection offering at his meetings and has no missionary visa than he is in double trouble."
We told you we are not taking offerings and you say who cares yet we were answering your uninformed question yet again. How much nastier can you get potty mouth? Then, you play victim when we (or let me be clear I) return fire with the same force which by the way we do on our channel as well and so did Jesus. That is how you treat a bully which you are. We are not intimidated by you and your false, fraudulent and constant allegations. We'll put you in your place every time and you deserve it. Get over it.
You claim Tim must have a missionary visa which is clearly for one entering the country for a foreign missions organization for missions work. Tim did not and is not a missionary and reports to no foreign missions organization which you even say and know and then talk in circles and claim the opposite. Fraud! His lawyer set up all that stuff anyway. Are you a lawyer? No, but you keep talking nonsense in ignorance as you have all along. You are just an agitator who has lost every debate and you get very nasty and we give it back and it hurts your feelings. Get over it. You are right about one thing, Tim doesn't even care about you and you are lucky he hasn't already come after you other than a veiled reference in a video where he just body slammed your weak debate. I would have called you out and started a crusade of thousands commenting against your blog which we easily could. However, he and I agree we should not allow you to go unchecked and we intend to respond to your ignorance. If you were not trashy, I wouldn't call you such. Stop behaving so. Jesus called the Pharisees a brood of vipers, hypocrites all, even the seed of satan. Your demonic behavior deserves at least that. You have no good reason to attack us the way you have especially Tim and Anna who have done nothing but try to serve the Filipino people giving and sacrificing much and you dare accuse them in ignorance. Yet you attack them personally and every blog. That makes you a fool, stupid, a moron and I will continue to follow the advice of the great Forrest Gump as "stupid is and stupid does" and what you are doing is uneducated, unscholarly and most certainly you do so from a platform of communist, jesuit, yellow tard-style agitation. You will be called out for that and you will be called what you are in your own blog and banned from our channel because your intentions are clearly malicious. You excrete from your mouth in a fowl way consistently as you have called us liars yet you never proved we lied once and we have not, dishonest, yet you never showed we were dishonest even once even after a 20-page blog and going in circles when your own dictation in the beginning says exactly what we said and proved you wrong, etc. Very libelous as well.
DeleteWe are not going to let you get away with this kind of trashy behavior. You can't even read a full reference and understand it and of all people, we would be happy to help you understand but from our first answers in which we attempted to enlighten you, you lash back incredibly nasty and you are going to get that right back if you bring that this way. Get over it. You attacked us from your first blog in giant leaps of assumption not only having never watched our series but not even knowing whom we are making stuff up which you continue even in this blog. You can easily get rid of me however because none of us here care about your insignificant blog. Stop attacking us and we'll stop responding. Anyone reading your blog sees you as a fool and you look really bad as you have not put forth one coherent point and it shows you do not understand not only the group you attempt to rebuke but the facts of which you have a very poor handle. We have never attacked you but only respond. Keep it up and look forward to a PhilippineFailsFails blog soon because we are not going to let you get away with this childish behavior much longer and there is always the legal option as you have no regard for the law whatsoever crossing boundaries of libel, gross negligence, even fake news, etc. as you repeat in this blog. You are screwing up the history of the Philippines, misleading and manipulating and no, Tim has never done such and you are not going to get away with it. You childishly mock, scoff and ridicule and I am pleased to be the one to wipe that smug grin off your face when I get the opportunity to obliterate your nonsense.
DeleteOh yeah, and:
DeleteHowever, who is funding you?
What is your full name?
Why is there no About Us page on your Blog?
What are you hiding?
What is your agenda?
Are you a communist?
What are your credentials?
If you want to know all that use the research skills that you boast of so much!
DeleteI NEVER SAID TIM WAS A ZIONIST!!! I said he was a judaizer. Big diff but apparently you don't understand that.
DeleteWell if he does not have a missionary visa then Tim is in violation of Philippine immigration law. You can't just come over here and start preaching.
DeleteAre you a lawyer? No, you are a liar. You are fraudulently representing yourself as such. Tim does not need your blessing and he has a lawyer who handles those kinds of things and he has the blessing of the Philippine government to do exactly what he is doing. Do you? Maybe we should report your fraud, libel, harassment, bullying and abuse. We stand on firm ground but you however, have broken multiple laws. Maybe the anti-corruption commissioner should know of your corrupt behavior.
DeleteA judiaizer is a Zionist fool. There is no such thing as a judaizer who is not and you are ignorant yet again. You just have one brain fart after another. So clueless.
DeleteYou are a public blogger criticizing others especially a group who is very well-meaning who has done nothing to deserve your agitation. You owe it to your people to tell them whom you are.
DeleteHowever, who is funding you?
What is your full name?
Why is there no About Us page on your Blog?
What are you hiding?
What is your agenda?
Are you a communist?
What are your credentials?
A zionist is not the same as a Judaizer!!! you are the fool not me! Tim wants people to keep the feasts but does he sacrifice animals????? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judaizers read Galatians! IF you want to know who I am then put your research skills the to the test!
Delete"Stupid is as stupid does..." Those who use the term judaizer today refer to those wishing to be Israeli Jews specifically following their ways of Judaism which is an unbiblical religion and they worship Jews and are most certainly Zionists. The term Zionist did not exist in Bible times fool. You just prove dumber and dumber in your attempt to parse words. Regardless Tim is neither and we are very familiar with the term and the way it is used today, you whoever, are not. If we research you, we will take action sir because we do not care whom you are. Your readers however, deserve to know. Go ahead, beg us to do so. I would love for Tim to pursue you for your illegal behavior. You deserve it.
DeleteRegarding the Feasts, you again comment without reviewing anything ignorantly as you always do. Pathetic. Jesus kept them and said to keep them. The disciples kept them even after the ascension and the early church kept them according to history and now the church keeps pagan replacements such as Christmas and Easter. What do you keep? Are you a Judaizer? Why do you support the British propaganda? Why do you act like a communist agitator? What is your name? What is your agenda? Your readers deserve to know these things.
Do you sacrifice animals? Because if you DON'T then you are not keeping the feasts! Do you live on the roof of your house for a week in a tent each year? If you DON'T then you are not keeping the feasts! Tim is a judaizer and so are you. God Culture is nothing but judaizing nonsense. Can't even say the name of Jesus. Gotta pretend to speak in Hebrew.
DeleteFor your education: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judaizers
Watch our videos and stop assuming stupidly. Do we ever say we sacrifice animals? You are a stupid fool. You do not know the Bible and you do not know history. You continue to ramble on and on in antiquated especially British propaganda and call yourself a Filipino yet run a blog that wishes for the Philippines to Fail. Nice! TGC teaches the actual name of Yahusha which we fully prove out, do you? No! You follow ignorant tradition of a twisted transliteration of a transliteration of a transliteration that is neither Ancient Hebrew, Greek, Aramaic, Latin, Old French, Old German nor Old English or in other words all the languages the Bible has been interpreted thru. The name of YHWH, Yahuah has also been replaced over 6,800 times with Lord which in Hebrew is Ba'al which is a Samaritan doctrine now called Judaism which is the Samaritan infusion of their Persian religion with the Bible which Yahusha calls against His commands and of none effect. Enjoy being of none effect. That is your right. However, for those willing to learn the name of God in scripture over 6,800 times, watch The Name of God Series and test it for yourself. This moron keeps going on and on without even watching videos. What an ignorant fool.
DeleteOf course you don't sacrifice animals!! And yet you claim to be keeping the feasts. But the Bible tells you exactly which animals to sacrifice and how many for each feast. Tim even admits he does not know the right calendar calculations in FEAST OF YHWH 1A! Yet you claim to be keeping the feasts. What a joke! If you want to be jews then be jews for real and stop pretending. Otherwise be christians.
DeleteI have already written about your anti-christian feast videos here: https://philippinefails.blogspot.com/2020/02/the-god-culture-jewish-fables.html
DeleteTim cannot even get his history right when he lies about what happened at the First Council of Nicea.
And you still have no clue our position yet comment in ignorance incredibly stupidly as you continue to. There you go again David Roxas committing libel in gross negligence yet again. You are a publishing format David Roxas and you better learn the laws pertaining to your own realm before trying to misread those of others you do not remotely understand David Roxas further misrepresenting yourself. What a liar you are David Roxas, we have NO videos on the Council of Nicea. You just make up stuff David Roxas. Your opinion is worthless David Roxas as you do not know the Bible nor history nor the Philippines and misrepresent yourself and you are a fraud David Roxas. You can't even render a sentence accurately David Roxas. Your viewers should know your name David Roxas. We have disproven ALL your ignorance and obliterated every argument David Roxas. You have lost every debate David Roxas and proven you know absolutely nothing David Roxas. Keep it up David Roxas.
Delete"we have NO videos on the Council of Nicea" that is a lie. see the video i referenced. FEAST OF YHWH 1A! that is where Timmy lies about the council of Nicea and Constantine and the Bishops.
DeleteYes my name is David Roxas. Tell me everything else you know about me. HAHAHA!!!
Look at how ANGRY you are that you repeat my name again and again! Fact remains it si YOU and TIM who know nothing about the Bible or history. That is why he lies about the 1st council of Nicea.
DeleteWe do not have any videos on the Council of Nicea PhilippineFails.blogspot David Roxas and you have lost the right to attempt debate as you are a fraud PhilippineFails.blogspot David Roxas. It seems to bother you when someone uses your concealed name over and over PhilippineFails.blogspot David Roxas yet you do it in every blog in ignorance as much of what you invoke Tim's name isn't even him. You are a liar PhilippineFails.blogspot David Roxas who has lost every debate PhilippineFails.blogspot David Roxas. You misrepresent constantly PhilippineFails.blogspot David Roxas and are guilty of libel, gross negligence, falsifying and massive misleadings PhilippineFails.blogspot David Roxas. I am very angry with your communist-style, jesuit-style agitation and many Filipinos are and will be as well as they will not tolerate your yellow-tard behavior much longer PhilippineFails.blogspot David Roxas. One of our viewers called your worthless rants of nothing, saliva PhilippineFails.blogspot David Roxas. You have attacked and attacked and attacked PhilippineFails.blogspot David Roxas without provocation nor reason and in fraud and you are proven wrong on every point PhilippineFails.blogspot David Roxas. You have lost all debate PhilippineFails.blogspot David Roxas. Everything you have attempted has been proven to have no basis and you have been caught manipulating historic quotes and misrepresenting taking fragments as you do with the word and misapplying them PhilippineFails.blogspot David Roxas. Your Biblical illiteracy is ridiculous PhilippineFails.blogspot David Roxas. This blog is one big blunder PhilippineFails.blogspot David Roxas. You have been caught lying about our leader in personal libelous garbage PhilippineFails.blogspot David Roxas and our group and you can't even render a sentence with accuracy PhilippineFails.blogspot David Roxas. You are a liar PhilippineFails.blogspot David Roxas. This blog is full of lies and deceit and frankly, demonic in nature and no, we will not tolerate demons PhilippineFails.blogspot David Roxas. We know who you are PhilippineFails.blogspot David Roxas and we know more but we will save that for the right time. You have failed the Philippines PhilippineFails.blogspot David Roxas. David Roxas owner of PhilippineFails.blogspot caught in manipulation, malicious lying. The person behind PhilippineFails.blogspot is David Roxas. President, PhilippineFails.blogspot David Roxas. PhilippineFails.blogspot blogger David Roxas exposed for libel, manipulation, gross negligence and harassment. I am not going to tolerate you anymore PhilippineFails.blogspot David Roxas. You are a waste of space PhilippineFails.blogspot David Roxas. We will not indulge you anymore in debate because you have lost such right as you are a fraud PhilippineFails.blogspot David Roxas. I will respond in the same annoying childish manner in which you have attacked because you have lost the right to debate immature child and you will simply have to get over it PhilippineFails.blogspot David Roxas. However, the search engines are gonna love all these mentions and it will not take long for your name to rise to the top with PhilippineFails. Enough of your abuse, you are now going to get it back PhilippineFails.blogspot David Roxas. I've been nice so far PhilippineFails.blogspot David Roxas.
Delete"We do not have any videos on the Council of Nicea" WATCH YOUR OWN VIDEO!!!!! Tim says Constantine entered into a conspiracy with the Bishops at Nicea to cover up the truth about Passover.
DeleteWe have no videos on the Council of Nicea David Roxas. You are just trying to find a crack somewhere yet you failed David Roxas. You have lost your right to debate because you have committed fraud, libel, gross negligence, harassment, etc. David Roxas. You have offered nothing but mistruths and misrepresentations David Roxas and you have been caught David Roxas. Enough of your lies David Roxas. You have failed the Phillippines David Roxas.
DeleteYou are not comprehending me. I know you do not have videos ABOUT the Council of Nicea. What you have are two videos about the feasts of the Lord. In one o those videos Tim says Constantine outlawed the passover and entered into a conspiracy to cover it up! If you knew anything about church history you would know this codifying of the celebration of Easter happened at the first Council of Nicea.
DeleteWatch your own video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69jyDIr61FQ Skip to 10:26 and listen to what Tim says. Look at 0:17 where the slide says: Early Church Kept the Spring Feast until Constantine Censored it.
You don't know church history and you don't even know the content of your own videos!
You are not comprehending me PhilippinesFails David Roxas. I am not answering you PhilippinesFails David Roxas because your time of deception is over PhilippinesFails David Roxas. You don't get to continue on and on and on and on and on PhilippinesFails David Roxas when you are proven to be a libelous, harassing, fraud with an agenda PhilippinesFails David Roxas and you have forfeited any right to engage us in debate PhilippinesFails David Roxas. We are done debating you PhilippinesFails David Roxas as we wiped the floor with you already and you are a sad existence who hates his country PhilippinesFails David Roxas who resorts to misdirection as you are now as this topic has nothing to do with this fraudulent blog proven so in which you are proven yet again PhilippinesFails David Roxas to mislead, misread and are challenged by some sort of learning disability. No more digs PhilippinesFails David Roxas. No more points PhilippinesFails David Roxas. You are ridiculous, deceptive and have abused the right to debate PhilippinesFails David Roxas. We are done debating you PhilippinesFails David Roxas but we will point out your fraud to your viewers in response to your nonsense PhilippinesFails David Roxas. This blog is nothing but nonsense and lies and has never proven us wrong on any point at any time. Yet, PhilippinesFails David Roxas wishes to act as if he did not assault and harass us yet he most certainly did and no we will not tolerate these fraudulent actions of PhilippinesFails David Roxas in his communist, jesuit-style agitation. His yellow-tard behavior will be called out and we will expose this as the fraud it is. PhilippinesFails David Roxas Is incapable of rendering a sentence in context in history nor the Bible and this is a demonic attempt to disparage a group who has executed extremely deep and valuable research. However, it does not fit his British world view and his desire to see the Philippines Fail as PhilippinesFails David Roxas names himself which is the very dumbest name one could imagine for a blog about a country unless they are a yellow-tard, communist who only desires their country fail. The Philippines will run PhilippinesFails David Roxas out for this behavior and will not tolerate it much longer. Enough of your evil.
DeleteDemonic? You know what is demonic is your continual invocation of my name. Are you attempting to cast a spell? Repetition of a phrase is how magic works. Are you a good witch or a bad witch?
DeleteYou are both hilarious and sad. It really is too bad you will not engage with the facts I have set down but instead resort to name calling and childish antics. Does Tim approve of what you are doing? Are you a faithful representative of what the God Culture is all about?
What is the title of this blog PhilippinesFails David Roxas? A direct personal, uninformed, ridiculous, evil attack on our leader! Demonic of you PhilippinesFails David Roxas. You don't even know the definition of a missionary sent by an organization, define that you know Tim is not a missionary in such capacity and then waive your witch hand and expect viewers to except your false paradigm that you set forth which already handicap the conversation PhilippinesFails David Roxas. What do you discuss in this blog PhilippinesFails David Roxas? Let's see. You prove you can't read PhilippinesFails David Roxas, you can't comprehend PhilippinesFails David Roxas, you form a false paradigm and attempt argument PhilippinesFails David Roxas, etc. You have lost such debate hands down and royally PhilippinesFails David Roxas. You are one big psycho psy-op PhilippinesFails David Roxas and now we know whom you are and no wonder PhilippinesFails David Roxas. I'm not a witch period as both are demonic PhilippinesFails David Roxas but no surprise you would be dumb enough not to know the difference PhilippinesFails David Roxas. See you can't even form a paradigm that is not demonic PhilippinesFails David Roxas as you have it on both sides as good demon vs. bad demon. Both demons PhilippinesFails David Roxas. This is because you only know demonic PhilippinesFails David Roxas. We have engaged you in mega facts in which you have screwed up every one to manipulate and agitate PhilippinesFails David Roxas and we proved you wrong every time PhilippinesFails David Roxas and have spent an awful lot of time on you which we will no longer bother with PhilippinesFails David Roxas because you have lost the privilege of debating with us PhilippinesFails David Roxas. You are sorely inadequate to enter the league in which Tim is in especially PhilippinesFails David Roxas. We know what you are doing and who you are PhilippinesFails David Roxas and we are not going to continue to placate your insanity any further PhilippinesFails David Roxas. Yes, this is insanity PhilippinesFails David Roxas. No one can be so wrong as you are without calculated negligence and that is demonic PhilippinesFails David Roxas. My responses to you from now on will remind your viewers who you are PhilippinesFails David Roxas and that you are a liar PhilippinesFails David Roxas because you are PhilippinesFails David Roxas. You have lost every debate on the facts PhilippinesFails David Roxas ad already lost royally. Get over it.
Delete"A direct personal, uninformed, ridiculous, evil attack on our leader!"
DeleteI did not personally attack your dear leader. I attacked his research and Judaizing.
"You don't even know the definition of a missionary sent by an organization, define that you know Tim is not a missionary in such capacity"
The BI would not care about whatever distinction you are making. Religious work is religious work and because Tim is doing religious work he needs a 9g visa.
"I'm not a witch"
Then stop with the incantations of my name.
"we proved you wrong every time"
HAHA!!!! No you EDITED YOUR VIDEOS because of me. And then you engaged in name calling not dealing with any of the very serious issues I have raised about your research.
Not even able to read the rest of your incoherent gobbled gook. And I am not going to try either. T
Does your "Leader" approve of your insane antics and childish behavior? Do they know what you are doing?
We will treat PhilippinesFails David Roxas as a child as he behaves as a child. Was the visa he mentioned as if he knew what he was talking about a religious visa? No, it is specifically for foreign missionaries sent by an organization which he admits Tim is not and then attempts to libel Tim illegally based on false criteria set in his false paradigm which is the core of every blog he has written about us. Our lawyer belly-laughed when we told him about this stupidity. This is the most immature blog imaginable from PhilippinesFails David Roxas. Just read the title and it tells you this is an insane approach from PhilippinesFails David Roxas. He mentions our leader and his wife's name over and over and over yet in these blogs but he doesn't like it when we do so but we will from now on PhilippinesFails David Roxas. Sad PhilippinesFails David Roxas. This is nothing but a psy-op of a communist-style agitator named PhilippinesFails David Roxas who takes one cowardly dig after the other in yellow journalism even if it crosses legal lines. We are done with this insane psy-op by PhilippinesFails David Roxas. Read the other blogs and this one, we have already responded to all of his filthy, disgusting misleadings and proven them so. PhilippinesFails David Roxas cannot even read and comprehend is the general theme you will find. We prove that in one reference after the other wasting our time to set his massively wrong misleading straight. No more. But of course, as a child PhilippinesFails David Roxas just will not accept his own shortcomings. Everything that he has attempted has proven to lead to a false paradigm PhilippinesFails David Roxas set up in an insane psy-op. And PhilippinesFails David Roxas behaves as a child. He hits and hits and hits and runs into the shadows but no more because you now know he is PhilippinesFails David Roxas. All of those he has been hitting now know he is PhilippinesFails David Roxas. Then, when one puts him in his place, PhilippinesFails David Roxas cries. Well, let PhilippinesFails David Roxas cry. PhilippinesFails David Roxas has lost every one of these debates and has lost all right to being considered a serious scholar because PhilippinesFails David Roxas is most certainly not. Even the very foundation of a blog named PhilippinesFails by David Roxas is a sad existence in which no one should pay attention. Time to send this guy packing Philippines. He has done enough harm. His communist-style agitation is done. This is demonic trash from PhilippinesFails David Roxas. We reject the very core of all of the inferences associated with all these blogs from PhilippinesFails David Roxas as he has established an insane psy-op in which to deceive you. No longer.
DeleteWho is funding this communist-style blog PhilippinesFails by David Roxas? China? Who taught this insane person how to agitate like this? China? This is no Filipino loving his country, it is one who hates his country and clearly by his title wishes for it to Fail. We have had enough of the misleadings and manipulations of PhilippinesFails David Roxas and we will treat PhilippinesFails David Roxas as the child in which he has behaved. There is no scholarship here in this blog in any sense from PhilippinesFails David Roxas.
DeleteWho is funding this blog? ME! I run this blog all by myself and I do it for fun. I love writing about the Philippines and exploring different aspects of its history and people. I have learned quite a lot since I started writing. The God Culture fits in this blog because you deal with the Philippines and her people.
DeleteWhy do you keep responding with the same old trash? Why do you keep posting the same comments over and over and over? If you want to dialogue about all the issues I have raised then do so. Otherwise what are you even doing but making The God Culture look awful! With your childish antics you are dragging their name through the mud! I am sure Tim is a nice person and easy to talk with. I bet we could have a nice sit down and discuss all the issues I have raised in a friendly manner. BUT YOU keep on with this nonsense. I have only set fact after fact documenting everything and you just keep on with the gobbledy gook.
If you don't want to have a real conversation then just go away. If you have had enough of me then go away. Turn off the computer. Walk away. It's that simple!
No one is forcing you to be here.
We will continue to respond to you PhilippinesFails by David Roxas in this same manner from now on. You represent a psy-op of communist agitation we will not tolerate and it will not go unchecked. You have harassed us and we will respond. Get used to it PhilippinesFails by David Roxas. Just look at the inappropriate erroneous title of this libelous blog for instance which is disgusting PhilippinesFails by David Roxas. You have no point and when proven wrong, you just leave this trash sitting there PhilippinesFails by David Roxas. You offer no corrections and nothing ethical whatsoever yet you are proven wrong PhilippinesFails by David Roxas. That is not journalism, it is the method of a coward and agitator PhilippinesFails by David Roxas. We offer clarification to our viewers because we do just seek the truth and you call us dishonest for clarifying especially when we announced it to them even and placed "edited" in our video titles for those few videos even and you are unethical and wrong yet that blog still sits there unethically and for public consumption with all it's lies as all yours do and it's illegal even. You deserve no respect PhilippinesFails by David Roxas. We are done with you PhilippinesFails by David Roxas. You are no scholar and we will not enter debate with you because you are unethical PhilippinesFails by David Roxas. You have forfeited any right to pull us into debate any further but we will respond to you in this manner PhilippinesFails by David Roxas because that is all this trash deserves. You, PhilippinesFails by David Roxas, have attacked us, committed libel, gross negligence, copyright infringement even, etc. and none of that is old news as you have done absolutely nothing to correct your many errors nor do you care to because you are an unethical, communist-style agitator which we will continue to repeat tagged to your name PhilippinesFails by David Roxas. Obviously, you did not set out to prove anything nor educate people but offer enough chaos unsupported to create doubt even though you are wrong on everything. We know your type and your tactic PhilippinesFails by David Roxas. We will not go away. You will leave us alone or we will respond to you PhilippinesFails by David Roxas and we care not whether that hurts your feelings or your opinion is meaningless.
Delete"when proven wrong"
DeleteI haven't been proven wrong yet. But you have been proven wrong which is why you edited your videos.
"We are done with you"
Then go away. Shoo!
"We offer clarification to our viewers because we do just seek the truth and you call us dishonest for clarifying especially when we announced it to them even and placed "edited" in our video titles for those few videos even"
DeleteYou didn't clarify anything. In fact you made the videos more confusing because you changed the SLIDES but not the AUDIO. So in one video Tim says of the armor it is indisputably Greek while the slide says "Archeological confirmation pending." Which is it? Indisputable? Or confirmation pending? You also deleted the Peralta citation instead of correcting it but that is ok because you did not read and of the three sources you cite. If you did you would have quoted from them. Until I ordered them and posted them you had never read them at all.
You clarified your videos the same way tossing dirt in a glass of water clarifies it! I dealt with that extensively here: https://philippinefails.blogspot.com/2020/02/the-god-culture-dishonestly-edited.html
You lied extensively including in the title PhilippinesFails David Roxas and you lost that debate and all debate liar. Now you continue your lousy lie already proven false which is your norm deceiver PhilippinesFails David Roxas. You repeated a sentence I wrote in response to you in which I was accurate. Then, you offered dictation that said exactly what I said thus accurate. Then, you went on for 20 pages in witchcraft trying to convince people that 1 slide in 1 video said something other than what it actually said which matched exactly what I wrote PhilippinesFails David Roxas. Talk about deception PhilippinesFails David Roxas. You never disproved TGC ever lied about anything yet you have lied many times and what do you do when exposed? You leave your trash lying around the internet as a stumbling block for others because you, PhilippinesFails David Roxas, have no interest in the truth. We proved you wrong PhilippinesFails David Roxas in that blog and in every one you have put out including this one PhilippinesFails David Roxas. You are a liar and a fraud PhilippinesFails David Roxas. Stick to your day job because your are pathetic at this PhilippinesFails David Roxas. The problem is you can't dispute our findings and the misrepresentations you have used prove that those are actually facts that support our case but you simply can't read and comprehend PhilippinesFails David Roxas. What a sad existence and the vomit continues out of your mouth trashing up the internet PhilippinesFails David Roxas for people to find. Filthy and disgusting PhilippinesFails David Roxas.
DeleteI have proved multiple times in several posts that you have misused your sources, not cited them properly, and in some cases not even read them (Peralta, Legeza, Villegas, and Farissol). In comments elsewhere you admit at least one source you use isn't even reliable. So why use him at all or include him in your list of reliable sources PDF? Makes no sense.
Delete"Suarez is wrong. We do not quote his conclusions because they are ignorant and loaded with propaganda as well and we do not consider him a true scholar as he tows the Rothschild line inheriting such from the likes of Samuel Purchas who was employed by the East India Company specifically to hack up this topic as a matter of record and confuse people with propaganda."
Go back and re-read everything I wrote very carefully. Don't forget while you were calling me names in the comment section you were editing your videos because you knew I was right.
You proved you can't read and comprehend Legeza and Villegas as we showed reading them in context very clearly represents exactly what we do. You are illiterate in comprehension. Peralta you prove nothing about anything. Farrisol, you again prove you can't even read as you focus on him being Jewish and ignore that he is being quoted by Rev. Thomas Stackhouse who is not a Jew stupid. What a fool you are. Suarez was wrong and we prove so. Purchas was employed by the Rothschilds as fact to write his false opinions. You are such a fraud and all you do s misrepresent. You are proven wrong and all your childish, stupid tactics exposed. Our video edits were those of updating sources we had already been working on before you brought up anything as we have been working on a book stupid. You get no credit for anything but lies and deceit and leaving your trash lying around the internet for people to stumble and to deceive.
DeleteYou proved you are willing to float a big lie such as Tim needing a missionary visa in utter stupidity and again, when proven wrong you leave your trash sitting around the internet to deceive. You are a liar.
DeleteYou proved you will manipulate Mela, The Periplus, even credible maps you ridicule in childish disgust, Justice Carpio, Professor Horridge, Villegas, Legeza, and many more and especially the Bible to twist and manipulate to your communist agitation purposes which we have dismantled all such debate and proven you are a liar and a manipulator. And you double down in such utter ignorance as a complete fool. You misrepresent yourself as a scholar which you are not, as an historian and you are not and as a lawyer and you are not. You are a fraud. You just attack and attack with smoke and your smoke has been dealt with and disappeared and all that is left is a sad communist-style blogger sitting in his mother's basement demanding that his country fail and fighting all things that could be positive as such. You are pathetic PhilippinesFails David Roxas and you have failed the Philippines. Filipinos will deal with you and you will be put in your place.
DeleteFor a foreinger to be allowed to do missionary work in the Philippines he needs a 9g noncommercial work visa also known as a missionary visa. That is a fact.
DeleteAll you are doing is copy pasting the same comments on each blog post and going the equivalent of "na-na-na-na you are stupid." Does Tim know that this is how you are representing him and The God Culture? You should be ashamed of yourself for continuing to blab on.
Face it. I set down in detail how you guys manipulate your sources and have not even read them and you CHANGED YOUR VIDEOS because you knew I was right.
Yes Tim is a Judaizer. He wants Christians to worship in a Jewish manner. He can't even get the history of the council of Nicea right but claims that it was a conspiracy with Constantine to cover up the truth. Always conspiracies with you guys. From covering up easter to covering up Ophir.
If you are not sacrificing animals then you are not keeping the feasts as they are laid out in the Old Testament. If you don't have the rack of the covenant and a high priest to put the blood of a lamb on the mercy seat then you cannot celebrate passover and the feast of atonement. All those feast are done away with. And if you are going to keep the feasts you had better be keeping all the other laws too including the kosher dietary laws and the laws about not wearing polyester clothing. Are you doing that?
The law has been changed because there is a new high priest. Heb 7:12.
THIS IS LIBEL!!! YOU ARE A FRAUD PhilippinesFails David Roxas! You are not a lawyer PhilippinesFails David Roxas and no such law applies to The God Culture who is not a missionary organization nor is Tim's immigration status any of your concern yet BI and his lawyer say you are wrong and they are the experts in that field you attempt to propagate still in continued fraud and misrepresentation as you have every fact you have touched. THIS IS LIBEL!!! What a stupid, communist-style agitator you are PhilippinesFails David Roxas who screws up everything he touches. You have been proven wrong PhilippinesFails David Roxas yet you leave your trach lying around the internet to cause people to stumble. You are a fraud PhilippinesFails David Roxas. We edited a few videos with notice to viewers publicly even in the title and you are a fraud misrepresenting that is somehow "dishonest." You are dishonest PhilippinesFails David Roxas. You lied about Mela's understanding of Chryse PhilippinesFails David Roxas. You lied about Horridge PhilippinesFails David Roxas. You lied about Villegas and Legeza PhilippinesFails David Roxas. You especially misrepresented the Periplus. You are not an historian and have no clue of what you speak. You are not a scholar and have no clue how to interpret the Bible and you definitely are no lawyer misrepresenting you understand immigration law you do not. You are a fraud. You have been wrong on every point PhilippinesFails David Roxas!!! The Feasts were kept by the disciples even after Jesus' ascension to heaven. You are a manipulative fool to then call all the apostles liars because that is what you are doing. The early church also kept the Biblical Feasts and none kept Christmas nor Easter which are pagan replacements of Biblical feasts. You have no point and have not made a single coherent point PhilippinesFails David Roxas. Kosher is not a Bible concept, that's Judaism you fool which is not Bible. You can't get anything right. You are just one big bumbling psy-op feeling your way aronnd in history you can't even read nor comprehend as well as the Bible. You should go back to your day job fraud PhilippinesFails David Roxas. Get our of your mother's basement yelling communist epithets at your screen and grow up. Stop vomiting on people's screens and show a little maturity PhilippinesFails David Roxas. You are a fraud PhilippinesFails David Roxas.
DeleteJudaizer? Was Paul a Judaizer? You can't even read nor have you watched the series' you criticize in utter ignorance and fruad misrepresenting yourself and proving yourself a fool. Paul kept the Feasts, the apostles kept the feast after Jesus ascended to Heaven. The early church kept the Feasts and you change scripture to say Paul who said "Keep the Feasts" somehow was sayign those who keep the Feasts are Judaizers and doing wrong. What a mixed up fool you are. You didn't even watch these videos in which you criticize which show abundant scripture the apostles, the early church and even Messiah kept the Feasts. Instead, you are a complete hypocrite keeping pagan festivals in place of feast you claim passed away yet those are pagan counterfeits of the same. What a hypocrite and fraud you are PhilippinesFails David Roxas.
DeleteWatch our videos for yourself and see if we in fact prove our position. We believe we do and many, many thousands agree including scholars, academics, lawyers, doctors, politicians, etc. Start with these 3 responses to this nonsense which obliterate any notion of such. This guy can't even read a full sentence and represent it. Very sad.
ReplyDeleteThe Lequios of Luzon: https://youtu.be/5QF9FGRjhhA
Finding Chryse: https://youtu.be/ffA5sWIdXI4
1492 Map shows Luzon as Chryse and Mindanao as Argyre: https://youtu.be/WLYZaHIb0O8
Watch Solomon's Gold Series, which this guy has not, yet continues to go on and on and on about nothing in ignorance. He continues to comment on 3 series in which he even admits he has never even watched and 1 series in which he has watched maybe 6 brief videos of almost 60. All in all, he may have reviewed 1% of the content we have put out on this topic and represents himself as an expert on what we cover - he is not nor can he even read. Talk about the epitome of ignorance. Einstein said it best:
"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." Yet, this guy misrepresents himself as a journalist. Ask him what his credentials are? A scholar? Ask him what his credentials are? He even acts as if he understands scripture yet he thinks the world was wiped out by 22' of water which is about the dumbest, most unscientific and unbiblical position we have ever heard among other antiquated junk theology he has spewed. He is here to mislead you and that's it. This is why he would launch out into this incredibly stupid blog about nothing. If he did not wish to bore you with The God Culture, he would not have written several very long blogs to attempt to debunk us. He has been after us for about 9 months now and yet, he has never produced anything of value. He failed thus he must take to the communist tactic of personal attacks because he can't deal with the facts before us.
You are watching a court jester at work... No, don't recap facts on a timeline. No!!! Don't make it easier to see the pattern. How dare we. Obviously, we cover those plot points in detail on other slides but he doesn't want you to know that. The Greeks picked up the Phoenician routes or that of Solomon's navy as they acquired the Phoenician marine acumen especially and that is not debatable. Solomon by the way began his reign in 970 BC not 990 BC. He did not reign when he was born so yet another misrepresentation from one with an obvious learning disability especially on this topic. Wikipedia says the Philippines was mining gold in 1000 BC as this buffoon well knows we cite that and then prove it out. He misrepresents yet again. Several actually cite this and it is originally from “Philippine Civilization and Technology,” Asia Pacific University. However, they have removed the original report from the internet creating dead links for these authors and bloggers. Obviously, they were all quoting something. We do not accept this at face value, however, but again this blogger is well aware of that. We represent it as something we will test and prove out and we do. As Philippines turns out to be Chryse and Argyre which we do prove in full and this blogger cannot disprove, this establishes the Philippines as this ancient land of gold from about 800-100 BC contemporary with the days of Israel's trade with Ophir. The Philippines continued as the land of gold for India, China and even traded with ancient Egypt and the Middle East. These are facts and you will find them accurately represented in our videos. This blogger came at us with nothing for months. Then, he thought he could go into sources and attempt to pick us apart. Of course a YouTube channel is not a scientific journal but he applies such standard and yet, still fails. Out of hundreds, he has focused on about 3. He has lost the debate on all 3 and he is an incredibly sore loser. Sad. All we have ever asked is that everyone watch our videos, go out and test them for yourselves proving all things and holding fast to that which is good (1 Thess. 5:21). Even that, he takes out of context and ignores the 2nd half of that scripture because, well, that is what he does. This is a disgusting display of yellow journalism that fails miserably on every level to do anything but attack in an illegal manner. Who is this blogger? What is his name? Where does he live? Did he live in America? Is he a communist? Is he associated with Ophirian Heritage? Why does he desire for the Philippines to Fail as he says in his name?
ReplyDelete“Philippine Civilization and Technology,” Asia Pacific University is found at the following link which i provided above.
Deletehttps://web.archive.org/web/20071201054321/http://www.geocities.com/Tokyo/Temple/9845/tech.htm#jew
The author offers no proof about Philippine gold mines being found dating back to 1,000 BC. He merely asserts that it is so. If the Philippines was the land of gold as Tim says it was and Solomon sent ships here then the mining industry would need to be much older than that but Tim does not suggest that. He takes the 1,000 BC date and the Wikipedia reference at face value.
Solomon's dates are 990-931. Not sure why you have a problem with that. By the time he was born, according to you, Filipinos had only been mining for ten years. by the time of his ascension to the throne only 30 years. That is not enough time for the Philippines to have become a world famous mining civilization.
Thought you were perfect (actually I know you are the opposite and have failed on every point and continue to). You better be with this ridiculous approach. You are wrong, Solomon ruled about 970 not 990 when he was born. We do not treat 1000 BC as fact, we prove it out. You really don't get it at all do you? That is a claim not proof. We then test it further and prove that the Greeks picked up this route 800-100 BC. We know you want CCTV footage of gold mining in 1000 BC to believe it, we get it. The question this presents is fully satisfied as we prove Chryse whcih is Ophir is the Philippines and specifically Luzon. You have not been able to disprove that and we realize how frustrating that must be for you but don't be a complete moron. This tests out and we prove it from multiple disciplines. You do nothing but scoff, misrepresent and attack personally illegally even.
DeleteYou can't seem to answer questions coward. Who are you? What is your name? Where do you live? Did you live in America? Are you a communist? Who is funding you? What is your agenda? Why do you wish for the Philippines to Fail?
What I really want is for Tim to get his sources right which he does not. I have proved that time and again. He even edited some of his videos because of this blog.
DeleteYou do treat 1,000 BC as a fact. That's why it's on the timeline! You are not understanding the Solomon thing. He was born in 990. by then the Philippines, according to you, had only been mining for TEN YEARS! By 970 they had only been mining for 30 YEARS! With the slow communication of that time and the primitive techniques to actually mine and fabricate jewelry that is NOT ENOUGH TIME for the Philippines to have become a world renown land of gold. You need OLDER MINES! An OLDER mining industry. OLDER mining techniques. But Tim does not even get that as he sticks with 1,000 BC.
This is a claim not a proof? So then it's an unfounded claim! Thanks for letting us all know that you use unfounded claims in your videos. But in fact I have already pointed this out in all my posts about Tim and the God Culture.
You want to know who I am? Use Google just as I did to find out about Timothy Schwab and his wife Anna Lisphy. I even text messaged with her lawyer in Florida a few weeks ago.
Why do I wish the Philippines to fail? I don't! I merely document the sad reality of this nation.
No you don't liar. This illegal harassment will stop one way or another. You want to find a gotcha which you have failed to. Tim and Anna are good people whom I have known for years and you are harassing them illegally under a fake news banner. You are fake news. 1000 BC is introduced as something we wish to test and prove out and then we do. We could care less what your ignorant view of that is and owe you nothing further. Yes, the Philippines was already mining gold when Solomon's navy arrived but they did not arrive at Solomon's birth and you are wrong on the date. You are wrong yet again and have gotten little right yet demand accuracy in our YouTube videos to the level of a scientific journal. What a fool. No we do not need "older gold mines" as archaeology can't date gold. History and the Bible set forth this overwhelmingly and you cannot prove either wrong. This is a comprehensive case not a bullet point fool. They can only date other artifacts. Even their dating of the Surigao Treasure is based on pottery which accompanied it yet the gold is recorded in history as being "from antiquity" and "handed down from their ancestors." Your attempt has failed. You have no point and you haven't had a point. You are just agitating. We stick with 1000 BC because it passes such test as the Philippines is Chryse and that proves it is Ophir and that reference from Wikipedia and those authors are accurate in their estimation. By the way, once again, you continue to be obtuse as 1000 BC could easily mean 1100 BC or 1200 BC as it is an estimate. Unto itself, it is not ironclad but placed in this very comprehensive case, it rings true and you cannot disprove it. We could care less what you accept as we know you would require CCTV footage in 1000 BC with a cataloguing of how much gold came out of each mine certified by the World Bank in order to accept it. We get it. You are a fool. You haven't made a point. This is not unfounded as our videos begin with scripture which leads to the Philippines as Ophir and geography, history, archaeology, science, linguistics, etc. all concur and you have not even taken 1 step in the direction of disproving our findings which you are not even educated yet write stupid blogs in ignorance attempting to seem important. Can you produce all that for your Malay Peninsula B.S.? No. Or anywhere else? No. You seized on a couple of very simplistic and childish points and kept claiming that was Ophir or Chryse in a juvenile, elementary case which fails quickly. You got nothing and your view obliterated and nonsense. You tell your people who you are coward. We aren't stalkers like you. Anna's lawyer in FL? What kind of nut job are you? You are just a harassing stalker after all. Using your own logic applied to you, perhaps you are a Jesuit priest and pedophile as well. Are you a communist because you sure do behave as such? You owe it to your viewers to tell them who you are. What is your agenda? The Philippines as a failure is a reality? You are truly a sad existence. No, it is not. It is rising and it will prove you wrong as well. Perhaps stop tearing it down and start helping instead because every one of these conversations with you has been a waste of breath and this blog a waste of space.
Delete1,000 BC is not an estimate. It is stated as a FACT. Tim even states it as a FACT. You yourself relied on the Wikipedia article it is in as a FACT. It is in the timeline as a FACT. There is no suggestion that there are any older mines yet for the Philippines to have been a WORLD RENOWNED land of gold the mines would have had to be much older than 1,000 BC.
DeleteIf they had meant 1100 or 1200 BC then that is what would have been stated both in wikipedia and in the article "philippine civilization and technology." They don't use that number because they mean 1,000 and not any other date.
Philippines rising?? HAHAHA!!! Do you even live here????
Stop using sources if you aren't going to even believe them!! You get so mad when I do exactly what Tim says to do which is to test him. He fails on every single point. His research is biased and he cannot get his sources right.
DeleteOn top of that he is most certainly breaking Philippine immigration law by doing missionary work in the Philippines without a missionary visa.
We begin treating it as fact as we test it and prove it out as it vets and your opinion in ignorance is impertinent. Like you would even know. You have hardly watched any of our videos and keep blogging incredibly stupidly in ignorance. Then you illegally harass our leaders and commit libel, gross negligence, etc. You are a piece of work. Our sources will be very well laid out in our coming book, very well. You are amazingly stupid and ignorant in everything you assert. You are just mixing and confusion and trying to cast doubt and tear down just as you are doing with this country and that is inexcusable. Just another communist-style agitator willing to cross lines to try to make a point even though there is no truth in it and no truth in you. What a demonic bunch of nonsense. Tim is not a missionary stupid and you have no point yet again. Stop making things up and stop your communist-style agitation.
DeleteAT LEAST! AROUND! CAN YOU READ AT ALL!? What a fool. Here's the original reference:
DeleteMines dating back to at least 1000 B.C. have been found in the Philippines.
Wikipedia says AROUND 1000 B.C.
AT LEAST! AROUND! What a fool you are. You can't even read and just make things up as you go.
Furthermore, no one can date gold and anyone that tells you they can is lying. They can only date artifacts found with it. That is problematic as that gold was not likely forged at the moment the person was buried with gold especially. This would have had sentimental value and Philippine history just so happens to identify the gold of Filipinos as that "from antiquity" handed down "from their ancestors." You have no point. How bout you stop harassing us in ignorance.
DeleteAt least around?? That is not in Wikipedia! That is in Wikipedia's source though. So which is it? Are you going to use Wikipedia or their source because they say two different things. And you do not reference Paul Sekai Manansala you reference Wikipedia.
DeleteWiki: Mining began in 1000 BC
WIki's source: Mines have been found dating to at least around 1000 BC
Furthermore there is no proof provided for that claim. You are taking his word on face value with ZERO proof. How about stop using sources in ignorance.
Really? You can't understand that? Wikipedia says AROUND 1000 B.C. Can you read? At least and around are essentially the same but at least defines it is likely older. Again, you have no point. We do not take the word of this, we test it and it vets as accurate which is why we have always used it. In fact, we go far deeper than that but yiou would not know because you have not actually reviewed our case but continue to blab away in ignorance. How bout stop using sources in ignorance yourself as you can't even read. You are unqualified to even attempt this narrative nor to write a blog. You are just mixing and confusing and this response is a perfect example because you do not care about the truth, you just want the Philippines to Fail. It will not but you will.
DeleteHere is how it goes:
DeleteWiki: Mining in the Philippines began around 1000 BC.
WIki's source (which Tim does not refer to nor do you): Mines dating back to at least 1,000 B.C. have been found in the Philippines
Tim: "Again Wikipedia says the Philippines has been mining gold since 1000 BC..."
Every single one of those statements is different!!
Did mining BEGIN around 1000 BC or were mines found dating to 1000 BC? None of the sources suggest that there are mines older than 1000 BC. No time frame is given that will make the Philippines world renown by 970 when Solomon ascends the throne so that he will be coveting gold from the Philippines.
"At least and around are essentially the same but at least defines it is likely older."
That is your inference and opinion and is not what the sources say. There is nothing in the sources about an older date and if they though that was the case then they would have written that. You have to separate what a source says and your own opinion which differs from it.
This is why I say over and over you are not using sources correctly but are shamelessly manipulating them to fit your thesis.
The Philippines has already failed and it has been this way for decades. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1987/11/a-damaged-culture/505178/
You are a complete moron. Whom exactly do you know who can date gold? Stupid! You are really sad. Who can date anything to 1000 BC exactly? No one. It would be an estimate, about, at least, etc. and yes, they are essentially the same thing. Do you know what the word essentially means? Clearly there are a lot of words you struggle with or omit often in your reporting in fraud, on purpose of course. There is no such as a 0 margin of error in dating. What a ridiculous parsing of words but let's not pretend you don't know what you are doing like a communist-style agitator because that is all you are doing. You are a lousy blogger who can't even get a sentence right. If this is what you do with politics as well, you are simply a propagandist troll of no value which you are certainly proving here. Manipulated? On YouTube, we quoted a former Chief Justice exactly with accurate source and he accurately represented what Horridge believed. You are not, liar. Taking a timeline recap after we have covered these previously and ignoring that is deception.
DeleteYour hate for the Philippines is disgusting and sending us this propaganda article, you have got to be kidding. The Atlantic? You really must be a British propagandist. That is extremely sad. The Philippines will not fail and Britain nor the US have a say in the matter. It will rise against their prince demon named Gog whose seat is in West and Central Europe indeed and they will write many articles condemning it but the Philippines will condemn them and they will not stop it from rising. Jesus does have something to say about this but you wouldn't know because you haven't even reviewed an ounce of the Bible portion which is our foundation however and He has spoken and you will not marginalize nor disprove His Word. Again, this blog is ignorant of our position but has taken to screenshots attempting to pick at sources for a YouTube channel expecting a scientific journal. Ludicrous and ignorance. Yet, even then, you have failed but take heart, you like failing.
What are you talking about? am not talking about DATING GOLD!!! Your source DATES THE MINES!!! WIkipedia's source says mines were found DATING BACK TO 1000 BC. Wiki then gives a DATE of 1000 BC for the beginning of mining. Tim himself gives a DATE of 1000 BC for mining.
DeleteYeah the Chief Justice quoted Horridge wrong. He was speculating not asserting a fact. And Tim does not even bother to check the source! Stop quoting sources secondhand and start using primary sources. Tim makes this mistake multiple times in his videos.
"pick at sources for a YouTube channel expecting a scientific journal"
DeleteRather pathetic that you get so mad that anyone would expect you to be accurate in your facts. You are making wild claims that chafe against all accepted scholarship and you moan and complain that I would dare expect accuracy from you. What a joke!
As for the Philippines rising? She is under the thumb of too many foreign countries and the weight of her own corruption and inefficiency to ever Rise up. One of the most corrupt nations in the world condemning anyone else? It is to laugh!
Rice sufficiency, BPO's, OFW remittances, and tourists are just the tip of an iceberg which is Philippine dependence on foreign countries to "stand on their own."
https://philippinefails.blogspot.com/2020/03/does-philippines-need-world-to-survive.html
You are hillarious. A Supreme Court Justice making a case for the Philippines in the South China Sea Dispute is "speculation?" What a stupid fool you are. And he is right in his assertion as Horridge clearly believed exactly what he said he believed. Additionally, we are a group not a person stupid. We have told you that so many times and you keep attacking Tim whom does an awesome job speaking on our behalf. You, however, do not. You are extremely sloppy in your misinterpretation and then call others names that really apply to yourself. This is witchcraft not scholarship and you are a deceiver in your absolutely fraudulent, demonic, communist manner you handle facts. Who on earth would actually try to make the point that because some scholar thinks there may be a corruption in a portion of a reference in Part 60 of the Periplus that that has anything to do with Parts 63-64? Well, no one with a shred of sense. Then, after we have slapped down every point you have made on that especially with overwhelming abundant history which confirms it and proves you ignorant yet again, who would keep trying to debate and with an empty deck? Only a fool. Who would read Bangko Sentral who identifies that Philippines traded with ancient Egypt both ways even spelling out the route and further entrenching with definitive language and then claim Philippine gold was not traded there especially based on a different article which uses an indefinite in one sentence yet also is definitive? Incredibly stupid. Then, you read Legeza and ignore what he says, waive your hand and say he didn't say what is right there in black and white. What a fraud. Your reading comprehension is sorely lacking and you should consider a different career. You are so obvious and viewers know better. This is why no one ever comments on any of your blogs on this topic except you and your pawn Michael who only knows how to agree with you. Of course, more likely no one reads this crap. You have committed massive errors in this blog and all under the thinking that you can take screenshots not even reviewing our case and somehow pick it apart and you don't even know what you are talking about. You have not nor will you. You have failed and you are one big blunder. You have resulted in personal attacks and illegal behavior in libel, gross negligence and you are illegally harassing in your unethical, bullying manner. What a fraud you are to try to represent yourself as an expert on a series you never watched. The epitome of ignorance. Blog after blog of nonsense and the ramblings of a childish fool. You have not landed a point because you have no clue what you are even talking about.
DeleteRead the Horridge reference in full. He says PERHAPS. Not I believe. He is speculating not stating a fact. The reference to paragraph 60 of the Periplus has to do with what types of ships were making voyages and it is not balangays. This reference is also KEY to Horridge's speculations. But you don't know that because you have not read those sources and have only seen them now when I have done the research and brought them to light. You have manipulated Horridge into suggesting that he said Filipino balangays made their way to India and Africa. He said nothing of the sort. Not even Carpio said that!
DeleteIf it wasn't for me you would have no idea what is in any of the three sources cited to prove Philippine gold jewelry was found in ancient Egypt. In fact you only know what I posted and not what's in the articles because no one in your group has read them. Not you or Tim or Anna or Anita. or Justin or anyone else. Not anyone who cites them in all the various blogs has even read them! If either you or them had read those articles you would have quoted from them but you did;t and none you even cite Peralta correctly. It was I who pointed out the wrong citation which you then removed from ONE of your videos and left in all the rest! It was ME who actually ordered the articles, read them, and analysed them. Now you are piggybacking off MY research.
So you admit you are wrong and cannot actually read Legeza and Villegas. Good. What a load of nonsense. Perhaps 200 BC, perhaps 186 BC, perhaps 193 BC, perhaps 250 BC. He believed it. Get over it. We will stick with Justice Carpio over your ignorant pontification and twisting. You can't read and comprehend and you have nothing nor have you offered anything in all this smoke. You have no clue what sources we had or did not have for our book as we told you in the beginning we were pulling everything together before you came in attacking over and over in ignorance. We had told you early on we had already ordered those sources. You just keep ignoring and omitting and twisting and manipulating yet claim to care about the truth. Don't pretend. You are just a communist-style bully, agitator harassing us with no support. For Justice Carpio, we find his credentials adequate and you have no say in the matter and his use as well. Get over it. Piggybacking on your research? What a fool you are.
DeleteStick wth Carpio? Over the man he quotes? Pathetic. Better to stick with what Horridge actually wrote and he did not write "they did" but PERHAPS. Of course Carpio's misquoting makes your thesis more plausible. What's foolish is to take Carpio for his word and not to find the ORIGINAL SOURCE to dive in and find out what Horridge is talking about. To get the whole context. IF you had done that you would have been lead to the paper about the Periplus and what kind of ships Horridge speculated might have been making the journey to India. They were not balangays.
DeleteI read Legeza and Villegas and took them for what they say. Not what I think they say or want them to say. You are not reading them as they are. You are manipulating them to say what best fits your thesis. If you want PROOF of Philippine gold being found in Egypt or of direct trade with Egypt then you need other sources as these do not confirm that thesis.
Oh you ordered those sources? Before or after you posted about them and did not quote from them? Before or after you posted the wrong citation of Peralta? Great research skills and honesty! Not!
He was accurate and you are not and we will us Justice Carpio's book whenever we wish. It is inappropriate for you to suggest otherwise. Your opinion is meaningless. What a fraud you are. Horridge indicates:
Delete“Certainly they have left numerous traces in canoe design, rigs, outriggers and fishing techniques,
and a mention in Greek literature (Christie 1957).”
You focus only on the after thought of a mention in Greek literature which is the Periplus and ignore his reference to numerous traces in archaeology that prove his point which is his point not a mention and then claim he didn't believe what he said even. That is fraudulent. You then used the Part 60 question from a scholar whom few agree anyway and attempt to apply that to Parts 63-64 which is fraud. 63 and 64 are well attested and confirmed as we have proven. You then prove you cannot read yet again because you focus only on the word perhaps without reading this prior in that same paragraph. You can’t even read a paragraph? Here is what Horridge relays:
"Theories that Austronesian rigs were derived from those of the Indian Ocean,
or even from Egypt, are mistaken because the Austronesians had left Mainland
Asia long before contacts spread eastwards."
[NOTE: He's not guessing nor speculating, Austronesians were sailing West long before the West headed East which affirms his belief expressed later of 200 BC even but you are misrepresenting yet again. If you can't see that, you can't read. You really can't even render a sentence in context can you?]
"On the contrary, the westward spread of the Austronesian triangular sail into the Indian Ocean about 200 BC provides us with the probable origin of the Arab triangular lateen sail that spread
into Egypt and even into the Mediterranean by late classical times, say AD 200."
[NOTE: Austronesian’s spread Westward period. That is his belief and to say other wise is stupid. He's not guessing nor speculating but this is what he believed but you are misrepresenting yet again. You really can't even render a sentence in context can you?]
It’s pretty bad you cannot even read a sentence in context whether alone a paragraph. You need to consider another profession because you are very poor in reading comprehension.
Add to this Bangko Sentral’s book where Villegas defines this route further and entrenches it further saying that it is ESTABLISHED FACT and then, Legeza who says this trade is PROVEN even dating it to the first century as fact. This is obviously not only accurate that Justice Carpio represented this correctly but also that these writers certainly believed, yes, believed, the Philippines was trading with Egypt and West Asia thousands of years ago. Yet, you attempt to marginalize and ignore this fact. The problem, this is established fact and you represent nothing but mistruths. Our sources were accurate and you are wrong. You are a fraud and failure yet again. The Philippines is Ophir and you have not even taken a step in the direction of disproving our conclusions.
Furthermore, he continues in the chapter to support his BELIEF that Austronesians sailed West to as far as Africa even describing the specifics of the journey down to minutiae and you say Horridge did not believe. You can't read and you are misrepresenting again.
Delete"Making use of periods of mixed winds (Finney 1985), a month’s journey of
exploration eastwards between 20°N and 20°S in the Pacific Ocean would easily
cover about 1000 km. To be on the safe side a drift back downwind might take
two months. Carbohydrate for three months for eight people would weigh about
300 kg, which is not an unreasonable load for a 12 m single-outrigger canoe.
Double canoes would carry a tonne with ease, but because of the larger
investment in construction labour they were more suitable for carrying family,
plants, animals and cargo to places already discovered.
Voyaging was always seasonal, even when not forced by the winds, because
the stars are seasonal. Charts of the tropical Pacific prepared for the days of sail
show the trade winds blowing fairly strongly but not consistently all the year
from the north-east to the north of the equator and from the south-east to the
south of the equator. However, from October to June over the whole area of
Melanesia and Polynesia to the south of the equator, from New Guinea to the
Tuamotus, the winds blow from the north-east about as frequently as they do
from the south-east."
[Note: He is not speculating.]
"Bearing all this in mind, the obvious time to set out eastwards into the unknown would
have been the beginning of December, starting with a westerly wind, and always
with the expectation of an easy return home."
[Even the time of year they would journey a few details left uncovered and you say he did not believe the Austronesian sailors traveled East when he said they did?]
"Voyages by outrigger canoe would ultimately have been limited by the
sea-water surface temperature. Apart from New Zealand, the Austronesian
colonialization was all within the isotherm of 21°C (70°F) in the warmest season."
Can you read? Seems not. He even maps the drift currents as he documents in this chapter his BELIEF that Austronesians sailed as far as Egypt. He continues on and on for many pages on the Westward route from the Austronesian islands to Egypt, etc. the construction of the ships and sails which he identifies as adopted from the Austronesians and you say he did not believe? You are such a fraud. Then for you to attempt to characterize this massively well-supported, huge view of Horridge you assert that a scholar questioned Part 60 of the Periplus which he vaguely references in the midset of what he calls fact. His belief is obvious to anyone who can read but certainly not to a communist-style agitator like PhilippinesFails David Roxas as has the reading comprehension of a child (sorry, for offended children for such association). While sitting in his mother's basement, PhilippinesFails David Roxas came up with yet another blunder to try to support his failed, communist-style agitation. Imagine that.
Hey good to know you downloaded the book! See you are making use of my research now. You didn't even have the book before I showed it to you or else you would have quoted it in your video. As for the your comment? What are you talking about!!?
DeleteThat is from a section titled "Sailing conditions in the Pacific." Can YOU read? There is nothing about Egypt here! Nothing about Filipinos or balangays either. Austronesians are not limited to Filipinos.
When he writes:
"Perhaps by that time Austronesian sailors were regularly carrying cloves and cinnamon to India and Sri Lanka, and perhaps even as far as the coast of Africa in boats with outriggers."
He is speculating about the timeframe in which these sailors may have been sailing to India and even Africa. He does not state it as a fact that by 200 BC they were sailing this far he says perhaps they were. Either way your quote from the section about sailing conditions in the PACIFIC is irrelevant to sailing to AFRICA which is not in the Pacific.
You are hillarious. We quoted a Supreme Court Justice exactly and you attempt to disprove a Supreme Justice was wrong in his interpretation. Talk about a fraud. You are wrong and we proved such. However, you focus on the 2nd half our our response and ignore the first in fraud yet again because you cannot read and your comprehension is that of a child. Sad.
DeleteHe was accurate and you are not and we will us Justice Carpio's book whenever we wish. It is inappropriate for you to suggest otherwise. Your opinion is meaningless. What a fraud you are. Horridge indicates:
“Certainly they have left numerous traces in canoe design, rigs, outriggers and fishing techniques,
and a mention in Greek literature (Christie 1957).”
You focus only on the after thought of a mention in Greek literature which is the Periplus and ignore his reference to numerous traces in archaeology that prove his point which is his point not a mention and then claim he didn't believe what he said even. That is fraudulent. You then used the Part 60 question from a scholar whom few agree anyway and attempt to apply that to Parts 63-64 which is fraud. 63 and 64 are well attested and confirmed as we have proven. You then prove you cannot read yet again because you focus only on the word perhaps without reading this prior in that same paragraph. You can’t even read a paragraph? Here is what Horridge relays:
"Theories that Austronesian rigs were derived from those of the Indian Ocean,
or even from Egypt, are mistaken because the Austronesians had left Mainland
Asia long before contacts spread eastwards."
[NOTE: He's not guessing nor speculating, Austronesians were sailing West long before the West headed East which affirms his belief expressed later of 200 BC even but you are misrepresenting yet again. If you can't see that, you can't read. You really can't even render a sentence in context can you?]
"On the contrary, the westward spread of the Austronesian triangular sail into the Indian Ocean about 200 BC provides us with the probable origin of the Arab triangular lateen sail that spread
into Egypt and even into the Mediterranean by late classical times, say AD 200."
[NOTE: Austronesian’s spread Westward period. That is his belief and to say other wise is stupid. He's not guessing nor speculating but this is what he believed but you are misrepresenting yet again. You really can't even render a sentence in context can you?]
It’s pretty bad you cannot even read a sentence in context whether alone a paragraph. You need to consider another profession because you are very poor in reading comprehension.
Add to this Bangko Sentral’s book where Villegas defines this route further and entrenches it further saying that it is ESTABLISHED FACT and then, Legeza who says this trade is PROVEN even dating it to the first century as fact. This is obviously not only accurate that Justice Carpio represented this correctly but also that these writers certainly believed, yes, believed, the Philippines was trading with Egypt and West Asia thousands of years ago. Yet, you attempt to marginalize and ignore this fact. The problem, this is established fact and you represent nothing but mistruths. Our sources were accurate and you are wrong. You are a fraud and failure yet again. The Philippines is Ophir and you have not even taken a step in the direction of disproving our conclusions.
Only a fool would read one author rendering a PROVEN trade between Egypt, West Asia and the Philippines and then call it speculative that the gold traded by the one side would end up in the other. That's willing ignorance not scholarship. Then, to read the other author who not only calls the African-Philippine trade as ESTABLISHED FACT but defines the route even but then, stupidly assert that both of these are only asserting a one-way trade of Egyptian goods to Philippines and not the other way around, ignorance. Villegas for Bangko Sentral even lays out the trade route of how Philippine items ended up in Egypt, etc. and you read that and say it's speculative based on the first part of a different article not even bothering to acknowledge this moves passed tentative language completely and nails it down as definitive. No surprise, that is exactly how you read the Bible and have even read our replies and attempting to screw up our videos. That is the kind of hatchet job you continue because it's all you got. You have nothing as you cannot disprove that the Philippines is Ophir. You have failed the Philippines. Again, you marginalize because you do not wish to accept what it clearly says. You don't have to but most will and most will see beyond this hack job on history you attempt which you represent. They will read for themselves and see your simply offering nonsense to confuse and instill doubt. But you failed.
ReplyDeleteEveryone can read for themselves...
ReplyDelete“Hellenistic trade beads of West Asiatic and Egyptian origins found in early burials in many places in the Philippines, prove that such early trade contacts, no matter how irregular, existed between the Philippine archipelago and West Asia by the first centuries of the first millennium A.D.” –Laszlo Legeza [21]
“Apart from India and China, Butuan is known to have had extensive trading connections with Arabia and in all probability with Sumatra and Java. The locally produced gold necklaces comprising of dentate interlocking beads seem to have reached Egypt, later to be mistakenly identified by European collectors as Egyptian.” –Laszlo Legeza
“Some of the non-Indian borrowed designs found only in their original sources and in the Philippine area suggest direct linkages with other cultural currents from the Indian Ocean. Among these are kamagi necklaces(Aldred 1978: 105) and penannular, barter rings which both show Egyptian influence(Aldred 1978: 20, 94). The earliest insular Southeast Asian products reached the Mediterranean through a port on the Arabian Gulf, which were transported overland to the headwaters of the Nile, then shipped down to Alexandria. Austronesian traders are also known to have reached Madagascar(Miller 1969; Taylor 1976), so the African connection is an established fact.” –Villegas, Bangko Sentral
You can't seem to answer questions coward. Who are you? What is your name? Where do you live? Did you live in America? Are you a communist? Who is funding you? What is your agenda? Why do you wish for the Philippines to Fail?
ReplyDeleteFinally, this fool can't even read the law. He is focusing on the criteria to attain a visa that in no way even applies in this instance. It is not only none of his business, he is full of crap. This is how he has operated all along. It is sad and a case extremely weak when one has to form a false narrative and operate within that false paradigm in order to try to claim he has a point. In reality, the entire time, he boxes a conversation into a world of nonsense. You have entered Alice's Wonderland folks. In this blog, evil is good, wrong is right, and an ignorant fool made out to be an expert. It must be a nice little, very small world this blowhard lives in. Unfortunately, he attacked the wrong group and we have proved every one of his blogs to be lined with fraudulent interpretation just like he tries to use a piece of Part 60 of the Periplus being questioned by a scholar and assume that means Part 63-64 are somehow in question when they are not and they are very well supported. Only a fool would attempt such and he looks extremely desperate here once again. Yet, he keeps going on and on about nothing because he cannot land a point. See, he cannot disprove the conclusions of The God Culture's Solomon's Gold Series. The questions are who is he? What is his name even because he conceals that from you? Is he a communist? What is his agenda? Who is funding him? What credentials does he have as he claims to be a scholar in history and the Bible yet knows nothing of either? Where does he live? Why does he follow British propaganda and treat it as proven fact? Why is he trying so hard to debunk something he never reviewed? Who does that? Only a paid shill.
ReplyDelete"Finally, this fool can't even read the law. He is focusing on the criteria to attain a visa that in no way even applies in this instance."
DeleteSo the law does not apply Timothy J Schwab? What hubris! Of course it does and if he does not have a missionary visa then he is in flagrant violation of immigration law because he is doing missionary work.
I never wrote that obscurity in part 60 of the Periplus throws parts 63 or 64 into question. I never even hinted at it. That is your assumption and it just goes to show that so much of you conclusions are only your assumptions and inferences and not real facts.
There you go again You cannot even render a sentence accurately. You cannot read the law. You pick out 1 visa type out of many and then focus on it's criteria. It's your same fallacious tactic you have applied over and over. What a liar you are. The criteria of 1 type of visa has no bearing on all visa types and there are very many. What a ridiculous, harassing, bullying, libelous, negligent slanderer you are. You can't open your mouth without excrement seeping out. You have to result is misdirections, distraction, misrepresentation, etc. to make a point. That is evil. It is called witchcraft.
DeleteYou cannot be a missionary on a tourist visa, a balkibayan visa, or a resident visa. You NEED A MISSIONARY VISA to do missionary work in the Philippines. How is that so hard to understand?? If he is doing missionary work without a missionary visa then he is in violation of the law. Plain and simple.
DeleteAn evangelist is not a missionary fool. A missionary comes on behalf of a foreign organization. Tim has no such connection. You know this as you say so in your stupid blog already characterizing Tim is not a missionary for a foreign organization and then, you go ahead use the criteria for a missionary from a foreign organization. What a fraud you are. You do not appear to be capable of having a discussion without lying. Every one of your blogs on this topic are riddled with misrepresentations and some even with illegal libel, gross negligence and most certainly harassment. You are a bully who has lost this debate on every point. We aren't backing down to your bullying. You are a liar.
DeleteI am not Tim first and have no idea what his visa is but his lawyer took care of it and I am confident once again, you are blowing smoke out of your wrong end which is all you offer viewers. Perhaps you want to contact his lawyer too? Of course you would you intrusive bully. There is no plain and simple when it comes to visas and only a fool would say so and then mischaracterize Tim as he is not there as a missionary stupid. You, however, are in violation of the law. Your illegal harassment, libel and gross negligence among other things is very blatant and way over the line. Enough of your utter crap!
ReplyDelete"mischaracterize Tim as he is not there as a missionary"
DeleteYes he is.
"The God Culture now re-enters the evangelistic ministry in conducting conferences beginning in the Philippines..."
That is from your website and says quite plainly that he is here doing evangelistic ministry. You cannot do that without a missionary visa. If he is not part of a religious organization then he will not be able to obtain one. Yet he testifies that he is part of no denomination or organization. Ergo he cannot obtain a missionary visa. On the other hand someone from the Philippines could have requested his services as a missionary and sponsored him. But if no one sponsored him, and he says he is NOT PART of any organization or denomination which casts much doubt on his being sponsored, then he cannot have obtained a missionary visa. A missionary visa is also know as a 9g noncommercial visa because missionary work is work but it is not commercial work.
Does Tim approve of all the vile things you have posted in these comments? If Tim read them would he think you are representing the God Culture in a way he would be pleased with? Are you accurately representing the God Culture and Timothy Schwab?
An evangelist is not a missionary fool. A missionary comes on behalf of a foreign organization. Tim has no such connection. You know this as you say so in your stupid blog already characterizing Tim is not a missionary for a foreign organization and then, you go ahead use the criteria for a missionary from a foreign organization. What a fraud you are. You do not appear to be capable of having a discussion without lying. Every one of your blogs on this topic are riddled with misrepresentations and some even with illegal libel, gross negligence and most certainly harassment. You are a bully who has lost this debate on every point. We aren't backing down to your bullying. You are a liar.
DeleteEvangelist, missionary, same thing. Doing the same kind of work! Tim is here in the country doing religious work and if he does not have a missionary visa then he has no right to be holding conferences in various cities preaching or teaching or doing the work of an evangelist and missionary.
DeleteYeah i posted the criteria for obtaining a missionary visa because that is exactly the type of visa he will need to be doing religious work in the Philippines. You think the Bureau of Immigration is going to care about the difference between words when the substance is the same?
No it is not. You are truly uneducated and trying to mix up everything. You have no say in that issue nor whether we quote a former Supreme Court Justice as those things are none of your concern nor business you harassing, libelous, fraudulent, negligent, bullying, ignorant blogger. It is inappropriate for you to put any of this in a blog and clearly you are just a communist-style agitator wishing evil not only on us but on the Philippines which you desire to Fail. What a sad yellow tard existence.
DeleteThe God Culture has no missionaries. We are not a missions organization. This fool has no clue what he is talking about yet again in another blog of absolute nonsense. He quotes the criteria for a missionary visa ignoring all the many others pretending and misrepresenting himself now as an attorney in addition to his fraudulent claims to know history nor the Bible which he has been wrong on every point as a simple reading of the references proves he cannot even read and comprehend. Sad. He even knows we are not a missions organization and admits it before then reading missionary visa criteria. What a waste of space. What a fool. You can read this crap if you want but we encourage you to watch our videos and test them for yourself. Prove all things including especially everything that comes from this deceiver parading as a scholar which he is not and a theologian which he is not and now evidently, a lawyer. Put it back to him and demand he be honest and open with you as he does not give his name yet attacks others personally which is the very lowest form of yellow journalism. In fact, he refuses to answer these very basic questions:
ReplyDeleteHowever, who is funding you?
What is your full name?
Why is there no About Us page on your Blog?
What are you hiding?
What is your agenda?
Are you a communist?
What are your credentials?
Is David Roxas of PhilippinesFails blog a yellow tard? Is he a communist? Is he a Jesuit? He certainly behaves like one. Who is funding PhilippinesFails David Roxas? Why is PhilippinesFails David Roxas hiding? What is the agenda of PhilippinesFails David Roxas? Test everything he writes. Regarding The God Culture, he is proven to offer only lies and fraud misdirecting and misrepresenting and he continues to harass and harass. PhilippinesFails David Roxas has lost every debate royally and yet, he continues with dig after dig illegally far over the line. You decide.
ReplyDelete"he is proven to offer only lies and fraud"
DeleteYou say this because you cannot refute what I wrote. I did exactly what Tim said to do, Test him. I watched his videos, i looked at his sources, and he was found to be wanting. HIs research is poor and shoddy and he twists his sources to say things they do not. Some he has not even read. I documented ALL OF THAT. Everything in all these posts is documented and comes straight from your videos and the sources you use.
And you know I am right because you edited your videos to cover up a few of your errors like removing the erroneous Peralta citation and adding a disclaimer in the ancient Greek armor video. But now look at you! Going crazy out here. Can't post a coherent comment. Nothing to say but name calling. You are the one who as lost royally because you fail to disprove what I have written and resort to childish antics.
I cannot wait for your book to come out. You will have it reviewed by historians, scientists, and archeologists right? I mean you are not going to publish it with out having it peer reviewed right??
Another misdirection psy-op from a child's viewpoint with yet more lies as this entire world PhilippinesFails David Roxas has created here is immature bull from manipulative liar. We have refuted and body slammed every false claim, every one of these ridiculous blogs PhilippinesFails David Roxas has created. Crushed them into shreds! After losing all debate, PhilippinesFails David Roxas attempts to change the subject and I am done with this psycho psy-op from PhilippinesFails David Roxas. This is a lousy blog written by a liar PhilippinesFails David Roxas that lost the right to have a meaningful conversation because PhilippinesFails David Roxas is incapable of doing so as he continues to attempt even now. He has no say in our operations, no say in our content and absolutely no say whatsoever in our book nor should he care but PhilippinesFails David Roxas clearly has serious issues. He is a fraud, PhilippinesFails David Roxas. He is no peer but far lesser in intellect than the members of this team and we could care less what PhilippinesFails David Roxas's opinion is. PhilippinesFails David Roxas has failed the Philippines whom he wants to fail and has proven he is one big psy-op of insane nonsense from a communist-style perspective. PhilippinesFails David Roxas cannot render a sentence accurately without manipulation and lies, can't even render a paragraph nor a quote without misrepresenting it, and PhilippinesFails David Roxas has done so consistently in these illegal, libelous blogs. We are done playing along in a communist-style psy-op from one who will take every answer and try to turn it in the opposite direction as communist-style liars have been trained. We will be treating PhilippinesFails David Roxas like the child he is from now on. If PhilippinesFails David Roxas continues his attacks, we will simply point out his psy-op as PhilippinesFails David Roxas is a liar. No more engagement because he has nothing of value to offer.
DeleteWhat is the title of this blog? It's called LIBEL. What then does he do? Misleads on every point and loses debate on all of them. What an absolute deceiver. How demonic in nature. PhilippinesFails David Roxas has broken several laws to execute this communist-style psy-op. He has lied many times in these blogs, misrepresented and when caught, misdirects and deflects. It's quite the psy-op and we are done placating this insane, childish behavior but will call it what it is. Evil. You can read this nonsense if you wish. However, anyone who has actually watched our videos which still this blowhard has hardly watched anything but a few briefs, would never attempt such immature, childish debate. We will not be lowering to his level any longer. Watch our videos for our positions. They are well-formed and well-supported and only a communist-style agitator like this would have the nerve to even attempt debate on something they haven't even reviewed. He has jumped to one rash conclusion after the other as the title of this blog clearly demonstrate an insane person who has the understanding of a child. Out of all the many visa types, he dares to claim he knows as if he is a lawyer and he is not thus misrepresents himself again, and he does not know what he is talking about but this is not new. He has been attacking The God Culture in the same haste, immature fashion for 9 months now and every time, we have responded and slapped down every one of his illegal, libelous claims he doesn't prove and we prove false. He can't even stick to the topic of his own blog because well, a child would have such difficulty. After losing debate, he deflects and misdirects. Why? Because he is incapable of scholarly thought and incapable of meaningful conversation. We will not be placating this behavior any longer.
ReplyDelete"He can't even stick to the topic of his own blog"
DeleteThe God Culture very much fits the topic of this blog which is all about the Philippines.
The title of this blog is false, fraudulent, libelous and illegal. The content continues in that vein. This one big psycho psy-op and PhilippinesFails David Roxas is finished. We will no longer treat him as a peer because PhilippinesFails David Roxas most certainly is not. Is this blog about Constantine? No. Yet he tries to misdirect there yet again. In fact, he sets forth a personal, illegal and libelous attack on our leader in fraud and then launches into continued childish antics of nonsense. We have disproven every one of these blogs and PhilippinesFails David Roxas is a fraud. He will no longer receive attention from us as an adult because PhilippinesFails David Roxas has proven to act as a communist-style agitator and a child.
DeleteThe title of this blog is false, fraudulent, libelous and illegal. The content continues in that vein. This one big psycho psy-op and PhilippinesFails David Roxas is finished. We will no longer treat him as a peer because PhilippinesFails David Roxas most certainly is not. Is this blog about Constantine? No. Yet he tries to misdirect there yet again. In fact, he sets forth a personal, illegal and libelous attack on our leader in fraud and then launches into continued childish antics of nonsense. We have disproven every one of these blogs and PhilippinesFails David Roxas is a fraud. He will no longer receive attention from us as an adult because PhilippinesFails David Roxas has proven to act as a communist-style agitator and a child.
ReplyDeleteThis illiterate, uniformed blog from PhilippinesFails David Roxas in it's continued reckless name-calling in communist-style fashion now calls Tim a Judaizer for teaching the Biblical principal Messiah and the apostles taught to keep the Biblical Feasts. Was Paul a Judaizer? Was he rebuking himself? Was he a hypocrite? Of course not yet Paul kept the Biblical Feasts as did Messiah, the Apostles and the Early Church. Scripture is abundant on this as we prove. Did Paul ever say not to keep the Feasts? Of course not. Paul said to KEEP THE FEASTS and kept them himself, so did Luke and so did Messiah Himself and he was not talking about the very hypocritical replacements called Christmas and Easter which are both rebuked by Jeremiah. Yet hypocrites like PhilippinesFails David Roxas attack the actual Biblical feasts and usually, keep these 2 feasts of the Harlot of Babylon instead because of course that is Biblical how? Oh, it’s not. Watch our Spring Feasts in the New Testament video and you will find scripture is not silent on this matter nor can anyone claim to represent scripture and claim Paul was ever rebuking the keeping of the Biblical Feasts as to say so is to call Paul a hypocrite which is false doctrine. No surprise from this illiterate blogger PhilippinesFails David Roxas. That is Biblical illiteracy which this PhilippinesFails David Roxas blog who has no qualifications to teach the Bible whatsoever nor is he an historian, fails the Philippines yet again. In this blog, he also misrepresents himself a lawyer, among other misrepresentations in not being able to read and comprehend history either, which he knows nothing of immigration laws, and the Bureau of Immigration does not agree with his fraudulent interpretation either. How embarrassing for PhilippinesFails David Roxas who shows his ignorance constantly. On and on and on he goes with fraudulent attacks based on misrepresentation and never once has he actually landed a legitimate criticism of The God Culture’s conclusions which he has not even reviewed yet continues in utter ignorance unable to even read a sentence or a paragraph just as he can’t watch the videos he condemns as he misrepresents Paul in this fashion as rebuking himself stupidly. Now that’s dumb of PhilippinesFails David Roxas. This blog is trash which should be removed but PhilippinesFails David Roxas leaves this trash sitting there on the internet for you to have to sift thru. Even though disproven, this manipulator leaves his lies out there to deceive. What a fraud this PhilippinesFails David Roxas is.
ReplyDeleteIf Paul condemned people for keeping the Biblical Feasts, why exactly is he caught keeping them multiple times and saying "keep the feast." Oops! This buffoon does not know scripture and even worse with history. He is simply a communist-style agitator who has no reading comprehension in the slightest and he is caught and disproven royally! He has lost every debate and we have exposed his fraud, libel, gross negligence, misrepresentations, lies and he continues on and on and on. He is simply a child sitting in his mother's basement yelling communist epithets at his screen. This is why he would name himself PhilippinesFails of all names. What a disgusting show of what is wrong with this world today. A lousy hit job from a lousy blogger who should stick to his day job.
ReplyDeleteThen this utter fraud, PhilippinesFails David Roxas, places an excerpt within this fraudulent blog attempting to cast doubt on the Periplus which is very well documented in history and not contested as a whole by ANYONE. He puts up an excerpt that says the OPPOSITE of the conclusion this fraud attempts to propagate. He can't even read. The above article from Antony Christie concludes that the supposed doubt of Muller claiming Part 60 to contain a corruption in a certain copy of the text is wrong and overcome by other, more careful texts. It does NOT call the Periplus into question at all even Part 60 for that matter. How stupid can one be than to put up an article that tells you there is no corruption to then say there is a corruption. He just provided proof he is stupid. Additionally, the directions to Chryse are found in Parts 63 and 64 not called into question even by Muller nor anyone. What a Fraud PhilippinesFails David Roxas is! He should change the name of this blog to PhilippinesFRAUD By David Roxas because he is a fraud. This blog is fraud, libel, fake news, misleads, misdirects and is a bunch of concocted lies in a psycho psy-op and he is caught! PhilippinesFails David Roxas is a fraud. He does not know immigration law and is no lawyer nor expert on the matter and represents himself to be such an expert in fraud. He can't even read nor comprehend history nor is he an expert and has proven the same with scripture which he royally screws up. What a load of crap from PhilippinesFails David Roxas.
ReplyDeleteI did not say the Periplus was corrupt and unreliable. I wrote something completely different.
Delete"This brief paper says that some consider this passage in the Periplus to be corrupt. The problem lies in the interpretation of the word highlighted above, colandia. Anthony Christie spends nine pages identifying what kind of ship a colandia is even investigating Chinese documents concerning these ships. Needless to say he does not identify it as a balangay or anything Filipino. In fact both Horridge and Christie use the all encompassing term Austronesian which could mean any number of people groups and not necessarily Filipinos."
To do religious work in the Philippines you need a missionary visa. Your website says that is what Tim is doing religious work in the Philippines.
"The God Culture now re-enters the evangelistic ministry in conducting conferences beginning in the Philippines"
Thus he needs a missionary visa.
No, you misrepresent over and over. There is no. "problem" with the Periplus as even Christie says such. You are a liar and a fraud and that point is impertinent regardless. We found Ophir, you did not nor will you because you cannot read nor comprehend. It's extremely poor and you behave as a child. You have committed Cyber Libel among many other lines you have crossed in this fraud of a blog you run. Tim has met the requirements according to actual experts. You have failed such test of the law and you will be dealt with. PhilippinesFails David Roxas is a fraud.
DeleteI never wrote that there was a problem with the Periplus. I wrote that Christie notes some thought this PASSAGE was corrupted. Then I show Christies solution.
Delete"As I wrote before, if they don't get their sources right here they won't get them right there. And if they don't get their sources right then their conclusions will be wrong. These several posts have proven that to be true."
https://philippinefails.blogspot.com/2020/03/the-god-culture-review-of-solomons-gold.html
No, you misrepresent yet again attempting to bring the Periplus into question so folks will doubt it. Your tactic is very obvious as you as just a communist style blogger with no regard for the truth PhilippinesFails David Roxas. This is Impertinent. You misrepresent and lie consistently and you are caught. You have also committed Cyber Libel PhilippinesFails David Roxas. You will discontinue this illegal harassment now, Cyber Libel, etc. or you will shortly find out the penalty for your illegal behavior. Enough of you fraudulent replies and your incredible uninformed, uneducated blog about nothing but communist style agitation.
DeleteUninformed and uneducated? It is actually your "research" that is uninformed and uneducated not even bothering to check sources but copy/pasting from other blogs!
Deletehttps://philippinefails.blogspot.com/2020/03/the-god-culture-review-of-solomons-gold.html
Yet you have not proven one point to be wrong. We understand how frustrated you must be but to commit Cyber Liber, fraud, gross negligence and outright lie, you should be ashamed of yourself. And this blog says nothing. Just worthless chatter of nothing. So worthless you have to point to another blog. Funny.
DeleteYeah I do have to point to another blog and write multiple entries because your sprawling series is too big to cover in just one post. Your dishonesty is exponential and takes careful sifting to prove it. Too bad your audience doesn't do what you tell them to do which is to test you. If they did you would not have an audience because they would see you are not only lying to them but you are parroting the same revisionist junk that has been around since Paterno. None of your research is original and you admit it as you liberally crib from AncientPhilippines and try to pass it off as your own research.
DeleteYou're still talking. You are a liar and you have no right to debate. You have forfeited every right to such as you have broken the law in cyber libel, gross negligence, fraud, misrepresentation and this blog is a despicable display of ineptitude and communist-style agitation. You haven't made a point but wasted many hours of our time and readers with your misrepresentations on many levels again crossed the line of the law even which is pretty liberal in such matters. What you have done is proven you are a fool and we will continue to remind your viewers you are meaningless. You have forfeited any right to debate us.
DeleteProblem, you have never proven our research to be uninformed nor uneducated nor have you even reviewed but few briefs not even our position yet continue to comment in utter ignorance and you are uninformed and uneducated on this topic in every sense. You mislead and misread The Periplus, Mela, Horridge, Villegas, Legeza and we have already proven every one of your misinterpretations to be childish and wrong missing 1/2 the reference or the sentence before or after in most cases. It is pathetically uneducated for you to misrepresent yourself as one who knows anything on this topic especially regarding The God Culture whose position you have NEVER reviewed yet comment in ignorance writing blog after blog which you are unqualified to and you continue to commit illegal acts of Cyber Libel, harassment, etc. Keep it up and you will be learn the penalty for such illegal and inappropriate behavior.
ReplyDeleteI have reviewed your research in depth in at least 7 articles now. Every single time I have dived into the sources you quote I have shown that you have misrepresented them and in some cases did not even read them. You claim to be a team doing deep research in History, archaeology, geogprahy, etc. but as I show in this new article you do nothing of the sort but instead quote very liberally from AncientPhilippines and do not bother to read the sources referred to.
Deletehttps://philippinefails.blogspot.com/2020/03/the-god-culture-review-of-solomons-gold.html
Wait a minute! 1% of our case by watching briefs like a high school kid trying to get away with cliff notes is now called "in-depth?" What a childish moron you are PhilippinesFails David Roxas. You are irresponsible and you have broken the law multiple times. What a fraud you are PhilippinesFails David Roxas.
DeleteYes in -depth. I have gone through your videos and proven how dishonest your "Research" really is. So much so that you EDITED your videos because you know I am right. As I wrote before, if you don't get your sources right here you won't get them right there. And if you don't get their sources right then your conclusions will be wrong. These several posts have proven that to be true. Your conclusions are all wrong because you can't even get the facts right.
Deletehttps://philippinefails.blogspot.com/2020/03/the-god-culture-review-of-solomons-gold.html
That's called ignorance. You are a fool and a fraud and a liar.
DeleteWe have proven over and over from his own words and deeds, this is a libelous, abusive, harassing, lying, fraud who offers nothing of value. He only knows how to corrupt and fraud and we have proven that with quote after quote, map after map, scripture after scripture… This shows how pathetic he is and he has identified his foundation now, we have it. David Roxas of PhilippineFails hates God in his own words. He blames him for the state of the Philippines instead of looking at how the Filipino people have lost covenant relationship which we are working to restore. Yet, he mischaracterizes and misrepresents yet claims he cares but he hates the Philippines and he is a racist, bigot who hates Filipinos and Americans. Seems he just hates everyone but this is common with those whose father is the devil. We live in the End Times when evil is painted as good and good as evil and this persecution is welcomed as it demonstrates we are in the Will of Yahuah. This fraud is in the will of his father, satan. They are liars incapable of truth, haters oblivious to love, demonizers who are the ones with demons, accusers yet guilty themselves… these are hypocrites and yes, the Philippines is not perfect but mostly because of the influence of these Jesuit and Communist-style agitators… They read scripture and then ignore it reframing it in fragments to manipulate to their Pharisee leaven which this fraud represents. They read history and outright lie and commit fraud to reframe it and cover it up but no longer. They are exposed. David Roxas of PhilippineFails has failed the Philippines.
ReplyDelete