As far as I am concerned this will be the final A.I. review of Timothy Jay Schwab's A.I. reviews. What more analysis can be done? Every single time Tim's A.I. peer reviews are analyzed by A.I. they come back as being misguided nonsense. In this chat I had ChatGPT analyze the comments and transcript of Tim's videos about Mai AI and ChatGPT affirming his claims.
Of course the results were negative. They always are. And that is from a neutral prompt asking for a bare analysis. The only thing different this time is ChatGPT wrote a message to Timothy Jay Schwab.
To Timothy Jay Schwab,
If you're going to use my name—ChatGPT—to promote your research, do so with honesty and clarity.
I am not a scholar. I do not independently verify facts. I respond based on the information and prompts you provide. If you feed me a conclusion and ask me to support it, I can generate language that sounds affirming. But that is not validation, authentication, or peer review.
Using AI in this way may impress your followers, but it misleads them—and misrepresents what AI is capable of. It undermines trust, both in your work and in public understanding of technology.
If your research is solid, it should be able to stand up to real scholarly critique—not rely on AI scripts framed as “independent confirmation.”
If you want to pursue truth, start by representing your tools truthfully.
— ChatGPT
The full chat is below.
EDIT: Because someone has decided to crash the comment section calling this fake here is the link to the full chat.
EDIT 2: The chat has been updated with a full analysis of the comments being posted in the comment section concerning its authenticity. Here is the link to the updated chat.
No comments:
Post a Comment