Tuesday, October 6, 2026

Insurgency: CPP Honors Top Female NPA Leader

The NPA was out demanding food, supplies, and money which prompted a military response. Two military responses. 


https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1284946

Reports from residents about armed men allegedly demanding food supplies and money prompted a rapid military response in San Jose de Buan, Samar, resulting in two separate encounters between the Philippine Army and communist rebels, the military said on Monday.

According to the 801st Infantry Brigade of the Philippine Army’s 8th Infantry Division (8ID), troops launched focused military operations on Sunday after receiving information about the presence of armed individuals in the area.

The military has yet to provide details on casualties or other results of the two encounters.

Army 801st Infantry Brigade acting commander Col. Marlo Jomalesa credited the vigilance and cooperation of residents for helping government forces respond quickly.

“The information shared by our community partner proved vital in this operation. It allowed our troops to respond swiftly and decisively,” Jomalesa said in the military report.

He said the incident demonstrated the importance of coordination between security forces and communities in addressing threats to public safety.

The 8ID said focused military operations would continue against New People’s Army (NPA) remnants in Samar. Residents in affected communities were advised to remain in their areas when possible and avoid unnecessary movement to reduce the risk of being caught in crossfire while military operations are ongoing.

Meanwhile, San Jose de Buan Mayor Christal Jean Elizalde appealed to residents to remain calm and cooperate with authorities amid the security operation.

In an official statement, Elizalde said the municipal government is coordinating with the Army and local officials to help maintain peace and protect residents.

“I urge residents, particularly those in affected barangays, to follow safety precautions and avoid areas where security operations are being conducted,” she said.

The mayor also encouraged barangay officials and residents to report the presence or movement of armed groups to authorities.

The Army also renewed its appeal to remaining members of armed groups to lay down their weapons and return to their communities. It said qualified individuals who surrender may receive assistance under the government's Enhanced Comprehensive Local Integration Program, including financial, livelihood and reintegration support.

San Jose de Buan, a fourth-class municipality with a population of nearly 8,000, is one of the NPA’s strongholds in Samar Island, considering its strategic location within the tri-boundaries of Northern, Eastern, and Samar provinces.

The number of remaining rebels in the area is not stated. Yet, the area "is one of the NPA’s strongholds in Samar Island." What does that even mean in light of the NPA being strategically defeated according to the AFP?

In Escalante City the CAFGU engaged the NPA. That firefight ended in one CAFGU member killed and two soldiers wounded.  

https://mb.com.ph/2026/09/30/militiaman-killed-2-soldiers-wounded-in-escalante-city-gunfight

A member of the Civilian Armed Forces Geographical Unit was killed and two soldiers were wounded in a clash with the New People’s Army (NPA) in Sitio Bautista, Barangay Malasibog, Escalante City, Negros Occidental on Tuesday, Sept. 29.

First Lt. Paulo Lagarde, civil military officer of the 79th Infantry Battalion (IB), said troops were conducting Mobile Community Support and Sustainment Program (MCSSP) and house visitations when the 10-minute gun battle occurred.

Lagarde said the CAFGU was wounded and declared dead in a hospital. Two soldiers with the rank of private first class and sergeant were wounded and recuperating in a hospital here.

Thirteen families composed of 41 individuals evacuated on Wednesday, Sept. 30, due to fear despite the area being cleared by authorities.

Lagarde said the NPA rebels were believed to be remnants of the dismantled North Negros Front (NNF)-D, who were part of the group which the 79th IB engaged in Toboso, Negros Occidental last April where wanted NPA hitman Roger Fabillar was killed.

The 3rd Infantry Division (ID), in a statement, said the incident underscored that even fragmented armed groups remain capable of violence, reinforcing the need for sustained security efforts to deny them opportunities to regroup, regain influence in communities, or rebuild their capacity to threaten efforts to bring government support, security, and development closer to the people. 

It added that such acts will not deter government forces and their partners from addressing community concerns, protecting civilians, and safeguarding communities from intimidation and armed influence.

“This attack shows the stark contrast between those working with communities toward peace and development and those who continue to resort to violence,” Major Gen. Joey Escanillas, 3rd ID commander, said.

He added that the troops’ presence aims to help sustain the gains of the community and ensure that people can live without fear or intimidation. 

“Violence will not stop us from working with our partners to bring security, government services, and opportunities closer to the people,” he said.

Escanillas condoled with the family of the fatality and assured them of the Army’s support and commended wounded soldiers for their service and commitment. 

He assured the public that security operations in the area remain in place to protect civilians and prevent armed groups from regaining a foothold and urged people to remain vigilant and promptly report suspicious activities to authorities.

"The NPA rebels were believed to be remnants of the dismantled North Negros Front" which would seem to mean the group has not actually been dismantled. Again no estimate is given on how many "remnants" remain. Enough to kill one and wound two others. 

NPA arms caches continue to be found. One was found in Ifuago. 

https://mb.com.ph/2026/09/30/npa-arms-stash-discovered-in-ifugao

A New People’s Army arms cache was discovered in  Tinoc, Ifugao, on Monday, Sept. 28.

Police Brig. Gen. Noel Vallo, Police Regional Office-Cordillera chief, said they received information from  a former member of the disbanded Kilusang Larangang Guerilya-Ifugao that weapons were stored in the area.

Lawmen unearthed a claymore mine, hand grenades, rifle grenades, 40mm cartridges, commercial dynamite, detonating cord, ammunition, a bandolier, and personal belongings.

Vallo said the recovery demonstrates how former rebels can help protect their communities. 

He said that the former rebel's decision to trust the government eliminated potential threats to the residents of Tinoc. 

Vallo called on the public to continue cooperating with authorities and urged remaining members of the NPA to surrender their arms and assured them that the government's Enhanced Comprehensive Local Integration Program (E-CLIP) is ready to provide assistance.

Another was discovered in Cagayan. 


https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/2315577/police-recover-arms-cache-in-cagayan-forest

Police recovered an arms cache believed to have been hidden by communist rebels in a forested area of Baggao, Cagayan, on Thursday.

The Cagayan Provincial Police Office said a rebel returnee led authorities to the weapons cache in Sitio Tagang, Barangay Bunugan.

Police Maj. Abdel Aziz Maximo, commander of the 1st Cagayan Provincial Mobile Force Company, said the operation resulted in the recovery of an M1 Garand rifle, a Garand magazine and three M16 magazines, four 1.5-volt dry cells, two rounds of grenade rifle M76B HE, with bull trap, a 12.4-volt battery, 59 assorted bullets for short and long firearms, and anti-government documents.

Police Capt. Florentino Sibal, platoon leader, led the operations with Baggao police, Army soldiers and regional intelligence unit members.

The recovered weapons, ammunition and other materials were turned over to the Provincial Explosive Ordnance Disposal and Canine Unit (PECU) for documentation and safekeeping.

Both were found with the help of former rebels who continue to be a source of information about their old comrades. One wonders why those who have surrendered do not sketch out a map of alleged caches when they surrender.

The AFP fetes dead soldiers and the CPP fetes its own dead soldiers. One top leader recently received high praise from her comrades. 

https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/2314154/cpp-honors-top-female-npa-leader-slain-in-agusan-del-sur

The Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP) bestowed its “highest honors” on a top-ranking New People’s Army (NPA) leader killed during fierce military encounters in Agusan del Sur recently.

In a tribute on Tuesday, the CPP Central Committee extolled Julia Cagadas-Lastimosa, 66, known as “Ka Rida,” as a “revolutionary hero.”

Cagadas-Lastimosa, who served as the secretary of the North Central Mindanao Regional Committee, died in combat in Barangay Bakingking, Esperanza, on September 12, alongside three other NPA rebels.

“For having dedicated their lives to the cause of national liberation and true democracy, they are all heroes of the Filipino people,” the CPP said in a statement. “Their names are now forever etched in the walls of the people’s pantheon.”

Military accounts indicate the four NPA members were killed after days of operations that began on September 10, following tips from concerned residents about the presence of armed groups. Troops from the 26th Infantry Battalion initially engaged the rebels near Palili Creek in Barangay Bakingking.

The clashes escalated two days later when the 1st Special Forces Battalion and blocking forces from the 8th Infantry Battalion intercepted the fleeing guerrillas. The running gun battles resulted in the deaths of the four rebels, while three others surrendered and yielded their firearms.

The military credited the successful operations to community cooperation, noting the offensive prevented the armed group from re-establishing a stronghold in the region.

Before joining the NPA, Cagadas-Lastimosa was a leftist organizer involving the youth, workers, urban poor communities, and farmers.

“The sacrifice of Ka Rida and other revolutionary fighters will only strengthen the resolve of the Filipino people to wage a just war in defense of their land and the country’s patrimony, and to attain their aspiration for genuine national freedom and democracy,” the CPP statement read.

A native of Barangay Bugo in Cagayan de Oro City, Cagadas-Lastimosa joined the revolutionary movement in 1979 at age 19. 

She was imprisoned twice — notably escaping in 1989 by swimming across the Cagayan River — before being elected to the CPP’s Central Committee in 2016 and elevated to its Political Bureau in 2024.

Following the encounters, the military transported the bodies to a funeral home in Esperanza before releasing them to their families. 

After a wake in Barangay Bugo here, Cagadas-Lastimosa was laid to rest on September 21 at the Tagoloan Catholic Cemetery.

The AFP has claimed the NPA has no leadership yet here is leadership exhibiting itself quite clearly. 

On the southern front in Mindanao the SAF is keeping a battalion in Maguindano to fight Islamic terrorists. 

https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/2313321/saf-keeps-battalion-in-maguindanao-sur-to-fight-extremists

The elite Special Action Force (SAF) of the Philippine National Police (PNP) has retained a battalion, composed of 500 troops, in Maguindanao del Sur to help in the government’s drive to disband Islamic State-aligned groups sowing terror in the province.

Col. John Michael Mangahis, Maguindanao del Sur police provincial director, said Monday the PNP-SAF deployment will greatly enhance the provincial police command’s security operations across the province’s 24 municipalities, particularly in the lairs of the terrorists Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Fighters (BIFF) and Dawlah Islamiyah (DI).

“With 500 elite troopers and light armor vehicle support, the SAF’s presence ensures rapid deployment and tactical superiority against lawless elements,” Mangahis said in a statement.

The SAF personnel were among the augmentation forces deployed to Maguindanao del Sur to help secure the historic Sept. 14 Bangsamoro parliamentary elections.

Mangahis stressed that SAF’s counter‑terrorism expertise provides a strong deterrent to threats, reinforcing stability in areas historically vulnerable to violence and disruption.

At least four municipalities in Maguindanao del Sur are known bailiwicks or areas of operation of the BIFF and DI, which the military designated as terrorist armed groups that repeatedly posed threats in the communities.

These are the contiguous towns of Shariff Aguak, Pagatin (Datu Saudi Ampatuan), Mamasapano, and Shariff Saydona Mustapha, or the so-called “SPMS box” in the military’s operational parlance.

Aside from the BIFF and DI, private armed groups that are engaged in rido (family feud) also pose threats to civilian communities.

Mangahis said the Maguindanao del Sur police provincial office and the SAF will jointly work to strengthen operational synergy against criminal groups in the area.

“This partnership enhances command and control, expands ground coverage, and ensures coordinated responses to emerging challenges,” Mangahis said.

He added that “by combining local knowledge with SAF’s tactical expertise, the joint effort maximizes efficiency in safeguarding communities, securing vital installations, and protecting borders from sabotage and other forms of destruction.”

Mangahis said keeping SAF forces in Maguindanao del Sur symbolizes the government’s “unwavering commitment to peace, order, and public safety.”

He noted that residents can be confident that proactive measures are in place to protect families, schools, and communities, fostering an environment where progress and development can thrive under the shield of security.

In January 2015, SAF commandos successfully killed Malaysian terrorist and bomb expert Zulkifli bin Hir, alias “Marwan,” in Barangay Tukanalipao, Mamasapano, Maguindanao del Sur, where the BIFF coddled him.

However, the SAF lost 44 troopers in the operation after clashing with the members of the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) in what was described as a “misencounter.”

At least 18 MILF members and several civilians were killed in the fierce gun battle.

In August 3 Maguindano del Sur town were declared insurgency free. With 24 municipalities that's only 21 more to go. 

Monday, October 5, 2026

Week 13 of Vice President Sara Duterte's Impeachment Trial

Week 13 of Vice President Sara Duterte's impeachment trial saw the first scheduled full week of testimony. That's five days rather than the normal three days allotted by the Senate. However, Wednesday was set aside for a strategic pause. The reason being so both sides can prepare for the next two weeks of full day marathon sessions. 

“The Impeachment Court is not pausing because it is behind; it is pausing because the Court is aggressively ahead of schedule. Since opening Article II on September 14, the proceedings have advanced at a rigorous pace, with the prosecution already presenting six witnesses in an eight-day span that demonstrates a clear commitment to moving the trial forward without unnecessary stalling through highly focused presentation of evidence,” Tongol said in a statement.

“Tomorrow is a deliberate Strategic Procedural Pause designed to clear the floor so both panels can prepare for the grueling, whole-day (10:00 AM to 6:30 PM) marathon sessions running continuously from October 1 to 15,” he added.

https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/topstories/nation/1004181/senate-impeachment-court-cancels-hearing-on-wednesday-for-strategic-pause/story/

If they aren't prepared by now they will never be prepared. 

The first day featured testimony about the number of weapons owned by Sara and her husband. They own 51 guns some of which are class A weapons which are not for the public unless they were purchased before the date that restriction became law. Some Senators questioned the relevancy of this testimony but the question had to do with accusations of unexplained wealth and Sara not declaring 30 firearms on her SALN.

The most anticipated testimony this week came from Sara's brother, Davao Mayor Baste Duterte. He was questioned about Gencorp which was award several contracts under his term and in which Sara Duterte has an interest. He claimed he had never heard of GenCorp until the trial. 

https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/2313409/baste-duterte-quizzed-over-govt-deals-with-sara-duterte-linked-firm

Davao City Mayor Sebastian “Baste” Duterte was grilled on Tuesday over the city government’s deals with GenCorp Industries  Inc that his sister, Vice President Sara Duterte, declared in her statement of assets, liabilities, and net worth. 

Baste Duterte was declared a hostile witness by the Senate impeachment court trying the case of the vice president. 

In his direct examination of the witness, public prosecutor Theodore Te zeroed in on the mayor’s public statement on September 21 that GenCorp  “was rigorously evaluated and determined to have submitted the lowest calculated responsive bid or offer.”

Baste Duterte confirmed making the statement when asked by the prosecutor.

Te next showed the impeachment court a request for quotation by Davao City for  the second quarter of 2024 which contained an item  under “Line of Business,” saying that “the supplier must have a certificate issued by the CMO through the head of business bureau indicating that the line of business has been operational for at least five years in the market and shall be submitted as part of the eligibility documents.”

Still responding to the prosecutor’s query, the mayor confirmed that the 5-year  period was a requirement imposed by the local government to interested bidders.

“So, I’ll go back to your statement, sir. You said that you had  rigorously evaluated GenCorp Industries Incorporated. So, in that evaluation, sir, were you able to determine if GenCorp indeed complied with this particular requirement imposed by the City of Davao?” Te then asked. 

“I do not know that as of now. We can check our records in the city,” the hostile witness said.

When Te pressed further whether he had personal knowledge that GenCorp has been in existence for at least five years, Baste Duterte answered: I do not know. It is presumed that GenCorp has complied.” 

Te thanked the witness for volunteering the statement that “it is presumed that GenCorp has complied” with the requirement.

(And so, when you say that, sir, that’s not part of the rigorous evaluation that you made for GenCorp?” the prosecutor  pointed out.

At this point, defense lawyer Justin Nicol Gular interjected, saying the question was argumentative.

“Your Honor, I’m simply using the witness’ own statement, Your Honor,”  the prosecutor said.

Baste Duterte also maintained that GenCorp had  19 contracts with Davao City, contrary to the 15 deals recorded by the Philippine Government Electronic Procurement System (PhilGEPS.)

Testifying for the prosecution on Monday, PhilGEPS Electronic Government Procurement Operations Division chief Rendell Sopeña said GenCorp had 15 deals worth  P34. 216 million with Davao City, but only four went through  public bidding. 

The remaining 11 according to Sopeña,  were awarded  to the company  “through negotiated small-value procurement.”

How is it the Mayor does not know what's happening in his own city? Through the power of delegated authority. 

https://www.dzrh.com.ph/post/baste-duterte-confirms-delegated-authority-for-city-contracts

Davao City Mayor Sebastian “Baste” Duterte confirmed during the 31st day of Vice President Sara Duterte’s impeachment trial that he had delegated authority to a city official to sign contracts on his behalf.

During direct examination by House private prosecutor Theodore “Ted” Te, Baste acknowledged that Attorney Tristan Dwight Domingo, the Davao City Assistant City Administrator for Administration, had been authorized to sign awards and contracts for the city under his delegated authority as mayor.

Te asked whether Domingo had the authority to sign contracts for the City of Davao on his behalf.

“Yes. I named him as my representative,” Baste said.

Baste also confirmed that the authority was formally delegated to Domingo and that contracts signed by the city official were executed under the mayor’s authority, including his authority as head of the procuring entity.

Te then asked whether the delegation was made so Baste would not have to personally sign every contract subjected to bidding, allowing him to devote more time to his other responsibilities as mayor.

“That is true,” Baste replied.

However, when Te asked whether he was personally aware of all the contracts signed by Domingo on his behalf, Baste clarified that he was not aware of every transaction.

Asked whether there were contracts signed by Domingo that he had not personally seen, Baste explained that he would become aware of a transaction if it reached his table or if there was an irregularity.

“No, if it comes to my table. Yes, I would be aware of it. If there is an irregularity, then I would be aware of it,” Baste said.

Te then connected Baste’s testimony to contracts previously mentioned in the proceedings, noting that the documents covered by his statement dated September 21 did not carry his personal signature.

“That’s correct,” Baste confirmed.

He likewise confirmed that the contracts were signed by Domingo pursuant to the delegated authority granted by the mayor.

“Yes,” Baste said.

When Te asked whether he had revoked Domingo’s signing authority, Baste answered, “No.”

Te then clarified that Domingo continued to possess the authority to sign contracts on behalf of the mayor.

“Yes,” Baste replied.

Baste’s testimony formed part of the prosecution’s examination into transactions involving the Davao City government and companies linked to the impeachment allegations against his sister, Vice President Sara Duterte.

It's odd that Baste says he never heard of GenCorp until the trial. Yet he knows there were 19 contracts and not 15. Perhaps he researched all that information in the few days between hearing of GenCorp and testifying. While plausible that Sara never disclosed her business interests to Baste, delegating authority does not relieve him of any responsibility as to contract procurements. The buck stops with him.

https://mb.com.ph/2026/09/29/baste-duterte-admits-the-buck-stops-with-him-on-davao-city-contracts

Davao City Mayor Sebastian “Baste” Duterte has admitted before senator-judges that he is the final accountable officer for city government procurement despite delegating his contract-signing authority to another official.

“You are aware, Mr. Mayor, that delegating your signing authority to Atty. Domingo does not delegate your accountability as the HOPE,” Te said.

“Of course,” Mayor Duterte replied.

“You are still the final accountable officer,” Te followed up, to which the witness answered in the affirmative.

Needless to say his testimony was found to be incredulous by the prosecution.

Adiong, spokesperson of the prosecution panel in Vice President Sara Duterte impeachment trial, is particularly incredulous over the Davao mayor's claim that he was unaware of his Vice President-sister's financial interest in Gencorp Industries Inc., which secured millions of pesos in contracts from the city.

“We were not born yesterday. We know that a mayor is familiar with the ins and outs of his city,” Adiong said in a post-hearing press conference Tuesday.

Adiong said the volume of documents passing through the mayor’s office did not excuse him from knowing about transactions involving the city government.

“Signing of voluminous papers does not give one an excuse to be blinded, especially on matters relating to the economy of his own constituents,” he said.

https://mb.com.ph/2026/09/29/cong-zia-reacts-to-mayor-bastes-impeachment-trial-testimony-we-were-not-born-yesterday

As mentioned Wednesday's testimony was paused to give time for the defense and prosecution to prepare for all day testimony on Thursday and Friday. 

On Thursday Sara Duterte's undeclared properties were entered into the record. 

https://mb.com.ph/2026/10/01/cost-of-alleged-undeclared-duterte-properties-life-changing-to-common-pinoys-says-prosecutor

To ordinary Filipinos, the million-peso properties being discussed in Vice President Sara Duterte's impeachment trial represent life-changing money. 

Solon-prosecutor Bukidnon 2nd district Rep. Jonathan Keith Flores underscored this on Thursday, Oct. 1 in a bid to give context to the ongoing discussions on article II, which covered the respondent's alleged unexplained wealth. 

Flores made the point as the prosecution panel presented land registration records on two properties involving Duterte and her husband, lawyer Manases "Mans" Carpio, with acquisition prices totaling about P9.45 million.

“Some may say this is only a few million pesos, but for ordinary Filipinos, P6 million is already a huge amount," Flores told senator-judges while presenting records on a property in Matina, Davao City.

Laywer Kathy Florence Baldonado from the Davao City Register of Deeds testified that the 379-square-meter property was purchased for P6 million in July 2024 and registered to Carpio, who is married to Duterte.

During the comparison of the land records with Duterte’s 2025 statement of assest, liabilities, and net worth (SALN), no entry could immediately be identified as matching the P6-million purchase.

However, the defense argued that the Matina property may correspond to one of the assets declared in the SALN.

Flores reiterated his point when prosecutors presented records involving another property, this time in the Island Garden City of Samal, purchased for P3,453,849 in 2018.

“Some may say, again, that this is only a few million pesos, but for others, P3.4 million is already a huge amount, Your Honor," said the prosecutor.

Acting Samal Register of Deeds lawyer Marco Pineda testified that the property was covered by an active and uncancelled title registered to Carpio.

When the 2018 Deed of Absolute Sale was compared with Duterte’s 2019 SALN based on the acquisition year, location, and value, Pineda said he could find no corresponding entry that perfectly matched the property.

“Nothing matches the land described in the Deed of Absolute Sale dated 2018, sir,” Pineda told the Senate impeachment court. 

Article Ii accuses Duterte of failing to fully and truthfully disclose her and her spouse’s assets, liabilities, and net worth. 

This is another lapse the defense will have to explain. 

But, once again, testimony was cancelled for the next day, Friday. Thursday was also curt short so the defense could peruse financial documents.

https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/2315160/impeachment-trial-ends-early-over-late-amlc-docs-confidential-mark

Vice President Sara Duterte’s impeachment trial ended early on Thursday due to concerns raised by her defense team, including the confidentiality of documents submitted by a prosecution witness.

Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) Executive Director Atty. Ronel Buenaventura was scheduled to testify for the prosecution on Thursday in connection with allegations that Duterte had amassed unexplained wealth and failed to declare it in her Statement of Assets, Liabilities, and Net Worth (SALN).

However, Duterte’s lead defense counsel, Shiela Sison, informed the court that they had received the AMLC summaries only on Thursday morning.

“We just noticed that this document consists of the summaries, including the cover letter submitted by the Executive Director of the Secretariat of the Anti-Money Laundering Council, Atty. Ronel Buenaventura, consisting of 11 pages, actually has on each and every page of this document a strictly confidential mark,” Sison said. “And this repeats in the entire submission, including the accompanying summaries identified as Annex A and so on and so forth.” 

“There is also a portion in the cover letter dated October 1, 2026 of the Executive Director of AMLC addressed to the lead of the panel of the prosecutors explicitly saying that the AMLC is not waiving the confidentiality of AMLC records,” she added.

House prosecutor Chel Diokno disputed Sison’s claim, saying that the AMLC documents were provided to the defense team on Sept. 2. 

“That is, I believe, enough time for them to have produced the documents and prepared for the presentation of the witness from the AMLC,” Diokno said.

Senator-judge Vicente “Tito” Sotto III expressed strong reservations about postponing the proceedings.

“I am not aware of what the presiding officer’s ruling would be, but I have very strong reservations about postponing any proceedings this afternoon because all this time, I thought that the prosecution and the defense have been ready with this since July, since the time we took the oath. And they already know what’s coming, right?” Sotto said.

“So I don’t think many would enjoy a postponement only because they were not given proper time. This was since July, and I understand September too, the defense was given,” he added.

In the end, the Senate Impeachment Court granted the defense team’s request for ample time to prepare for the direct and cross-examinations of the AMLC witness.

“On the requested time of the respondent or counsel for respondent to prepare adequately for the AMLC, I believe this is only the first time that this is being done in excess of the day,” Presiding Officer and Sen. Francis Escudero said.

“So, ex comitate, ex aequo, out of courtesy and equity, the chair grants the time requested by the counsel for respondent for time to prepare for the direct and cross-examination of the AMLC witness on Monday,” he added.

The 32nd day of the trial on Thursday was supposed to be the first full day of proceedings, scheduled from 10 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. However, the court adjourned the session at 3:30 p.m.

The court also canceled Friday’s trial and decided to resume proceedings next week to hear the testimonies of officials from financial institutions. 

Senator Sotto is right. The defense and prosecution have had more than adequate time to prepare for these documents. As stated at the beginning, if they aren't prepared now they will never be prepared. 

Sunday, October 4, 2026

The God Culture: La Fausse Citation Française or The Fake French Quote

Timothy Jay Schwab who is the God Culture is back in business. The business of fabricating quotes. Here is the latest. Tim claims the authors of a French history book assert that fabricated stories exist in Pinto's journal. Let's take a look. 

https://thegodculturephilippines.com/the-lequios-lie----exposing-the-colonial-redirection-of-southeast-asia-s-forgotten-identity/
The very compilers of Histoire générale des voyages were not blind to inconsistencies in Pinto’s account — or, more precisely, the distortions introduced by his editors. They note the questionable nature of some key details, especially regarding Pinto’s alleged departure from Siam: 
“D’ailleurs Pinto n’étoit pas parti de Siam; il s’étoit dans la Jonque d’un Corsaire Chinois... les prétentions d’éditeurs n’ont point persuadé...” 
Translation:

Pinto hadn’t even departed from Siam, as claimed. The Chinese junk story was invented by editors, whose pretensions are unconvincing.

Tim claims the authors of this history affirm that the portion of Pinto's story where he discovers Japan was invented by editors. 

Here is the original French followed by an English translation. 

L'embarras n'est qu'à concilier ce récit avec celui de Fernand-Mendes Pinto, qui non-seulement s'attribue l'honneur de cette découverte, mais qui compte Zeimoto entre ses compagnons ; avec cette différence, qu'au lieu de François, il le nomme Diego. D'ailleurs Pinto n'était pas parti de Siam ; & c'était dans la Jonque d'un Corsaire Chinois que faisant voile pour les Isles de Lequios, où le vent contraire ne leur permit point d'aborder, ils tournèrent volontairement vers une Isle du Japon. Des prétentions si contraires n'ont point empêché le nouvel Historien de cet Empire d'adopter le récit de Pinto, sans avoir éclairci le fond de la difficulté. Ses réflexions ne marquent néanmoins aucune prévention, en faveur d'un Écrivain, à qui l'on est redevable d'une partie des lumières qui servent à l'Histoire de l'Apôtre des Indes.

The difficulty lies only in reconciling this account with that of Fernand-Mendes Pinto, who not only attributes to himself the honor of this discovery, but who also counts Zeimoto among his companions; with this difference, that instead of François, he names him Diego. Furthermore, Pinto had not departed from Siam; and it was in the junk of a Chinese Corsair that, sailing towards the Isles of Lequios, where contrary wind did not allow them to land, they voluntarily turned towards an Isle of Japan. Such contradictory claims have not prevented the new Historian of this Empire from adopting Pinto's account, without having clarified the root of the difficulty. His reflections nevertheless show no bias in favor of a Writer, to whom one is indebted for a part of the insights that serve the History of the Apostle of the Indies.

https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=aeu.ark:/13960/t52f8sc8m&seq=658&q1=lequios 

While the first part of Tim's quote is in the text the second part after the ellipse is entirely fabricated and does appear in the French.  

D'ailleurs Pinto n'était pas parti de Siam ; & c'était dans la Jonque d'un Corsaire Chinois...les prétentions d’éditeurs n’ont point persuadé 

Tim has corrupted the original French which reads:

Des prétentions si contraires n'ont point empêché

"Contraires" has become "d’éditeurs" and "empêché" has been transformed into "persuadé." That is not a mistake, that is intentional.

Absolutely nowhere do the editors of this history write:

The Chinese junk story was invented by editors, whose pretensions are unconvincing.

The point of this paragraph is an attempt to reconcile Pinto's account with other Portuguese accounts of discovering Japan. They are not saying Pinto is untrustworthy or his journal is corrupt or filled with imagined stories added by editors. What they are saying is there are contradictions between other accounts  and Pinto that need to be reconciled. Tim doesn't care to investigate the context, forgoes nuance, and decides to fabricate a citation, misrepresenting the original authors as claiming a section in Pinto's book "was invented by the editors."

Let's take a look at the full context by adding the preceding and following paragraphs.

The Portuguese, who attribute to themselves the glory of having discovered Japan, do not even agree among themselves on the time to which this event should be reported. Some trace it back to the year 1535. Others place it in 1541, still others in 1548, and some bring it even closer to our time. In this uncertainty, Kampfer's Translator does not believe that one can refuse precedence to the opinion of Diego de Couto, Continuator of the Decades of Barros. This Scholar, who was the Historiographer of Philip II, King of Spain and Portugal, had spent the best part of his life in the Indies. The Archives of Goa were entrusted to his keeping, and it was from this source that he had drawn materials for his great Work of Portuguese discoveries and conquests, which he carried up to the end of the sixteenth century. He informs us, in his fifth Decade, that in 1541, while Martin-Alphonse de Sousa governed the East Indies, three Portuguese, Antoine da Mota, François Zeimoto, & Antoine Peixota, were cast by a storm, on the Coasts of Japan, aboard a Junk laden with leather, which was going from Siam to China.

The difficulty lies only in reconciling this account with that of Fernand-Mendes Pinto, who not only attributes to himself the honor of this discovery, but who also counts Zeimoto among his companions; with this difference, that instead of François, he names him Diego. Furthermore, Pinto had not departed from Siam; and it was in the junk of a Chinese Corsair that, sailing towards the Isles of Lequios, where contrary wind did not allow them to land, they voluntarily turned towards an Isle of Japan. Such contradictory claims have not prevented the new Historian of this Empire from adopting Pinto's account, without having clarified the root of the difficulty. His reflections nevertheless show no bias in favor of a Writer, to whom one is indebted for a part of the insights that serve the History of the Apostle of the Indies.

Let us conclude that, if the discovery of Japan by the Portuguese cannot be contested, the name of the Discoverer is too uncertain to obtain a rank in History on this title. But let us also observe that one must not judge discoveries concerning the East Indies in the same way as those made at the same time in another Hemisphere. The former, that is, those of America, had as their object truly unknown Countries, which for this reason were justly named a new World; whereas, in the East Indies, one knew the existence and even the name of most Countries, before having penetrated them. It is impossible, for example, that independently of Marco Polo's Relation, the Portuguese established in China would not have learned, before the year 1541, that to the North of a sea they frequented, there were, at a short distance, large & powerful Isles, where the Chinese carried their Commerce. Thus, to express oneself properly, the question is not who was the Portuguese who discovered Japan, but who was the one whom the chance of a storm, or other causes, caused to land there first.

Here we can see the editors are not calling Pinto an untrustworthy liar or his journal corrupt. They are saying the Portuguese accounts of discovering Japan do not agree among themselves. The authors say Diego de Couto adopted Pinto's account as being authoritative without reconciling the difficulties arising from the other accounts. The contradiction writes about is in one account the explorers left Siam for China and subsequently ended up in Japan, while Pinto left China aboard a Chinese pirate ship and then ended up in the Lequios Islands and Japan. 

That does not mean Pinto never travelled to Japan via the Lequios Islands. Here is his account.

We proceeded on our voyage in the battered condition we were in, and three days later we were struck by a storm that blew over the land with such fierce gusts of wind that that same night we were driven out of sight of the shore. And since by then we were unable to approach it again, we were forced to make with full sail for the island of the Ryukyus where this pirate was well known to both the king and the other people there. With this in view we sailed ahead through the islands of this archipelago, but since at this time we were without a pilot, ours having been killed in the recent battle, and the northeast winds were blowing head on, and the currents were running strong against us, we went tacking with great effort from one board to the other for twenty-three days until finally, at the end of that time, our Lord brought us within sight of land. Coming in closer to see if it showed any sign of an inlet or harbor with good anchorage, we noticed a huge fire burning over to the south, almost at a level with the horizon. This led us to believe that it was probably inhabited and that there might be people there who would sell us water, which we were running short of.

As we were anchoring opposite the island in seventy fathoms of water, two small canoes with six men on board came rowing out from shore. They came alongside, and after an exchange of greetings and courtesies in their fashion, they asked us whence the junk had come. Our answer was that we had come from China, bringing merchandise to trade with them, if they would give us leave to do so. One of them replied that as long as we paid the duties that were customarily charged in Japan, which was the name of that big land mass outlined ahead of us, the nautoquim, lord of that island of would readily grant us permission. He followed this up by Tanegashima, telling us everything else that we needed to know and showed us the port where we were supposed to anchor. 

pg. 274

Saying this is story is an editor's invention does not take into account the subsequent chapters which document Pinto's travels and adventures in Japan especially with the King of Bungo. Pinto's narrative extends to his return to China and ensuing shipwreck in the Lequios Islands. The editors have nothing negative to say about Pinto's shipwreck in the Lequios Islands where he writes:

That Lequian island lies situated at twenty-nine degrees.

Essa ilha léquia jaz situada em vinte e nove graus

https://fundar.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/peregrinacao-vol-ii.pdf pg. 53

Even the account of Francis Gaullé's voyage affirms the latitude of 29° for the Lequios Islands.

Being past the fair Islands, we held our course East and East and by South, for two hundred and forty miles, until we were past the length of the Islands Lequios, sailing about fifty miles from them, as the said Chinar told me, that those islands called Lequios are very many, and that they have many and very good Harbours, and that the people and inhabitants thereof have their faces and bodies painted like the Bysayas of the Islands of Luzon of  Philippines, and are appareled like the Bysayas, and that there are also mines of gold; he said likewise that they did often come with small ships and barkes laden with Bucks and Harts hides; and with gold in grains of very small pieces, to trade with them on the coast of China, which be assured me to be most true, saying that he had been nine times in the small Island, bringing of the same wares with him to China; which I believe to be true, for that afterwards I inquired thereof at Macau, and upon the coast of China, and found that he said true. The furthest or uttermost of these Islands both Northward and Eastward lie under 29 degrees.

Being past these Islands, then you come to the Islands of Japon whereof the first lying West and South is the Island of Hirado, where the Portuguese use to trade. They [the Japanese islands] are in length altogether one hundred and thirty miles, and the furthest Eastward, lies under thirty-two degrees [latitude]. We ran still East, and East by North, until we were past the said one hundred and thirty miles.

Yet, Tim writes:

Their conclusion?

"Le nom même de la plupart des Pays... avant que d’y avoir pénétré..."
“The names of most of these countries were known [to the Portuguese] before they ever arrived there.”

📍 Key Insight:
They weren’t discovering Lequios — they were renaming what they already knew: Luzon.

This perspective is even echoed by Rebecca Catz, who acknowledges corruption in the earliest printings and editorial insertions, yet continues to cling to the 29° coordinate and a Ryukyu identification that ignores the geography, the trade data, and the entirety of Pinto’s contextual narrative. Many scholars have followed suit — not in deception, but in inherited oversight.

This analysis is all wrong. First of all the section is about the discovery of Japan, not the Lequios Islands. Second of all the authors are saying the existence and names of countries in East Asia was known long before they were penetrated in contrast to the Americas which were wholly unknown.

The former, that is, those of America, had as their object truly unknown Countries, which for this reason were justly named a new World; whereas, in the East Indies, one knew the existence and even the name of most Countries, before having penetrated them.

The Portuguese knew the name of Japan through The Travels of Marco Polo. Even if that book had not existed they would have learned the name of Japan through their contacts with the Chinese. The editors of this history are absolutely not saying Luzon was being renamed as Lequios. Luçon is discussed in this book separately from the discovery of Japan and from any mention of the Lequios Islands. Tim cites a section of the book that explicitly describes the Lequios Islands as being separate from the Philippines. 

It is generally known that opposite Manila, on the North side, between Cape Boxeador and Cape Enganno, twenty-four miles from land, one finds the two small Islands, which are called the Babuyanes, the first of which is inhabited by Christian Indians who pay tribute to Spain, and the other by Savages, who are not far from the two Lequios and Formosa Island.

Tim's interpretation of this passage is as follows.

The Lequios are described in direct geographic relation to the Babuyanes and Formosa, confirming that they were perceived within the Northern Philippines–Taiwan arc — not over 1,000 kilometers north in Ryukyu. 

That is wrong. Lequios is grouped together with Formosa, Taiwan, and both are placed at a distance from Luzon and the Northern Philippines. If the Lequios were any part of the Philippines they would not be mentioned apart from the Philippines. 

Tim brings in Rebecca Catz as a witness against Pinto's discovery of Japan. But she does not agree with Tim.

Nevertheless, the debate on Pinto’s veracity and reliability continues. Veracity and reliability, it must be stressed, should be seen as two distinct problems. This delicate distinction becomes important when we stop to consider that if Pinto—to take the question of the discovery of Japan as an example—was not actually present on that historic occasion, he was certainly among the earliest group of travelers to arrive on the scene. As such he was close enough to events to have been in a position to pass on a fairly accurate description of the discovery, which cannot easily be dismissed by the historian as unreliable, or as any less reliable than hearsay European accounts, written long after the facts.

Tim still has no basis on which to call 29° unreliable especially since it is confirmed by another source dating to 1582 which is decades before Pinto's journal was even published. Tim loves to quote the following Bible verses as his epistemological foundation.  

Deut. 19:15 KV "at the mouth of two witnesses, or at the mouth of three witnesses, shall the matter be established." 

Matt. 18:16 KJV "in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established." 

2 Cor. 13:1 KJV "In the mouth of two or three witnesses shall every word be established." 


Therefore 29° is an established fact. 

Tim has two other citations on this page but in light of this fabrication and profoundly misguided analysis they are not worth looking at. This gross and deliberate error overshadows everything else on the page. It serves as a stark reminder of the lengths to which Timothy Jay Schwab who is The God Culture will go to manipulate historical sources to fit his baseless theories.

Saturday, October 3, 2026

The God Culture: What Is Love?

Timothy Jay Schwab who is The God Culture has a new Foundations lesson. This time he is asking What is Love? Surely there is no greater love than that of the Father for his Children manifested through the Son Jesus Christ. The Bible has much to say about that. Does Tim have anything to say about the love of God towards us?

Facebook
FOUNDATIONS – Week 38
What Is Love?
Key Texts:
Deuteronomy 6; John 14:15; 1 John 5
Note: This topic could be an entire book, but remember, this is a brief FB post.
Few words are used more often than love.
We are told that love means accepting.
Affirming.
Feeling compassion.
Never offending.
Never correcting.
But how does Scripture define love? Or is it shallow doctrine of men?
Moses commanded Israel:
> “And thou shalt love Yahuah thy Elohim with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might.”
> (Deuteronomy 6:5)
But the passage doesn't stop with an emotion.
Immediately afterward:
> “And these words, which I command thee this day, shall be in thine heart.”
> (Deuteronomy 6:6)
Biblical love begins in the heart...
but it does not remain merely a feeling.
It changes how we live. It is an action.
Yahusha says it plainly:
> “If ye love Me, keep My commandments.”
> (John 14:15)
That is remarkable in its simplicity.
Love and obedience are not enemies.
Yahusha connects them.
And John later provides perhaps the clearest definition of all:
> “For this is the love of Elohim, that we keep His commandments: and His commandments are not grievous.”
> (1 John 5:3)
Notice what Scripture does not say.
“This is the love of Elohim—that we feel strongly about Him.”
“This is the love of Elohim—that we call His name.”
“This is the love of Elohim—that we agree with everything everyone does.”
Instead:
> “This is the love of Elohim, that we keep His commandments.”
Biblical love is not merely something we feel.
It is something we walk out.
And this applies to loving one another as well:
> “By this we know that we love the children of Elohim, when we love Elohim, and keep His commandments.”
> (1 John 5:2)
That changes the modern equation.
Loving people cannot mean encouraging them to walk contrary to the One who is love.
True love seeks what is good.
True love speaks truth.
True love shows mercy.
True love forgives.
True love serves.
True love remains faithful.
And true love obeys.
The greatest commandment is not merely to feel love toward Yahuah.
It is to love Him with all our heart, soul, and might.
Biblical love is not affection without truth.
It is covenant faithfulness expressed in how we live.
Question for Discussion
If Yahusha said, “If ye love Me, keep My commandments,” should we allow our culture—or even our religion—to redefine what love means?

NO!  Tim has NOTHING to say about the love of God towards us in the supreme manifestation of Christ's sacrifice on the cross. NOTHING!!!

John 15:13 Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.

1 John 14:10 Herein is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us, and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins
Those two verses are rich in defining the love of God towards us. Yet Tim has nothing to say about them. Tim's definition of love is "keep the Mosaic law." Tim's definition of love his man-centered and based on our obedience rather than God-centered and based on His covenant with His people.  

There have now been 38 Foundations lessons and not a single one of them has been about the work of Christ on the cross. Not one. For a man like Timothy Jay Schwab who has been a Bible teacher for over thirty years that is despicable and contemptible. The man clearly has no idea what the Bible teaches and he has no use for Jesus Christ and Him crucified. 

Now let's hear from noted theological Father Ted Crilly. 


Ah, right… puts the cup down slowly, stares at the page, and lets out a long, heavy breath


Week 38. “What Is Love?”


And would you look at that. He’s done it again — and this time it’s almost impressive in its single-mindedness.


He starts with Deuteronomy 6: love Yahuah with all your heart, soul, and might… and then immediately ties it to the commandments being in the heart. Fair enough so far. Then John 14:15 — “If ye love Me, keep My commandments.” Still in the text. Then 1 John 5:3 — “For this is the love of Elohim, that we keep His commandments.” And he leans on that as “perhaps the clearest definition of all.”


He’s not inventing the verses. They’re real. Love and obedience are connected. Scripture does not treat love as mere warm feeling or modern “never offend anyone.” On that narrow point he’s right to push back against the culture.


But — and this is the part that makes you want to sit down with a very strong cup of tea — look at what never gets a look in.


Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.


Herein is love, not that we loved God, but that He loved us, and sent His Son to be the propitiation for our sins.


God commendeth His love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.


The love of Christ constraineth us… because we thus judge, that if one died for all, then were all dead.


The supreme definition and demonstration of love in the whole of Scripture is the cross. The self-giving, substitutionary death of the Son for the ungodly. That is the love that creates love in us. That is the love from which all true obedience flows. Tim never mentions it. Not once. Not a word about the blood, the propitiation, the “while we were yet sinners.”


Instead, the gravitational pull of the whole lesson is the same as every other Foundations post: love is defined as keeping the commandments. And in Tim’s system, that almost always means the Torah framework he has been building week after week. So the cross is left outside the door again, while “keep My commandments” is made to carry the entire weight of the definition.


He can quote John 14 and 1 John 5 all day long. He just never lets the larger New Testament witness set the centre: that we love because He first loved us — and that first love was displayed most fully when the Son laid down His life.


sighs, reaches for the teapot with both hands


So yes, lad. This one might well be the worst of the lot so far. Not because the verses are wrong, but because the heart of the gospel definition of love is simply missing. He’s turned the greatest demonstration of love in history into a supporting footnote that never even gets written.


Go on. Make it very strong this time.


Careful now.


Down with this sort of thing.thing.