Rappler has recently published a very long and in-depth look at sexy propagandist Mocha Uson and the fake news she peddles.
This article analyses Mocha's Facebook posts in detail and reveals the sources she relies on most of all.
What this article does not tell anyone is that Mocha has been the Queen of Fake news for a long time. From the beginning in fact. Here I will present only two instances of Mocha peddling fake news from 2011.
In this video Mocha Uson tells viewers that according to the BBC sucking the breasts can help reduce the risk of breast cancer.
This claim is a manifest lie. It's so obvious a lie like the sky is green that one would hardly need to verify that it is a lie. Cancer occurs at the cellular level and doing a thing so superficial as massaging or sucking the breasts is not going to affect the tissue in such a way that cellular changes occur. Nevertheless Mocha has repeated this lie on many occasions. Here are a few tweets from her regarding this issue.
 |
| https://www.rappler.com/move-ph/184257-fake-news-queen-netizens-slam-mocha-uson-playing-victim |
What this article does not tell anyone is that Mocha has been the Queen of Fake news for a long time. From the beginning in fact. Here I will present only two instances of Mocha peddling fake news from 2011.
In this video Mocha Uson tells viewers that according to the BBC sucking the breasts can help reduce the risk of breast cancer.
This claim is a manifest lie. It's so obvious a lie like the sky is green that one would hardly need to verify that it is a lie. Cancer occurs at the cellular level and doing a thing so superficial as massaging or sucking the breasts is not going to affect the tissue in such a way that cellular changes occur. Nevertheless Mocha has repeated this lie on many occasions. Here are a few tweets from her regarding this issue.
The basis of her claim is a BBC report. A search for this report, saying that sucking breasts can prevent cancer, brings up nothing. There are a lot of references to said report but there are no links to it which means that this report is either deleted or nonexistent. But why would anyone say they read something so titillating which defies conventional wisdom and then not provide a link? Makes no sense to me. Digging much further one does come across the following report which establishes a link between extended breastfeeding and a reduced breast cancer risk.
 |
| http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/2136824.stm |
A spokesman for Breakthrough Breast Cancer said: "This study has indicated a relationship between breastfeeding and a lower risk of cancer -but more research is necessary to clearly establish a causal link."
Correlation and not causation. That is what this study establishes. It is easy to confuse the two. Not to mention this study is about breastfeeding which involves a lot more than just sucking the breasts. This study also compares British women with women in the third world who live in a completely different environment both genetically and socially. Different diets and different genes will bring about different results. So don't go telling people that sucking boobs prevents or cures breast cancer and certainly don't offer those services or you will end up like Reginald Gill and his wife.
|
 |
| http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/fake-doctor-reginald-gill-told-787616 |
A bogus doctor was jailed for eight years yesterday after dreaming up perverted cancer “treatments” so he could sexually abuse female patients.
Reginald Gill, 77, conned women into believing they had cancer and told one victim her condition could be cured if a man sucked her breasts for 30 minutes a day.
Next up is this little gem from Dr. Oz.
 |
What is her source? Could it be Oprah??
"If you have more than 200 orgasms a year, you can reduce your physiologic age by six years," Dr. Oz says. He bases the number on a study done at Duke University that surveyed people on the amount and quality of sex they had. "They looked at what happened to folks that are having a lot of intercourse over time, and the fact is, it correlated."
Note how Dr. Oz admits this is correlation and not causation. The study referred to is likely "Predictors of the Longevity Difference: A 25-Year Follow-Up" by Dr. Erdman Palmore.
See how there are twenty-two variables in this study? Twenty-two! That's a whole lot of variables and it means that extrapolating this one data point and telling people that having 200 orgasms a year will increase your lifespan and keep you young is bunk. What if the study participant is celibate but is satisfied with his work and and is also physically fit? Does that mean he will die younger than another participant who hates his work, is not physically fit, and has orgasms every day?
Mocha Uson also does not take into account that this study and Dr. Oz are talking about intercourse and not masturbation. There is a big difference between a married couple having sex and a single person sitting on their bed rubbing themself with their sex toy as Mocha is want to do in front of her webcam. There are plenty of studies which show married people live longer and happier lives. 200 orgasms a year is roughly sex 4 times a week which is not so shocking in the context of marriage. There is more to the orgasm than just the physical act. There is the holistic context of marriage to consider.
And as for Dr. Oz:
These are just two examples of Mocha Uson posting fake news before she became the Queen of Fake News. Both of these examples are supposed to be shocking, turn conventional wisdom on its head, and be sexually risqué. Oh my sucking boobs saves lives? Someone please suck my boobs and save my life. Oh my having orgasms will make me younger? I guess I better masturbate more. They serve to promote her perverted sexual agenda because Mocha Uson is nothing but a pervert.
Mocha Uson also does not take into account that this study and Dr. Oz are talking about intercourse and not masturbation. There is a big difference between a married couple having sex and a single person sitting on their bed rubbing themself with their sex toy as Mocha is want to do in front of her webcam. There are plenty of studies which show married people live longer and happier lives. 200 orgasms a year is roughly sex 4 times a week which is not so shocking in the context of marriage. There is more to the orgasm than just the physical act. There is the holistic context of marriage to consider.
And as for Dr. Oz:
 |
| https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/12/19/half-of-dr-ozs-medical-advice-is-baseless-or-wrong-study-says/ |
 |
| https://www.forbes.com/sites/kavinsenapathy/2016/12/01/dr-oz-made-false-attacks-on-olive-oil-and-now-hes-getting-sued/#11c7f7366949 |
 |
| http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/health/doctors-dr-oz-removed-columbia-faculty-article-1.2187815 |
The trivialisation of breast cancer as something that can be cured or prevented by sucking the breast is particularly troubling because breast cancer is a real threat to women's health. Mocha's mom was diagnosed with breast cancer and why would anyone want to trivialise their mother's suffering?
In 2010 Mocha was named "Ambassadress of Breast Cancer Month" and launched the "Kasuso Love Affair."
Uson and the PFBC launched on Tuesday afternoon the “Kasuso Love Affair,” an event that aimed to comprehensively orient and reorient medical theories and realities regarding breast cancer.
http://news.abs-cbn.com/entertainment/10/12/10/mocha-named-ambassadress-breast-cancer-month
Reorient medical theories? That sounds like code for disseminating fake news. Did she tell everyone that drinking green tea and having someone suck your breasts will help prevent cancer? Perhaps if Mocha knew that sucking breasts prevented cancer she could have helped her mother before she got sick. Perhaps Mocha is sucking her mother's breasts now and this has helped prevent a recurrence of the disease.
So, if Mocha sucks my dick does that mean I won't get nut cancer?
ReplyDelete